Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Buku ini merupakan mengenai perspektif mengenai revolusi yang terjadi di Rusia selama pemerintahan Uni Soviet."

"Buku ini berisi pengantar singkat tentang sejarah Kekaisaran Rusia dan Uni Soviet."

"This essay examines the perceptions of Russia’s 1905 revolution in the Korean periodicals of the time. The revolution drew significant interest in Korea for a variety of reasons. First, Russia was at war with Japan, so the revolution could decisively influence the result of that war and, consequently, the fate of Korea. Second, constitutionalism was a popular topic of debate in Korea. The Russian revolution was seen as a part of the worldwide struggle constitutionalism, and as proof that the shift to constitutionalism was a worldwide trend. Third, the Russian revolution involved a struggle for either autonomy or self-determination by a variety of minorities inside the Russian Empire. Such a struggle was met with natural sympathy in Korea, given the country’s own precarious position with between the Russian and Japanese empires. The vociferous anti-Semitism and pogroms in Tsarist Russia had been widely reported in the Korean press even before the revolution, and were perceived to be among the factors that triggered it. The root cause of revolution was predominantly found in autocratic misrule and Tsarist expansionist policies. A shift to constitutionalism and rule of law was seen to be needed in Russia – and, by extension, in Korea as well. The terrorist struggle by Social revolutionaries (SR), anarchists, and assorted minority nationalist groups attracted significant attention in Korea and may well have influenced the adoption of individual terror tactics by some Korean nationalist militants at the end of the first decade of the twentieth century."

"The 1905 Revolution in Russia occurred in the midst of a major international war waged between Japan and Russia from February 1904 to September 1905. We know very little about the impact of the revolution on the Japanese soldiers fighting at the front. Through an exhaustive study of personal materials of soldiers—namely, personal diaries, particularly those of the lower ranks—this essays offers a glimpse into the mentality of Japanese soldiers on the battlefield as they faced enemy soldiers. How did they describe their feelings toward the Russians? Did they learn about the 1905 Revolution while in the trenches? If so, what were their reactions? Did the revolutionary turmoil in Russia affect the fighting spirit of the Russian and Japanese soldiers? This was a pivotal moment in the history of both Russia and Japan. A methodological approach that takes into account the history from below can shed new light on popular Japanese attitudes toward the revolution."

"Pada Tahun 1917 di Rusia, Revolusi Bolshevik timbul atas ideologi baru yang diusung sebagai pengganti kosongnya pemerintahan setelah bergulingnya kekaisaran Rusia. Gerakan seni Konstruktivisme dibuat sebagai alat penyampaian Komunisme dalam Revolusi Bolshevik yang umum agar dapat diterima oleh masyarakat. Mengangkat ideologi Komunisme oleh Karl Marx bahwa Komunisme adalah untuk pembebasan proletar, Kelompok Para Pekerja Konstruktivis sepakat bahwa konstruksi seni Konstruktivisme yang sebenarnya adalah untuk kepentingan dan kegunaan semua. Contoh kegunaan dalam Konstruktivisme yang paling konkrit adalah dalam arsitektur. Dasar dari Arsitektur Konstruktivisme merupakan kebutuhan untuk mengembalikan keadaan ekonomi Rusia dengan ambisi membangun lingkungan yang dapat meningkatkan keadaan sosial dan teknologi yang menguntungkan negara. Perbedaan translasi mengenai Arsitektur Konstruktivisme oleh seniman dan arsitek dalam perancangan arsitektur mencerminkan perbedaan pemahaman mengenai Konstruktivisme yang sesuai dengan Komunisme oleh Marx melalui Lenin. Skripsi ini akan membahas mengenai Arsitektur Konstruktivisme pada masa Revolusi Bolshevik di Rusia 1917 dengan dua studi kasus perancangan terkenal; Monumen Propaganda Monument to The Third International oleh Vladimir Tatlin dan rancangan bangunan publik Institut Kepustakawanan Lenin oleh Ivan Leonidov dalam merepresentasikan Arsitektur Konstruktivisme dalam konteks sosial Revolusi Bolshevik dengan Teori Basis dan Superstruktur oleh Marx. Tujuan dari perbandingan ini adalah mengkaji kesesuaian perancangan Konstruktivisme dengan Komunisme melalui Teori Karl Marx sebagai penulis The Communist Manifesto. Berdasarkan hasil kajian diperoleh bahwa berdasarkan Teori Basis dan Superstruktur oleh Marx, Institut Kepustakawanan Lenin oleh Ivan Leonidov lebih sesuai dalam merepresentasikan Konstruktivisme daripada Monument to The Third International oleh Vladimir Tatlin.

---

In 1917, Bolshevik Revolution rises as a new ideology to replace the vacuum of regime after Monarchy roll-over in Russia. Constructivism art movement was made as a tool to deliver Bolshevik Revolution to be acceptable to the community. Carrying Communism by Karl Marx, that Communism is for the liberation of the proletariat, The Working Group of Constructivists agreed that the actual goal for Constructivism construction is for the peoples purposes and interests. Architecture is an example of a concrete form of Constructivism in serving purposes. The primary purpose of Constructivism Architecture is to serve function to restore economic condition of Russia with the ambition of constructing environment in order to improve the social and technology state for the benefit of the nation. Differences in Constructivism Architecture translation from the artists and architect in designing architecture shows a difference in understanding Constructivism in accordance to Communism by Marx through Lenin. This thesis discussed Constructivism Architecture during Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 1917 within two study case of renowed architecture design; Propaganda Monument of Monument to The Third International by Vladimir Tatlin, and design of public place Lenin Institute of Librarianship by Ivan Leonidov in representing Constructivism Architecture in social context of Bolshevik Revolution with Base and Superstructure Theory by Marx. The aim of this comparison is to review the conformity of Constructivism design from Communism through Karl Marxs Theory as the author of The Communist Manifesto. Based on the study, it is obtained that: based on Base and Superstructure Theory by Marx, Lenin Institute of Librarianship by Ivan Leonidov is more fitting in representing Constructivism than Monument to The Third Internationtal by Vladimir Tatlin."