Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The skills needed to conduct all types of business interviews and ensure legal compliance. Here is the book that can turn non-interviewers into good interviewers?and good interviewers into great interviewers. Whether you're a general manager or human resources specialist, the fact is that you do some interviewing (formally or informally) virtually every day. This book will help you sharpen such skills as open-ended questioning, active listening, and reading body language?all essential in a variety of management situations. You?ll learn to apply these techniques to 12 types of business interviews, from hiring and coaching to assessment and termination. You?ll even gain practice in dealing with interviewees who are nervous, aggressive, overly talkative, evasive, or otherwise challenging. "Which questions can and can't I ask? How should I document an interview?" Because such concerns can trip up even the most experienced business interviewer, you?ll find clear guidance on key legal issues and specific do's and do not's dictated by current legislation. Managers will also appreciate the wealth of real-life dialogs that highlight this broad-based and highly useful course. This is an ebook version of the AMA Self-Study course. If you want to take the course for credit you need to either purchase a hard copy of the course through amaselfstudy."

"When hero policeman Grant Cliveden dies from a poisoning in the Old Bailey, it threatens to shake the country to its core. The evidence points to one man. Jimmy Knight has been convicted of multiple offences before and defending him will be no easy task. Not least because this is trainee barrister Adam Green's first case. But it will quickly become clear that Jimmy Knight is not the only person in Cliveden's past with an axe to grind. The only thing that's certain is that this is a trial which will push Adam - and the justice system itself "

"Metode persidangan pidana dengan menggunakan alat elektronik baru digunakan luas setelah terjadinya pandemi Covid-19 yang berdampak pada sistem peradilan pidana berbagai negara di dunia. Perubahan ini berdampak pada hak terdakwa untuk hadir di muka pengadilan yang diatur dalam KUHAP. Hak kehadiran terdakwa di muka pengadilan merupakan salah satu hak dasar bagi terdakwa dan sebagai jaminan dalam pelaksanaan peradilan yang adil (fair trial) karena berkaitan dengan proses pembuktian. Dalam pembahasan ini metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum Indonesia, Belanda, dan Amerika Serikat. Penelitian ini menunjukkan, sidang pidana elektronik di Indonesia hanya diatur dalam peraturan Mahkamah Agung dan ini berbenturan dengan KUHAP; sedangkan di Belanda, sekalipun telah dituangkan dalam KUHAP, penggunaan videoconference dianggap melanggar ketentuan dalam European Convention on Human Rights; di Amerika Serikat penggunaan videoconference diatur dengan cukup ketat dalam CARES Act. Penelitian ini berpendapat, persetujuan terdakwa dalam persidangan pidana online diperlukan karena hal ini sebagai persetujuan mengenyampingkan hak untuk hadir di muka sidang. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan videoconferece tidak melanggar fair trial dan tetap dapat imparsial sepanjang terdapat persetujuan dari terdakwa atau ketentuan yang mengatur tersebut menjamin bahwa seluruh hak-hak terdakwa dapat dipenuhi.

---

The criminal trial method using electronic devices has only been widely used after the Covid-19 pandemic which has impacted the criminal justice system of various countries in the world. This change has an impact on the right of the accused to presence before the court as regulated in the Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code. The right of the accused's presence before the court is one of the basic rights for the accused and as a guarantee in the implementation of a fair trial because it is related to the evidentiary process. In this thesis the research method used is normative juridical with a comparative approach to the laws of Indonesia, the Netherlands, and the United States. This thesis shows that electronic criminal courts in Indonesia are only regulated in the Supreme Court regulations and this is in conflict with the Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code; whereas in the Netherlands, even though it has been stated in the Dutch Criminal Procedure Code, the use of videoconferencing is considered a violation of the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights; in the United States the use of videoconference is regulated quite strictly in the CARES Act. This thesis argues that the accused’s approval to conduct a criminal trial via videoconferencing is necessary because this is an agreement that overrides the right to presence before the court. Therefore, the use of videoconferencing does not violate the fair trial and can still be impartial as long as there is agreement from the accused or the stipulations that regulate it ensure that all the rights of the accused can be fulfilled."

"Rancangan KUHP dan Rancangan KUHAP telah mengadopsi mekanisme penyelesaian perkara di luar proses yakni pada Pasal 145 R-KUHP dan Pasal 42 R-KUHAP, sebagai suatu kebijakan pidana (penal policy) untuk menanggulangi peningkatan jumlah perkara yang bersifat ringan yang membebani sistem peradilan pidana dan anggaran negara. Meskipun demikian, masih ada permasalahan utama terkait upaya memperluas penerapan mekanisme penyelesaian perkara di luar proses atau afdoening buiten proces dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia yakni belum siapnya sistem hukum pidana Indonesia untuk melaksanakannya. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan pemahaman secara komprehensif tentang pertimbanganpertimbangan yuridis sebagai dasar kebijakan pidana (penal policy) untuk memperluas penerapan mekanisme transaksi atau afdoening buiten proces dari pasal 82 KUHP, hal-hal yang harus dipenuhi sebagai prasyarat, serta tentang kriteria-kriteria tindak pidana yang dapat diselesaikan dengan menerapkan mekanisme transaksi atau afdoening buiten proces. Tipe penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif, namun untuk memperkuat argumen normatif, peneliti juga telah mendapatkan argumen praktis-sosiologis tentang urgensi perluasan penerapan afdoening buiten proces dalam sistem peradilan pidana terpadu dengan cara melakukan wawancara terstruktur dengan nenek Aminah, Aguswandi, dan Kholil yang telah menjalani proses hukum acara pidana karena tindak pidana yang bersifat ringan. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Pertimbanganpertimbangan yuridis sebagai dasar kebijakan pidana memperluas penerapan mekanisme penyelesaian perkara di luar proses atau afdoening buiten proces dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia adalah sebagai wujud implementasi asas oportunitas yang dimiliki penuntut umum, sesuai dengan asas peradilan pidana yang cepat, sederhana, dan biaya ringan, relevan dengan konsep restorative justice yang sekarang ini berkembang, sebagai bagian dari upaya desain ulang sistem peradilan pidana, sebagai alternatif untuk pidana penjara singkat, dan sebagai langkah terobosan hukum untuk pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Sedangkan hal-hal yang harus dipenuhi sebagai prasyarat memperluas penerapan mekanisme penyelesaian perkara di luar proses adalah dalam hukum acara pidana harus dirumuskan mekanisme penyelesaian perkara di luar proses yang cocok bagi sistem hukum Indonesia yakni dalam bentuk transaksi, pola transaksi, lembaga pelaksana transaksi, prinsip-prinsip pelaksanaan transaksi, dan hal-hal teknis lainnya. Terakhir, kriteria-kriteria tindak pidana yang dapat diselesaikan dengan menggunakan mekanisme transaksi adalah (pertama) kriteria yang bersifat subyektif seperti umur pelaku, kondisi fisik dan mental, mens rea, serta kondisi, sikap,atau tindakan pelaku setelah terjadinya tindak pidana, dan (kedua) kriteria yang bersifat obyektif seperti derajat tercelahnya perbuatan, derajat kerusakan atau kerugian yang ditimbulkan, jenis tindak pidana (kejahatan atau pelanggaran), ancaman pidana dalam pasal yang dilanggar, serta faktor kepentingan umum.

---

The draft Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code has adopted the draft resolution mechanisms criminal case settlement outside the trial process on Article 145 of the Penal Code and Article 42 R-KUHAP, as a penal policy to cope with an increasing number of mild cases that burden the criminal justice system and the budget countries. Nevertheless, there are still major issues related to efforts to expand the application of criminal case settlement outside the trial process or afdoening buiten proces in the criminal justice system that is unprepared Indonesian criminal justice system to implement. Therefore, this study aims to gain a comprehensive understanding of legal considerations as a basis for penal policy extending the application of the criminal case settlement outside the trial process of Article 82 of the Criminal Code, the things that must be met as a prerequisite, as well as on the criteria?s crimes that can be solved by applying the criminal case settlement outside the trial process. Type of research is a normative juridical studies, but to strengthen the normative argument, researchers also have a practical-sociological argument about the urgency of expanding the application of afdoening buiten proces in the integrated criminal justice system by means of structured interviews with Amina, Aguswandi, and Kholil who had undergone criminal proceedings for criminal acts that are minor. The results of this study concluded that the legal considerations as a basis for penal policy of extending the application criminal case settlement outside the trial process in Indonesian criminal law system is as a form of implementation of the opportunity principle that the prosecution had, in accordance with the principle of criminal justice is quick, simple , and low cost, relevant to the concept of restorative justice are the present developed, as part of efforts to redesign the criminal justice system, as an alternative to short jail, and as a legal breakthrough for the eradication of corruption. While the things that must be met as a prerequisite for extending the application criminal case settlement outside the trial process is in the Criminal Procedure Code must be formulated the criminal case settlement outside the trial process which is suitable for the Indonesian legal system that is in the form of transactions, patterns of transactions, the implementing agency transactions, principle-principle of the transaction, and other technical matters. Finally, the criteria's crimes that can be solved by using a transaction mechanism is the (first) subjective criteria such as offender age, physical condition and mental, mens rea, as well as the conditions, attitudes, or actions of the perpetrator after the crime, and (second ) are objective criteria such as degrees of flawed act, the degree of damage or loss incurred, the type of crime (felony or offense), the threat of criminal in the article are being violated, as well as public interest factors."