Ditemukan 13640 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
London: Euromoney, 2005
332.1 GLO
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1991
336 CAS
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Washington: IMF Institute and Monetary and Exchange Affairs Departement, International Monetary Fund , 1997
332.1 BAN
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Smith, Roy C.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1997
332.15 SMI g
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Binhadi
Jakarta: Institut Bankir Indonesia, 1995
332.1 BIN f
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Ade Nanda Sawitri
"Krisis keuangan global yang terjadi pada tahun 2008, berdampak pada industri perbankan syariah di Indonesia. yang terjadi dibelahan dunia termasuk di Indonesia, telah mengakibatkan berbagai lembaga keuangan global mengalami kerugian dan kebangkrutan. Salah satu sistem perbankan yang teruji dapat bertahan pada saat terjadinya krisis adalah perbankan syariah. Akan tetapi, dilihat dari pertumbuhan industri perbankan syariah pada indikator keuangan dan rasio keuangan cenderung melambat pada tahun 2014-2015. Dengan melambatnya perkembangan industri perbankan syariah maka penelitian ini akan melihat dampak assesment terhadap efisiensi perbankan syariah di Indonesia.
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan tingkat efisiensi perbankan syariah di Indonesia ketika krisis keuangan global dan sesudah krisis keuangan global bersifat fluktuatif. Bank Umum Syariah ketika krisis keuangan global lebih efisien dibanding sesudah krisis keuangan global. Penyebab inefisiensi yang harus diperbaiki fokus bisnisnya akibat terjadinya kekurangan dan kelebihan pada variabel input Dana Pihak Ketiga, Aset Tetap, dan Modal serta variabel output Pembiayaan dan Pendapatan operasional.
Global financial crisis happened in 2008 had an effect on Islamic banking industry in Indonesia. The crisis had made different financial institutions suffered global losses and bankruptcy. One of the banking system that was tested and survived on that crisis was Islamic banking. However, judging from its development, the Islamic banking industry tended to slow down in the years 2014 2015. Based on this slow development of Islamic banking industry, this study will look at the impact of assessment on the efficiency of Islamic banking in Indonesia.The method used in measuring the efficiency of the method is non parametric Data Envelopment Analysis DEA. The results of this study indicates that the overall level of efficiency of Islamic banking in Indonesia in and after the global financial crisis is fluctuating. Islamic Banks in the global financial crisis were more efficient than after the global financial crisis. The cause of inefficiency that had to be fixed due to the advantages and disadvantages of the input variables Deposits, Fixed Assets, and Capital and output variables Financing and Operating Income."
Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia, 2017
T-Pdf
UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library
Laili Rahmi
"
ABSTRAKThe global financial crisis has affected some industries or non-industries around the world. It has also impacted to Islamic banking in Indonesia, especially after 2007 until 2008. It has been recorded the Islamic banking industry in Indonesia shows a speedy recovery from the impact of the global financial crisis. Thus, this study aims to evaluate and examine the differences of Islamic bankings financial performance after the global financial crisis in Indonesia. The financial performances in this study are profitability ratio Return on Asset ROA and Return on Equity ROE, liquidity ratio Financing to Deposit Ratio FDR and Current Asset Ratio CAR and solvency risk ratio Equity Multiplier E and Debt to Equity Ratio DER. The samples in this study are the six Islamic banks from Islamic Commercial Banks Bank Usaha Sharia BUS and Islamic Business Unit Banks Unit Usaha Sharia UUS in Indonesia. Based on the results shows by the descriptive statistic, UUS is more effective in using their assets to generate income compared to BUS, but BUS is greater to manage their financing and more liquid than UUS whose has higher risk than BUS during 2009 until 2013. Independent sample t test shows that there is significant difference in terms of profitability, liquidity and solvency risk ratio between BUS and UUS Indonesia during 2009 until 2013."
Aceh: UIN Ar-Raniry , 2017
297 ARR 4:1 (2017)
Artikel Jurnal Universitas Indonesia Library
Auerbach, Robert D.
New York: Macmillan, 1989
332.1 AUE m
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Barger, Harold
Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1969
332 BAR m
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library
Fisher, Douglas
Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin , 1980
332.497 3 FIS m
Buku Teks SO Universitas Indonesia Library