Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia on the Criminology perspective in Indonesia actually happened because it is contrast and opposed one another among the legal upholders in upholding and not understanding enough the legislation and legal theories comprehensively, because the legislation and legal theories essentially as a analysis knife in upholding the criminal law in Indonesia. Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia generally because of being less the legal apparatus? knowledge themselves in understanding the legislation and legal theories so in enforcing the criminal law often produced some mistakes, whereas the legal theories are the legalresource to solve the events that are being happened in legal process and in the society noussays. Causes factors that happened and invited the paradox of criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective in Indonesia are the legal factor itself, the law enforcement factor, means factor, community factor and cultural factor. The effort of paradox criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective could be done by having improvement of system, the moralistic improvement and the ethics of legalupholders, improvement of legal education and the realization of religion."

"The Human Rights Court established in Indonesia is the first in its kind. Various opinion emerge regarding the exixtence of court. In one hand, Indonesia is considered against the international desire to bring the perpetrator to eliminate the assumption that Indonesia is unable and unwilling to bring the perpetrator who convicted breach gross violation on human rights. This article based on the writer personal explain the legal and non-legal difficult in the Indonesia HUman Rights Court."

"Klitih merupakan fenomena kenakalan anak yang melibatkan geng anak. Kenakalan ini masih dapat ditemukan hingga saat ini, sehingga diperlukan penelitian lebih lanjut dalam mengkaji bagaimana fenomena klitih masih terjadi, meskipun telah dilakukan berbagai tindakan untuk menghentikanya. Penelitian ini membahas aktivitas geng anak dengan menggunakan perspektif kriminologi budaya untuk menjawab bagaimana anak dapat menjadikan klitih sebagai budaya serta bagaimana budaya tersebut dipelajari. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui wawancara, observasi serta studi data sekunder untuk mempelajari fenomena Klitih. Dengan menggunakan Social Learning Theory Akers sebagai konsep teori, penelitian ini juga membahas mengenai keterkaitan lower class terhadap geng anak. Dengan demikian, hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa teman sebaya memiliki peran besar dalam melakukan transmisi budaya kepada anak, sehingga anak mampu mempelajari bentuk kenakalan seperti klitih. Selain itu kondisi anak dengan status lower class memiliki kemungkinan besar untuk tergabung dalam geng anak sebagai akibat dari kesamaan budaya di antara keduanya.

---

Klitih is a phenomenon of child delinquency involving child gangs. This delinquency can still be found today, so further research is needed to examine how the klitih phenomenon still occurs, even though various actions have been taken to stop it. This research discusses child gang activity using a cultural criminology perspective to answer how children can make klitih a culture and how this culture is learned. This research uses qualitative methods through interviews, observations, and secondary data studies to study the Klitih phenomenon. By using Akers' Social Learning Theory as a theoretical concept, this research also discusses the relationship between the lower classes and child gangs. Thus, the research results explain that peers have a significant role in transmitting culture to children so that children can learn delinquency forms such as klitih. Apart from that, children with lower class status have a greater possibility of joining child gangs as a result of the cultural similarities between the two."

"Fenomena peradilan sesat adalah ketika seorang terduga pelaku kejahatan mengalami penuntutan, penghukuman, dan penahanan karena kejahatan yang tidak dilakukan merupakan permasalahan hukum dan sosial yang terjadi dalam sistem peradilan pidana, juga menjadi permasalahan sistemik yang dapat merusak integritas dan legitimasi proses peradilan pidana. Sebagai bagian dari objek studi kriminologi, penulisan ini bertujuan ingin melihat bagaimana manifestasi fenomena peradilan sesat dalam sistem peradilan pidana dengan menggunakan deskripsi 2 kasus yang berbeda yaitu kasus YT dan YM serta menguraikan faktor-faktor penyebab peradilan sesat pada 2 kasus tersebut berdasarkan indikator dari Bohm (2005), Naughton (2007), Colvin (2009), serta Poyser dan Milne (2011). Tidak hanya itu, juga menganalisis menggunakan pembahasan peradilan sesat oleh Forst (2004) perihal error of due process dan mengaitkan fenomena tersebut dengan perspective of justice sistem peradilan pidana yaitu due process model. Melalui analisis dengan pendekatan tersebut menggunakan data sekunder putusan pengadilan dan dokumen pendukung kasus YT dan YM, ditemukan bahwa fenomena peradilan sesat pada kasus YT dan YM memiliki kesamaan dalam faktor penyebab terjadinya peradilan sesat pada kasus mereka dan faktor yang sangat berkontribusi besar berasal dari penyelewengan pada penyidikan Kepolisian, yang pada akhirnya memengaruhi proses peradilan pidana selanjutnya. Dan fenomena tersebut dapat dikatakan sebagai bentuk pelanggaran due process model yang bersifat due process prosedural yang juga mencakup pelanggaran hak asasi manusia pada aspek hak fair trial serta dalam kajian lingkup sosiologi hukum manifestasi dari pengingkaran moralitas praktisi hukum pada pemikiran Durkheim, ketidakrasionalan hukum modern Weber, dan kesadaran hukum yang palsu pada pemikiran Peters.

---

The phenomenon of Miscarriage of Justice is when a suspected criminal experiences prosecution, punishment, and detention because a crime that was not committed is a legal and social problem that occurs in the criminal justice system, it is also a systemic problem that can damage the integrity and legitimacy of the criminal justice process. As part of the object criminology studies, this paper aims to see how the manifestation of the phenomenon Miscarriage of Justice in the criminal justice system uses descriptions of 2 different cases, namely YT and YM cases, and describes the factors causing Miscarriage of Justice in these 2 cases based on indicators from Bohm (2005), Naughton (2007), Colvin (2009), and Poyser and Milne (2011). It also analyzes using the Miscarriage of Justice discussion by Forst (2004) regarding error of due process and associates this phenomenon with a perspective of justice in the criminal justice system, namely the due process model. Through analysis with this approach, using Court Decision and supporting documents as secondary data, it was found that the phenomenon of Miscarriage of Justice in YT and YM cases has similarities in the factors causing Miscarriage of Justice in their cases and the most contributing factor comes from investigation misconduct by the Police, which ultimately affects the subsequent criminal justice process. And this phenomenon can be said as a form of the due process model violation criminal justice system, which is due process procedural that also includes human rights violations in fair trial rights. In the study of the sociology of law, the manifestation of denial of the morality of legal practitioners in Durkheim’s thought, the irrationality of Weber’s modern law, and the false awareness of law in Peters’ thought."