Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indonesia sea is approximately 2 per 3 wider than the mainland, with very strategic geographical posisition located at the cross point of Indian and Pacific Oceans. This geographical posisition serves as strategic route for shipping, with every shipment from the west to east and the opposite will sail through the Indonesian sea. This can be both opportunity or challenge, depending on how Indonesia will manage it. If the State did not manage it well, it will increase the maritime security threats, such as IUU fishing, smuggling, and piracy. These threats may seriously disrupt the marine economics development, given the limited number of armaments and personnel of marine law enforcement agencies. Therefore, the capacity of fishermen in assisting marine law enforcement agencies to prevent the maritime security threat is inevitable. This study uses descriptive qualitative method. There are two types of data sources, primary and secondary data sources. Primary sources is obtained through interview with stakeholders and fishermen organization, while secondary data source is obtained by literature study. The role of fishermen in assisting maritime law enforcement agencies, in this case PSDKP KKP and Navy, to prevent maritime security threats is prescribed role or recommended role. The prescribed role is shown by the community group program established by PSDKP and Coastal Development in Rural area which is established by the Navy. With this program, the fishermen can supply informations about maritime security threats to PSDKP and the Navy so that they can act immediately to prevent these threats."

"ABSTRAKSetiap negara berdasarkan kedaulatannya memiliki berbagai cara atau dalam hal ini, sistem yang dibentuk untuk melindungi kedaulatan tersebut serta kepentingan nasionalnya, khususnya di laut. Setidaknya dikenal tiga jenis sistem penegakan hukum di laut, yakni sistem Single Agency Multi Tasks, sistem Multi Agency, dan sistem Three Tier Coastal Security. Ketiga sistem tersebut memiliki cirinya masing- masing, yang paling jelas dapat dilihat adalah jumlah instansi yang melakukan fungsi penegakan hukum di laut dan bagaimana penunjukan instansi utama yang melakukan fungsi tersebut. Berdasarkan penelitian yuridis normatif yang telah dilakukan, secara umum negara yang menerapkan sistem Single Agency Multi Task memiliki satu instansi utama penegak hukum di laut, sistem Multi Agency tidak memiliki instansi utama penegak hukum di laut, dan sistem Three Tier Coastal Security sesuai namanya memiliki tiga instansi utama penegak hukum di laut.

---

ABSTRACT Each states, based on their sovereignty, has different ways or in this case, different system formed to protect their sovereignty and national interests, especially at the sea. There are at least three types of maritime law enforcement systems: the Single Agency Multi Tasks system, the Multi Agency system, and the Three Tier Coastal Security system. These three systems have their respective characteristics, which can be identified from the number of agencies with maritime law enforcement functions and the appointment of apex bodieswith said functions. Based on the normative and juridical research that has been done, in general, stateswith the Single Agency Multi Task system has one apex body with maritime law enforcement functions, the Multi Agency systems does not have any apex bodies with said functions, and the Three Tier Coastal Security system, as the name suggests, has three apex bodies with maritime law enforcement functions."

"Perbedaan antara penegakan hukum maritim dan use of force di wilayah yurisdiksi negara pantai sama rumitnya dalam hukum internasional dan juga mendasar dalam praktiknya. Putusan arbitrase kasus Guyana/Suriname serta putusan pengadilan kasus M/V Saiga (No. 2) dan M/V Virginia G menjadi sangat signifikan dalam hal ini karena pengadilan-pengadilan tersebut harus mempertimbangkan beberapa pertanyaan penting yang melibatkan kategorisasi tindakan paksa di laut. Penelitian skripsi ini akan menawarkan beberapa refleksi awal tentang apa yang dianggap sebagai aspek kunci dari perbedaan antara penegakan hukum maritim dan use of force di wilayah yurisdiksi negara serta bagaimana seharusnya implementasi penegakan hukum yang diatur di dalam 1982. Berdasarkan penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan, tindakan use of force pada penegakan hukum di wilyayah yurisdiksi negara merupakan suatu hal yang tidak dilarang, namun harus sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip necessity, unavoidability, dan reasonableness. Use of force dalam konteks ini juga harus dianggap sebagai kasus lex specialis dan tidak termasuk dalam lingkup larangan umum use of force di bawah pasal 2 (4) Piagam PBB.

---

The distinction between maritime law enforcement and the use of force in the jurisdiction of a coastal state is as complex in international law as it is fundamental in practice. The Guyana/Suriname arbitration award and the judgments of the M/V Saiga (No. 2) and the M/V Virginia G cases have been significant in this regard since the tribunal had to consider several important questions involving the categorization of forcible action at sea. This thesis research will offer some initial reflections on what are considered the key aspects of the difference between maritime law enforcement and the use of force in the jurisdiction of a coastal state and how law enforcement should be implemented as regulated in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. Based on normative legal research conducted, use of force in law enforcement in the jurisdiction of a coastal state is something that is not prohibited, but must comply with the principles of necessity, unavoidability, and reasonableness. The use of force in this context must be considered as a lex specialis case and does not fall within the scope of the general prohibition of use of force under article 2 (4) of the UN Charter."

"Now in its fourth edition, this authoritative guide covers all of the core aspects of maritime law in one distinct volume. Maritime Law is written by a team of leading academics and practitioners, each expert in their own field. Together, they provide clear, concise and fully up-to-date coverage of topics ranging from bills of lading to arrest of ships, all written in an accessible and engaging style. As English law is heavily relied on throughout the maritime world, this book is grounded in English law whilst continuing to analyse the key international conventions currently in force.Brand new coverage includes:The entry into force of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, 2005 and greater detail on Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast).The entry into force of the Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks, 2007.Discussion on the Arctic Sunrise and Duzgit Integrity arbitrations and the "Enrica Lexie" Incident (Italy v India), Provisional Measures in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. Analysis of the Insurance Act 2015.Comment on recent cases including London Steam Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v Spain (The Prestige) and PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC v OW Bunker Malta Ltd (The Res Cogitans). This book is a comprehensive reference source for students, academics and legal practitioners worldwide, especially those new to maritime law or a particular field therein"

"Indonesia sebagai negara kepulauan terbesar di dunia memiliki garis pantai yang sangat panjang dan berbatasan dengan sepuluh negara. Hal tersebut menyebabkan delimitasi batas maritim merupakan hal yang penting bagi Indonesia. Namun demikian proses delimitasi batas maritim seringkali membutuhkan waktu yang sangat lama hingga ber tahun-tahun. Permasalahan yang sering timbul ketika proses negosiasi delimitasi batas maritim sedang berlangsung adalah apabila terjadi pelanggaran kenentuan hukum nasional dari kedua negara, sehingga sering menimbulkan ketidak pastian hukum terkait siapa yang memiliki kewenangan untuk menegakkan ketentuan hukum nasional di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan diantara kedua negara. Ketidak pastian tersebut sering berakibat pada saling tangkap terhadap pelanggaran yang terjadi di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan oleh kedua negara yang bersengketa. Terkait hal tersebut UNCLOS hanya memberikan kewajiban kepada kedua negara untuk membentuk pengaturan sementara di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan untuk mencegah terjadinya konflik. Skripsi ini lebih lanjut akan menganalisa mengenai regulasi nasional dan Internasional serta praktek negara-negara terkait penegakan hukum di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan. Adapun penegakan hukum di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan dapat dibagi menjadi tiga bentuk yaitu penegakan hukum secara preventif, Kuratif dan Represif. Berdasarkan praktek negara dan hukum internasional tindakan represif oleh negara di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan dapat menimbulkan konflik dan memperlambat penyelesaian delimitasi batas maritim antara kedua negara. Sehingga dapat disarankan bahwa di perairan perbatasan yang belum ditentukan negara hanya dapat melakukan penegakan hukum secara preventif dan juga kuratif.

---

Indonesia as the largest archipelagic country in the world has a very long coastline and is bordered by ten countries. This makes delimitation of the maritime boundary is genuinely important for Indonesia. Nevertheless, the process of maritime boundary delimitation often takes a very long time. The problem that often arises when the maritime boundary delimitation negotiation process is underway is if there is a violation of the provisions of the national law of both countries, which often leads to legal uncertainty over who has the authority to enforce national law provisions in the unresolved maritime boundary between the two countries. Such uncertainty often results in interception of violations occurring in undefined border waters by the two disputing countries. In this regard, UNCLOS only provides obligations to both countries to establish provisional arrangements in undefined border waters to prevent conflicts. This thesis will further analyze the national and international regulations as well as the practice of law enforcement related countries in undefined border waters. The law enforcement in unspecified border waters can be divided into three forms preventive law enforcement, curative and repressive. Based on country practice and international law, repressive action by the state in undefined border waters can lead to conflict and slow the completion of the delimitation of the maritime boundary between the two countries. So it can be suggested that in the undefined border waters country can only do law enforcement in a preventive and also curative."