Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tanggal 31 Oktober 2011 melalui prosedur pemungutan suara di Konferensi Umum UNESCO Palestina secara resmi diterima menjadi anggota baru UNESCO. Ini adalah kasus pertama suatu entitas hukum internasional yang bukan merupakan anggota dari PBB diterima menjadi anggota dari organisasi ini. Skripsi ini membahas pokok permasalahan sebagai berikut : 1. Bagaimanakah sistem penerimaan keanggotaan dalam organisasi internasional 2. Bagaimanakah proses penerimaan Palestina sebagai anggota UNESCO dan 3. Bagaimanakah penerimaan Palestina jika ditinjau berdasarkan hukum internasional. Secara garis besar pembahasan didasarkan pada studi literatur mengenai perkembangan doktrin sejarah dan pengaturan keanggotaan dalam organisasi internasional dengan meninjau instrumen pokok dari UNESCO itu sendiri beserta prinsip umum PBB. Selanjutnya dianalisis pula pemenuhan persyaratan keanggotaan UNESCO oleh Palestina beserta dampak dampak penerimaannya. Secara ringkas simpulan yang didapat menjawab secara positif diterimanya Palestina sebagai anggota UNESCO adalah suatu hal yang diperbolehkan dalam hukum internasional.

---

On October 31st 2011 through its General Conference voting procedures Palestine officially admitted as a new member of UNESCO. It is the first case for an international legal entity which are not a member of United Nations to be approved as a member of the organization. This undergraduate thesis tries to answer following questions :1. How does membership system in international organizations 2. How does admission of Palestine process to be a member of UNESCO and 3. How does admission of Palestine based on international law. Generally the analysis is based on literature study concerning development of doctrine histories and regulation on membership in international organizations based on UNESCO Constitution itself and United Nations general principles. Moreover the analysis also examines about requirements fullfilment by the Palestine with its implications In brief the conclusion answers in positive the admission of Palestine as a new member of UNESCO is a allowed in international law."

"The global increase in cross-border transactions has led to a rising trend in international disputes. International arbitration has become the preferred dispute resolution method, as companies and individuals increasingly favour a neutral international tribunal over foreign domestic courts. This new book provides a practical guide to international arbitration. Written by leading experts Stuart Dutson, Andy Moody, and Neil Newing from Eversheds, this title explains the stages of the arbitration process in a straight-forward manner and from a practitioner's perspective. The authors provide guidance on drafting the arbitration agreement, commencing arbitration, selecting the arbitral tribunal, drafting pleadings and witness evidence, liaising with the tribunal throughout the arbitral process and enforcing the final award. Numerous tips, examples and precedents are included to help the new practitioner or interested student understand each stage of the arbitration proceedings"

"The Nature of procedure and policy considerations -- Powers, rights and duties of arbitrators -- The Procedural framework for international arbitration -- Written notices, submissions and the articulation of claims and defences -- Selection, challenge and change of arbitrators -- Establishing the procedural framework -- Complex arbitration -- Preliminary, interim and dispositive determinations -- Hearings -- Approaches to evidence and fact finding -- Documentary evidence -- General witness and expert evidence -- Procedure and evidence in choice of law and interpretation -- Remedies and interest -- Costs in arbitration -- The Award."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perbedaan konsep pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional di Malaysia, Singapura, dan Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga menganalisis praktek yang dilakukan oleh lembaga peradilan di Malaysia, Singapura, dan Indonesia melalui putusan Pengadilan setempat. Penulis mempergunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan walaupun Malaysia dan Singapura merupakan negara yang mengadopsi UNCITRAL Model Law namum terdapat perbedaan dalam hal pengaturan pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional di kedua negara tersebut. Perbedaan pengaturan pembatalan putusan arbitrase internasional juga akan terlihat kontras jika konsep pembatalan dikedua negara tersebut dibandingkan dengan Indonesia. Praktek di lembaga peradilan sudah tepat dalam menerapkan peraturan arbitrase di negara setempat. Hal tersebut tercermin dalam putusan Court of Appeal Malaysia antara TLL HLL melawan Laos, High Court Singapore JVL melawan Agritrade, dan putusan MA PT.Indiratex melawan Everseason.

---

This research aimed to identify the difference of the concept of international arbitral award annulment in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. This research also analyze the practice of the national courts in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia through the court judgment. Author use juridical normative research method with literature studies.

The research shows although Singapore and Malaysia are the Model Law Countries, they still have differences on the regulation of international arbitral award annulment. The differences contrastingly will be shown if we compare those regulations with Indonesia regulation in the international arbitral award annulment.

The practice of the courts have been appropriate in applying the rules of arbitration of the country concerned. It was proved on the Malaysia Court of Appeal award between TLL HLL vs. Laos Government, Singapore High Court award JVL vs. Agritrade, and Indonesia Supreme Court PT. Indiratex vs. Everseason."