Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPuisi Indonesia Modern adalah sebuah bentuk puisi yang baru, yang sebelumnya tidak dikenal dalam tradisi puisi Indonesia asli. Sebagaimana dengan Kesusastraan Indonesia Modern, Puisi Indonesia Modern juga merupakan bentuk sastra hasil dari persentuhan dengan tradisi sastra asing, terutama kesusastraan Barat. Persentuhan itu tidak hanya terbatas dengan menghasilkan perubahan-perubahan dalam struktur, tetapi juga dalam tema, sikap, dan visi kepengarangan. Perubahan-perubahan dan gejala-gejala yang terlihat dalam struktur dapat menjelaskan dan dijelaskan melalui proses perubahan dalam tema, sikap, dan visi kepengarangan."

"One of the differences between the expression of the language aspects of English and Indonesian is related to the definiteness and indefiniteness (henceforth: DFS and IDFS) phenomenon. Lyons (1995:0) sates that the natural languages express the DFS and IDFS phenomenon by using several semantic categories. However, the expression of the phenomenon in most languages is not as a well-defined system, with clear-cut categories and black and white distinctions, as that in English (Chesterman, 1991:4; Lyons, 1977:179). According to Lyons (1977) English might use the definite article the in the definite noun phrase (henceforth: NP). Proper names and personal pronouns also express the English definite NP Then, the English indefinite NP is usually peceded by the indefinite article a/an. The Indonesi_an DFS's syntactic devices include demonstratives itu/ini and personal pronoun -nya, while the IDFS's uses noun classifiers (seorang for human, seekor for animal, and sebuah for the rest) (Dardjowidjojo, 1983:194_245). Alwi et al. (1998a:44) specifies the DFS""s syntactic devices of the parts of Indonesian syntax, namely, artrcles (si/ sang, yang), demonstratives (itu/ini), proper names (Rizky, Rizka, Kharin), personal pronouns (I, my, you, your), or referring nouns (I3apak, Ibu, Saudara). Thus, those devices vary, and my study suggests to use zero (4)), too. The analogical mistakes made by the Indonesian students who study English were due to the fact that the forms and the meanings of the syntactical devices in English and Indonesian are not equivalent (Dardjowidjojo, 1983:194_245; cf. Mansyur, 1993). The definite and indefinite NP are two referring expessions in the referential system; the others are the general, opaque, and generic references (Lyons, 1977:177-197). The role of the definite and indefinite NP are more basic than those other referring expressions. Thus, my study focuses on the definite and indefinite NP which entail the discussion of those other referring expressions, but not vice versa."