Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perbankan secara umum mempunyai peran vital bagi urat nadi perekonomian, perannya dalam pembangunan sebagai alat transmisi kebijakan moneter. Secara khusus, perbankan juga berperan sangat vital dalam penyelenggaraan transaksi pembayaran, baik nasional maupun internasional. Sehingga citra perbankan dalam masyarakat menjadi sangat penting dijaga untuk menumbuhkan kepercayaan pada dunia perbankan di Indonesia. Pembentukan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) merupakan tujuan filosofis dari Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Pasal 33, khususnya ayat (2) dan (3). Dengan pengertian bahwa badan usaha milik negara tersebut menguasai cabang-cabang produksi yang sangat vital bagi hajat hidup orang banyak dan untuk memenuhi seluruh kebutuhan masyarakat yang belum dapat dikelola oleh pihak swasta, dan menjadikan BUMN, baik yang berbentuk non-bank maupun bank, sebagai agen pembangunan (agent of development). Penyertaan modal, yang bersumber dari Anggaran dan Pendapatan Belanja Negara, yang dilakukan oleh Negara melalui Pemerintah pada BUMN membawa implikasi terhadap pengelolaan kekayaan BUMN sebagai entitas badan hukum yang berdiri sendiri, sehingga menimbulkan pemahaman bahwa asset BUMN adalah asset Negara, secara otomatis piutang BUMN pun adalah piutang Negara dan pengelolaannya pun oleh Negara, bukan berdasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip perusahaan yang sehat. Tingginya tingkat kredit bermasalah (non performing loan) pada bank BUMN menimbulkan reaksi Pemerintah dengan mengeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 33 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Tata Cara Penghapusan Piutang Negara/Daerah, yang sebelumnya telah mendapat dasar hukum melalui Fatwa Mahkamah Agung (Fatwa MA) Nomor WKMA/Yud/20/VIII/2006 tanggal 16 Agustus 2006, yang menekankan bahwa penyertaan modal BUMN merupakan ?pemisahaan kekayaan negara? dari APBN, sehingga pembinaan dan pengelolaannya tidak didasarkan pada sistem APBN melainkan didasarkan pada sistem perusahaan yang sehat menurut UU Perseroan Terbatas dan UU BUMN. Berdasarkan pada Peraturan Pemerintah tersebut diatas, maka piutang BUMN bukan lagi dianggap sebagai piutang Negara. Penanganan kredit bermasalah (NPL) bank BUMN diselesaikan menurut kebijakan bank BUMN itu sendiri dan tidak diserahkan lagi kepada Negara.

---

Banking in general give an important role for the economic matters, the role is as the device of the monetary policy transmission. Specifically, banking also give a vital role for the payment transaction, in national or international. Therefore, the image of the banking in society become very important to preserve the trust of the banking system in Indonesia. The philosophy of the history of the state-owned company as mentioned in Constitution years 1945, in Article 33, especially in point (2) dan (3), can be explained that the state-owned company shall dominate all the vital production for the people and to fulfill the needs of the people that can not be dominate by the privat sector, and also made the state-owned company, as well as the bank and non-bank, as the agent of development. The participation of the Capital from the Earnings and Expenditures of the National Budget (APBN) by the State through the government in the state-owned company brought an implication to the management of the asset of the state-owned company as the independent entity of the corporation, and caused a comprehension that the asset of the state-owned company belong to the asset of the state too, in automatically the account receivables of the state-owned company belong to the account receivables of the state too, and will manage by the state, not by the principal of the good corporate governance management. the increase of the non-performance loan in the state-owned bank, reacted by the government by issued the Government Regulation number 33 year 2006 regarding the Alteration of the Government Regulation number 14 year 2005 regarding the Manners of the Remission of the Account Receivables of the state/provincial, based on the instruction of the Supreme Court number WKMA/Yud/20/VIII/2006 dated 16 Agustus 2006, mentioned that the participation of the capital in the state-owned company is ?the separation of the state asset? from the APBN, therefore its management not based on the APBN system but based on the corporation system due to the Laws of Limited Liability Company and the Laws of the State-Owned Company. Thus, the account receivables of he state-owned company not belong to the State and the management of the non-performing loan of the State-Owned Company based on the policy of the State-Owned Company itself, not manage by the State anymore."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pelaksanaan penambahan modal dalam Bank Perkreditan Rakyat X berdasarkan Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 8/26/PBI/2006 tentang Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa penambahan modal yang dilakukan oleh BPR tidak dapat langsung dipergunakan dalam operasionalnya. Hal ini dikuatirkan mempengaruhi kerja BPR khususnya dalam memberikan kredit kepada debitor. Maka diperlukan penyederhanaan prosedur penambahan modal BPR berdasarkan UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

---

The focus of this study is about implementing in increasing capital in Bank Perkreditan Rakyat X accordingly to Bank Indonesia Law and Regulations No. 8/26/PBI/2006 regarding Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR). The survey proofs that the money in which to increase the capital by Bank Perkreditan Rakyat cannot be used directly in its operational needs. This is something to be concerned about because it might effect Bank Perkreditan Rakyat?s operation, especially in lending credits to debitors. So, it needs simplifying procedures in increasing capital in Bank Perkreditan Rakyat which according to Law Number 40 Year 2007 regarding Limited Company (UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas)."

"Skripsi ini membahas faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan Bank Indonesia menerbitkan Surat Edaran No.14/7/DPbS dan praktik gadai emas syariah serta implikasinya setelah diterbitkan peraturan tersebut di Bank UDA. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif terhadap regulasi yang dikeluarkan Bank Indonesia selaku bank sentral dengan pendekatan studi kasus pada salah satu bank syariah yang memiliki produk gadai emas syariah. Hasil dari penelitian adalah Bank Indonesia menemukan sejumlah fakta pelanggaran komitmen dan indikasi praktik investasi dalam gadai emas syariah. Secara keseluruhan tidak terdapat perbedaan prosedur gadai emas syariah setelah diterbitkan Surat Edaran No.14/7/DPbS di Bank UDA, hanya ada penambahan fungsi Admin Gadai untuk menerapkan dual control. Implikasi diterbitkannya peraturan tersebut terhadap praktik gadai emas syariah adalah pasar gadai emas syariah semakin kecil dan kompetitif, adanya persaingan yang tidak seimbang, dan pertumbuhan Perbankan Syariah menjadi terhambat.

---

This thesis discusses about the factors that led Bank of Indonesia issued regulation letter No.14/7/DPbS, sharia gold pawn practices and the implications of being published the regulation at UDA Bank. This study is a descriptive study of the regulation issued by Bank of Indonesia as the central bank with a case study approach to one of Islamic banks that have sharia gold pawn products.

The results of the study is Bank Indonesia found a number of facts the commitment offense and indications of investment practices in the sharia gold pawn. Overall there was no difference procedures of sharia gold pawn after regulation letter No.14/7/DPbS issued at UDA Bank, there only additional function, Pawn Admin, to implement dual control. Implications of the issuance of these regulations on the sharia gold pawn practices are market getting smaller and competitive, the competition is not balanced, and a stunted growth of Islamic Banking."

"[Tesis ini membahas tentang ketentuan rahasia bank di Indonesia sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perbankan. Namun pada kenyataannya, batasan-batasan tentang rahasia bank itu sangatlah sempit, dan tidak melindungi nasabahpeminjam. Selain itu, terdapat banyak pengecualian dari ketentuan rahasia bank di peraturan perundang-undangan lain, bahkan yurisprudensi hakim. Penelitian ini dikaji dengan menggunakan teori hukum dari Lon L. Fuller dan menggunakan metode penilitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan historis dan pendekatan komparatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui batasan-batasan dan pengecualian dari ketentuan rahasia bank di indonesia. Dalam penulisan ini juga mencantumkan beberapa pengaturan mengenai rahasia bank dari beberapa negara. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan agar ditambahkan ketentuan untuk melindungi data nasabah debitur dengan kolektibilitas pinjaman lancar dan menambahkan ketentuan pengecualian dari ketentuan rahasia perbankan di undang-undang perbankan. Hasil penelitian ini juga menyarankan agar Undang-Undang Perbankan menambahkan nasabah debitur dalam pengertian rahasia bank dan menambahkan ketentuan pengecualian atas rahasia bank;This Thesis discusses about bank secrecy regulation in Indonesia as stipulated in the Banking Act. However, limitations on bank secrecy was very narrow, and not to protect borrowers. In addition, there are many exceptions from bank secrecy regulation in other legislation, even from jurisprudence of the judges. This study examined using the legal theory of Lon L. Fuller and using normative juridical research method using a historical approach and comparative approach. This study aims to determine the limitations and exclusions of bank secrecy provisions in Indonesia. In this paper also lists some arrangements regarding bank secrecy from several countries. Results of this study concluded that the added provisions to protect the data of debtors with loans collectibility smoothly and added exemption from the provisions of banking secrecy in banking laws. This study aims to determine the limitations and exceptions of bank secrecy regulation in Indonesia. Results of this study suggest that the Banking Act adds borrowers in terms of bank secrecy and adds exceptions to bank secrecy provisions, This Thesis discusses about bank secrecy regulation in Indonesia as stipulated in the Banking Act. However, limitations on bank secrecy was very narrow, and not to protect borrowers. In addition, there are many exceptions from bank secrecy regulation in other legislation, even from jurisprudence of the judges. This study examined using the legal theory of Lon L. Fuller and using normative juridical research method using a historical approach and comparative approach. This study aims to determine the limitations and exclusions of bank secrecy provisions in Indonesia. In this paper also lists some arrangements regarding bank secrecy from several countries. Results of this study concluded that the added provisions to protect the data of debtors with loans collectibility smoothly and added exemption from the provisions of banking secrecy in banking laws. This study aims to determine the limitations and exceptions of bank secrecy regulation in Indonesia. Results of this study suggest that the Banking Act adds borrowers in terms of bank secrecy and adds exceptions to bank secrecy provisions]"