Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai Implementasi Demokrasi dalam ProsesPerubahan Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Tahun 1999 ? 2002. Penelitianini adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif, dimana alat pengumpulan data yangdigunakan adalah studi kepustakaan yang didapat melalui literatur berupa bukubuku,peraturan perundang-undangan, dan artikel-artikel dari harian umummaupun dari internet. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Proses perubahanUndang-Undang Dasar 1945 Tahun 1999 ? 2002 memakai model demokrasipartisipatif hal ini didasarkan atas teori demokrasi partisipatif yang dikemukakanoleh David Held. Peran dari masyarakat sebagai bentuk perwujudan demokrasipartisipatif yang sangat luar biasa dapat dimengerti karena pada dukungan duniatelekomunikasi yang sudah sangat canggih sehingga dapat memberikan peran danpeluang yang besar bagi masyarakat untuk ikut telibat dalam proses perubahanterhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Tahun 1999 - 2002.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the implementation of democracy in the ProceedingsAgainst the Amendment Act of 1945 Years 1999 to 2002. This study is thejuridical-normative research, where data collection tools used were obtainedthrough library research literature in the form of books, legislation, and newspaperarticles from the public or from the internet. The results showed that the processof changing the Constitution of 1945 Years 1999 to 2002 using this model ofparticipatory democracy based on Participatory democracy theory advanced byDavid Held. The role of the community as a form of manifestation of participatorydemocracy that is extraordinary world can be understood as support for a highlysophisticated telecommunications so as to give a role and a great opportunity forpeople to participate in the process of change towards telibat Act of 1945 Years1999 to 2002"

"Esensi Demokrasi adalah kebebasan berbicara dan partisipasi masyarakat dalam setiap kebijakan publik. Aspirasi masyarakat sebagai figur sentral demokrasi harus diserap oleh Negara dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang. Karakter responsif pada proses pembentukan undang-undang belum dapat diwujudkan di Indonesia karena partisipasi masyarakat belum dapat dilaksanakan secara maksimal dan lebih dari itu kompromi-kompromi politik masih ada. Lebih dari pada itu, karakter responsif pada proses pembentukan undang-undang tidak hanya bergantung pada konfigurasi politik yang demokratis namun membutuhkan partisipasi masyarakat secara intensif dan luas. Sama seperti undang-undang sebelumnya, yaitu Undang-undang nomor 8 tahun 1985 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan, Undang-undang No.17 tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan masih mempunyai sifat yang represif dan ortodok karena Undang-undang No.17 tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan belum mengedepankan karakter responsif yang menampung dan menyerap aspirasi masyarakat dalam proses pembentukannya walaupun proses pembentukan undang-undang tersebut telah memenuhi standar ketentuan partisipasi masyarakat.

---

The essence of Democracy is freedom of speech and public participation in any public policy. As the central figure of democracy, the aspiration of citizen shall be absorbed by the country ragarding in law making process. The responsive character in law making process could not yet be fully implemented in Indonesia due to public participation has not been fully performed and the existence of political compromises. Moreover, the responsive character in law making process shall not only depend on democratic political configuration but also intensively and widely public participation. Same as the previous law, which is Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1985 on Community Organization, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2013 on Community Organization still has repressive and orthodox characteristic due to it does not put the priority on the responsive character by accomodating and absorbing the public's aspiration on its law making process despite of the law making process on Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2013 on Community Organization has already complied with the standard requirement of public participation."

"The establishment of acts is part of state authority, it shall be transparent and accountable. It also needs public participation. Thus it will produce a democratic act and it will be beneficial to the society. Furthermore it is able to embody good governance in accordance with the constitution 1945. "

"The machanism procedure of establishing by laws is the same act and the position of by law is equal with the act, in the sense that bylaws and act are ligiislative products. However the cyontain of by laws is different with the act. The implementation of by laws is limited to a certain registration, otherways the act is in the national level. Thus the hierarchy of law is lower than the act."

"Thanks to a series of recent US Supreme Court decisions, corporations can now spend unlimited sums to influence elections, Super PACs and dark money groups are flourishing, and wealthy individuals and special interests increasingly dominate American politics. Despite the overwhelming support of Americans to fix this broken system, serious efforts at reform have languished. Campaign finance is a highly intricate and complex area of the law, and the current system favors the incumbent politicians who oversee it. This illuminating book takes these hard realities as a starting point and offers realistic solutions to reform campaign finance. With contributions from more than a dozen leading scholars of election law, it should be read by anyone interested in reclaiming the promise of American democracy."