Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Income Tax Section 21 is lease to the employment income accepted by foreign employees and laboring local employees in the foreign delegation or its branch.

Employment Income in wide divided to become two type of income, that is (1) obtained income as employees in relation work with employer which in referred International Taxation Literature also as "labor income"; in Ordinance Pay As You Earn 1935, this income is referred as fee, and (2) income from free work or self-employed income or professional income.

The research method conducted is base on the qualitative research method with the type of research of analytical descriptive and the collecting method is through interview with the interlocked parties; they are tax officer, tax consultant, and tax payers. This research was also conducted on the on the interlocked documents, they are law of income tax, thesis, tax article, books, and data of tax auditing.

Withholding of Income Tax Section 21 represent program of payment during year applying to employment income. Income which withheld by Income Tax ection 21 represent imposed income or lease representing lease object pursuant to rule law material.

Rule arranging withholding to the production from work is The Law of Income Tax Section 21. As for imposed income tax section 21 is production from referring to work, accepted activity or service or obtained by personal Taxpayer. Income Tax Section 21 arrange only production of personal Taxpayer home affair, while hitting personal Taxpayer abroad arranged by Income Tax Section 26.

At withholding by other party, withholder pays salary or fee to taxpayer and obliged to arrest the amount of tax which debt from amount of paid to the order income of taxpayer and pay for the amount of income tax of the taxpayer to Exchequer.

According to data in Permanent Establishment and Foreigner Tax Office the amount of Tax Wit holder which enough fluctuative from year to year, in meaning amount Taxpayer mobility which high enough. With high mobility level and rely on self assessment system representing one of the factor needed for high compliance from the Taxpayer, also to be able to accept tax with rule of legislation.

Pursuant to result research of writer concerning, level compliance of Taxpayer with reference to existence of obligation of forwarding of Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21, there are big percentage enough to the uncompliance of Taxpayer in remit and report Income Tax Section 2las according to real situation and amount which because of intention and also negligence from Taxpayer. To the things hence causing delaying of tax money which step into Exchequer, so that affect also to acceptance of tax.

The level compliance of Taxpayer in submitting Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21 from year 2000 up to year 2003 continuing to experience of degradation because Taxpayer incapable of reporting Annual Tax Return Income Tax Section 21 punctually because of unfinished of his financial statement, its time at the same time with forwarding of Annual Tax Return of Income Tax Section 25 and other reason like difficulty of cash-flow, and Taxpayer have nothing like because have do not operate again.

From result of this research, Writer try to analyze causes the happening of uncompliance and try to look for resolving so that Taxpayer progressively growing obedient in done duty taxation. The writer also suggests Tax Office better urge to submit Annual Tax Return before tax year ended so Taxpayer can prepare all calculation of his income tax section 21 with time enough and is not hurried. Annual tax Return which is less payee require to be conducted by a accurate research why happened lacking of payee as payment of Income Tax Section 21 ought to have been done at a period of income accepted by employees."

"ABSTRAKSuatu hal yang sangat panting dari perombakan sistem perpajakan pada tahun 1983 adalah diterapkannya sistem self assessment sebagai pengganti sistem oficial assessment. Sistem self assessment akan berjalan dengan baik apabila kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam· membayar pajak tinggi. Dari serangkaian kewajiban yang ada di dalam Pajak Penghasilan, kewajiban membayar PPh pasal 25 adalah merupakan kewajiban yang sangat panting karena melalui kewajiban ini, pengeluaran-pengeluaran negara ( khususnya yang bersifat rutin) dapat terpenubi. Namun sayang tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam membayar kewajiban ini masih rendah, seperti yang terjadi di Kanwil III Ditjen Pajak (Jaya I). Di Kanwil ini tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak membayar kewajiban PPh pasal 25 ini berkisar 54,20% untuk wajib pajak perseorangan dan 52,53 % untuk wajib pajak badan. Menurut Andre F. Vinch , seorang konsultan pajak asal tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak dikatakan tinggi telah mencapai angka di atas 75 %. Belgia', apabila Rendahnya tingkat kepatuhan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan terhadap kewajiban PPh pasal 25 masih lemah. Ini terlihat dari sering terlambatnya penerbitan Surat Tagihan Pajak (S~P) yang merupakan sarana pengawasan terhadap kewajiban PPh pasal 25. Keterlambatan didalam proses penerbitan STP ini dikarenakan adanya keterlambatan data· yang diperlukan untuk menerbitkan STP tersebut. Untuk mengatasi hal itu komputerisasi merupakan pertimbangan yang tepat. Dengan adanya komputerisasi,STP akan lebih cepat diterbitkan sehingga akan meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak dalam melaksanakan ke\'lajiban membayar PPh pasal 25. Disamping itu usaha penyuluhan pajak harus lebih ditingkatkan baik mutu maupun jumlah pelaksanaannya."

"In APBN Year 2002-2003 tax income gave 70%-80% contribution for state income, which Income tax gave the biggest contribution about 50%. Therefore to improve tax income from income taxes in the future, to be needed by the improvement of taxpayer compliance. According to the above statement, hence factors influencing the compliance of taxpayer in filling corporate income tax return is an interesting issue to be researched.Corporate income tax return filling arranged in Act of Republic of Indonesia No. 16 year 2000 (KUP) concerning: tax return, Bookkeeping, Inspection and Sanction. And Act of Republic Of Indonesia No. 17 year 2000 (income tax) about * calculation in tax liability. And guide of execution of admission filling of corporate income tax return Decision of DIP No. KEP-185IPJ./2003. The fundamental of problems is how far tax payer comprehend Law and Regulation of Taxation including the ability of conducting fiscal correction of financial statement base on calculation taxes amount owed to be filed in tax return, and what kind of effort which have been conducted by DJP to push voluntary compliance creation (compliance voluntary) of taxpayer in filling tax return.In developing theoretical framework, research taken is library a research. The knowledge and ability of Taxpayer in comprehending and laws application and Regulation of Taxation is the main variable which influence compliance of 'Taxpayer in filling tax return. Counseling and also inspection is an important matter for DIP so that tax payer feel to be observed and will request to fulfill accountability of responsibility in filling tax return using Self Assessment system.Research type used is qualitative with analytical descriptive. Method data collecting is "quota sampling" to be held an interview with by using guidance of interview at tax payer, tax consultant, even at Functionary of DJP which related to admission the filling of corporate income tax return. The result of the Research analyzed and reported in tabular, composition and descriptive.Research result shows the existence of high impact between knowledge and ability of Taxpayer to comprehend and laws application and Regulation of Taxation, to the compliance of in filling income tax return. Role of inspection and counseling by DJP have a big impact in realizing compliance of level of tax payer in filling income tax return. Policy of giving the predicate of "Obedient tax payer" by DJP, to motivate obedient tax payer so that, this program not yet so drawn for most tax payer because do not influence tariff of tax payment.Analysis to research finding show that: Formal compliance of tax payer in submitting income tax return in KPP Bekasi is only 30% from amount of income tax return which enlist, and among which have submitted income tax return the 64% is zero tax return. For the measurement of accuracy calculation in tax liability in tax return seen from ability of tax payer in conducting fiscal correction to financial statement only 25% from tax payer the research, consist of " Obedient tax payer" and " Regular tax payer submit tax return", and this tax payer there no correction of tax officer after checked_ From this finding result earn requested that there is still lower mount compliance of tax payer in filling corporate income return. Added again with limitation of DJP Resources in conducting inspection to corporate income tax return, hence tax potency owed by which not yet dug by in KPP Bekasi is still high.Conclusion, that knowledge and ability of tax payer for the application of Law and Regulation of Taxation influence compliance of tax payer in filling seen corporate income tax return of result inspection of tax officer to tax return submitted by tax payer most unable to fulfill the laws and regulation of Taxation. Strive counseling of DJP to socialize Law and Regulation of Taxation there are, but not yet reached entire/all levels of taxpayer. And activity of inspection by DJP still limited and prioritized to overpaid tax return, condition of this also give opportunity for tax payer which tend to avoid Tax, to submit underpaid tax return in order not to be object of inspection. To improve compliance of tax payer in filling tax return repair there must be from both parties, first tax payer have to improve the knowledge of comprehending rule of legislation of Tax to fill corporate income tax return. Both of DJP as Stakeholders running role to improve acceptance of Tax better progressively fraternize in giving counseling but coherent in executing inspection by totally to all tax payer, therefore shall DJP conduct inspection pursuant to data of DJP alone is not pursuant to restitution, and in management and inspection of corporate income tax return use information technology system like sketch which have in format by DJP, so that tax payer feel to be observed and asked the accurate is calculation of and accountable and also responsible in filling tax return using the system of self assessment."