Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Berdasarkan UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, anak dari perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan berakibat anaknya tidak mempunyai hubungan perdata terhadap ayah biologisnya. Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 mengubah hubungan keperdataan anak luar kawin terhadap ayah biologisnya. Skripsi ini membahas mengenai efektivitas putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap kepentingan anak luar kawin, serta akibat dari putusan itu dalam hal terjadinya pewarisan khususnya anak luar kawin terhadap ayah biologisnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang diuraikan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ditemukan banyak kelemahan dalam putusan ini yang malah menambah masalah baru karena setelah putusan dikeluarkan pemerintah tidak segera membentuk undang-undang yang dapat memperbaharui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan sebagaimana telah dinyatakan bahwa Pasal 43 ayat (1) dikatakan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat karena bertentangan dengan Undang- Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.

---

Based on Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, children from the unrecorded marriage has no civil relationship to the biological father. Existence of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 has changed the civil relationship between illegitimate child to their biological father. This Thesis discuss regarding the effectiveness of the Constitutional Court's decision on the illegitimate child?s standing, and the consequences of their inheritance rights. This research using the normative juridicial method and outlined descriptively.

As the result, many flaws in this decision was found, or even add new problems because government was not immediately establish new laws that can renew the Act No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage as already stated that Article 43 paragraph (1) has no binding legal force because it conflicts with the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, 1945."

"Tentang keabsahan seorang anak, Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dalam Pasal 42 dikatakan bahwa anak yang sah adalah anak yang dilahirkan dalam atau sebagai akibat perkawinan yang sah. Selanjutnya ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan telah mengatur bahwa anak yang dilahirkan di luar perkawinan hanya mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ibunya dan keluarga ibunya. Akan tetapi berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 yang dikeluarkan pada tanggal 13 Februari 2012 tersebut, hubungan perdata anak dengan ayahnnya dan keluarga ayahnya didasarkan atas adanya hubungan darah secara nyata antara anak dengan ayahnya, sebagaimana hubungan darah dengan ibunya, meskipun antara ayah dan ibunya belum tentu ada ikatan perkawinan. Ketiadaan dan/atau ketidaksempurnaan hubungan nikah antara ayah dengan ibunya tidak menghapuskan adanya hubungan darah dan hubungan perdata antara anak dengan ayah kandungnya sebagaimana hubungan perdata antara anak dengan ibu kandungnya. Permasalahan dalam tesis ini adalah mencari tahu bagaimana kedudukan hukum anak zina menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia dan bagaimana implikasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam perkara Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 terhadap kedudukan anak zina di Indonesia. Dalam penelitian tesis ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis-normatif, dengan data utama yang digunakan yaitu data sekunder. Sedangkan kesimpulan berdasarkan permasalahan di atas dapat diketahui bahwa kedudukan hukum anak zina di Indonesia berdasarkan KUHPerdata, anak zina tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum apapun, mengingat anak zina termasuk dalam kategori anak luar kawin yang tidak dapat diakomodir dalam lembaga pengakuan dan pengesahan anak luar kawin, sehingga tidak dapat mewaris. Mengingat bahwa dalam UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 kedudukan anak hanya dibedakan menjadi anak sah dan anak luar kawin dan sehubungan dengan fakta bahwa anak zina tidak dapat dikategorikan sebagai anak sah, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa anak zina termasuk di dalam kategori anak luar kawin dalam UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Akan tetapi setelah Mahkamah Konstitusi mengabulkan uji materiil atas Pasal 43 ayat (1), maka sejak tanggal dikeluarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 tanggal 13 Februari 2012, maka anak zina memiliki hubungan keperdataan dengan ayahnya.

---

About the validity of a child, The Act No.1 of 1974 concerning Marriage in article 42 says that a legitimate child is a child who was born legitimately in or as a result of a legitimate marriage. Then the provisions of article 43 paragraph 1 Act No.1 of 1974 on Marriage has been set up that children whom born outside marriage has only a civil relationship with her mother and her family. However, based on Constitutional Court Desicion No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 is that a civil relationship with the father and the father's family is based on the actual blood relationship between the child and his father, even between father and the mother do not necessarily have the bond of marriage. The absence of imperfections relationship between the father and mother marriage didn't abolish the blood and the civil relationship between the child and the birth mother.

The problems in this thesis is to find out how the legal status of natural child according to the legislatin in Indonesia and what is the implications of the Constitutional Court No.46/PUUVIII/ 2010 to the position of natural child in Indonesia. In this thesis studies the author use the research methods literature that is juridical-normative, with the main data used are secindary data. The conclusion is based on the above problems can be seen that the legal status of natural child in Indonesia based on The Book of Civil Law, natural child doesn't have any legal status, given the natural child included in the category of children outside of marriage that can not be accomodated in the institution of recognition and validation of the child outside marriage, so they can not be inherited. Given that The Marriage Law only place can be devided into legitimate children and children outside marriage and children due to the fact that adultery can not be categorized as a legitimate child, it can be concluded that the natural child included in the category of children ourside marriage in The Marriage Law. However, after The Constitutional Court to grant judicial review of Article 43 Paragraph 1, then from the date issued desicion number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dated February 13 2012, the natural child has a civil relationship with the father."

"Dengan dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 terhadap penambahan ketentuan dari Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan, kini anak luar kawin dapat mempunyai hubungan keperdataan dengan ayah biologisnya apabila dapat dibuktikan dengan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi atau alat bukti hukum lainnya yang dapat membuktikan bahwa anak tersebut memang memiliki hubungan darah atau biologis dengan laki-laki sebagai ayah kandungnya. Seiring dengan berjalannya waktu, ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi sudah amat maju dan berkembang. Pembuktian anak luar kawin dengan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi ialah menggunakan metode tes DNA (Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid). Dalam hukum Islam, mengenai pembuktian menggunakan tes DNA terhadap penentuan nasab seorang anak terdapat berbagai pendapat berbeda yang dilontarkan oleh ahli hukum Islam. Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai pandangan hukum Islam terhadap pembuktian anak luar kawin dalam penentuan nasab dengan menggunakan pembuktian melalui tes DNA serta akibat hukumnya apabila anak tersebut dapat dinasabkan kepada ayah biologisnya. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, dilakukan penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan suatu metode berbentuk yuridis normatif dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka maupun data sekunder. Hasil analisis adalah, bahwa pembuktian anak luar kawin dengan menggunakan tes DNA dalam hukum Islam diletakan pada “maqasid asy-syariah” yang memiliki arti “segala sesuatu perbuatan tergantung pada tujuannya”, karena maksud dan tujuan dari tes DNA untuk mengetahui pertalian darah seorang anak terhadap ayah kandungnya, maka hal tersebut memberikan suatu manfaat kepada anak itu sendiri, dan apabila tujuan tes DNA tersebut melenceng dari suatu ketentuan atau perintah yang telah ditentukan hukum Islam, maka eksistensinya tentu akan dilarang.

---

With the issuance of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on the addition of Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, now illegitimate child can have a civil relationship with their biological father if it can be proven by science and technology or other legal evidence that can prove that the child does have a blood or biological relationship with a man as his biological father. As time goes by, science and technology are very advanced and developed. Now proving illegitimate children with science and technology, using the DNA (Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid) testing method. In Islamic Law, regarding proof using a DNA test to determine nasab of a illegitimate child there are various different opinions expressed by Islamic jurists. The problem raised in this study is the view of Islamic law on proving illegitimate children in determining of nasab using proof through DNA testing and the legal consequences if the child can serve his biological father. To answer these problems, legal research was carried out using a normative juridical method by examining library materials and secondary data. The results of the analysis are, that proving the child outside of marriage using DNA testing in Islamic law is placed in the “maqasid asy-sharia”, which means "all actions depend on their purpose". Because the purpose of DNA testing is to determine the relationship of a child's blood to his biological father, then it provides a benefit to the child himself, and if the purpose of the DNA test deviates from a provision or order stipulated by Islamic law, then its existence will certainly be prohibited.

"

"Children of "siri" marriages are deemed at a disadvantage under the mariage Act, Law No. 1 Year 1974, as they ae regarded as illegitimate under state law. As a legal consequence, siri children do not derive civil rights, particulary inheritance, from their father and the father's family. This 2012 ruling of the Constitutional Courth granting judicial review of Article 43 paragraph (1)of the Marriage Act has effectively amended the said law. Siri children, including those born from mat'ah marriages, common law unions and adulterous relationships, are now given equal right accorded to legitimate children if blood ties with the father is proven or established by science and technologi and/or other evidence under the law. This paper discussed the implications of this ruling on the civil rights of illegitimate children flowing from their parental relationship with their biological father."

"Salah satu akibat hukum dari perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan adalah status dan kedudukan hak waris terhadap anak yang lahir dari perkawinan tersebut atau selanjutnya disebut sebagai anak luar kawin. Hak waris akan timbul apabila seseorang telah dinyatakan meninggal dunia. Anak yang lahir dari perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan termasuk ke dalam anak luar kawin dalam arti sempit dan mereka tidak memiliki status dan kedudukan yang sama dalam pembagian warisan. Masalah mengenai pembagian waris antara anak sah dan anak luar kawin ada kalanya terjadi di masyarakat yang tidak bisa diselesaikan dengan kekeluargaan, maka dari itu biasanya berakhir di Pengadilan dimana Putusan dari Pengadilan akan menjadi jalan keluar untuk memutuskan dan memberikan keadilan bagi perkara kewarisan anak luar kawin. Penulis dalam melakukan penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang datanya dikumpulkan dari studi kepustakaan. Berdasarkan Penulis, anak luar kawin dapat menjadi ahli waris apabila adanya pengakuan dahulu dari Pewaris, tetapi bagian yang didapatkan tidak sama dengan anak sah dimana besar bagian anak luar kawin bergantung pada dengan siapa anak luar kawin tersebut mewaris bersama. Kemudian, status dan kedudukan anak luar kawin hanya diatur dalam KUHPerdata padahal dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan ada satu pasal yang menyinggung anak luar kawin dan diatur lebih lanjut dalam Peraturan Pemerintah tetapi dalam Peraturan Pemerintah tidak ditemukan mengenai anak luar kawin, sehingga menimbulkan kesimpangsiuran dan permasalahan. Maka dari itu, Penulis menyarankan untuk membentuk suatu peraturan khusus untuk status dan kedudukan anak luar kawin dan juga memberi saran kepada Majelis Hakim yang berperan dalam memutus perkara ini untuk memeriksa dan mengadili secara teliti sengketa status dan kedudukan hak waris anak luar kawin dengan pertimbangan yang seadil-adilnya bagi anak luar kawin tersebut.

---

One of the legal consequences of an unregistered marriage is the status and position of inheritance rights for children born from the marriage or hereinafter referred to as children out of wedlock. Inheritance rights will arise if someone has been declared dead. Children born from unregistered marriages are included as children out of wedlock in a narrow sense and they do not have the same status and position in the distribution of inheritance. Problems regarding the distribution of inheritance between legitimate children and illegitimate children sometimes occur in society which cannot be resolved by kinship, therefore it usually ends in court where a decision from the court will be the way out to decide and provide justice for cases of inheritance of illegitimate children. In doing this writing, the author used a juridical-normative research method with a qualitative approach in which the data was collected from literature studies. According to the author, children out of wedlock can become heirs if there is prior recognition from the heir, but the portion obtained is not the same as legitimate children where the size of the child out of wedlock depends on who the out of wedlock child jointly inherits. Then, the status and position of children out of wedlock are only regulated in the Civil Code even though in the Marriage Law there is one article which alludes to children out of wedlock and is further regulated in Government Regulations but in Government Regulations there is no mention of children out of wedlock, giving rise to confusion and problems. Therefore, the author suggests establishing a special regulation for the status and position of illegitimate children and also advises the panel of judges who play a role in deciding this case to examine and adjudicate carefully disputes over the status and position of inheritance rights for illegitimate children with the fairest considerations for children out of wedlock."

"Article 43 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 year 1974 on Mariage only sets on private relations of a child born out-of-wedlock with his mother: child born out of wedlock cannot obtain full rights, as the biological father is not responsible for fulfilling the rights of the child. This analysis reviews the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 with three main focuses of discussion: 1) how the judges of the Constitutional court made legal considerations responding to the alimony/child support of child born out of wedlock; 2) how the conformity of the concept of 'hifzhu al-nafs' to the redirected responsibility of the father's family after a DNA test result; and 3) whether there is a similarity of concept of 'hifzhu al-nafs' in Shari'ah maqashid to the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (1) regarding to the issue of alimony for the child born out of wedlock after judicial review. The analysis is through in normatice juridicial research, which is more a qualitative research, using library research methods. From the analysis, it is learn that after the juridicial review of Article 43 paragraph (1), there is renewal stating that a child born out-of-wedlock is entitled to obtain a living support from the parents, if legally or by science and technology proven. In harmony, the decision of the Constitutional Court itself is fully supported the concept hifzhu al-nafs, in the purpose maintaining the soul of the child from the downturn. Where the adjustment to the concept hifzhu al-nafs is made, the decision could be implemented in Indonesia by adhering to the procedures set by the Constitutional Court."

"In Indonesia society, a lot of 2 children are born outside marriage. Basically the child has no relation with his father, thus in this case inheritance law is not applicable between them according to the Civil Code, the Islamic Law compilation ( kompilasi Hukum Islam) and the Customary Law. His right under the Civil Code will arise after the acknowledgement of his father or mother, while with the father and mother's family after the official statement. Based on the Islamic Law compilation. an illegitimate child is entitled to inheritance right from his mother ang hos mother's family and vice versa. Meanwhile, since no relation with his biological father exists, no in heritance right arise. According to the concept of customary law, an illegitimate children has a civil relationship only with his mother, the refore an illegitimate child will only acquire inheritance from his mother and his mother's family. The child will not be entitled to for the inheritance from his father because there is no civil relationship with his father."

"Anak yang lahir di luar perkawinan hanya mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ibunya dan juga keluarga ibunya. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010, telah memberikan perubahan terhadap kedudukan anak luar kawin. Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dikatakan bahwa anak luar kawin dapat memiliki hubungan keperdataan dengan ayahnya apabila dapat dibuktikan memiliki hubungan darah berdasarkan ilmu pengetahuann dan tekonologi dan/atau alat bukti lain menurut hukum. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut tidak mengatur mengenai ruang lingkup atau sejauh mana hubungan keperdataan antara anak luar kawin dengan ayah biologisnya. Permasalahan yang akan dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin sebelum dan sesudah dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010, apakah hubungan keperdataan yang terdapat antara anak luar kawin dengan ayahnya termasuk pula hak mewaris atau tidak, serta melihat bagaimanakah penerapan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 mengenai kedudukan anak luar kawin dalam Penetapan Nomor 0156/Pdt.P/2013/PA.JS, Penetapan Nomor 0008/Pdt.P/2013/PA.Yk, Penetapan Nomor 183/Pdt.P/2015/PN.Sda, dan Penetapan Nomor 229/Pdt.P/2015/PN.Kdl. Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penelitian yuridis normatif yang diuraikan secara deskriptif. Dari hasil penelitian ini dapat diketahui bahwa setelah dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 anak luar kawin tidak hanya memiliki hubungan keperdataan dengan ibunya saja, tetapi anak luar kawin juga memiliki hubungan keperdataan dengan ayah biologisnya, dan hubungan keperdataan tersebut termasuk juga hak mewaris antara anak luar kawin dengan ayah biologisnya.

---

Illegitimate child has only a civil relation with their mother and their mother?s family. Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 has provided a change the position of illegitimate children. Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 has revised legal relation of illegitimate child with their biological father. Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 proclaimed that the illegitimate child may have civil relations with their biological father if it is proven scientifically that the children are related or tied by filiations, and/or other evidence according to the law. The Constitutional Court Decision does not regulate the scope or extent of civil relationship between the illegitimate child and their biological father. Issues examined in this research are about status of illegitimate child previous to and post Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, whether the relationship of civil between illegitimate child and their father including the inheritance rights or not, and the applications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 regarding the status of illegitimate child in Ascertainment Number 0156/Pdt.P/2013/PA.JS, Ascertainment Number 0008/Pdt.P/2013/PA.Yk, Ascertainment Number 183/Pdt.P/2015/PN.Sda, and Ascertainment Number 229/Pdt.P/2015/PN.Kdl. This research is based on normative juridical method elaborated descriptively. Through this research, we learn that after the application of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, illegitimate child not only have civil relation with their mother but also with their biological father, that includes the inheritance right."

"Perubahan kedudukan dan hak anak luar kawin pasca dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 46/PUU-VIII/2010 memberi banyak perubahan dalam tata hukum keluarga di Indonesia. Permasalahan yang akan dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai kedudukan dan hak mewaris anak luar kawin sebelum dan sesudah dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUUVIII/ 2010 serta melihat bagaimana penerapan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dalam kasus serupa yaitu penetapan No. 0156/Pdt.P/2- 13/PA.JS. Penelitian ini termasuk kedalam penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan metode case and statute approach. Hasil dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa setelah adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUUVII/2010 anak luar kawin dapat memiliki hak-hak keperdataan kepada ayah biologisnya. Dengan demikian, dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VII/2010 memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada anak anak yang dilahirkan di luar perkawinan yang sah.

---

The modification of the status and inheritance rights of illegitimate children's due to Constitutional Court No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 give many transformation in Indonesian family law. The problems taken in this thesis are about the status and the inheritance rights of illegitimate children's before and after the Contitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 issued and also how that Constitutional Court Decision applied in the establishment No. 0156/Pdt.P/2013/PA.JS. This is a juridical normative research by using case and statute approach. The result of this research are, by the issued of the Constituional Court Decision No. 46/PUUVIII/ 2010 the illegitimate children can have an inheritance rights to their biological father as long as they can prove that there is a blood relation between them. So, it can be said that the Contitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUUVIII/2010 give a legal protection to the illegitimate children to have their rights."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai hak mewaris Anak Luar Kawin secara penggantian terhadap harta peninggalan keluarga ibunya pada golongan Tionghoa Non Muslim setelah diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Hukum Waris yang berlaku bagi golongan Tionghoa Non Muslim adalah sesuai Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Dalam KUHPerdata seorang Anak Luar Kawin harus diakui lebih dahulu untuk menimbulkan hubungan hukum antara anak dan ibu yang melahirkannya. Namun setelah UU Perkawinan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat 1 harus dibaca, ldquo;anak yang dilahirkan diluar perkawinan mempunyai hubungan perdata dengan ibunya dan keluarga ibunya, serta dengan laki-laki sebagai ayahnya yang dapat dibuktikan berdasarkan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi dan/atau bukti lain menurut hukum mempunyai hubungan darah, termasuk hubungan perdata dengan keluarga ayahnya. rdquo; Makna hubungan hukum yang diberikan antara anak luar kawin dengan keluarga ibunya menyebabkan banyak interpretasi, apakah kedudukan anak luar kawin menjadi sama dengan anak sah atau sama dengan anak luar kawin yang diakui sah tanpa perlu pengakuan sesuai ketentuan dalam KUHPerdata. Apakah kemudian anak luar kawin khususnya golongan Tionghoa Non Muslim memiliki hak untuk mewaris secara penggantian terhadap harta peninggalan ibu dan keluarga ibu? Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Menerapkan asas hukum Lex Specialist Derogat Legi Generali, ketentuan dalam KUHPerdata merupakan ketentuan khusus mengenai hukum waris, sedangkan UU Perkawinan merupakan ketentuan umum, sehingga berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 842 KUHPerdata, dalam hal mewaris secara penggantian tempat hanya dapat dilakukan oleh keturunan yang sah. Jika kedudukan Anak Luar Kawin ingin diperbaiki dengan memberikan hak-hak waris yang lebih baik, perlu dibuat peraturan perundang-undangan setingkat undang-undang di bidang hukum waris yang baru agar berlaku asas hukum Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori terhadap KUHPerdata.

---

This thesis is about the inheritance rights of Children Born out of Wedlock in Place Fulfillment to his her mother rsquo s family inheritance for Non Muslims Chinese Ethnic after the enacted of Article 43 paragraph 1 Law No. 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage Law and The Constitutional Court Verdict No. 46 PUU VIII 2010. The Law of Inheritance applied for Non Muslims Chinese ethnic is in Indonesian Civil Code. According to Civil Code, a child born out of wedlock must be recognized to create legal relationship between the child and his her mother. But after the enacted of Marriage Law and The Constitutional Court Verdict No. 46 PUU VIII 2010, Article 43 paragraph 1 must be read, ldquo a child born out of wedlock has legal relations with his her mother and the mother rsquo s family, and with a man as his her father who can be proven on the science basis and technology and or other evidence according to the law has blood relations, including legal relationships with his her father rsquo s family rdquo . The meaning of lsquo legal relationship rsquo given between the child born out of wedlock and the family of the mother raise more than one interpretations, whether child born out of wedlock after the Marriage Law has equal rights with the legitimate child or even without recognition from the mother born out of wedlock has the same position as the recognized child as mention in inheritance law in Civil Code. Do child born out of wedlock have the right of place fulfilllment in inheritance from his her mother and mother rsquo s family especially for Non Muslims Chinese Ethnic according to Article 43 1 Marriage Law This research was conducted by normative juridical research method with descriptive analytical and qualitative approach. In accordance to legal principle Lex Specialist Derogat Legi Generali, Civil Code is the special law concerning the inheritance law, whereas the Marriage Law is the general provision. Consequently Article 842 Civil Code, that stated inheritance by place fulfillment can only done by legitimate descendant, is applied to child born out of wedlock. If we are willing to give child born out of wedlock a better inheritance rights, it is necessary to enact legislation at the Law level in order to apply Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori principle to Civil Code."