Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi efek entrenchment dan alignment pemegang saham pengendali akhir terhadap kebijakan dividen kas serta efek moderasi kepemilikan keluarga dan mekanisme corporate governance (CG) terhadap pengaruh entrenchment effect pada kebijakan dividen kas. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa perusahaan dengan pemisahan hak kendali dan hak arus kas yang besar menimbulkan adanya insentif ekspropriasi yang memicu entrenchment effect berupa konflik keagenan yang serius antara pemegang saham pengendali akhir dengan pemegang saham non pengendali sehingga berdampak pada pembagian dividen kas yang rendah. Sampel penelitian ini menggunakan perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2006 - 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kenaikan rasio hak arus kas meningkatkan alignment effect yang mendorong perusahaan membagikan dividen kas yang lebih tinggi. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan efek entrenchment effect tidak berpengaruh terhadap kebijakan dividen kas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, kepemilikan keluarga memberikan pengaruh yang dapat memperlemah efek negatif entrenchment pada dividen kas, sedangkan mekanisme CG pada perusahaan ternyata belum dapat melindungi pemegang saham non pengendali dari tindakan ekspropriasi."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh praktik corporate governance dan struktur kepemilikan keluarga terhadap kebijakan dividen. Variabel-variabel utama yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah corporate governance index, kepemilikan keluarga, kepemilikan institusional, dan kepemilikan asing. Sampel di dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan publik yang terdaftar di BEI kecuali perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang keuangan untuk periode 2007-2011 yang berjumlah 420 perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa kualitas corporate governance yang diukur dengan corporate governance index berpengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap kebijakan dividen. Kepemilikan keluarga mempunyai pengaruh signifikan positif terhadap kebijakan dividen. Kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan asing tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kebijakan dividen.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance, family ownership, institusional ownership, and foreign ownership on dividend payout policy. The main variables in this study is corporate governance index, family ownership, institusional ownership, and foreign ownership. The samples of this study is public company listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange, except financial firms, for years 2007-2011 with a total 420 companies.

The results of this study show that the quality of corporate governance as measured by corporate governance index have a significant negative impact on dividend payout policy. Family ownership has a significant positive effect on dividend payout policy. Institusional ownership and foreign ownership has no significant effect on dividend payout policy."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh Corporate Governance, kepemilikan keluarga dan umur perusahaan terhadap Corporate Social Performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Penelitian ini juga ingin menguji pengaruh Financial Performance terhadap asosiasi Corporate Governance dengan Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Governance dinilai berdasarkan indeks yang dikeluarkan oleh Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), sedangkan untuk Corporate Social Performance menggunakan kriteria pernilaian yang digunakan oleh Greening dan Turban (2000) dimana pengukuranny berdasarkan dimensi yang digunakan lembaga KLD (Kinder,Lydenberg and Domini). Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan model regresi logistik dan sampel sebanyak 239 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Kepemilikan keluarga memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi product quality sedangkan umur perusahaan memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi environment dan dimensi product quality. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa financial performance tidak memperkuat hubungan corporate governance dengan probabilita sebuah perusahaan memiliki high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations.

---

This research aims to determine whether corporate governance, family ownership, and firm age influence corporate social performance in environment dimension, product quality dimension, and community relations. In addition, this research also would like to know the effect of financial performance on the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance. Corporate governance viewed by an index issued by Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), while corporate social performance is measured by KLD?s criteria that used by Greening and Turban (2000).

Hypothesis testing used logistic regression with sample of 239 companies that are listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008. These result indicate that companies with good corporate governance will have bigger probability getting high corporate social erformance in those dimensions. Family ownership has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and firm age also has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and community relations dimension. Yet, financial performance is proven that there is no influence of financial performance to the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance."

"Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Corporate governance performance index sebagai gambaran pelaksanaan Corporate governance dan Konsentrasi kepemilikan perusahaan terhadap efisiensi investasi. Sebagai proksi over-investment dan under-investment menggunakan tingkat kas dan hutang perusahaan, dimana perusahaan dengan kas yang besar berpeluang over-investment, jika perusahaan dengan hutang yang besar berpeluang untuk underinvestment.Dengan menggunakan data yang bersumber dari perusahaan ? perusahaan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia serta hasil penelitian CGPI dalam kurun waktu 2007 ? 2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance performance index tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap efisiensi investasi perusahaan, sedangkan struktur kepemilikan memiliki pengaruh terhadap efisiensi investasi.Untuk penelitian selanjutnya agar menilai corporate governance dari aspek lainnya seperti Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Disclosure serta aspek lainnya, agar terlihat aspek mana yang mempengaruhi pengambilan keputusan investasi.

---

This study aims to analyze the influence of corporate governance performance index as a picture of the implementation of corporate governance and corporate ownership concentration on investment efficiency. As a proxy for over-investment and under-investment using cash and debt levels of companies, where companies with large cash over-investment opportunity, if firms with large debt likely to underinvestment.

By using data sourced from listing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange and the CGPI research results in the period 2007 to 2010. The results showed that the corporate governance performance index has no influence on the efficiency of corporate investment, while the ownership structure has an influence on the efficiency of investment.

For further research to assess other aspects of corporate governance such as Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Disclosure, and other aspects, in order to see which aspects that influence the investment decision."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga terhadapkinerja perusahaan Selain itu penelitian ini juga ingin melihat bagaimanacorporate governance mempengaruhi hubungan antara kepemilikan keluargaterhadap kinerja perusahaan. Pengujian dilakukan dengan Ordinary Least Square(OLS) dengan sampel sebanyak 257 perusahaan terbuka tahun 2014. Penelitian inimenyimpulkan bahwa kepemilikan keluarga tidak berpengaruh terhadap kinerjaperusahaan yang diukur dengan Tobin?s Q maupun ROA. Penelitian ini jugamembuktikan bahwa dewan komisaris dapat memperkuat efek positif kepemilikankeluarga terhadap kinerja perusahaan, namun komite audit menambah efek negatifkepemilikan keluarga terhadap kinerja perusahaan;This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin?s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance.;This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin?s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance., This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin’s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh dan hubungan Corporate Governance dan Kepemilikan Bank terhadap Kinerja Perbankan periode 2008-2011. Dalam penelitian ini kinerja perbankan diukur menggunakan rasio rentabilitas (profitability) yaitu Return on Equity (ROE), Return on Asset (ROA), dan Biaya Operasional Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO). Industri Perbankan merupakan sektor yang sangat penting dalam meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional. Oleh karena itu diperlukan pengelolaan perbankan yang baik dalam mendukung usaha perbankan. Hal ini dapat diwujudkan melalui pelaksanaan corporate governance dalam industri perbankan. Pelaksanaan good corporate governance pada industri perbankan sangat diperlukan untuk membangun kepercayaan masyarakat dan dunia internasional agar dapat berkembang dengan baik dan sehat. Mengiat sektor perbankan yang memiliki ciri khusus dibandingkan dengan sektor lainnya, maka diperlukan pendekatan-pendekatan yang spesifik dalam penerapan good corporate governance (GCG). Dalam penelitian ini, pelaksanaan corporate governance diukur menggunakan self assessment berupa nilai komposit masing-masing bank dan Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). Sesuai dengan data Bank Indonesia, bank di Indonesia dibagi kepemilikannya menjadi kepemilikan swasta, pemerintah, pemerintah daerah dan asing. Dengan adanya kepemilikan yang berbeda pada masing-masing bank maka akan memberikan kinerja yang berbeda pula. Penelitian ini menggunakan model regresi berganda dengan 37 sampel berupa bank yang diambil dari data Bank Indonesia pada periode penelitian 2008-2011.

---

The objective of this research are to analyze the effects and relations of Corporate Governance and Bank?s Ownership toward bank?s performance period 2008-2011. In this study the performance of banking firms is measured using Ratio of Rentability (Profitability) are Return on Equity, Return on Asset and Operating Expense Operating Income (BOPO). Banking Industry is very impotant sector for national economy growth. Therefore we need a good management of banking institution in support of the banking business. this can be realized through the implementation of corporate governance in the banking industry. The implementation of good corporate governance in the banking industry is needed to establish public trust and the international community in order to develop properly and healthy. Given banking sector has special characteristics compared with other sectors, it would require specific approaches in the implementation of good corporate governance (GCG). In this study, the implementation of corporate governance is measured using a self-assessment form a composite score of each bank and the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR). In accordance with data from Bank Indonesia, Bank Indonesia's shared ownership to private ownership, government, and foreign governments. With the different ownership of each bank it will give a different performance. This study uses multiple regression model with 37 samples taken from the bank in the form of data from Bank Indonesia in the study period 2008-2011."

"Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan good corporate governance dan struktur kepemilikan dapat mempengaruhi risiko aset dalam bank di Indonesia. Good corporate governance dinilai berdasarkan skor corporate governance berdasarkan kriteria yang ditetapkan oleh Bank Indonesia yang telah dibuat oleh penelitian sebelumnya yaitu penelitian Mahdan (2010), sedangkan untuk struktur kepemilikan dibedakan menjadi tiga, yaitu kepemilikan pemerintah, swasta, dan asing. Kepemilikan yang berbeda memungkinkan adanya perbedaan pengelolaan risiko pada masing-masing bank. Pengujian hipotesis dengan model regresi linear berganda yang menggunakan observasi sebanyak 223 observasi (firm year) yang terdaftar di Bank Indonesia selama tahun 2008 hingga 2011.Hasilnya penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa good corporate governance tidak berpengaruh terhadap asset risk bank yang diproksikan dalam standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan. Namun struktur kepemilikan swasta memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan, sedangkan untuk kepemilikan asing tidak berpengaruh terhadap standard deviasi return on asset dan non performing loan.

---

The study aims to determine the application of good corporate governance and ownership structures can affect the risk of bank assets in Indonesia. Good corporate governance were evaluated according to corporate governance based on the criteria stipulated by Bank Indonesia have been made by previous research studies Mahdan (2010), whereas for the ownership structure is divided into three, namely government ownership, private, and foreign. Different ownership allows for differences in risk management at each bank. Hypothesis testing with multiple linear regression model that uses as many as 223 observations (firm year) are listed in the Bank Indonesia during 2008 to 2011.

The result of this study suggest that good corporate governance does not affect the bank asset risk in standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans. But private ownership structure has a negative effect on the standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans, while foreign ownership does not affect standard deviation of return on assets and non performing loans."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah perusahaan tipe-J (agency cost of free cash flow tinggi) akan membuat laporan keuangan yang bersifat lebih konservatif dibandingkan perusahaan tipe non-J. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh efek moderasi hutang (H2), dividen (H3a), stock repurchase (H3b), persistensi perusahaan dalam menahan kas (H4), dan tata kelola perusahaan (H5) dalam mempengaruhi hubungan antara tingkat agency cost of free cash flow dan tingkat konservatisme laporan keuangan perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua ukuran konservatisme, yakni konservatisme ukuran akrual dan konservatisme nilai pasar. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan terkait hubungan antara tingkat agency cost of free cash flow dan tingkat konservatisme laporan keuangan perusahaan untuk kedua ukuran konservatisme. Sedangkan kedua ukuran konservatisme menunjukkan bahwa variabel moderasi tidak berpengaruh, yang mengindikasikan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh variabel moderasi terhadap hubungan antara tingkat agency cost of free cash flow dan tingkat konservatisme laporan keuangan pada perusahaan.

---

The objective of this research is to investigate whether the J-type firm (high agency cost of free cash flow) will have more conservative financial report compared with non J-type firm. Moreover, this research also aim to investigate the effect of debt (H2), dividend (H3a), stock repurchase (H3b), cash persistency (H4), and corporate governance (H5) as moderating variables in the relationship between agency cost of free cash flow and conservative financial report. This research uses two measures of conservatism, accruals and market.

The result shows that there is a positive and significant relationship between agency cost of free cash flow and conservative financial reporting for the two measures. And for the moderating variables, both measures show that there are no effects, which means the moderating variables have no effect in the relationship between agency cost of free cash flow and conservative financial report."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan (inside ownership dan foreign ownership) dan corporate governance (board size dan board composition) terhadap likuiditas perusahaan (cash holding) pada perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode tahun 2007-2012. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh negatif yang tidak signifikan antara inside ownership dan foreign ownership terhadap cash holding. Sementara itu, board size memiliki pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap cash holding dan board composition memiliki pengaruh negatif yang tidak signifikan terhadap cash holding.

---

This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure (inside ownership and foreign ownership) and corporate governance (board size and board composition) on corporate liquidity (cash holding). By using non financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2007-2012 as a samples, this research shows that inside ownership and foreign ownership have an insignificant negative effect on cash holding. Meanwhile, board size has a significant positive effect on cash holding and board composition has an insignificant negative effect on cash holding."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari pengaruh political connections, corporate governance, dan blockholders ownership terhadap corporate cash holdings sebagai proxy dari agency problem. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan data panel dari 141 data observasi pada periode 2005, 2008 dan 2011 di Indonesia. Political connections diukur menggunakan variabel dummy. Perusahaan diidentifikasi memiliki political connections apabila terdapat setidaknya satu pemegang saham besar atau top officers yang menjadi anggota parlemen, menteri, atau menjalin hubungan dekat dengan politikus terkemuka atau partai. Corporate governance diukur menggunakan Corporate Governance Index dari Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship. Blockholders ownership diukur menggunakan variabel continuous berupa jumlah kepemilikan saham serta menggunakan variabel dummy yang merupakan pengelompokan untuk kepemilikan blockholders rendah, moderat, dan tinggi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa political connections dan corporate governance terbukti berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap corporate cash holdings. Keberadaan hubungan politis pada perusahaan dapat meminimalkan agency problem karena para politisi yang terlibat dalam perusahaan memanfaatkan jabatan dan kekuatan politiknya untuk keuntungan perusahaan. Penelitian ini juga memperkuat argumen bahwa implementasi corporate governance yang baik dapat meminimalkan agency problem dalam perusahaan. Blockholders ownership tidak terbukti signifikan berpengaruh terhadap corporate cash holdings baik secara linier maupun non linier. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena definisi blockholders yang kurang mencerminkan kepemilikan yang spesifik.

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm’s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm’s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm’s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven., The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm’s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm’s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm’s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.]"