Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The Constitutional Court verdict Number 11-14-21-126-136/PUU-VII/2009, dated March 31st, 2010, related to judicial review of Law Number 9 in 2009 on Educational Legal Entity, granted the request of the apllicant for the most part. One of the ruling of the Constitutional Court stated that Law Number 9 of 2009 on Educational Legal Entity contract to the State Constitution of the Indonesia Republic 1945 and has no binding legal force. The Constitutional Court verdict brings implications on education in Indonesia. This essay analyzes the juridical implications of The Constitutional Court Verdict Number 11-14-21-126-136/PUU-VII/2009. Juridical implications of the verdict related to the existence of a legal vacuum (rechvacuum) and the implementation levels of education. The juridical implications influence legislation governing the management and implementation of education, especially the education ubit of governance. Therefore, it is necessary immediately to establish a law as a substitute for The Law of Educational Legal Entity and do a redesign for the conductor of the educational unit."

"Yayasan yang merupakan badan hukum yang terdiri atas harta kekayaan yang dipisahkan dengan tujuan sosial, keagamaan dan kemanusiaan. Berlakunya Undang-undang No. 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan, maka suatu yayasan yang usahanya dibidang pendidikan harus tunduk pada ketentuan undang undang tersebut. Dampak berlakunya UU BHP terhadap yayasan adalah yayasan harus membentuk BHP kemudian membubarkan diri.

---

Foundation which is a legal entity consisting of the separate property with the objective of social, religious and humanitarian. The introduction of Indonesian Law No. 9 Year 2009 about Legal Education, the foundation of a business education should be subject to the provisions of the law. The effect of the introduction of BHP Law is the foundation of the foundation must be established and BHP discharge."