Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[State-controlled listed companies have always dominated Chinese stock markets. As a result of the rampant scandals related to them, there have been voluminous academic efforts to explore their corporate governance, underpinned by agency costs. However, these studies have yet to examine the phenomenon from the perspective of venture capital and adaptive efficiency. During the last ten years, despite China's remarkable progress in the development of its venture capital market, its domestic venture capital has been marginalized by American competitors. Given the different performance between them, the author contends that the corporate governance system of Chinese state-controlled listed companies has hampered the performance of the institutional factors which are responsible for the prosperity of American venture capital in Chinese venture capital markets. With the practice of American venture capital as the mirror, he empirically demonstrates that Chinese domestic venture capital lacks the four factors related to the success of their American counterparts: large and independent funding, application of incentive mechanisms, efficient exit channels, and a high risk tolerance level. More importantly, these defects as a whole are closely linked to the corporate governance of state-controlled listed companies. Considering the potential negative consequences on economic and social development, the author identifies policy reforms underway to harmonize agency costs and adaptive efficiency. , State-controlled listed companies have always dominated Chinese stock markets. As a result of the rampant scandals related to them, there have been voluminous academic efforts to explore their corporate governance, underpinned by agency costs. However, these studies have yet to examine the phenomenon from the perspective of venture capital and adaptive efficiency. During the last ten years, despite China's remarkable progress in the development of its venture capital market, its domestic venture capital has been marginalized by American competitors. Given the different performance between them, the author contends that the corporate governance system of Chinese state-controlled listed companies has hampered the performance of the institutional factors which are responsible for the prosperity of American venture capital in Chinese venture capital markets. With the practice of American venture capital as the mirror, he empirically demonstrates that Chinese domestic venture capital lacks the four factors related to the success of their American counterparts: large and independent funding, application of incentive mechanisms, efficient exit channels, and a high risk tolerance level. More importantly, these defects as a whole are closely linked to the corporate governance of state-controlled listed companies. Considering the potential negative consequences on economic and social development, the author identifies policy reforms underway to harmonize agency costs and adaptive efficiency. ]"

"ABSTRACTThis paper uses a difference in difference model to study the impact of venture capital (VC) participation on board characteristics. Our sample includes companies listed on the growth enterprise market (GEM) on Chinas Shenzhen stock exchange over the period 2009 to 2014. Our measure of board characteristics is chief executive officer (CEO) duality, the scale of the board of directors, and the proportion of independent directors. Our empirical analysis reveals the following findings: the VC backed GEMlisted companies are more inclined to choose the mode of CEO duality and contain a large board of directors and a high proportion of independent directors. These characteristics, we find, are conducive to improving company performance."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan (institutional dan managerial ownership) dan corporate governance (board size dan non-executive directors) terhadap struktur modal. Menggunakan sampel perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2008-2013, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hasil yang signifikan antara struktur kepemilikan dan corporate governance terhadap struktur modal. Return on asset (ROA) sebagai variabel kontrol juga mempunyai hasil yang signifikan dengan struktur modal namun firm size mempunyai hasil yang tidak signifikan terhadap struktur modal. Maka, hasil penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa struktur kepemilikan dan corporate governance mempunyai peran penting pada struktur modal perusahaan manufaktur.

---

This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure (institutional and managerial ownership) and corporate governance (board size and non-executive directors) on capital structure. By using listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2008-2013 as a sample, results reveal that ownership structure and corporate governance are significantly correlated with capital structure. Return on asset as control variable has significant correlation with capital structure, but as for firm size has insignificant correlation with capital structure. Therefore, results suggest that ownership structure and corporate governance play important roles in a firm's capital structure."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur modal dan corporate governance terhadap leverage ratios pada perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2008-2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga definisi leverage ratios untuk melihat perbedaan signifikansi dan arah hubungan pada tiap model penelitian. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini berupa struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah tiga definisi leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, dan debt to asset ratio).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada model 1 (DER) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size dan board independence) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 2 (LDR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size dan asset tangibility) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 3 (DR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) terhadap leverage-ratios.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of capital structure and corporate governance on leverage ratios of non financial companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. This research uses three proxies of leverage ratios to see significance difference and relation signs in each model. The independence variables of this research are capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership), while the dependence variables are the three proxies of leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, debt to asset ratio).

The result shows that there is significant effect of capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence) toward leverage ratios in the first model (DER), while the second model (LDR) shows significant effect of capital structure (size dan asset tangibility) towards leverage ratios, and there is significant effect of capital structure (size, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) toward leverage ratios in the third model (DR)."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal terhadap agency cost pada perusahaan sektor non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2008 2012 Corporate governance diproksikan dengan board of commissioner size dan proporsi dewan komisaris Struktur kepemilikan diproksikan dengan kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional Sedangkan struktur modal diproksikan dengan debt to asset ratio Agency cost pada penelitian ini diproksikan dengan asset utilisation ratio Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan uji analisis Random Effect Model REMHasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa secara simultan corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap agency cost Selanjutnya secara parsial hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa board of commissioner size kepemilikan manajerial kepemilikan institusional dan debt to asset ratio memiliki pengaruh yang negatif signifikan terhadap agency cost Kata Kunci Agency cost corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure on agency cost of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. Corporate governance is proxied by board of commissioner size and proportion of independent commissioners. Ownership structure is proxied by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. Whereas, capital structure is proxied by debt-to-asset ratio. In this study, agency cost is measured by asset utilisation ratio. This research is a quantitative research by using panel data regression. This research is analyzed with Random Effect Model (REM).

The result shows that corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure simultaneously have significant effect on agency cost. Furthermore, board of commissioner size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and debt-to-asset ratio significantly affect agency cost and have negative correlation with agency cost."

"Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan dari corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Corporate governance merupakan seperangkat aturan yang mengatur relasi antara staekholders, pemerintah, pihak internal maupun eksternal, karyawan, dan manajemen yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban mereka. Proksi yang digunakan untuk variabel corporate governance adalah komisaris independen, board size, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan non-institusional Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah regresi data panel. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah non-keuangan yang tercatat di BEI pada periode tahun 2006-2016.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, komisaris independen, boardsize, managerial ownership dan institusional ownership memiliki pengaruh secara signifikan terhadap biaya modal. Selain itu, hasil penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, boardsize, institusional ownership, dan non- institusional ownership berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan Tobins Q.

---

This study examines the use of corporate governance to the cost of capital and corporate value. Corporate governance is a set of rules which manages the relationships between stakeholders, government, internal and external parties, employees, and management that are related to their rights and obligations. The proxies used for corporate governance variables are independent commissioners, board size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership and non institutional ownership. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of corporate governance on the cost of capital and firm value. The research method used is panel data regression. The sample used in this study is non financial listed on the IDX in the period 2006 2016.The results of this study indicate that variables of corporate governance such as, independent commissioner, boardsize, managerial ownership and institutional ownership have a significant influence on capital costs. In addition, the results of this study also found that variables of corporate governance such as boardsize, institutional ownership, and non institutional ownership significantly influence the firm 39s value Tobin 39s Q."

"Menggunakan Index Corporate Governance yang diriset dan diperingkat oleh The Indonesian Institute for Corporate Governance (IICG) yaitu Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI), peneliti menganilisis perusahaan- perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam CGPI apakah perusahaan-perusahaan yang memiliki Corporate Governance yang baik memiliki kinerja perusahaan yang baik dibandingkan dengan perusahaan-perusahaan yang memiliki Corporate Governance yang kurang baik. Menggunakan index CGPI secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa size dan momentum mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan yang diukur oleh CGPI. Perusahaan-perusahaan yang memiliki index corporate governance yang tinggi memiliki kinerja perusahaan yang lebih baik hingga 8.95% per tahun pada penelitian perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar dalam CGPI periode 2007-2011 setelah memperhitungkan faktor-faktor market risk, size, book to market dan momentum.

---

Using the Corporate Governance Index that have been researched and rated by The Indonesian Institute for Corporate Governance (IICG) which is Corporate Governance Perception Index (CGPI), researchers analyzed companies listed in CGPI whether companies that have good corporate governance will have good performance compared with companies that have poor corporate governance. Using CGPI index overall, the study found that the size and momentum affect the company's performance as measured by CGPI. Companies that have a high index of corporate governance have better corporate performance up to 8.95% per year on research in companies listed at 2007-2011 period, after taking into account the factors of market risk, size, book to market and momentum."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja pasar emiten industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Penelitian ini mengacu pada penelitian Bebchuck et al 2009 Dalam penelitian ini corporate governance dinilai menggunakan governance index berupa indeks hasil asesmen penerapan corporate governance yang dilakukan oleh Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD sedangkan kinerja pasar dinilai dengan Tobin rsquo s Q Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi panel data dampak tetap terhadap 180 observasi firm year perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2010 sampai 2012 Hasil penelitian memberikan bukti empiris bahwa penerapan corporate governance berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pasar emiten Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja pasar emiten industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Penelitian ini mengacu pada penelitian Bebchuck et al 2009 Dalam penelitian ini corporate governance dinilai menggunakan governance index berupa indeks hasil asesmen penerapan corporate governance yang dilakukan oleh Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD sedangkan kinerja pasar dinilai dengan Tobin rsquo s Q Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi panel data dampak tetap terhadap 180 observasi firm year perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2010 sampai 2012 Hasil penelitian memberikan bukti empiris bahwa penerapan corporate governance berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pasar emiten

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to examine the impact of corporate governance to market perfomance of manufacturing listed companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange This research refers to previous research conducted by Bebchuck et al 2009 In this research corporate governance is measured with corporate governance index assessed by the Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD meanwhile market performance is measure with Tobin rsquo s Q Hypotheses testing conducted by fixed effect data panel regression to 180 firm year observation of listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 until 2012 The empirical result shows that implementation of corporate governance has positive significant impact to market performance of listed companies "

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menguji pengaruh dari kualitas dewan komisaris, kualitas komite audit, kepemilikan keluarga, kepemilikan asing dan kualitas audit terhadap pengungkapan pengendalian internal pada perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan 403 sampel perusahaan di luar sektor keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat pengungkapan pengendalian internal dalam laporan tahunan memiliki rata-rata sebesar 48,42% dan dewan komisaris serta komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan pengendalian internal. Sedangkan kepemilikan keluarga berpengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat pengungkapan pengendalian internal dalam laporan tahunan. Kepemilikan asing dan kualitas audit tidak terbukti berpengaruh terhadap tingkat pengungkapan pengendalian internal dalam laporan tahunan.

---

ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of the quality of the Board of Commissioners, quality of audit committee, family ownership, foreign ownership and audit quality on the disclosure of internal control in the annual report of non finansial companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange. This study uses a sampel of 403 companies of non financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, the results shows the level of internal control disclosure in the annual report have an average of 48,42% and board of commissioners and audit committee have a positive effect on the disclosure of internal control. While the family ownership is negatively affect the level of internal control disclosure on annual report. Foreign ownership and audit quality are not shown to affect the level of internal control disclosure on annual report"