Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Rethinking virtue ethics offers a model of Aristotelian virtue ethics based on a deductive paradigm. This book argues that, contrary to what many contemporary thinkers are inclined to believe, Aristotelian virtue ethics is consistent with at least some action-guiding moral principles being true unconditionally, and that a justification for general moral principles can be grounded in fundamental concepts within Aristotle?s theory. An analysis of ethical propositions that hold for the most part is proposed that fits well within the deductive paradigm developed. This unique interpretation of virtue ethics has implications for recent discussions of the virtues in social psychology, issues about how fundamental moral principles are known, questions about the justification of inalienable rights, debates about moral particularism and generalism, and discussions of moral realism and anti-realism."

"This book explores the relationship between the production of ethical stances in two different contexts, the ethical manoeuvring of participants within online media-fan communities and the ethical decision-making of the author as Internet researcher, manoeuvring, as it were, in the academic community. In doing so, the book outlines a reflexive framework for exploring research ethics at different levels of analysis, the empirical settings of research, the theoretical perspectives which inform the researcher?s objectification of the research settings, and the methodological issues and practical decisions that constitute the activity as research. "

"ABSTRACTDavid Hume menulis dua buku yang membahas moral secara filosofis dan komprehensif yaitu A Treatise of Human Nature dan An Enquiry Concerning the Principle of Morals. Hume mendapat kritik dari Jeremy Bentham dan Immanuel Kant bahwa kajian filosofisnya terhadap moral tidak memberikan pedoman untuk membuat putusan moral etika normatif . Robert Shaver dan Nicholas Capaldi membantah kritik tersebut. Keduanya mengatakan bahwa Hume memiliki teori putusan moralnya sendiri yang unik. Namun, pembelaan mereka tidak menunjukkan teori moral Hume yang bisa digunakan membuat putusan moral. Penelitian tulisan ini akan memaparkan pemikiran moral Hume yang dilandasi oleh teori epistemologinya yaitu empirisme, lalu dengan menggunakan enam kriteria putusan moral dari B. C. Bostow sebagai alat analisis, tulisan ini memperkuat argumentasi bahwa Hume memiliki teori putusan moral sendiri yaitu etika kebajikan.

---

ABSTRACTDavid Hume wrote two philosophy books that concern about moral A Treatise of Human Nature dan An Enquiry Concerning the Principle of Morals. Hume gets criticism from Jeremy Bentham and Immanuel Kant that his philosophical theory of morals does not provide guidance for making moral judgments normative ethics . Robert Shaver and Nicholas Capaldi denied the criticism. Both say that Hume has his own unique moral judgement theory. However, their defense does not show Hume 39 s moral theory that can be used to make moral judgments. The study of this paper will describe Hume 39 s moral thinking based on his epistemology theory empiricism and then using the six criteria of the moral ruling by B. C. Bostow as an analytical tool. This paper reinforces the argument that Hume has his own moral judgment theory, that is virtue ethics. "