Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAK Bahwa dalam rumah susun di Indonesia, terdapat satuan rumah yang dapatdimiliki secara terpisah dan ada pula pemilikan bersama atas bagian bersama,benda bersama, dan tanah bersama sesuai dengan nilai perbandingan danproporsionalnya. Hal ini menyebabkan perlunya dilakukan pengaturan mengenaipenggunaan dan pengelolaannya yang dilakukan oleh Perhimpunan Penghunisebagai badan hukum yang bertanggung jawab mengurus kepentingan bersamapara pemilik dan penghuni rumah susun. Perhimpunan Penghuni diatur dalamUndang-Undang Rumah Susun Nomor 16 tahun 1985 dan juga terhadap Undang-Undang Rumah Susun Nomor 20 Tahun 2011. Perhimpunan Penghuni diberikedudukan sebagai badan hukum yang memiliki Anggaran Dasar dan AnggaranRumah dan dapat melakukan tindakan hukum ke luar dan ke dalam atas namapemilik dengan wewenang yang dimilikinya untuk mewujudkan ketertiban danketenteraman dalam lingkungan rumah susun. Tetapi banyak perhimpunanpenghuni yang tidak melaksanakan tugasnya dengan baik dengan tidakmementingkan kesejahteraan para penghuni dan pemilik rumah susun. Hal ini punterjadi pada Apartemen Mediterania Palace Residences Kemayoran, dimanaperhimpunan penghuni yang seharusnya menjadi sarana untuk meningkatkankesejahteraan justru menjadi batu sandungan yang mengambil hak-hak parapenghuni rumah susun.

---

ABSTRACTWhereas, for the condominium in Indonesia, there is a unit of condominiumwhich can be owned separately and can be owned jointly upon the joint property,joint asset, and joint land in accordance with each of the party?s calculation andproportionality. These would cause the needs of the regulatory regarding its useand maintenance, which conducted by Resident?s Association as a legal entitywhich responsible to maintain the joint interest of the owners and residents of thecondominium. Resident?s Association is regulated under the Law ofCondominium No. 16 Year 1985 and as well the Law of Condominium No. 20Year 2011. Resident?s Association is given the authority as the legal entity andhaving its own articles of association and articles of maintenance which entitle toconduct a legal action outside and inside on behalf of the owners with its givenauthorization to implement the safety and tranquility of the condominium?senvironment. However, there are Resident?s Association which not implement itsduty with good faith by not pursue the wealth of the residents and owners of thecondominium. These also happens on the Mediterania Palace ResidencesKemayoran Apartment, whereby the Resident?s Association who are obliged to bethe facility to improve the wealth of the residents, precisely became the hindranceand (illegally) detain the rights of the condominium residents.;Whereas, for the condominium in Indonesia, there is a unit of condominiumwhich can be owned separately and can be owned jointly upon the joint property,joint asset, and joint land in accordance with each of the party?s calculation andproportionality. These would cause the needs of the regulatory regarding its useand maintenance, which conducted by Resident?s Association as a legal entitywhich responsible to maintain the joint interest of the owners and residents of thecondominium. Resident?s Association is regulated under the Law ofCondominium No. 16 Year 1985 and as well the Law of Condominium No. 20Year 2011. Resident?s Association is given the authority as the legal entity andhaving its own articles of association and articles of maintenance which entitle toconduct a legal action outside and inside on behalf of the owners with its givenauthorization to implement the safety and tranquility of the condominium?senvironment. However, there are Resident?s Association which not implement itsduty with good faith by not pursue the wealth of the residents and owners of thecondominium. These also happens on the Mediterania Palace ResidencesKemayoran Apartment, whereby the Resident?s Association who are obliged to bethe facility to improve the wealth of the residents, precisely became the hindranceand (illegally) detain the rights of the condominium residents.;Whereas, for the condominium in Indonesia, there is a unit of condominiumwhich can be owned separately and can be owned jointly upon the joint property,joint asset, and joint land in accordance with each of the party?s calculation andproportionality. These would cause the needs of the regulatory regarding its useand maintenance, which conducted by Resident?s Association as a legal entitywhich responsible to maintain the joint interest of the owners and residents of thecondominium. Resident?s Association is regulated under the Law ofCondominium No. 16 Year 1985 and as well the Law of Condominium No. 20Year 2011. Resident?s Association is given the authority as the legal entity andhaving its own articles of association and articles of maintenance which entitle toconduct a legal action outside and inside on behalf of the owners with its givenauthorization to implement the safety and tranquility of the condominium?senvironment. However, there are Resident?s Association which not implement itsduty with good faith by not pursue the wealth of the residents and owners of thecondominium. These also happens on the Mediterania Palace ResidencesKemayoran Apartment, whereby the Resident?s Association who are obliged to bethe facility to improve the wealth of the residents, precisely became the hindranceand (illegally) detain the rights of the condominium residents., Whereas, for the condominium in Indonesia, there is a unit of condominiumwhich can be owned separately and can be owned jointly upon the joint property,joint asset, and joint land in accordance with each of the party’s calculation andproportionality. These would cause the needs of the regulatory regarding its useand maintenance, which conducted by Resident’s Association as a legal entitywhich responsible to maintain the joint interest of the owners and residents of thecondominium. Resident’s Association is regulated under the Law ofCondominium No. 16 Year 1985 and as well the Law of Condominium No. 20Year 2011. Resident’s Association is given the authority as the legal entity andhaving its own articles of association and articles of maintenance which entitle toconduct a legal action outside and inside on behalf of the owners with its givenauthorization to implement the safety and tranquility of the condominium’senvironment. However, there are Resident’s Association which not implement itsduty with good faith by not pursue the wealth of the residents and owners of thecondominium. These also happens on the Mediterania Palace ResidencesKemayoran Apartment, whereby the Resident’s Association who are obliged to bethe facility to improve the wealth of the residents, precisely became the hindranceand (illegally) detain the rights of the condominium residents.]"

"ABSTRAKRumah susun merupakan salah satu alternatif pemecahan masalah kebutuhan tempat tinggal karena jumlah lahan terbatas sedangkan jumlah penduduknya terus meningkat. Tesis ini membahas permasalahan hukum terkait perizinan dalam pembangunan Apartemen X di DKI Jakarta. Tujuan penelitian ini guna mengetahui permasalahan hukum yang timbul terkait perizinan pembangunan rumah susun dan bagaimanakah tanggung jawab penyelenggara pembangunan serta dampak hukum yang ditimbulkan dari permasalahan tersebut. Metode penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan alat pengumpulan data dengan cara studi dokumen dan wawancara, kemudian data dianalisis dengan metode kualitatif. Dari hasil penelitian dapat diketahui bahwa meskipun serah terima satuan rumah susun Apartemen X di DKI Jakarta kepada konsumen telah dilakukan oleh penyelenggara pembangunan sesuai dengan target, namun dalam pelaksanaan pembangunannya penulis menemukan 3 tiga masalah utama terkait perizinan. Pertama, Apartemen X dibangun dengan Surat Izin Penunjukkan Penggunaan Tanah SIPPT tanpa terlebih dahulu memperoleh Surat Persetujuan Prinsip Pembebasan Lahan/Lokasi SP3L ; kedua, pembangunan tower pertama dilakukan sebelum adanya Izin Pendahuluan; ketiga, penggunaan bangunan pada tower kedua dilakukan sebelum adanya Sertipikat Laik Fungsi SLF . Sehingga hasil dari penelitian ini menyarankan agar penyelenggara pembangunan selalu mematuhi berbagai ketentuan mengenai perizinan, dan bagi pemerintah agar meningkatkan pengawasan dan penertiban terkait pembangunan rumah susun, serta masyarakat sebagai konsumen harus memastikan perizinan dalam pembangunan rumah susun sebelum melakukan pembelian satuan rumah susun.

---

ABSTRACTApartment is an alternative problem solver as a place to live because the limited amount of land while the population continues to increase. The topic of this thesis is about legal issues that arise related to the permit of Apartement X rsquo s construction in DKI Jakarta. The purpose of this research is to know legal issues that arise related to the permit of Apartement X rsquo s construction and how the developer 39 s responsibilities and the legal impacts arising from the problems. The method of this research is normative juridical using the secondary data and the data were collected by document study and interview, and then the data is analize with qualitative method. From this research we know that even the handover is already been done according to the constructions target, but it turns out that the researcher have found 3 three major permit rsquo s legal issues related to the construction of Apartment X. First, Apartment X was builded based on Appointment of Land Use Permit without Land Acquisition Permit second, the development of the first tower was begun without Preliminary Permit third, the second tower is already being used before the Functionality Permit published. Therefore the result of this research is to give advice for the developer to always follow the rules and regulations especially related to permit, and for the goverment has to improve the control of Apartments construction, and also for society as consumer have to make sure the permit rsquo s legal centainty in the construction of Apartments before buy an apartment."

"Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemilik Satuan RumahSusun yang juga Merupakan Pelaku Pembangunan RumahSusun atas Tindakan Perhimpunan Penghuni terkaitdengan Penggunaan Bagian Bersama dalam Rumah Susun Kajian Yuridis tentang Putusan Mahkamah AgungNomor 187 K/Pdt./2016 Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik satuanrumah susun yang juga merupakan pelaku pembangunan rumah susun. DalamUndang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun serta PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 4 Tahun 1988 tentang Rumah Susun, dijelaskan mengenaihak-hak yang dimiliki oleh penghuni satuan rumah susun terhadap tanah bersama,benda bersama bagian bersama dimana perhimpunan penghuni rumah susundiberikan kewenangan untuk mengelola tanah bersama, benda bersama dan bagianbersama tersebut. Dalam tesis ini dijabarkan mengenai pemanfaatan bagianbersama oleh PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia berupa akses masuk dan keluardari satuan rumah susun miliknya pada Apartemen Casablanca Mansion dimanaPerhimpunan Penghuni Rumah Susun Hunian Apartemen Casablanca menutupakses tersebut dengan membangun dinding gypsum yang mengakibatkan hakakses PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia menjadi terganggu. Untuk itu, penulismeneliti bagaimana sebetulnya kewenangan yang dimiliki perhimpunan penghuniterhadap pengelolaan bagian bersama pada rumah susun serta bagaimanaperlakuan yang seharusnya diperoleh oleh pemilik satuan rumah susun yang jugamerupakan pelaku pembangunan rumah susun terhadap bagian bersama tersebut.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kepustakaan yang bersifatyuridis normatif. Dari hasil penelitian, penulis mendapatkan bahwa perhimpunanpenghuni dalam melakukan pengelolaan bagian bersama tetap harus mengacukepada pertelaan yang telah disahkan oleh pemerintah sehingga segala tindakanyang bersifat mengurangi bagian bersama merupakan suatu tindakan yangmenyalahi ketentuan. Selain itu, sekalipun penghuni rumah susun merupakanpelaku pembangunan rumah susun tetapi ia tetap dianggap sebagai penghunisatuan rumah susun yang memiliki hak untuk menjadi anggota dan tunduk padaperaturan yang diberlakukan oleh perhimpunan penghuni rumah susun.Kata kunci: rumah susun, penghuni, perhimpunan penghuni, pelakupembangunan, bagian bersama

---

Law Protection to the Owner of the Apartment Unit whichis also the Developer of the Apartment from the Act of theResidents Association for the Use of Shared Part in theApartment Juridical Review to the Decision of SupremeCourt Number 187 K Pdt. 2016 This thesis discusses about law protection to the owner of apartment unit which isalso the developer of the apartment itself. Law Number 20 of 2011 concerningApartment and Government Regulation Number 4 of 1988 concerning Apartment,describe the rights owned by the resident of apartment unit to the shared lands,shared goods and shared part in which the residents association is granted therights to manage such shared lands, shared goods and shared parts. This thesisanalyzes the use of shared part by PT Intersatria Budi Perkasa Mulia for entry andexit access from its apartment units in Apartment Casablanca Mansion where thePerhimpunan Penghuni Rumah Susun Hunian of Apartment Casablanca Mansionas the residents association had closed such entry and exit access by constructingthe gypsum wall which caused the access right of PT Intersatria Budi PerkasaMulia was interfered. By this thesis, the author reviews on how is the authority ofthe residents association in managing the shared part in the apartment and alsohow is the treatment which shall be received by the resident which is also thedeveloper of the apartment to such shared part. From the review, it is known thatthe residents association in managing the shared part shall always refer to thedescription as built drawing which was validated by the government so that allactions in the form of reducing the shared part will be considered as violating theprovision. Further, even though the resident is also the developer of apartment,they have the rights to be treated as a regular resident which having the right tobecome a member and subject to the applicable policies determined by theresidents association.Keywords apartment, resident, residents association, developer, shared part"

"Tesis ini membahas permasalahan yang dihadapi pengembang dalam pembangunan dan pengelolaan Apartemen Setiabudi Residences. Tujuan penelitian guna mengetahui apakah pengembang telah mematuhi seluruh ketentuan tentang rumah susun. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan berdasarkan sumber hukum primer, sekunder dan tertier. Pembangunan apartemen telah memenuhi persyaratan perijinan yang ditentukan, namun perubahan tampak dan layout lobby tidak sesuai dengan IMB. Jual beli satuan rumah susun dilakukan, sebelum bangunan selesai berdasarkan pemesanan, namun isi surat pesanan belum sesuai dengan Kep. MENPERA No.11/KPTS/1994. Pengembang selaku perhimpunan penghuni sementara melakukan pengelolaan dengan menunjuk badan pengelola profesional dan telah membantu pembentukan perhimpunan penghuni yang defenitif.

---

This thesis emphasize on the problems facing throughout the construction and management of Apartment Setiabudi Residences. The purpose of this study is to find out whether the developer already fulfills all the requirements related to constructions and management of a strata title building. This study using documentary researched from primary, secondary and tertiary sources. The construction process already fulfill all the licenses required, however the changed of lobby layout is violate the Building Permit. The marketing of the apartment had been made before the constructions finished (pre project selling) through reserve system, however contents of the booking form is not comply with the Ministry of Housing Decree (Kep. MENPERA) No. 11/KPTS/1994. As the interim Owner Association, developer had managed the apartment through an appointed professional building management and helped to established definitive owners association."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang Perjanjian Tripartit atau skema perjanjian 3 pihak dalam proses pembangunan Apartemen Nines Plaza and Residence BSD antara PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk, BUMN dibidang konstruksi dan PT Waskita Karya Realty Tbk (anak perusahaan dari PT Waskita Karya (Persero)) yang bergerak di bidang property dan Pihak Ketiga yaitu Subkontraktor. Penelitian hukum yang dilakukan adalah yuridis normatif dengan berbasis pada analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan khususnya materi/isi perjanjian kerjasama Tripartit serta kaidah-kaidah hukum perjanjian dalam Buku III KUHPerdata. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Perjanjian Tripartit tersebut memenuhi 4 (empat) unsur syarat-syarat dalam pembuatan perjanjian yang diatur dalam Pasal 1320. Terjadinya wanprestasi dalam pelaksanaan Perjanjian Tripartit Proyek Nines Plaza and Residence BSD adalah akibat terjadi suatu keadaan tidak dilaksanakannya apa yang telah diperjanjikan, oleh karena ketidakmampuan salah satu pihak yang terikat dalam perjanjian, yaitu tidak melaksanakan pembayaran yang mengakibatkan terhambatnya pembangunan berkelanjutan di Proyek Nines Plaza and Residence, diluar ketidakmampuan dalam hal pembayaran terdapat faktor lain yaitu dikarenakan Pandemi Covid-19 yang membuat semua bisnis dikalangan pekerja konstruksi macet. Akibat hukum yang timbul dari tindakan tidak melaksanakan kewajiban dalam hal pembayaran adalah Penyedia Jasa/Owner bisa dituntut ke BANI untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan (Jika Terjadi). Sejauh ini upaya penyelesaian yang ditempuh adalah melalui musyawarah di antara para pihak, hal ini didahului dengan pemberian teguran ataupun somasi dan diupayakan penyelesaian kontrak dengan membuat addendum kontrak. Disarankan perlunya dilakukan pertimbangan serta perhitungan yang lebih matang pada proyek Nines Plaza and Residence BSD yang sedang dilaksanakan.

---

This thesis discusses the Tripartite Agreement or 3-party agreement scheme in the development process of Nines Plaza and Residence BSD Apartments between PT. Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk, BUMN in the field of construction and PT Waskita Karya Realty Tbk (a subsidiary of PT Waskita Karya (Persero)) which is engaged in property and Third Parties, namely Subcontractors. The legal research carried out is normative juridical based on an analysis of statutory regulations, especially the material/content of the Tripartite cooperation agreement and the legal principles of the agreement in Book III of the Civil Code. The results of the study show that the Tripartite Agreement fulfills 4 (four) elements of the requirements in making the agreement regulated in Article 1320. The occurrence of a default in the implementation of the Tripartite Agreement for the Nines Plaza and Residence BSD Project is due to a condition where what has been agreed has not been implemented, because the inability of one of the parties bound in the agreement, namely not making payments which resulted in delays in sustainable development at the Nines Plaza and Residence Project, apart from inability in terms of payment there are other factors, namely due to the Covid-19 Pandemic which has brought all business among construction workers to a standstill. The legal consequences arising from the act of not carrying out obligations in terms of payment are that the Service Provider/Owner can be sued to BANI to resolve the dispute (if it occurs). So far the settlement efforts taken are through deliberation between the parties, this was preceded by giving a warning or subpoena and efforts were made to settle the contract by making a contract addendum. It is suggested that there is a need for more mature considerations and calculations on the Nines Plaza and Residence BSD project that is being implemented."

"Ketersediaan Tanah Khususnya di DKI Jakarta semakin sedikit, sementara tempat tinggal masih menjadi kebutuhan Primer bagi manusia, Pembangunan Rumah Tinggal Vertikal menjadi hal yang dapat menjadi solusi dari permasalahan tersebut. Apartement atau rumah susun adalah salah satu bentuk dari tempat tinggal vertikal tersebut. Rumah susun di Indonesia dimiliki secara pemilikan bersama dengan melihat perbandingan proporsional kepemilikannya. Perhimpunan penghuni dan pemilik satuan rumah susun adalah badan hukum yang dibentuk dan diberikan tanggung jawab untuk mengurus kepentingan bersama para pemilik dan penghuni rumah susun. Perhimpunan penghuni dan pemilik satuan rumah susun ini diatur dalam Peraturan Gubernur nomor 132 tahun 2018 dan Undang-Undang Rumah Susun Nomor 20 tahun 2011. Tesis ini membahas Tanggung jawab hukum Persatuan Penghuni dan Pemilik Satuan Rumah Susun terhadap Penghuni Satuan Rumah Susun pada kasus Apartement Mediterania Residence dan Perhimpunan Penghuni dan Pemilik Satuan Rumah susun dapat dikategorikan sebagai Pelaku Usaha sehingga dapat diminta Pertanggung-jawaban dari sisi Perlindungan Konsumen. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif. Tipe penelitian ini berdasarkan pada tipe deskriptif analitis. Metode pengolahan data yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 132 tahun 2018 tentang Perhimpunan Penghuni dan Pemilik Tanggung jawab hukum Persatuan Penghuni dan Pemilik Satuan Rumah Susun terhadap Penghuni Satuan Rumah Susun pada kasus Apartement Mediterania Residence adalah hal yang mutlak dan Perhimpunan Penghuni dan Pemilik Satuan Rumah susun dapat dikategorikan sebagai Pelaku Usaha sehingga dapat diminta Pertanggung-jawaban dari sisi Perlindungan Konsumen karena pengurus berbentuk badan hukum.

---

The availability of land especially in DKI Jakarta has been diminish, while house is still primary need for human. The construction of vertical houses can be the solution to the problem. Apartement or Flats is one form of vertical residence. In Indonesia, Flats is owned jointly according the proportional ration of the owenership. This causes the need of arrangements regarding the managements. Associatons of residents and flats owner association are legal entities that are formed and given the responsibilities to take care of the common interest in the apartement. The Association of residents and flats owner is regulated in Governer regulation number 132 pf 2-19 and the law on flats number 20 of 2011. This thesis discusses the responsibilities of the residence and unit flats owner association for residential residents with case study from Mediterania Palace residence apartement. The research method used is normative juridical research. This type of research is based on a descriptive analytical type. The data processing method used is a qualitative method. The study resulted that the application of Governer Regulation no.132 of 2018 concerning the Association of Residents and flats owner is to have sanctions so that there are no problems that might harm residential residents. And the responsibility of the association, is only limited by Governer Regulation no. 132 of 2018 and Law Number 20 of 2011."

"Perjanjian pengikatan jual beli bawah tangan satuan unit Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020, tidak mengikuti ketetntuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku yaitu Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Rumah Susun dan Pasal 12 ayat (2) Permen Sistem Perjanjian Pendahuluan Jual Beli Rumah, sehingga tidak memberikan perlindungan maksimal kepada pembeli selaku konsumen. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai kepastian hukum berdasarkan asas konsensualisme, dan perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli berdasarkan atas PPJB satuan unit Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang berbentuk yuridisnormatif dimana penelitian mengacu pada norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Kesimpulan penelitian menyatakan PPJB Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020 batal demi hukum, hal mana yang mengacu pada pengecualian asas konsensualisme sebagai salah satu dasar perjanjian, namun selama selama perjanjian baru belum dibuat, berdasarkan asas Pacta Sunt Servanda, maka PPJB bawah tangan tersebut hanya memiliki kekuatan akta di bawah tangan. Perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli dijamin oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada, namun tidak ada sanksi yang tegas bagi pengembang yang membuat PPJB bawah tangan. Oleh karena itu dharapkan pemerintah dan pembuat undang-undang dapat menerapkan sanksi yang tegas terhadap PPJB bawah tangan agar tercipta perlindungan yang maksimal bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian.

---

The agreement for sale and purchase under the hands of the Pancoran Riverside Apartment unit number 03018/PR-GRTP/ PPJB/II/2020, does not follow the provisions of the applicable laws, namely Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Law on Flats and Article 12 paragraph (2) Regulation of the Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement System, so as not to provide maximum protection to buyers as consumers. This research discusses legal certainty based on the principle of consensualism, and legal protection for buyers based on the PPJB unit of the Pancoran Riverside Apartment unit Number 03018/PRGRTP/ PPJB/II/2020. This research is a juridical-normative research where the research refers to the legal norms contained in statutory regulations. The research conclusion states that PPJB Pancoran Riverside Apartment Number 03018/PR-GRTP/ PPJB/II/2020 is null and void, which refers to the exclusion of the principle of consensualism as one of the basis for the agreement, but as long as a new agreement has not been made, it is based on the principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda , then the underhand PPJB only has the power of the underhand deed. Legal protection for buyers is guaranteed by existing laws and regulations, but there are no clear sanctions for developers who make PPJB under their hands. Therefore, it is hoped that the government and legislators can apply strict sanctions against under-handed PPJB in order to create maximum protection for the parties to the agreement."

"Legal aspects of apartments in Indonesia"