Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The article 52 verse (3) the teacher and lecturer's act number 14 year 2005, says that a lecturer who works in a private institution is given a payment based on the work agreement or collective labor agreement. It shows that the private lecturer's payment will be regulated basically on the two party's agreement, the lecturer and the private institution. Although there are some provisions that regulate about the payment details from the act, some questions will come up in the legal protection to the private lecturer in getting good payment, for example “ how is the payment regulation based on the work agreement?”, “ how is the protection to the private lecturer's payment?”."

"Perkembangan teknologi komunikasi dan Informasi yang begitu pesat dan dengan segala fasilitas penunjangnya telah membawa manusia masuk kedalam era digital. Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi, media, dan komunikasi telah mengubah baik perilaku masyarakat maupun peradaban manusia secara global. Teknologi Informasi saat ini menjadi pedang bermata dua karena selain memberikan kontribusi bagi peningkatan kesejahteraan, kemajuan, dan peradaban manusia, sekaligus menjadi sarana efektif perbuatan melawan hukum. Di Indonesia pemanfaatan teknologi ini dipayungi oleh UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 sebagai dasar hukumnya. Dengan adanya pengaturan ini maka diharapkan penggunaan teknologi informasi dapat dimaksimalkan. Ironis, pengaturan ini yang kemudian digunakan untuk menjerat seorang konsumen yang hanya menjalankan haknya untuk menyampaikan keluhannya. Hal ini kemudian yang menimbulkan pertentangan, bagaimana mungkin hak seorang konsumen untuk menyampaikan kritik atau keluhan terhadap pelaku usaha disimpangi undang-undang lain dan dianggap sebagai pencemaran nama baik. Hal ini yang kemudian menimbulkan pertanyaan, sebenarnya bagaimanakah hubungan antara konsumen dan pelaku usaha selama ini? Apakah sudah sesuai dengan cita-cita Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen yakni memperjuangkan konsumen dan menyeimbangkan posisi kedua belah pihak. Apakah penerapan pasal pencemaran nama baik tersebut tepat apabila dilihat dari kacamata hukum perlindungan konsumen? Hak-hak konsumen sebenarnya sudah jelas diatur dalam UUPK begitupula dengan kewajiban pelaku usaha, namun hal ini tampaknya kurang dipahami sehingga pelaku usaha lebih memilih melakukan penuntutan terhadap konsumennya daripada harus menanggapi keluhannya.

---

The rapid growth of communication and information technology and every supporting facility has brought people into the era of digital. The utilization of information technology, media and communication has altered the behavior of both human society and civilization globally. Information Technology is currently regarded as a two-edged sword inasmuch as aside from the contributions to increase prosperity, development, and civilization, it is also used as an effective media to conduct tort. In Indonesia, the usage of this technology is covered under Law No. 11 of 2008 as a legal basis. Alongside with the existence of this regulation, the use of information technology is in expectation to be maximized. Ironically, such regulation is thereafter used to ensnare consumers who are only carrying out their rights to complain. This matter then resulted in the occurrence of conflict as to how can a consumer's right to convey criticism or complaints against entrepreneurs be over-ruled by other regulations and thus considered as a libel (or defamation). This issue leads to the question of how exactly is the relationship between consumers and entrepreneurs hitherto? Has it been in accordance with the ideals of the Consumers? Protection Act, which is to fight for consumers? rights and to balance the position of both parties? Is the implementation of the article on defamation valid when observed from the perspective of consumers? protection laws? Consumer rights has been clearly stipulated in the Consumer?s Protection Act as well as the obligations of entrepreneurs, but this seems to be less understood by the entrepreneurs to the point that they prefer to conduct prosecution against their customers instead of having to respond to their complaints."