Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Membina sebuah rumah tangga memang tidak semudah membalikkan tangan, pasti selalu ada konflik yang timbul terutama masalah harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan. Apabila sebelum melangsungkan perkawinan suami isteri tidak membuat perjanjian kawin, maka harta bawaan dan harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta persatuan bulat. Kemudian selama perkawinan berlangsung, terjadi sesuatu hal misal suami boros dan berkelakukan tidak baik yang mengakibatkan harta bersama akan habis, maka isteri dapat mengajukan tuntutan pemisahan harta kekayaan ke Pengadilan Negeri, karena perjanjian kawin sudah tidak dapat lagi dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Dari keadaan tersebut di atas, maka yang jadi permasalahan penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah akibat hukum dari pemisahan harta kekayaan yang dilakukan berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang dibuat setelah perkawinan dan bagaimana secara yuridis pertimbangan Hakim mengenai pemisahan harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan sebagaimana ternyata dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2901 K/Pdt/2012 tanggal 9 Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dimana penulis dalam meneliti mengacu pada aturanaturan hukum yang ada. Maka ditemukan jawabannya bahwa akibat hukum yang timbul sebagaimana ternyata dalam kasus yang diteliti yaitu tidak dapat diadakan pemisahan karena isteri tidak memenuhi Pasal 186 BW, sehingga objek sengketa tetap menjadi harta bersama suami dan isteri. Untuk perjanjian pisah harta yang telah dibuat dihadapan Notaris menjadi batal demi hukum karena mengandung cacat yuridis dan bertentangan dengan undang-undang. Dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung sudah tepat dan telah sesuai dengan Pasal 119 BW, karena antara suami dan isteri tersebut tetap terjadi persatuan harta bulat. Sedangkan penerapan Pasal 29 ayat (4) Undang-undang Perkawinan dalam pertimbangan Hakim dianggap kurang tepat karena tidak terjadi perubahan perjanjian kawin.

---

Fostering a household is not as easy as turning the hand, there is always a conflict triggered by wealth in marriage. If spouse did not make a prenuptial agreement, separation asset and any asset they acquire during the course of their marriage would be community asset. Furthermore, during the marriage takes place, if there is something happen e.g. the husband is extravagant and does not have good manner which is caused community asset would be lost, the wife could propose a claim for asset separation to District Court, because prenuptial agreement could no longer be made after marriage took place. According to that circumstances, the consent of this research is how the legal consequences of the assets separation that is performed by prenuptial agreement made after marriage and how the juridical considerations of the Judge regarding separation assets in marriage, as it turns out in the Supreme Court Verdict No. 2901 K / Pdt / 2012 dated December 9, 2013. By using a normative juridical research method, the author in researching refers to rules of existing law. Then found the answer that the legal consequences arising in this case study that the separation cannot be held because the wife does not comply with Article 186 BW, then the object of dispute remain the property of the husband and wife. And the prenuptial agreement that has been made before a Notary cancelled and void because of flawed juridical and contrary to law. And Supreme Court decisions were appropriate and in accordance with Article 119 of the BW, as between husband and wife are still having community assets. While the application of Article 29 paragraph (4) of the Law of Marriage in consideration of Judges considered less appropriate because there is no change in prenuptial agreement."

"[ABSTRAKTerbukanya suatu pewarisan adalah karena kematian. Sehingga, dengan terbukanyapewarisan maka di dalam KUHPerdata telah ditentukan siapa-siapa yang akanmenjadi ahli waris. Namun, adanya perbedaan penafsiran, suatu warisan tidakdidapatkan apabila di dalam suatu ikatan perkawinan telah dilaksanakan dengan suatuperjanjian perkawinan. Sehingga timbul permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pengaruhperjanjian perkawinan pisah harta antara suami dan istrinya terhadap hak mewarisserta bagaimana kedudukan hukum mewaris suami dan adik pewaris terkait sebagaiahli waris yang ditinjau dalam KUHPerdata. Terhadap permasalahan tersebut,dilakukan penelitian untuk menemukan titik terang akan siapa yang akan berhakmenjadi ahli waris. Selanjutnya, penyusunan tesis ini disusun dengan metodepenelitian hukum normatif, untuk mendapatkan hasil penelitian yang bersifat analisiskualitatif yaitu dengan menelaah data yang diperoleh. Akhirnya, sampailah pada hasilpenelitian bahwa suatu perjanjian perkawinan mengatur pemisahan harta kekayaanselama perkawinan, dengan putusnya perkawinan akibat kematian seseorang terhadapharta kekayaan, akan adanya pewarisan dalam bentuk perpindahan kekayaan dandalam pewarisanpun telah ditentukan siapa yang menjadi ahli waris, sehingga suatuperjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat menutup hak mewaris seorang suami. Kedudukanhukum seorang suami dan adik pewaris sebagai ahli waris telah ditentukan denganpenggolongan ahli waris yang mana golongan ahli waris terdekat menutup golonganahli waris terjauh. Dengan demikian, karena masih adanya suami, harta peninggalanpewaris, haruslah jatuh pada golongan pertama. Disarankan bagi Notaris untukmemberi penjelasan bila ingin membuat perjanjian perkawinan.

---

ABSTRACTThe opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement, The opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has beendetermined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code(“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtainedwhen the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arisessuch as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right ofinheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inheritbetween husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. Inregards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information onwhose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed withnormative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitativeanalysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that aprenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, withdissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would betransfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determinedwhose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right ofinheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs havebeen determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancelfurther heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife,the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person.Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptialagreement]"

"Perjanjian kawin dibuat untuk menyimpangi ketentuan persatuan harta perkawinan yang diatur dalam undang-undang serta dibuat dengan akta otentik untuk kepastian tanggal akta dan didaftarkan agar berlaku pada pihak ketiga yang terikat dengan para pihak pembuat perjanjian kawin. Akta otentik ini dibuat di hadapan pejabat berwenang, yakni seorang Notaris yang tunduk pada suatu undang-undang khusus yang mengatur jabatannya termasuk tugas, kewajiban serta tanggung jawabnya dalam membuat akta, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Dengan tidak dibuatnya akta perjanjian kawin yang sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang telah ditentukan, maka akta perjanjian kawin tersebut bisa dianggap cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum dan menjadikan para pihak berada dalam persatuan harta perkawinan. Dalam penulisan ini, kasus yang diangkat adalah kasus dimana diadakannya sebuah perjanjian kredit dan perjanjian jaminan yang dibuat oleh Almarhum Suhendro Halim dengan PT Bank Negara Indonesia berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum serta tidak didaftarkan pada pegawai pencatatan perkawinan yang berakibat pada dikembalikannya jaminan tersebut ketika harus dieksekusi kepada Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa sebagai penggugat bersih dari jaminan. Dari sini kemudian penulis melakukan penelitian yuridis normatif tentang tanggung jawab Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya dalam membuat akta perjanjian kawin serta upaya hukum seperti apakah yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga yang dirugikan karena berada dalam posisi tidak memiliki jaminan untuk pelunasan hutang perjanjian kredit yang masih berjalan.

---

The prenuptial agreement is made to deviate from the union of the marital assets which stipulated in the law and made with an authentic deed for certainty of the date and registered to apply to third parties whose bound by the prenuptial agreement makers. This authentic deed made before an authorized official, a Notary who is subject to a special law that regulates his position including his duties, obligations and responsibilities in making a deed, namely Law Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 years 2004 concerning Notary Position. With the absence of a prenuptial agreement deed in accordance with predetermined legal rules, the prenuptial agreement deed can be deemed legally flawed and null and void and makes the parties in the union of marital assets. In this paper, the case raised is the case in which a loan agreement and guarantee agreement was made by the late Suhendro Halim with PT Bank Negara Indonesia based on a prenuptial agreement that was legally flawed and null and void and was not registered with the marriage registrar employee who resulted in the return of collateral when it must be executed to Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa as the plaintiff free from collateral status. From this case, the writer conducts a normative juridical analysis about the responsibility of the Notary in carrying out his position in making prenuptial agreement deeds and what legal remedies can be done by third parties who are disadvantaged because they are in the position of having no collateral for repayment for the loan agreement."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan di Kantor Catatan Sipil atau Kantor Urusan Agama dapat dijadikan alasan seseorang untuk mengajukan gugatan pembatalan perjanjian perkawinan. Disahkannya perjanjian perkawinan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan dapat ditafsirkan sebagai salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan. Metode penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan tetap berlaku bagi para pihak (suami-istri) yang membuatnya. Tidak dicatatkannya perjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat dijadikan alasan sebagai perbuatan tidak terpenuhinya syarat perjanjian perkawinan yang mengakibatkan perjanjian perkawinan tersebut batal demi hukum. Pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, hanya merupakan tindakan Pencatatan/Pendaftaran saja guna memenuhi asas publisitas. Pendapat Mahkamah Agung mengenai perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris bukan syarat formil merupakan pendapat yang keliru. Perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat dihadapan notaris merupakan syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Diperlukan peraturan pelaksana untuk mengatur perjanjian perkawinan itu sendiri, agar jelas dan tidak menimbulkan multitafsir.

---

A Prenuptial Agreement not registered at Civil Registry or religious Affairs Office may be the reason of a person to file a cancellation of the Prenuptial Agreement. The passing of the Prenuptial Agreement by the Marriage Officer may be interpreted as one of the conditions for the validity of the Prenuptial Agreement. The research method is normative juridical with qualitative approach is descriptive analytical. The Prenuptial Agreement not registered by the Marriage Officer shall apply to the parties (the spouses) who make it. The non-registration of the Prenuptial Agreement shall not be the reason for the non-fulfillment of the terms of the Prenuptial Agreement which resulted in the Prenuptial Agreement being void. The ratification of the Prenuptial Agreement by the marriage registrar as stipulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage, is only a Registration / Registration activity only to fulfill the publicity principle. The Supreme Court's opinion on the Prenuptial Agreement made by Notary is not a formal requirement is a false opinion. The Prenuptial Agreement made by notary is a requirement for the validity of a Prenuptial Agreement as described in the Civil Code. An implementing regulation is required to govern the Prenuptial agreement itself, in order to be clear and not to create multiple interpretations."

"Perjanjian perkawinan dibuat untuk mengatur harta benda milik suami istri. Perjanjian perkawinan yang telah dibuat harus didaftarkan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil bersamaan dengan pendaftaran akta nikah. Namun dalam praktiknya para pihak yang membuat akad nikah tidak melampirkan akad nikah pada saat pencatatan nikah. Pentingnya pencatatan berdampak pada status aset dan hutang pihak ketiga. Berdasarkan aturan, akad nikah yang tidak tercatat membuat akad nikah tidak sah, karena tidak memenuhi asas publisitas. Dengan menggunakan metode penulisan normatif, makalah ini akan membahas tentang perjanjian nikah yang tidak tercatat dalam akta nikah dengan menganalisis Putusan Nomor 25 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.Tbn. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa akad nikah siri akan membatalkan akad nikah yang tidak mengikat pihak ketiga. Namun keberadaan akad nikah tetap berlaku bagi pihak yang membuatnya. Penulis menyarankan kepada hakim untuk memberikan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat mengenai tata cara pembuatan dan pencatatan akad nikah serta mempertimbangkan pula untuk menentukan perpanjangan atau pembaharuan akad nikah.

---

The marriage agreement is made to regulate the property belonging to the husband and wife. Marriage agreements that have been made must be registered at the Population and Civil Registry Service together with the registration of a marriage certificate. However, in practice, the parties making the marriage contract do not attach the marriage contract at the time of registration of marriage. The importance of record-keeping has an impact on the asset and debt status of third parties. Based on the regulations, an unregistered marriage contract invalidates the marriage contract, because it does not fulfill the principle of publicity. By using the normative writing method, this paper will discuss about marriage agreements that are not recorded in the marriage certificate by analyzing Decision Number 25 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.Tbn. It can be concluded that the siri nikah contract will cancel the marriage contract that is not binding on a third party. However, the existence of the marriage contract still applies to the party who made it. The author suggests the judge to provide socialization to the public regarding the procedures for making and recording marriage contracts and also considering determining the extension or renewal of the marriage contract."

"Menurut ketentuan Pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan dibuat pada waktu atau sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan oleh pasangan calon suami isteri. Akan tetapi karena kurangnya pengetahuan masyarakat Indonesia mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, maka banyak pasangan suami isteri yang membuat perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan dengan alasan permohonan perlindungan Hukum terhadap harta pribadi masing-masing terkait resiko tanggung jawab pekerjaan atau berakhirnya perkawinan karena suatu perceraian. Di dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian analitis deskriptif. Data yang dipergunakan adalah data sekunder, yaitudata yang berupa studi kepustakaan dan studi terhadap penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Hakim dalam menetapkan Penetapan Pengadilan tersebut, mengingat bahwa permohonan Penetapan perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan bertentangan dengan ketentuan pasal 29 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Dari hasil penelitian ini penulis mengambil kesimpulan bahwa Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 01 Tahun 1974 adalah satu-satunya peraturan yang berlaku di Indonesia yang mengatur mengenai pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan, namun atas dasar-dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim yang penulis uraikan dalam penelitian ini maka Hakim mengabulkan permohonan pasangan suami isteri Junaida dan Kazuo Sawachi dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur Nomor : 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim.,dan setelah tanggal ditetapkannya maka penetapan Pengadilan tersebut dapat dijadikan sebagai dasar hukum dalam menjalankan pemisahan harta bersama di dalam perkawinan mereka

---

Under the terms of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, it is stipulated that a prenuptial agreement shall be made on or before the performance of the marriage by the bride and groom. However, because of the lack of public knowledge regarding the creation of a prenuptial agreement, many married couples in Indonesia enter into a prenuptial agreement after the marriage takes place on the grounds of legal protection of each of their personal properties associated with occupational responsibility risks or the dissolution of a marriage by divorce. In this study, the author used the juridical normative research method with the descriptive analytical research type. The data used is secondary data, i.e. data in the form of literature studies and studies on the Court Order of the East Jakarta District Court No. 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim. This study was conducted to determine and analyze the basis of the judges' considerations in determining the aforementioned Court Oder, given that the petition of the Court Order to legitimize the prenuptial agreement after the officiation of the marriage was contrary to the provisions of Article 29, paragraph (1) of Law Number 01 Year 1974 on Marriage. From the result of this research, the author concludes that Article 29 of Law Number 1 of 1974 is the only rule in Indonesia that regulates the creation of prenuptial agreements. Nevertheless, on the grounds of the legal considerations of the judge that the author describes in this research, the judge granted the request of the couple Junaida and Kazuo Sawachi through East Jakarta District Court Order Number 2173/Pdt.P/2012/PNJkt.Tim., and after the date of its enactment, the aforementioned court order may be used as a legal basis in the dividing of the joint property in their marriage."

"Umumnya suami-istri akan mempertahankan keberlakuan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Seiring hal tersebut, hingga kini belum ada pengaturan mengenai pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan. Dapat atau tidaknya pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung; landasan hukum pertimbangan hakim; dan akibat-akibat hukumnya. Metodelogi penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pembatalan akta perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan berlangsung tidak dapat dilakukan dengan cara apapun juga. Pasal 1338 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tidak sesuai diterapkan dalam kasus ini. Pasal 35 dan Pasal 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan diterapkan sejak dikabulkannya pembatalan. Setiap pihak tetap bertanggung jawab pribadi atas segala utangnya.

---

Generally husband and wife will retain the enforceability of the prenuptial agreement. As it is, until now there has been no regulation regarding cancellation of the prenuptial agreement. Whether or not cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage; judges considered the legal basis; and the legal consequences. Normative research method and qualitative approach. Cancellation of the prenuptial agreement after marriage can't be done by any means. Article 1338 Civil Lawbook isn't applicable in this case. Article 35 and Article 36 Marriage Law applied since the granting of the annulment. Each party remain personally liable for any debts."

"Dengan adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, kini perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sepanjang perkawinan dapat dilakukan tanpa adanya penetapan pengadilan negeri terlebih dahulu dan dapat disahkan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan atau notaris. Pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sepanjang perkawinan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan dilakukan dengan cara melaksanakan pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan pada Kantor Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil atau Kantor Urusan Agama, sedangkan pengesahan oleh Notaris dianggap membingungkan karena dianggap tidak jelas maksudnya. Hal ini menimbulkan permasalahan karena belum ada ketentuan mengenai tata cara pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, sehingga pegawai pencatat perkawinan menolak melakukan pencatatan terhadap perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sepanjang perkawinan dan meminta adanya penetapan pengadilan negeri untuk pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif yang menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder sebagai sumber data, dimana penulis dalam meneliti mengkaji aturan hukum mengenai perkawinan dan perjanjian perkawinan untuk dapat menjawab permasalahan secara dekriptif analitis. Melalui penelitian ini penulis menemukan jawaban bahwa pengesahan dan pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sepanjang perkawinan kini dapat dilakukan tanpa adanya penetapan pengadilan negeri terlebih dahulu dengan berpedoman kepada Surat Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil tanggal 19 Mei 2017 No. 472.2/5876/Dukcapil tentang petunjuk mengenai pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat sepanjang perkawinan.

---

With the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 PUU XIII 2015, postnuptial agreement can be done without any approval from the district court. It can also be legitimated by the marriage officer or the notary. The legalization of postnuptial agreement by the marriage officer is done by registering the postnuptial agreement to the Office of Population and Civil Registration Agency or the Office of Religious Affairs, while the legalization done by the notary is considered confusing as its main point is not that clear. It causes problem since there is no other regulation yet about the procedure of postnuptial agreement registration beside the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 PUU XIII 2015 so that the marriage officer refuses to accept the registration of postnuptial agreement and asks the approval from district court to legalize it. This research uses normative juridical method using primary and secondary data as the source as I examine the law of marriage and postnuptial agreement to find the descriptive and analytical answer for the problems occur. The findings reveal that the legalization and the registration of postnuptial agreement now can be done without any approval from the district court, based on the regulation on Surat Direktorat Jenderal Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil, May 19, 2017 No. 472.2 5876 Dukcapil about the guidance of postnuptial agreement registration."