Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Decentralisation system in Indonesia was introduced after the fall of the former President Soehartowith the objective of ensuring good governance and equitable development across all regions inthe country. Unfortunately, the implementation of desentralisasi has been complicated. Somescholars have suggested that the model was flawed as it did not consider Indonesia’s context of lessdeveloped administrative institutions in the regions. Not only did desentralisasi cause headachesfor the government, it also created confusion for foreign investors. Consequently, it affects theinvestment climate in the country and undermines the perception of Indonesia as an attractiveplace to invest in. In certain cases, desentralisasi has also led to claims by foreign investors forinvestor-State arbitration under Indonesia’s international investment agreements (IIAs). Thispaper analyses the problems of desentralisasi in Indonesia, its effects to foreign investors andsuggests ways to alleviate the problems by modifying and using Indonesia’s IIAs effectively.Setelah jatuhnya rezim Soeharto, sistem pemerintahan desentralisasi mulai diterapkan diIndonesia dengan tujuan untuk memastikan tata kelola yang baik dan pembangunan yangadil di seluruh wilayah Republik Indonesia. Sayangnya, penerapan desentralisasi sangatlahsulit. Beberapa akademisi mengatakan bahwa model sistem desentralisasi yang diterapkan diIndonesia tidak sesuai dengan situasi di lapangan di Indonesia, khususnya di daerah-daerahyang belum mempunyai kantor-kantor administratif yang berfungsi dengan baik. Desentralisasimenimbulkan berbagai masalah bagi pemerintah dan membingungkan para investor asing.Akibatnya, desentralisasi memperburuk iklim investasi di Indonesia dan menimbulkan persepsinegatif mengenai Indonesia sebagai tempat berinvestasi. Dalam beberapa kasus tertentu,desentralisasi juga menyebabkan munculnya tuntutan-tuntutan oleh para investor asing diarbitrase antara investor dan Pemerintah berdasarkan perjanjian investasi internasional (PII)Indonesia. Makalah ini menganalisa masalah-masalah yang ditimbulkan oleh desentralisasi diIndonesia, efek-efeknya bagi para investor asing dan memberikan saran mengenai cara-carauntuk menangani beberapa masalah tersebut dengan mengubah dan menggunakan PII Indonesiasecara efektif."

"Since eradicating corruption having been continously encouraged by late governments ? and until now ? , there would not be less important as to retracting the corrupted assets. There are many aspects to be considered in doing such action, such as manifesting the legal aspects of administrative law, and so other applied national regulations. By these regulations, such as Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003 (Konvensi Perserikatan Bangsa Bangsa Anti-Korupsi, 2003), Law Number 25 of 2003 On Amendment to Law Number 15 of 2002 on Money Laundering, Act 30 of 2002 on Corruption Eradication Commission, Law Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption, and Government Regulation Number 65 of 1999 on Implementation Procedures for Examination of State Property, retraction the corrupted assets should be define in order to get known about eradicating corruption. Another issue that urgently to be defined, as it also become main subject of retracting assets, is the asset itself. Indeed, as the asset which become mainly discussed about is State assets. So, it would be very necessary to clearly have a distinction between State responsibility and that of irresponsibility of the State, in order to settle down, as an after effect, many interpretations."

"Penelitian ini didasarkan pada pembentukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstiusi yang diatur dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan UU No. 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang menggunakan data sekunder. Penelitian ini membahas tiga permasalahan utama. Pertama, konsep pengawasan internal yang dilaksanakan dalam lingkungan kekuasaan kehakiman, dalam hal ini terkait dengan pengisian jabatan dan pengawasan hakim di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Kedua, perubahan susunan, kedudukan, dan peran Majelis Kehormatan dalam menjalankan fungsi pengawasan atas hakim konstitusi. Ketiga, menganalisis perubahan susunan, kedudukan, dan peran Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan relasinya dengan pengisian jabatan hakim konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan yang bersifat internal di lingkungan hakim di masa lalu dianggap tidak berjalan dengan efektif sehingga memunculkan gagasan perlunya pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh suatu lembaga khusus. Adanya peran pihak eksekutif dan legislatif maupun lembaga non-yudisial dalam proses perekrutan hakim, tidaklah dianggap sebagai hal yang dapat mempengaruhi kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman. Adanya keinginan untuk mengaktifkan kembali pengawasan eksternal memberikan pengaruh yang cukup besar pada susunan, kedudukan dan peran Majelis Kehormatan termasuk di dalamnya keterlibatan 3 (tiga) lembaga negara yang berperan dalam pengisian jabatan hakim konstitusi di dalam susunan Majelis Kehormatan di Indonesia secara langsung.

---

This research is based on the establishment of Constitutional Court of honor assembly which is regulated in Act No.24/2003 regarding Constitutional court and its amendments, Act No. 8/2011. The method used in this study is a yuridis normatif by using the secondary data. First, the concept of internal control which is implemented in the judial power, in this case related to recruitment system and surveillance mechanism in the constitutional court. Second, the amendment in the composition, position and role of the Constitutional Court of Honor Assemblies in performing supervisory functions. And the third is to analyze the changes in the composition, position and role of the Constitutional Court of honor assemblies in performing supervisory functions and ts relation to recruitment system of Constitutional Judges. There results showed that the internal surveillance in the past is considered ineffective, and this leads to the idea of the need for supervision by the special agency. On the other hand, the participation of the executive, legislatif and/or non-judicial body in recruitment system of Constitutional Court Judges should not be considered as a threat to judicial independency. There is an inclination to re-enable the external supervision to constitutional judges which leads to a significant change of the composition, position, and role of the Constitutional Court of Honor Assemblies, including the involvement of the executive, legislative and judiciary in its honor assemblies."

"Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 yang memaknai Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 memperbolehkan pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan selama dalam ikatan perkawinan postnuptial agreement serta pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan. Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan yaitu keberlakuan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat selama dalam ikatan perkawinan serta akibat hukum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menelaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 dan menganalisanya dengan teori untuk mendapatkan jawaban dari permasalahan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut menyatakan bahwa perjanjian perkawinan berlaku sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan kecuali ditentukan lain dalam perjanjian perkawinan. Dapat disimpulkan, berlaku surutnya postnuptial agreement sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan akan mengakibatkan perubahan kedudukan harta perkawinan yang berpotensi merugikan pihak ketiga. Selain itu, perubahan kedudukan harta perkawinan dari harta bersama menjadi harta pribadi menyebabkan harta bersama yang telah ada harus dilakukan pemisahan dan pembagian padahal harta bersama merupakan pemilikan bersama yang terikat yang hanya dapat diakhiri karena berakhirnya perkawinan. Pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan berpotensi merugikan pihak ketiga karena itu akta pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan sebaiknya diberitahukan dan diumumkan serta dicatatkan agar dapat diketahui pihak ketiga. Akibat hukum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan terhadap harta perkawinan adalah kedudukan harta perkawinan kembali pada kedudukan semula sehingga berlaku ketentuan Pasal 35 dan 36 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974, sedangkan akibat hukum terhadap pihak ketiga tidak berlaku mutlak, tetap berlaku kedudukan harta perkawinan sebelum pencabutan perjanjian perkawinan.

---

Constitutional Court Decision Number 69 PUU XII 2015 which interprets article 29 of The 1974 Marriage Law Law No. 1 of 1974 allows execution of postnuptial agreement, an agreement entered into after a marriage has taken place, as well as to repeal marriage agreement prenuptial, postnuptial. The Decision raised the question on the validity of an existing postnuptial agreement and what would be the impact of the repeal of marriage agreement. The method used in this research is normative juridical by reviewing and analyzing theorically The Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 69 PUU XIII 2015 to answer the question. The Decision of The Constitutional Court stipulates that ldquo The agreement valid since the wedding took place, unless otherwise specified in marriage agreement. rdquo The conclusion from this study is that the retroactive validity of postnuptial agreement caused changes in the status of marital property which may cause disadvantage to any third party. In addition, the change in the status of marital property from joint property to private property causes existing joint property to be split and division whereas joint property is a bonded joint ownership that can only be terminated due to the end of marriage. The repeal of marriage agreement potentially has a negative impact to third parties, hence should be notified, announced and registered. The law impact of marital property due to the repeal of marriage agreement is the fact that joint property will be reinstated, matters relating thereto shall be afforded the same status as that applicable prior to repealed, therefore article 35 and 36 of The 1974 Marriage Law applied, whereas impact on third parties shall not apply absolute, retain the status of the marital property prior to repealed."