Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Partai Politik merupakan bagian penting dalam tatanan negara demokrasi karena merupakan manifestasi dari kebebasan berserikat yang telah mendapatkan jaminan dalam konstitusi. Akan tetapi tidak jarang partai politik dalam melaksanakan aktivitasnya keluar dari koridor yang telah diatur, sehingga cara terakhir yang harus ditempuh adalah dengan membubarkan partai politik. Skripsi ini membahas sekaligus mengkritisi legal standing permohonan pembubaran partai politik di Mahkamah Konstitusi yang hanya diberikan kepada pemerintah saja. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang disempurnakan dengan pendekatan sejarah, pendekatan kasus dan perbandingan dengan dua negara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa legal standing yang hanya diberikan kepada pemerintah tidak sesuai dengan aspek ilmiah dan kebutuhan ketatanegaraan Indonesia saat ini. Dimana mulai dari teori kedaulatan rakyat, teori negara hukum, dan beberapa pendekatan empiris diketahui bahwa pemberian legal standing yang hanya diberikan kepada pemerintah terbukti menuai banyak masalah. Maka dari itu perlu adanya upaya merevitalisasi masalah ini dengan merevisi Pasal 68 Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan cara memberikan legal standing kepada Warga Negara dan Kelompok Masyarakat juga.

---

Political parties are an essential part in the democratic state order because it is a manifestation of freedom of association thatis guaranteed in the constitution. But it is not an uncommon thing for political parties to be carrying its’ activities out of the corridor that has been set, so that the last way to be taken is to dissolve them. This thesis discusses the legal standing of the petition and at the same time criticized the dissolution of political parties in the Constitutional Court that is only given to the government alone. The method used is normative research methods, enhanced with historical approach, case approach and comparison with two different countries. These results indicate that the legal standing which is only given to the government is not in accordance with the scientific aspects and the needs of Indonesian state structure at this time. The sovereignty of the people, the theory of state law, and some empirical approach that are known to grant the legal standing to be only given to the government proved to reap a lot of problems. Thus the need for efforts to revitalize this problem by revising Article 68 of the Law on the Constitutional Court by giving legal standing to citizen and community groups as well."

"ABSTRAKKesuksesan pemilu tidak hanya ditentukan dari terlaksananya pemungutan suara saja, tetapi juga penyelesaian sengketa yang terjadi. Legal standing merupakan sesuatu yang penting dalam mengajukan permohonan gugatan ke MK karena salah satu syarat berbicara di MK adalah memiliki legal standing atau kedudukan hukum. Putusan dapat diterima atau tidak dapat diterima pun tergantung dari legal standing pemohon. Khusus pada sengketa pemilu legislatif 2014, MK melakukan perkembangan legal standing. Ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (1) PMK No. 1 Tahun 2014 telah memperluas legal standing pemohon yakni, tidak hanya partai politik dan perseorangan calon DPD, tetapi juga perseorangan Caleg DPR dan DPRD baik provinsi maupun kabupaten/kota. Kebijakan MK inilah yang menimbulkan banyak pro dan kontra di kalangan masyarakat, khususnya para pemerhati konstitusi dan peserta pemilu. Mengingat implikasi yang ditimbulkan dari kebijakan ini, memiliki pengaruh besar terhadap penanganan sengketa hasil pemilu.

---

ABSTRACTThe success of general elections is not only determined by the voting execution, but also the settlement of the existing disputes. Legal standing is an important factor in filing the lawsuit to the Constitutional Court since having a legal standing is one of the requirements to speak out in The Constitutional Court. The acceptance of decision is based on the applicant’s legal standing. Especially in the 2014 legislative election dispute, the Court did the development of legal standing. The provisions of Article 2 paragraph (1) PMK No. 1 Year 2014 has expanded the legal standing of the applicant, not only political parties and individual candidates for the DPD, but also individual candidates DPR and DPRD both provincial and district / city. This Constitutional Court policy is what raises a lot of pro and contra among the society, especially the observer of the constitution and election participants. Given the implications of this policy, have a major influence in the handling of elections result disputes."

"Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang no. 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap UUD 1945. Tiga permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai (1) legal standing pemohon dalam pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi; (2) pertimbangan Mahkamah Konstitusi memberikan legal standing kepada pemohon dalam pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi; serta (3) usulan pemberian legal standing terhadap pemohon dalam perkara pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan bahan hukum berupa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta tulisan-tulisan yang berkaitan dengan hukum tata negara. Adapun jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis-normatif. Teori dalam menilai pemohon memiliki legal standing atau tidak, salah satunya adalah teori legal standing. Teori legal standing point d’interet point d’action yaitu tanpa kepentingan tidak ada suatu tindakan. Para pemohon dalam perkara No. 36/PUU- X/2012 dan No. 7/PUU-XI/2013 tidak memiliki legal standing dalam mengajukan permohonan. Mahkamah tidak tepat menilai para pemohon dalam perkara No. 36/PPU-X/2012 dan No.7/PPU-XI/2013 memiliki legal standing. Karena para pemohon tidak memiliki dasar (kepentingan) untuk mengajukan permohonan pengujian undang-undang. Selain itu terdapat dissenting opinion hakim konstitusi yang menguatkan bahwa para pemohon tidak memiliki legal standing."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai Kedudukan Hukum Legal Standing Lembaga Negara dalam Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara di Mahkamah Konstitusi yang dikaitkan dengan berbagai putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara terjadi ketika suatu lembaga merasa kewenangannya diganggu, dikurangi dan/atau diambil-alih secara tidak sah oleh lembaga lainnya. Lembaga yang dapat menjadi Pemohon atau Termohon dalam beracara sidang Mahkamah Konstitusi hanya lembaga yang memperoleh kewenangan dari Undang-Undang Dasar. Penelitian ini mengambil rumusan masalah tentang bagaimana penerapan hukum acara sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara dan bagaimana pembatasan subjectum litis dan objectum litis sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang bertumpu pada data sekunder dan disajikan secara deskriptif analitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sejauh ini Mahkamah Konstitusi telah menerapkan hukum acara sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara dengan konsisten dan telah memberikan penegasan serta pengakuan terhadap lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan oleh Undang-undang Dasar 1945.Kata Kunci: Kedudukan Hukum, Sengketa Kewenangan, Subjectum Litis, Objectum Litis, Putusan Perkara SKLN.

---

This thesis discusses Legal Standing of State Institution in authority disputes in various Constitutional Court decisions. Authority dispute of State Institution occurs when a State Institution or Agency perceive its Authority is being interrupted, reduced and or illegally taken over by another institution. Institutions that act as the Petitioners or the Petitionees in the Constitutional Court's justice proceedings shall be the only institutions authorized by the Constitution.

This study takes the outline of issues about how procedural law of State institutions authority dispute is applied and how subjectum litis and objectum litis is restricted in authority dispute of State institutions.

The method used in this study is juridical normative based on secondary data and presented descriptive analytic.

Results of the study shows that the Constitutional Court has consistently applied procedural law of State institutions authority dispute and has given affirmation and acknowledgment to state institutions which authority is attributed by the 1945 Constitution.Keywords Legal Standing, Authority Dispute, Subjectim Litis, Objectum Liti, Court Decision in Authority Dispute of State Institutions "

"[ABSTRAK Didalam penelitian ini peniliti memberikan gagasan mengenai pembubaran partaipolitik korup melalui celah hukum pembubaran partai politik di indonesia denganmemberikan tafsir terhadap makna hukum positif yang mengatur tentang pembubaranpartai politik, salah satunya yaitu adanya nomenklatur yang disebutkan didalam Pasal 2huruf b Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 12 Tahun 2008 Tentang PedomanBeracara Pembubaran Partai Politik yang menyebutkan bahwa partai politik dapatdibubarkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi apabila kegiatan/akibat yang dilakukan olehpartai politik tersebut bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Klausul?akibat? yang ditimbulkan tersebut dapat disamakan dengan kegiatan korupsi yangmelibatkan pengurus/anggota partai politik yang melaksanakan kegiatan aktifitaskepartaian untuk dapat dibubarkan. Adanya persamaan pengertian yang ditujukanantara korporasi selaku badan hukum yang disamakan dengan pengertian partai politikselaku badan hukum dapat dijadikan sebagai bahan acuan untuk menarik keterlibatanpartai politik melalui pengurusnya dalam melakukan tindak pidana korupsi denganmempergunakan doktrin strict liability dan doktrin vicarious liability yangmemungkinkan partai politik tersebut bertanggungjawab atas perbuatan yang dilakukanoleh pengurus/anggota partai politik yang menjalankan aktivitas kepartaian.

---

ABSTRACTResearcher in this study provides an idea of the dissolution of the corrupt politicalparties through legal loopholes dissolution of political parties in Indonesia to provideinterpretation of the meaning of positive law governing the dissolution of politicalparties, one of which is the existence of the nomenclature referred to in Article 2paragraph b of the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 12 year 2008 on Guidelines forthe Proceedings In the Dissolution of Political Parties which states that a political partycan be dissolved by the Constitutional Court if the activities/result conducted by thepolitical parties in conflict with the Constitution of 1945. Clause " due " posed is whatcan be equated with corruption involving officials/members of a political partyconducting the activities of the party to be dissolved. The existence of the commonunderstanding between the corporation intended as a legal entity which is equated withthe notion of a political party as a legal entity can be used as a reference for theinvolvement of political parties through its officials in committing corruption by usingthe doctrine of strict liability and vicarious liability doctrine that allows the politicalparty responsible for acts committed by officials/members of political parties that runthe activities of the party.;Researcher in this study provides an idea of the dissolution of the corrupt politicalparties through legal loopholes dissolution of political parties in Indonesia to provideinterpretation of the meaning of positive law governing the dissolution of politicalparties, one of which is the existence of the nomenclature referred to in Article 2paragraph b of the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 12 year 2008 on Guidelines forthe Proceedings In the Dissolution of Political Parties which states that a political partycan be dissolved by the Constitutional Court if the activities/result conducted by thepolitical parties in conflict with the Constitution of 1945. Clause " due " posed is whatcan be equated with corruption involving officials/members of a political partyconducting the activities of the party to be dissolved. The existence of the commonunderstanding between the corporation intended as a legal entity which is equated withthe notion of a political party as a legal entity can be used as a reference for theinvolvement of political parties through its officials in committing corruption by usingthe doctrine of strict liability and vicarious liability doctrine that allows the politicalparty responsible for acts committed by officials/members of political parties that runthe activities of the party.;Researcher in this study provides an idea of the dissolution of the corrupt politicalparties through legal loopholes dissolution of political parties in Indonesia to provideinterpretation of the meaning of positive law governing the dissolution of politicalparties, one of which is the existence of the nomenclature referred to in Article 2paragraph b of the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 12 year 2008 on Guidelines forthe Proceedings In the Dissolution of Political Parties which states that a political partycan be dissolved by the Constitutional Court if the activities/result conducted by thepolitical parties in conflict with the Constitution of 1945. Clause " due " posed is whatcan be equated with corruption involving officials/members of a political partyconducting the activities of the party to be dissolved. The existence of the commonunderstanding between the corporation intended as a legal entity which is equated withthe notion of a political party as a legal entity can be used as a reference for theinvolvement of political parties through its officials in committing corruption by usingthe doctrine of strict liability and vicarious liability doctrine that allows the politicalparty responsible for acts committed by officials/members of political parties that runthe activities of the party.;Researcher in this study provides an idea of the dissolution of the corrupt politicalparties through legal loopholes dissolution of political parties in Indonesia to provideinterpretation of the meaning of positive law governing the dissolution of politicalparties, one of which is the existence of the nomenclature referred to in Article 2paragraph b of the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 12 year 2008 on Guidelines forthe Proceedings In the Dissolution of Political Parties which states that a political partycan be dissolved by the Constitutional Court if the activities/result conducted by thepolitical parties in conflict with the Constitution of 1945. Clause " due " posed is whatcan be equated with corruption involving officials/members of a political partyconducting the activities of the party to be dissolved. The existence of the commonunderstanding between the corporation intended as a legal entity which is equated withthe notion of a political party as a legal entity can be used as a reference for theinvolvement of political parties through its officials in committing corruption by usingthe doctrine of strict liability and vicarious liability doctrine that allows the politicalparty responsible for acts committed by officials/members of political parties that runthe activities of the party., Researcher in this study provides an idea of the dissolution of the corrupt politicalparties through legal loopholes dissolution of political parties in Indonesia to provideinterpretation of the meaning of positive law governing the dissolution of politicalparties, one of which is the existence of the nomenclature referred to in Article 2paragraph b of the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 12 year 2008 on Guidelines forthe Proceedings In the Dissolution of Political Parties which states that a political partycan be dissolved by the Constitutional Court if the activities/result conducted by thepolitical parties in conflict with the Constitution of 1945. Clause " due " posed is whatcan be equated with corruption involving officials/members of a political partyconducting the activities of the party to be dissolved. The existence of the commonunderstanding between the corporation intended as a legal entity which is equated withthe notion of a political party as a legal entity can be used as a reference for theinvolvement of political parties through its officials in committing corruption by usingthe doctrine of strict liability and vicarious liability doctrine that allows the politicalparty responsible for acts committed by officials/members of political parties that runthe activities of the party.]"

"Kementerian Negara sebagai unsur yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dengan kedudukan presiden memiliki pengaturan yang terpisah dalam UUD 1945 yaitu Bab V yang terpisah dari Bab III tentang pengaturan kekuasaan pemerintahan. Pemisahan ini, pada pokoknya, disebabkan oleh karena kedudukan menteri-menteri negara itu dianggap sangat penting dalam sistem ketatanegaraan menurut UUD 1945. Hal yang menjadi perdebatan adalah mengenai kedudukan hukum terhadap kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh menteri dalam Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara di Mahakmah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini akan memfokuskan pada analisis terhadap kedudukan menteri dalam sengketa kewenangan lembaga negara yang kewenangannya diberikan oleh UUD 1945 oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hal ini sangat penting, mengingat UUD 1945, maupun Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak menjelaskan detail pelaksanaan kewenangan tersebut, sehingga sebenarnya Mahkamah Konstitusi diberikan kewenangan untuk mengatur hal-hal yang diperlukan bagi kelancaran pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenangnya termasuk dalam hal menentukan lembaga negara apa saja yang dapat berpekara di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Ada beberapa teori yang dapat dijadikan acuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum kementerian negara yaitu teori kewenangan dan pemisahan kekuasaan yang akan dikaitkan dengan sistem pemerintahan yang dianut di Indonesia. Dengan diketahuinya wewenang yang dimiliki oleh menteri dan kedudukannya dalam ketatanegaraan di Indonesia, maka hal tersebut juga turut dapat menjawab kewenangan Kementerian Negara sebagai pihak-pihak yang berperkara di Mahkamah Konstitusi.

---

Ministry of State as an element that can not be separated with the president having a separate arrangement in Indonesian’s Constitution 1945. The Constitution separating between Chapter V of Ministry of States and Chapter III of governmental power. This separation is caused by the position of state ministers was considered very important in the state system by 1945Constitution. It is a debate is about the legal position of the authority possessed by the minister of State Agency Dispute Authority in Constitutional Court. This study will focus on the analysis of the position of minister of state on Settlement Disputes of Authorities of State Institutions granted by the 1945 Constitution by the Constitutional Court. This is particularly important, given the 1945 Constitution, and Law. 8 of 2011 on the Constitutional Court did not explain the details of the implementation of the authority, so that in fact the Constitutional Court was given the authority to regulate matters necessary for the smooth execution of duties and responsibilities, including in terms of determining what state institutions can apart as a parties in the Constitutional Court . There are several theories that can be used as a reference to determine the legal position of the state ministries, namely the theory of separation of powers and the authority to be associated with the system of government adopted in Indonesia. By knowing the power of the minister and his position in the state administration in Indonesia, then it also helped to answer the authority of the Ministry of State as a litigant parties in the Constitutional Court."

"Pengujian konstitusionalitas Undang-undang No. 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Tiga permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai (1) legal standing pemohon dalam pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi; (2) pertimbangan hakim konstitusi memberikan legal standing kepada pemohon dalam pengujian Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi; serta (3) usulan pemberian legal standing terhadap pemohon dalam perkara pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan bahan hukum berupa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, peraturan perundang-undangan, serta tulisan-tulisan yang berkaitan dengan hukum tata negara. Adapun jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridisnormatif. Teori dalam menilai pemohon memiliki legal standing atau tidak, salah satunya adalah teori legal standing. Teori legal standing point d?interet point d?action yaitu tanpa kepentingan tidak ada suatu tindakan. Para pemohon dalam perkara No. 36/PUU-X/2012 dan No. 7/PUU-XI/2013 tidak memiliki legal standing dalam mengajukan permohonan. Karena para pemohon tidak mengalami langsung kerugian konstitusional yang bersifat spesifik (khusus) dan aktual dari dua (2) undang-undang yang diuji materi di Mahkamah Konstitusi atau setidaknya bersifat potensial yang menurut penalaran yang wajar dapat dipastikan akan terjadi. Mahkamah tidak tepat menilai para pemohon dalam perkara No. 36/PUUX/ 2012 dan No. 7/PUU-XI/2013 memiliki legal standing. Karena para pemohon tidak memiliki dasar (kepentingan) untuk mengajukan permohonan pengujian undang-undang. Selain itu terdapat dissenting opinion hakim konstitusi yang menguatkan bahwa para pemohon tidak memiliki legal standing. Sehingga Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak tepat menilai para pemohon memiliki legal standing. Perlu adanya perbaikan atas penentuan legal standing yang lebih ketat.

---

Year 2001 on Oil and Gas and Law No. 8 of 2011 on the Amendment of the Law No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, which was registered with the case number and case number 7/PUU-XI/2013 36/PUU-X/2012. This study departs from the appropriateness of the valuation given legal standing by the Constitutional Court. Clarity regarding the legal standing of the complex requires further assessment. Three issues are addressed in this study is about (1) the applicant's legal standing in the judicial review of Law No. 22 Year 2001 on Oil and Gas and Law No. 8 of 2011 on the Amendment Act No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court; (2) consideration of the constitutional judges give legal standing to the applicant in the judicial review of Law No. 22 Year 2001 on Oil and Gas and Law No. 8 of 2011 on the Amendment Act No. 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court; and (3) the proposed granting legal standing of the applicant in the case of judicial review in the Constitutional Court. To answer these problems, this study used a legal substance of the Constitutional Court decision, legislation, and writings relating to constitutional law. The type of this research is the juridical-normative.

Theory in assessing the applicant has legal standing or not, one of which is the theory of legal standing. Theory of point d'interact legal standing point d'action that is without the benefit of no action. No. The applicant in the case. 36/PUU-X/2012 and No.7/PUU-XI/2013 not have legal standing to appeal. Because the applicant did not experience direct losses specific constitutional (specifically) and the actual of two (2) laws that material tested in the Constitutional Court, or at least the potential is based on logical reasoning will surely occur. The Court did not precisely assess the applicant in the case of No.36/PUU-X/2012 and No.7/PUUXI/2013 have legal standing. Because the applicant has no basis (interest) to apply for judicial review. In addition there are constitutional judges dissenting opinion affirming that the applicant has no legal standing. So that the Constitutional Court did not assess the applicant's right to have legal standing. There needs to be an improvement over the determination of more stringent legal standing."

"Setelah dibentuknya Mahkamah Konstitusi pasca reformasi, salah satu kewenangannya ialah membubarkan partai politik, sudah seharusnya peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia juga mengatur aturan lanjutan akibat-akibat hukum dari pembubaran tersebut. Salah satunya ialah aturan lanjutan, dari salah satu akibat hukum dibubarkannya partai politik, yaitu pemberhentian seluruh anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat “DPR” yang berasal dari partai politik yang dibubarkan. Implikasi tersebut akan meninggalkan jabatan atau kursi kosong di parlemen sehingga pengaturan di masa mendatang (ius constituendum) tentang prosedur pengisian kekosongan jabatan anggota DPR akibat pembubaran partai politik di Indonesia sangat diperlukan. Hal ini disebabkan, walaupun Indonesia belum pernah mengalami hal demikian semenjak MK dibentuk, pengaturan ini diperlukan untuk memberikan kepastian hukum (rechtssicerheit) bagi pemerintah, masyarakat, dan pihak-pihak yang berperan langsung di dalamnya, baik partai politik maupun DPR itu sendiri, bila mana hal demikian terjadi dalam perkembangan Indonesia di masa yang akan datang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif yang disempurnakan dengan pendekatan sejarah, kasus, dan perbandingan dengan tiga negara. Hasil analisis dari Skripsi ini menunjukan bahwa akibat hukum pembubaran partai politik sendiri harus diatur melalui undang-undang. Kemudian, terdapat beberapa mekanisme yang dapat dijadikan pilihan dalam pengisian kekosongan jabatan DPR. Oleh karena itu, sebagai upaya mengakomodir ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut, perlu adanya perubahan pada peraturan perundang-undangan terkait.

---

After the establishment of the post-reformation Constitutional Court, one of its powers is to dissolve political parties, Indonesian laws and regulations should also regulate further legal consequences of such dissolution. One of them is a follow-up regulation, one of the legal consequences of the dissolution of a political party, namely the dismissal of all members of the People's Representative Council "DPR" who are from the disbanded political party. The implication is that it will leave vacant positions or seats in parliament so that the ius constituendum regulation of procedures for filling vacancies in DPR positions due to the dissolution of political parties in Indonesia is very necessary. This is because, although Indonesia has never experienced such a thing since the Constitutional Court was formed, this arrangement is needed to provide legal certainty (rechtssicerheit) for the government, society, and parties who play a direct role in it, both political parties and the DPR itself if this happens in the development of Indonesia in the future. The research method used is a normative research method that is refined with a historical, case, and comparison approach with three countries. The results of the analysis of this thesis indicate that the legal consequences of the dissolution of a political party itself must be regulated by law. Then, there are several mechanisms that can be used as an option in filling the vacant position in the DPR. Therefore, to accommodate these provisions, it is necessary to make changes to the relevant laws and regulations."