Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membahas mengenai perlakuan perpajakan atas penghasilan lintas batas dari kegiatan keartisan dalam ketentuan perpajakan di Indonesia dan aplikasi/penerapannya di lapangan serta pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (sebagai otoritas perpajakan di Indonesia) atas penghasilan lintas batas yang diterima oleh para artiste tersebut. Dalam melakukan penelitian ini, metode yang digunakan adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan analisis deskriptif yang meliputi analisis teoritis, studi literatur dan studi lapangan. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan perpajakan mengenai penghasilan lintas batas yang diterima oleh artiste belum diatur secara khusus dalam ketentuan peraturan perpajakan di Indonesia dan pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak belum sepenuhnya fokus terhadap pemenuhan kewajiban perpajakan atas penghasilan lintas batas yang diterima oleh Artiste Indonesia yang telah ?Go International? dan pemenuhan kewajiban perpajakan para promotor musik dan/atau agent di Indonesia yang membayarkan penghasilan (fee) kepada artiste luar negeri sehubungan dengan kegiatan pertunjukan konser musik yang dilakukannya di Indonesia

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the tax treatment of income from cross-border activities of artistry in tax regulations in Indonesia and application/ implementation in the field as well as the supervision carried out by the Directorate General of Taxation (as the taxation authority in Indonesia) on cross-border income received by the artistes. In conducting this research, the method used is qualitative method with descriptive analysis approach which includes theoretical analysis, literature studies and field studies. The results of this study indicate that the tax treatment of cross-border income received by the artiste has not specifically stipulated in the provisions of the taxation laws in Indonesia and supervision carried out by the Directorate General of Taxation has not fully focus on the fulfillment of the obligations of cross-border taxation of income received by the Indonesian Artiste have "Go International" and the fulfillment of tax obligations music promoters and/or agent in Indonesia who pay income (fees) to the foreign artistes in connection with activities that do music concert performances in Indonesia.;"

"Tulisan ini menganalisis pengaturan imbalan bunga perpajakan setelah diundangkannya Undang – Undang 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan atau UU HPP, khususnya dalam amar putusan Pengadilan Pajak. Tulisan ini disusun dengan menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Hak imbalan bunga perpajakan adalah bentuk representatif dari konsep value time of money. Konsep value time of money adalah perubahan nilai uang dari waktu ke waktu yang disebabkan oleh berbagai faktor. Hak imbalan bunga juga merupakan bentuk kesetaraan antara Wajib Pajak dan Fiskus karena apabila atas putusan sengketa pajak yang menyebabkan kelebihan pembayaran atas sengketa pajak wajib pajak dikenakan imbalan bunga perpajakan namun apabila putusan sengketa pajak menolak dan Wajib Pajak belum membayar dikenakan sanksi administrasi berupa denda. Namun pada praktiknya berdasarkan analisis pada putusan pengadilan pajak terdapat hak imbalan bunga yang tidak diberikan karena diberlakukannya UU HPP diberlakukan secara retroaktif sehingga hak imbalan bunga yang timbul dari UU KUP lama tidak diberikan imbalan bunga. Perspektif lainnya berdasarkan teori law and economics Wajib Pajak kehilangan kesempatan untuk mendapatkan keuntungan yang lebih karena terdapat eksternalitas pergantian peraturan perundang – undangan, sehingga dari sisi pembuat peraturan perlu mempertimbangkan teori Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency untuk menekan kenaikan angka sengketa pajak atas imbalan bunga.

---

This Thesis analyzes the regulation of tax interest rewards after the promulgation of Law 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations or the HPP Law, especially in the ruling of the Tax Court. This Thesus was prepared using doctrinal research methods. Tax interest compensation rights are a representative form of the time value of money concept. The concept of time value of money is the change in the value of money over time caused by various factors. The right to receive interest compensation is also a form of equality between the Taxpayer and the Fiscus because if a tax dispute decision results in an overpayment of the tax dispute, the taxpayer is subject to tax interest compensation, but if the tax dispute decision is rejected and the Taxpayer has not paid, he is subject to administrative sanctions in the form of a fine. However, in practice, based on the analysis of the tax court's decision, interest compensation rights are not granted because the enactment of the HPP Law is applied retroactively so that interest compensation rights arising from the old KUP Law are not granted interest compensation. Another perspective is based on law and economics theory. Taxpayers lose the opportunity to gain more profits because there are externalities of changes in laws and regulations, so that from the regulatory side it is necessary to consider the Kaldor-Hicks Efficiency theory to reduce the increase in the number of tax disputes over interest rewards."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang asas keadilan dan kepastian hukum pada Pasal 29 Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 74 Tahun 2011 dilihat dari Pasal 13A Undang-Undang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan (UUKUP). Tetapi Pasal 29 PP melarang untuk melakukan permohonan pengajuan keberatan. Permasalahan yang timbul yaitu pelarangan permohonan upaya hukum keberatan tersebut ternyata bertentangan dengan UUKUP dan ternyata PP tersebut juga terindikasi tidak memenuhi ketentuan pada UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 UU Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (UUPPP). Oleh Karena latar belakang tersebut, maka pokok permasalahan tesis ini adalah apakah Pasal tersebut telah sesuai dengan asas keadilan dan kepastian hukum dalam perpajakan dan bagaimana dengan upaya hukumnya terhadap Wajib Pajak itu sendiri. Permasalahan tersebut dibahas dengan menggunakan tipologi penelitian deskriptif-perspektif, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dan ditambah dengan informasi dari narasumber yang terkait, sehingga menghasilkan kesimpulan yaitu ternyata Pasal 29 PP No.74 Tahun 2011 tesebut tidak mencerminkan asas keadilan dan asas kepastian hukum bagi Wajib Pajak (WP), dan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan 2 cara yaitu cara pertama dengan mengedepankan system case by case yang kedua yaitu dengan langsung mengajukan judicial review.

---

This thesis discusses about the principles of justice and the rule of law in Article 29 of Government Regulation No. 74 In 2011 seen from Article 13A of Law the General Provisions and Tax Procedures. But Article 29 of the Regulation prohibits the submission of objections to the petition. The problems that arise are banning the application for legal remedy of appeal was contrary to land it also indicated that Government Regulation does not meet the provisions of Act Regulation No. 12 In 2011 Act Establishment of Legislation. By because on this background, the subject matter of this thesis is whether the article has been in accordance with the principles of justice and the rule of law in taxation and how the legal efforts against taxpayers themselves. The problem is addressed by using descriptive research typology perspective, using research literature and coupled with information from relevant sources, resulting in a conclusion that turns Article 29 of Government Regulation No. 74 In 2011 proficiency level does not reflect the principles of justice and the principle of legal certainty for Taxpayers, and remedies that can be done in 2 ways is the first way to promote system case by case the second is to directly apply for judicial review."

"Pendekatan keadilan restoratif menjadi dasar dalam penegakan hukum atas pelanggaran perpajakan dengan mengutamakan terjadinya pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi kebijakan pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara setelah berlakunya UU 7/2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan (UU HPP) dengan menggunakan variabel dari Grindle (1980) dan memberikan alternatif kebijakan untuk mendorong pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara mendalam dengan informan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara setelah berlakunya UU HPP telah memenuhi semua indikator yang ada di dalam content of policy, yaitu kepentingan kelompok sasaran, tipe manfaat, derajat perubahan yang diinginkan, letak pengambilan keputusan, dan pelaksana dan sumber daya kebijakan. Namun, untuk variabel context of implementation, kebijakan pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara belum terpenuhi di semua indikator yaitu kekuasaan, kepentingan, dan strategi, karakteristik institusi, dan kepatuhan atau daya tanggap. Ketiga indikator tidak terpenuhi karena kepentingan implementor yang belum padu, masih terjadi disparitas di antara implementor, dan daya tanggap dan kepatuhan implementor yang masih kurang. Alternatif kebijakan dalam mendorong pemulihan kerugian pada pendapatan negara adalah pemberlakuan putusan pidana penjara kepada para pelanggar pidana pajak dan eksekusi pidana denda diubah menjadi denda administrasi dan pemberlakuan kembali kebijakan Pasal 13 ayat (5) dan/atau Pasal 15 ayat (4) UU KUP untuk menagih denda pidana hasil putusan pidana pajak. 

---

The restorative justice approach is the basis for law enforcement on tax violations by prioritizing recovery of losses in state revenue. This study aims to analyse the implementation of loss recovery policy on state revenue after the enactment of Law 7/2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations (UU HPP) using variables from Grindle (1980) and provide policy alternatives to encourage loss recovery on state revenue. This study used a qualitative approach with a descriptive research type which was obtained through a literature study and in-depth interviews with informants. The results of the study show that the policy for recovering losses on state revenue after the enactment of the UU HPP has fulfilled all the indicators contained in the content of the policy, namely the affected, the types of benefit, extent of change envision, site of decision making, and policy implementors and resources. However, for the context of implementation, loss recovery policy on state revenue have not been fulfilled in all indicators, namely power, interests, and strategy, institution characteristics, and compliance or responsiveness. The three indicators were not fulfilled because the implementor's interests were not yet integrated, there were still disparities among implementors, and the implementor's responsiveness and compliance were still lacking. Policy alternatives in encouraging recovery of losses on state revenue are the imposition of prison sentences on tax offenders and the execution of fines changed to administrative fines and the reintroduction of the policy of Article 13 paragraph (5) and/or Article 15 paragraph (4) of the UU KUP to collect criminal fines resulting from tax criminal decisions."

"Skripsi ini membahas karakteristik penghasilan yang timbul atas transaksi melalui kabel optik bawah laut yang melintasi batas teritorial antar negara dan bagaimana analisis perpajakannya. Globalisasi secara tidak langsung mengakibatkan terjadinya pemajakan berganda secara yurisdis, dalam hal ini adalah dispute mengenai karakterisasi penghasilan yang muncul (royalti atau business profit) atas transaksi kabel optik antara negara sumber dan negara domisili. Hal ini menjadi isu yang krusial, mengingat karakterisasi tersebut menentukan negara mana yang berhak untuk memajaki penghasilan tersebut. Lebih lanjut, skripsi ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka dari berbagai macam jurnal, buku dan sumber lain yang terkait, serta wawancara dengan pihak-pihak yang kompeten. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan adalah royalti maupun business profit dapat digunakan untuk menjustifikasi jenis penghasilan yang muncul, tergantung nature dari transaksi dan treaty antara kedua negara yang bertransaksi.

---

This under-graduate thesis discusses the characteristics of revenue arising on a transaction through optical cable across the territorial boundaries between countries and how is the tax analysis. Globalization indirectly lead to the occurrence of juridical double taxation, in which case is a dispute about the characterization of income that arises (royalties or business profit) over optical cable deals between the source and domicile country. This has become a crucial issue, given the characterization of determining which country has the right to tax the earnings. Further, the methods used in this under-graduate thesis are library research and interview with competent experts. In the end, royalty and business profit can be used to justify the kind of earnings that appear; depending on the nature of the transactions and the treaty between the two countries engaged."

"In order to improving awareness and compliance of taxpayers about their rights and obligations, the understanding about justice from a rule of law and regulation looked into to play an important part in improving awareness and taxpayer compliance. Comprehended level of justice of a rule is hence expected by a taxpayer earn more own awareness and compliance about their obligation of taxation. The target of this research is to analyze the level of justice from an imposition of Tax, which is Income Recognition of bank interest payable write-off, evaluated from principle of taxation justice. In this research, a descriptive analysis method was used by through study of bibliography comparing opinion among experts according to their definition, with rule of law and regulation about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off. The evaluation use Model System which assessing a policy by comparing input, Process, and Output of law and regulation policy.

From the analyze result, pulled conclusion that rule of legislation of Income Tax about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off Do Not reflect principle of justice either through Horizontal and also Vertical, because Income Recognition [of] according to rule of legislation do not in line with taxpayer ability, if compared to Income Recognition from business transaction besides Interest Payable Write-Off.

Revising rule Article 4 sentence (1) Law of Number 7 Year 1983 about Income Tax as have been altered last with Law of Number 17 Year 2000 related with Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off would be able to bring constructive benefit, in the effort to improve level of its justice."