Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The main objective of this research is qualitatively study the influence of corporate governance mechanism, such as board of commissioner composition and size, and audit committee exixtence on firms value in public transportation companies listed in Jakarta Stock exchange. This research is only an early research that will be focused in the period of recent fuel price crisis during the year 2008. The research data of corporate governance mechanism will be collected from public transportation financial statements or annual reports for the period of 2007. Fimr's value will be reflected by the market capitalization. The stock price data used will be daily stock closing price during the recent fuel crisis in the first semester of the year 2008. Descriptive statistics will be used just to give figures about the firm's value condition during the fuel crisis period. The logical thinking of this research is that public transportation companies are the companies got the worst impact by the fuel crisis. Good corporate governance is needed to avoid negative shortcut in keep running the business during the crisis. By this qualitative research we hope we could have an early picture of factors in corporate governance that affecting firms value during the crisis, so the hypothesis can be build and tested in next further research."

"Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap kinerja perusahaan sektor industri barang konsumsi (yaitu, Tobin’s Q). Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 30 perusahaan menggunakan data akuntansi dan data pasar yang tersedia untuk tahun 2008-2012. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa investor institusional, kepemilikan pemerintah, rasio utang (total hutang / total aset), rasio pembayaran dividen, dan ukuran perusahaan (penjualan) memiliki dampak yang signifikan pada kinerja perusahaan, sedangkan ukuran dewan, dan jenis audit yang menunjukkan dampak yang tidak signifikan.

---

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on firm performance consumer goods industry sector (i.e., Tobin's Q). This study utilizes a sample of 30 firms using the accounting and market data available for 2008-2012. The results show that institutional investors, government ownership, debt ratio (total debt / total assets), and the dividend payout, and ratio firm size (sales) have a significant impact on the firm performance, while board size, and the audit type that show a non-significant impact."

"Akuntabilitas atau pertanggungjawaban merupakan salah satu prinsip yang harus dipenuhi. Salah satu sarana akuntabilitas manajemen adalah informasi keuangan. Bagaimana kita dapat memahami proses pengelolaan perusahaan oleh manajemen tanpa didukung oleh transparansi dan sistem informasi yang dapat diandalkan. Informasi keuangan dan pengungkapan yang diberikan oleh manajemen sangat dipengaruhi oleh struktur kepemilikan dan struktur keuangan perusahaan serta industri dimana perusahaan beroperasi. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan pengertian yang lebih mendalam mengenai struktur kepemilikan perusahaan-perusahaan publik yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta dan informasi akuntansi (dan informasi keuangan) yang dihasilkannya serta peranan informasi tersebut dalam penerapan good corporate governance dengan melakukan benchmarking dengan standar-standar unggulan yang berkaitan dengan pengungkapan informasi keuangan, misalnya dengan standar yang dikeluarkan oleh OECD, Calpers, dan lain sebagainya. Dengan proses ini diharapkan, dapat diperoleh gambaran mengenai seberapa jauh posisi perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia dalam penerapan konsep good corporate governance."

"Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang termasuk daam indeks kompas100. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel 40 perusahaan menggunakan akuntansi dan data pasar yang tersedia untuk tahun 2008-2012. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan saham oleh CEO memiliki hubungan negatif terhadap ROA, sedangkan hubungan positif terhadap Return Saham. Presentase keemilikan komisaris independen memiliki hubungan negatif dengan kinerja keuangan baik ROA ataupun Return Saham, tetapi tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan Return Saham. Board Structure cenderung memiliki hubungan negatif dengan kinerja perusahaan kecuali pada susunan komisaris dengan ROA dan jumlah ukuran dewan terhadap Return Saham, tetapi tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan Return Saham. Variabel Economic Determinant memiliki hubungan positif dengan kinerja keuangan perusahaan namun nilai market to book ratio menunjukkan hubungan negatif terhadap Return Saham dan Sales memilikihubungan positif signifikan terhadap ROA.

---

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of companies included in the index Kompas100. This study used a sample of 200 companies using accounting and market data are available for the years 2008-2012. The results show that CEO stock ownership has a negative relationship to ROA, while a positive relationship to Return Shares. Percentage ownership of independent directors has a negative relationship with financial performance either ROA or Return Shares, but no significant effect on ROA and Stock Return. Board Structure tends to have a negative relationship with firm performance unless the commissioner arrangement with ROA and the number of board size on Stock Return, but no significant effect on ROA and Stock Return. Economic Determinant variables have a positive relationship with the financial performance of the company but the value of the market to book ratio showed a negative relationship to the Stock Return and Sales has a significant positive relationship to ROA."

"Penelitian ini ingin melihat pengaruh corporate governance dan country governance terhadap performa perbankan dengan proksi ROE dan ROA pada pra dan pasca krisis finansial global 2008. Observasi dilakukan terhadap 65 bank di Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam selama kurun 3 tahun pra (2005-2007) dan pasca (2009-2011) krisis finansial global 2008. Data yang digunakan ialah data panel yang bersumber dari data perbankan dan World Bank. Dengan menggunakan Generalized Least Square, didapatkan hasil bahwa corporate governance dan country governance berpengaruh signifikan terhadap performa perbankan, walaupun memiliki perbedaan arah pada pra dan pasca krisis finansial global 2008

---

This research examines the impact of corporate governance and country governance on bank performance (as measured by ROE and ROA), before and after 2008 global financial crisis. Observed samples are 65 banks in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, and Vietnam within period of before (2005-2007) and after (2009-2011) 2008 global financial crisis. Data sources are from bank‘s report and World Bank. By using panel data of firm and country data and by using Generalized Least Square estimation model, research finds that country governance and country governance significantly affect bank performance, although some variables of both have different sign before and after 2008 global financial crisis."

"Skripsi ini membahas pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga dan corporate governance terhadap risiko idiosyncratic perusahaan dengan menggunakan total observasi sebanyak 183 atas perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Dengan menggunakan metode Pooled Least Square didapatkan hasil bahwa kepemilikan keluarga ternyata tidak berpengaruh terhadap risiko idiosyncratic. Kemudian penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa perusahaan dengan kualitas corporate governance yang tinggi akan memiliki risiko idiosyncratic yang rendah. Selain itu, peneliti juga menguji pengaruh moderasi corporate governance atas hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk, dan menemukan bahwa variabel corporate governance tidak memiliki efek moderasi terhadap hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk.

---

This thesis studied about the relationship of family firm and corporate governance on firm?s idiosyncratic risk, by using 183 observations data of manufacturing company which is listed in BEI. By using Pooled Least Square Method, this research found that family ownership did not have significant effect on idiosyncratic risk. Furthermore, this research also found that firm with high quality of corporate governance will have lower level of idiosyncratic risk. Besides, the authors also test the moderating role of corporate governance to the relationship of family firms with the idiosyncratic risk, and found that corporate governance do not have a moderating role on the effect family firms to the idiosyncratic risk."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

---

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh Corporate Governance, kepemilikan keluarga dan umur perusahaan terhadap Corporate Social Performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Penelitian ini juga ingin menguji pengaruh Financial Performance terhadap asosiasi Corporate Governance dengan Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Governance dinilai berdasarkan indeks yang dikeluarkan oleh Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), sedangkan untuk Corporate Social Performance menggunakan kriteria pernilaian yang digunakan oleh Greening dan Turban (2000) dimana pengukuranny berdasarkan dimensi yang digunakan lembaga KLD (Kinder,Lydenberg and Domini). Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan model regresi logistik dan sampel sebanyak 239 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Kepemilikan keluarga memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi product quality sedangkan umur perusahaan memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi environment dan dimensi product quality. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa financial performance tidak memperkuat hubungan corporate governance dengan probabilita sebuah perusahaan memiliki high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations.

---

This research aims to determine whether corporate governance, family ownership, and firm age influence corporate social performance in environment dimension, product quality dimension, and community relations. In addition, this research also would like to know the effect of financial performance on the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance. Corporate governance viewed by an index issued by Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), while corporate social performance is measured by KLD?s criteria that used by Greening and Turban (2000).

Hypothesis testing used logistic regression with sample of 239 companies that are listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008. These result indicate that companies with good corporate governance will have bigger probability getting high corporate social erformance in those dimensions. Family ownership has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and firm age also has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and community relations dimension. Yet, financial performance is proven that there is no influence of financial performance to the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance."

"Good public and corporate governance have begun to command considerable attention today in the world, as well as across the Asia-Pacific, not only from civil society, NGOs and the public itself, but also from the business community and the markets. Despite the heavy emphasis on international terror and the war against it, human rights and democracy are far from being irrelevant in good governance; in fact, the people could now become an even more effective "bridge" and "check" between good public and corporate governance than earlier envisaged. A new mentality seems to be sprouting up across Asia in terms of governance."