Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Stuttered speech is a dysfluency rich speech, more prevalent in males than females. It has been associated with insufficient air pressure or poor articulation, even though the root causes are more complex. The primary features include prolonged speech and repetitive speech, while some of its secondary features include, anxiety, fear, and shame. This study used LPC analysis and synthesis algorithms to reconstruct the stuttered speech. The results were evaluated using cepstral distance, Itakura-Saito distance, mean square error, and likelihood ratio. These measures implied perfect speech reconstruction quality. ASR was used for further testing, and the results showed that all the reconstru-cted speech samples were perfectly recognized while only three samples of the original speech were perfectly recognized.Shuttered speech adalah speech yang kaya dysfluency, lebih banyak terjadi pada laki-laki daripada perempuan. Ini terkait dengan tekanan udara yang tidak cukup atau artikulasi yang buruk, meskipun akar penyebabnya lebih kompleks. Fitur utama termasuk speech yang berkepanjangan dan berulang-ulang, sementara beberapa fitur sekunder meliputi, kecemasan, ketakutan, dan rasa malu. Penelitian ini menggunakan LPC analysis dan synthesis algoritma untuk merekonstruksi stuttered speech. Hasil dievaluasi menggunakan jarak cepstral, jarak Itakura-Saito, mean square error, dan rasio likelihood. Langkah-langkah ini terkandung kualitas speech reconstruction yang sempurna. ASR digunakan untuk pengujian lebih lanjut, dan hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa semua sampel speech yang terekonstruksi dikenali dengan sempurna sementara hanya tiga sampel dari speech asli dikenali dengan sempurna."

"Kasus ujaran kebencian di media sosial Indonesia tidak sedikit. Penelitian ini akan mengkaji salah satu kasus ujaran kebencian yang terjadi di tahun 2022, yaitu kasus yang menimpa EM. Pada saat karya ilmiah ini ditulis, kasus ini sudah naik ke tahap persidangan di pengadilan. EM didakwa menyatakan ujaran kebencian terhadap masyarakat yang ada di Kalimantan dengan frasa "tempat jin buang anak". Jenis kajian penelitian adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Objek penelitian ini bersumber dari YouTube yang dikelola oleh EM sendiri. Penelitian ini untuk mengungkapkan apakah ujaran EM “tempat jin buang anak” dapat dikategorikan sebagai ujaran kebencian atau tidak berdasarkan Pasal 156 KUHP dan Pasal 45A ayat (2) dalam UU RI No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE. Peneliti menggunakan teori tindak tutur, konteks pertuturan, dan analisis wacana untuk membuktikan ujaran EM tersebut. Berdasarkan analisis tindak tutur, konteks pertuturan, dan analisis wacana, EM dapat dinyatakan melakukan ujaran kebencian berdasarkan Pasal 156 KUHP karena memenuhi semua unsur yang dipaparkan dalam undang-undang tersebut. Namun, EM tidak dapat dinyatakan melakukan ujaran kebencian berdasarkan Pasal 45A ayat (2) dalam UU RI No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE karena salah satu unsur wajib tidak memenuhi. Unsur yang tidak memenuhi tersebut adalah semua pernyataan EM tidak ditujukan untuk menimbulkan rasa kebencian kepada masyarakat Kalimantan. Selain itu, pernyataan EM juga tidak ditujukan untuk menimbulkan permusuhan kepada masyarakat Kalimantan.

---

There are many cases of hate speech on Indonesian social media. This study will examine one of the cases of hate speech that occurred in 2022, namely the case that befell EM. At the time this scientific paper was written, this case had already reached the stage of trial in court. EM was charged with expressing hatred towards the people in Kalimantan with the phrase "tempat jin buang anak". The type of research study is descriptive qualitative. The object of this research is sourced from YouTube which is managed by EM himself. This research is to reveal whether the EM utterance “tempat jin buang anak” can be categorized as hate speech or not based on Pasal and Pasal 45A ayat (2) dalam UU RI No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE. The researcher uses speech act theory, context of speech, and discourse analysis to prove the EM utterances. Based on the analysis of speech acts, context of speech, and analysis of discourse, EM can be declared to have committed hate speech in Pasal 156 KUHP because it fulfills all the elements described in the 2 law. However, EM cannot be declared to have committed hate speech on Pasal 45A ayat (2) dalam UU RI No. 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE because one of the mandatory elements does not fulfill. The element that does not fulfill this is that all of EM's statements are not intended to cause hatred for the people of Kalimantan. In addition, all of EM's statements are also not intended to cause hostility to the people of Kalimantan.

"

"In the current study, two experiments are reported that investigated the effects of simple white noise and mixture of white noise and other sounds on perception of speech. In both experiments, university students were recruited to listen to short sentences under various sound masking conditions. Experiment 1, where standard sets of speakers were used for both speech and masking stimuli, has shown that, compared to baseline where there was no masking sound, the participants had significantly greater difficulties in understanding the sentences where the average level of understanding was 28% for the white noise condition and 20% for the mixed noise condition in which white noise was mixed with pink noise and sounds of running water. In Experiment 2, a test model of the specially designed sound masking speaker was used to present the masking noise. Further, sounds of tweeting birds and healing music were added to the mixed noise from Experiment 1 to create the three masking noise conditions. The average level of understanding for the mixed noise condition was 14%, while that for the bird and music conditions were 24% and 30% respectively. The higher understanding rates for the latter conditions were due to lower volume of the mixed white noise in order to keep the overall volume including the birds and music at 55dB. There were also significant effects of sentence type and reading voice gender, suggesting that auditory legibility does not solely depend on the speech-to-noise sound level ratio, but also on other variables, such as, predictability of the sentences, and clarity of the speech. Feedback at the end of the sessions revealed that the participants found mixed noise less irritating than pure white noise, and they preferred mixed noise with bird tweeting or music even better. Thus, it was concluded that mixed noise with occasional sounds of tweeting birds, was the most suitable masking sound for commercial use, being efficient and not unpleasant."