Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This article examines uses of Indonesian third person singular pronouns ia and dia in news reports. It takes as its departure point the general account of the pronouns which specifies that ia can occur only in subject position, while dia can occur in subject or object position. The article shows that, although both pronouns can occur in subject position, they differ distributionally and functionally. Ia occurs almost three times as frequently as dia and predominates in subject position, while dia occurs mostly in non-subject position. Ia is primarily used to convey the notion that the referent is a reliable and authoritative source of information and to focus on the referent as an agent or protagonist who is initiating or performing some action or a series of actions. By contrast, dia tends to be selected for contexts in which the referent is presented as a speaker who is elaborating on what has been said previously rather than introducing a new point. The predominance of ia in news report accords with its characterization as a pronoun strongly associated with formal registers."

"The absence of a gender opposition in the Indonesian pronominal system requires special strategies in the translation from languages which do have such an opposition illustrated in the first part opf this article. In the second part the lexical and morphological means are discussed with which Indonesian expresses gender, culminating in a description of the use of perempuan and wanita, pria and laki-laki."

"This article examines uses of Indonesian third person singular pronouns ia and dia in news reports. It takes as its departure point the general account of the pronouns which specifies that ia can occur only in subject position, while dia can occur in subject or object position. The article shows that, although both pronouns can occur in subject position, they differ distributionally and functionally. Ia occurs almost three times as frequently as dia and predominates in subject position, while dia occurs mostly in non-subject position. Ia is primarily used to convey the notion that the referent is a reliable and authoritative source of information and to focus on the referent as an agent or protagonist who is initiating or performing some action or a series of actions. By contrast, dia tends to be selected for contexts in which the referent is presented as a speaker who is elaborating on what has been said previously rather than introducing a new point. The predominance of ia in news report accords with its characterization as a pronoun strongly associated with formal registers."

"This paper deals with the phonology and the lexicology of the Indonesian Bajo language and more specifically with the dialect or variant that can be heard all around the Flores Sea in Kangean, South-East Sulawesi, Sumbawa, and Flores. The phonological survey focuses on vowel lengthening, gemination, pre-nasalized phonemes, and sandhi. The second part of this paper proposes an insight into Bajo lexicology, restricted to nominal and verbal derivation."

"In this paper, I describe four Indonesian aspect markers, sudah, telah, pernah, and sempat, showing that the main opposition between them relies not only on their aspectual meanings, but also on the various modalities they express. The opposition between the very frequent markers sudah and telah is analysed in detail. The syntactic and semantic survey shows that these two markers are not synonyms in most contexts."

"Different form many other name-giving possibilities in the world, in Indonesia parents are free to give their children any name they like. These names, many of which are auspicious in view of the child?s future, are often constructed by means of productive morphological procedures. Seven suffixes are followed through history and culture and their possibilities in making new names are explored. The suffixes concern the female ?ingsih, ?ingrum, ?ingtyas, ?ingdyah ?astuti, ?wati, and the male ?wan. Various ins and outs concerning these suffixes are explored and their attachments to various words from various word classes from Indonesian, Javanese and other language revealed. Cross-language name construction leads to trans-language creations that play a possible role in the constitution of Indonesian nation building. The procedures moreover seem to indicate trends away from the inclination to give children Muslim names."

"Pada bahasa Jawa standar, pronomina persona pertama aku selalu berbentuk terikat -ku ketika digunakan secara posesif, contohnya tanggaku ‘tetanggaku’. Pronomina aku tidak pernah menjadi unsur atribut pada frasa nominal yang menyatakan kepemilikan. Namun data penelitian ini menemukan aku yang menjadi atribut pada frasa nominal kepemilikan, contoh tanggane aku. Perilaku sintaksis semacam itu merupakan ciri pronomina persona yang berasal dari kelas kata nomina (tidak asli). Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan perilaku sintaksis pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah ragam lisan. Pengumpulan data ragam lisan dalam bentuk lisan diperoleh dengan teknik wawancara, sedangkan ragam lisan dalam bentuk tulisan diperoleh dari export chat WhatsApp. Hasil pengumpulan data tersebut diproses pada penyediaan data menggunakan aplikasi AntConc. Data penelitian ini berupa kata, frasa, dan kalimat yang memuat pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes. Analisis dilakukan berdasarkan teori pragmatik dan sintaksis pronomina persona menurut Wedhawati (2006). Hasil analisis pragmatik menunjukkan pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes terdiri atas pronomina persona pertama, kedua, dan ketiga. Berdasarkan jumlahnya, pronomina persona pertama dan kedua memiliki bentuk tunggal dan jamak, sedangkan pronomina persona ketiga hanya berbentuk tunggal. Berdasarkan bentuknya, pronomina persona ini terdiri atas bentuk bebas dan terikat. Analisis sintaksis menunjukkan pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes hadir dalam bentuk bebas dalam membentuk konstruksi posesif. Dalam konstruksi pasif, prefiks di- digunakan sebagai penanda pasif dengan argumen agen persona pertama, kedua, dan ketiga. Prefiks tak- kehilangan fungsi pragmatiknya karena memiliki fungsi yang sama dengan di- dalam konstruksi pasif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sumber data ragam lisan dalam penelitian dialek telah memperlihatkan banyak variasi, sehingga penting dalam pemilihan sumber data.

---

In standard Javanese, the first-person pronoun aku always takes the bound form -ku when used possessively, e.g. tanggaku 'my neighbor'. The pronoun aku is never an attribute element in nominal phrases expressing ownership. However, the data in this study found aku as an attribute in possessive nominal phrases, for example, tanggane aku. Such syntactic behavior is characteristic of personal pronouns derived from the noun word class. Based on this background, the purpose of this study is to describe the syntactic behavior of Javanese personal pronouns in Brebes. This research method uses qualitative method. The data source used is oral variety. Data collection of oral variety in oral form is obtained by interview technique, while oral variety in written form is obtained from export WhatsApp chat. The results of the data collection were processed on data provision using the AntConc application. The data of this research are words, phrases, and sentences containing personal pronouns of Brebes Javanese language. The analysis was conducted based on the theory of pragmatics and syntax of personal pronouns according to Wedhawati (2006). The results of the pragmatic analysis show that Brebes Javanese personal pronouns consist of first, second, and third person pronouns. Based on the number, the first and second personal pronouns have singular and plural forms, while the third personal pronoun is only singular. Based on their form, these personal pronouns consist of free and bound forms. Syntactic analysis shows that Brebes Javanese personal pronouns are present in free form in forming possessive constructions. In passive constructions, the prefix di- is used as a passive marker with first, second, and third person agent arguments. The tak- prefix loses its pragmatic function because it has the same function as di- in passive constructions. The results of this study show that the source of oral variety data in dialect research has shown many variations, so it is important in the selection of data sources."

"Pada bahasa Jawa standar, pronomina persona pertama aku selalu berbentuk terikat -ku ketika digunakan secara posesif, contohnya tanggaku ‘tetanggaku’. Pronomina aku tidak pernah menjadi unsur atribut pada frasa nominal yang menyatakan kepemilikan. Namun data penelitian ini menemukan aku yang menjadi atribut pada frasa nominal kepemilikan, contoh tanggane aku. Perilaku sintaksis semacam itu merupakan ciri pronomina persona yang berasal dari kelas kata nomina (tidak asli). Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan perilaku sintaksis pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah ragam lisan. Pengumpulan data ragam lisan dalam bentuk lisan diperoleh dengan teknik wawancara, sedangkan ragam lisan dalam bentuk tulisan diperoleh dari export chat WhatsApp. Hasil pengumpulan data tersebut diproses pada penyediaan data menggunakan aplikasi AntConc. Data penelitian ini berupa kata, frasa, dan kalimat yang memuat pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes. Analisis dilakukan berdasarkan teori pragmatik dan sintaksis pronomina persona menurut Wedhawati (2006). Hasil analisis pragmatik menunjukkan pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes terdiri atas pronomina persona pertama, kedua, dan ketiga. Berdasarkan jumlahnya, pronomina persona pertama dan kedua memiliki bentuk tunggal dan jamak, sedangkan pronomina persona ketiga hanya berbentuk tunggal. Berdasarkan bentuknya, pronomina persona ini terdiri atas bentuk bebas dan terikat. Analisis sintaksis menunjukkan pronomina persona bahasa Jawa Brebes hadir dalam bentuk bebas dalam membentuk konstruksi posesif. Dalam konstruksi pasif, prefiks di- digunakan sebagai penanda pasif dengan argumen agen persona pertama, kedua, dan ketiga. Prefiks tak- kehilangan fungsi pragmatiknya karena memiliki fungsi yang sama dengan di- dalam konstruksi pasif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sumber data ragam lisan dalam penelitian dialek telah memperlihatkan banyak variasi, sehingga penting dalam pemilihan sumber data.

---

In standard Javanese, the first-person pronoun aku always takes the bound form -ku when used possessively, e.g. tanggaku 'my neighbor'. The pronoun aku is never an attribute element in nominal phrases expressing ownership. However, the data in this study found aku as an attribute in possessive nominal phrases, for example, tanggane aku. Such syntactic behavior is characteristic of personal pronouns derived from the noun word class. Based on this background, the purpose of this study is to describe the syntactic behavior of Javanese personal pronouns in Brebes. This research method uses qualitative method. The data source used is oral variety. Data collection of oral variety in oral form is obtained by interview technique, while oral variety in written form is obtained from export WhatsApp chat. The results of the data collection were processed on data provision using the AntConc application. The data of this research are words, phrases, and sentences containing personal pronouns of Brebes Javanese language. The analysis was conducted based on the theory of pragmatics and syntax of personal pronouns according to Wedhawati (2006). The results of the pragmatic analysis show that Brebes Javanese personal pronouns consist of first, second, and third person pronouns. Based on the number, the first and second personal pronouns have singular and plural forms, while the third personal pronoun is only singular. Based on their form, these personal pronouns consist of free and bound forms. Syntactic analysis shows that Brebes Javanese personal pronouns are present in free form in forming possessive constructions. In passive constructions, the prefix di- is used as a passive marker with first, second, and third person agent arguments. The tak- prefix loses its pragmatic function because it has the same function as di- in passive constructions. The results of this study show that the source of oral variety data in dialect research has shown many variations, so it is important in the selection of data sources."

"Skripsi ini membahas ranah semantis bangunan tempat tinggal dalam bahasa Indonesia. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia digunakan sebagai korpus data dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui lema ranah bangunan tempat tinggal dalam bahasa Indonesia, mengetahui komponen makna, dan relasi makna dari setiap lema dalam ranah tersebut. Teori ranah semantis, komponen makna, dan relasi makna digunakan untuk tercapainya tujuan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ditemukan sebanyak 33 lema bahasa Indonesia yang termasuk ke dalam ranah bangunan tempat tinggal. Lema rumah dijadikan superordinat dari lema ranah bangunan tempat tinggal.

---

This thesis analized semantic domains of residential building in Indonesian language. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia is used as a corpus of data in this study. Purpose of this study is to find out the lemma from semantics domain of residential building in Indonesian language, find out component meaning, and find out semantic relation from every lemma in this semantic domain. Semantic domain theory, component meaning theory, and semantic relation theory used to get the purpose of this study. Result from this study, found 33 lemma in Indonesian language include to semantic domain of residential building. House is a superordinat from all the lemma in this semantics domain."

"Penelitian ini membahas komponen makna cerdas dan pintar dalam bahasa Indonesia. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia KBBI digunakan sebagai korpus data dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan komponen makna cerdas dan pintar, dan relasi makna dari cerdas dan pintar. Teori yang digunakan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut antara lain teori makna yang berdekatan, teori komponen makna, dan teori relasi makna digunakan untuk tercapainya tujuan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa cerdas memiliki 25 komponen makna, sedangkan pintar memiliki 39 komponen makna. Dari komponen makna ini diperoleh relasi makna antara cerdas dan pintar, yaitu relasi makna sinonim dekat.

---

This research analyze component meaning of cerdas and pintar in Indonesian language. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia KBBI is used as corpus data in this research. The aim of this research is to determine component meaning of cerdas and pintar, and to determine semantic relation between cerdas and pintar. To reach the objectives of the research, the researcher used component meaning theory, and semantic relation theory. The result of this research showed that cerdas has 25 component meaning while pintar has 39 component meaning. The result also showed that semantic relation between cerdas and pintar is a close synonym relation. "