Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh karakteristik akuntan publik Pendidikan Profesional Berkelanjutan/PPL, beban kerja, dan perencanaan audit dan karakteristik Kantor Akuntan Publik/KAP supervisi dan review, ukuran KAP, dan spesialisasi industri terhadap kualitas audit. Kualitas audit diukur dengan jumlah pelanggaran terhadap standar audit yang berkaitan dengan respon risiko dan pelaporan. Sampel penelitian ini adalah akuntan publik yang diperiksa oleh Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan, Kementerian Keuangan RI untuk periode pemeriksaan tahun 2011 sampai dengan 2015 dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 155. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perencanaan audit, supervisi dan review, serta ukuran KAP berpengaruh positif terhadap kualitas audit. Sedangkan PPL, beban kerja, dan spesialisasi industri tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of the characteristics of public accountant Continuing Professional Education CPE, workload and audit planning and the characteristics of audit firm supervision and review, firm size, and industry specialization on audit quality. Audit quality is measured by number of violations of auditing standards relating to risk response and reporting. Data are collected from examination report of public accountants conducted by Finance Professions Supervisory Center PPPK Ministry of Finance for examination period 2011 until 2015 with 155 samples. The results show that audit planning, supervision and review, and firm size have positive effect on audit quality. But CPE, workload, and industry specialization have no significant effect on audit quality. "

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kuadratik antara Tenure akuntan publik (AP) dan Tenure Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit, pengaruh rotasi AP dan rotasi KAP terhadap kualitas audit, serta pengaruh ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit. Sampel penelitian adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2009 hingga 2014, kecuali perusahaan yang bergerak di industri keuangan. Kualitas audit dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan kualitas laba dengan menggunakan tingkat akrual diskresioner (Kasznik, 1999) Tenure KAP terbukti tidak berpengaruh kuadratik terhadap kualitas audit. Tenure AP terbukti memiliki hubungan kuadratik dengan kualitas audit, rotasi KAP terbukti berpengaruh positif terhadap kualitas audit, dan rotasi AP tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Ukuran KAP dalam penelitian ini dibagi menjadi tiga klasifikasi, yaitu KAP Big Four, Second Tier dan KAP Kecil, hasilnya KAP Big Four dan KAP Second Tier berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Hasil ini mengindikasikan bahwa kualitas audit yang dihasilkan KAP Big Four dan KAP Second Tier lebih baik daripada KAP Kecil.

---

This research aims to examine the effect of quadratic impact between audit partner tenure and audit firm tenure on audit quality, the effect of audit partner rotation and audit firm rotation on audit quality and the effect of audit firm size on audit quality. The research samples are public companies that are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2009-2014 periods exclude the companies in financial industry. Audit quality's proxy is earnings quality which is measured by the level of discretionary accrual (Kasznik, 1999).

This research finds that audit firm tenure have no quadratic relationship effect on audit quality. Audit partner tenure have quadratic relationship effect on audit quality. There is a positive of audit firm rotation on audit quality. But audit partner rotation have no effect on audit quality. Audit Firm Size in this study were divided into three classifications, namely Big Four, Second Tier, and small firm auditor. There is a positive of Big Four and Second Tier audit firm on audit quality. These results indicate that audit quality by the Big Four, Second Tier better than small audit firm."

"Penelitian ini menganalisis PP Nomor 20 tahun 2015 yang meniadakan kewajiban rotasi KAP serta memperpanjang masa penugasan (tenure) AP menjadi lima tahun dan KMK Nomor 359/KMK.06/2003 serta PMK Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008 yang memperbolehkan terdapatnya praktik rotasi KAP semu. Untuk menganalisis peraturan tersebut, penelitian ini menguji pengaruh tenure KAP dan AP, rotasi KAP, serta rotasi KAP riil dan semu terhadap kualitas audit dengan menggunakan data 194 perusahaan yang terdaftar pada Pasar Modal Indonesia selama periode 2008 hingga 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa tenure KAP, baik linear ataupun kuadratik, tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Berbeda dari tenure KAP, tenure AP terbukti memiliki pengaruh kuadratik cembung terhadap kualitas audit dengan titik maksimum tiga tahun. Penelitian ini juga membuktikan bahwa rotasi KAP berpengaruh negatif terhadap kualitas audit. Dengan hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ditiadakannya kewajiban rotasi KAP yang tercantum dalam PP Nomor 20 tahun 2015 merupakan regulasi yang tepat, tetapi tidak bagi regulasi yang memperpanjang tenure AP karena terbukti, tenure AP hanya meningkatkan kualitas audit sampai tenure tiga tahun sebelum akhirnya menurunkan kualitas audit. Selain itu penelitian ini memebuktikan bahwa rotasi KAP semu berpengaruh negatif sementara rotasi KAP rill tidak berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. Hasil ini menunjukan bahwa KMK Nomor 359/KMK.06/2003 dan PMK Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008, yang mememperbolehkan terdapatnya praktik rotasi KAP semu, merupakan regulasi yang kurang tepat.

---

This research analyzes Government Regulation No.20 of 2015 which abolishing the rotation rule and extends the tenures of public accounting firms to 5 years and The Minister of Finance Decree Number 359/KMK.06/2003 and The Minister of Finance Regulation No.17/PMK.01/2008 that results in pseudo-rotation practices done by public accounting firms. To analyze these regulations, this research examines the effect of public accounting firms and public accountants tenures, public accounting firms rotations, as well as real and pseudo-rotations of public accounting firms on audit quality, using data of 194 companies who are listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2008-2014. The result of this research shows that public accounting firms rotations, both linear and quadratic, do not affect audit quality. In contrast, public accountant tenures are proven to have a convex quadratic effect on audit quality with maximum point of 3 years. Moreover, this research proves that public accounting firms rotations negatively affect audit quality.

With this result, we can conclude that abolishing the rotation rule, based on Government Regulation No.20 of 2015, is the appropriate regulation; however, not for the regulation that extends public accountants tenures which result proves that public accountant tenures only increase the audit quality for first three years. This result also prove that pseudo-rotations of public accounting firms negatively affect audit quality, while real public accounting firms rotations do not affect audit quality. With this result, we can also conclude that The Minister of Finance Decree Number 359/KMK.06/2003 and The Minister of Finance Regulation No.17/PMK.01/2008, which permits pseudo-rotations of public accounting firms, is not an appropriate regulation."

"Laporan karya akhir ini membahas tentang pengaruh rotasi kantor akuntan publik terhadap kualitas audit dan biaya audit. Proksi untuk kualitas audit adalah manajemen laba yang diukur dengan akrual abnormal. Sampel penelitian ini adalah 619 perusahaan nonkeuangan yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia dalam periode 2013 - 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rotasi kantor akuntan publik tidak berpengaruh kualitas audit. Hal ini dikarenakan kualitas audit lebih dipengaruhi oleh independensi auditor dan kompetensi auditor. Rotasi kantor akuntan publik juga tidak berpengaruh terhadap biaya audit baik normal maupun abnormal karena biaya audit yang dibebankan kantor akuntan publik pada setiap perusahaan pada dasarnya sama. Kata Kunci: Rotasi Kantor Akuntan Publik, Kualitas Audit, Biaya Audit, Manajemen Laba.

---

This research discusses the effect of audit firm rotation on audit quality and audit fees. The proxy for audit quality is earnings management as measured by abnormal accruals. The sample of this research is 619 nonfinancial companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2013 2016. The results show that the audit firm rotation does not affect the quality of audit. This is because audit quality is more influenced by auditor independence and auditor competence. The audit firm rotation also has no effect on the normal or abnormal audit cost because the audit fees charged by the audit firm on each company are essentially the same."

"Profesi akuntan publik menjadi semakin penting sebagai tulang punggung dunia bisnis. Namun, pada akhir-akhir ini kualitas audit yang dihasilkan oleh Kantor Akuntan Publik KAP mulai diragukan oleh masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh variabel audit tenure, time budget pressure, auditor specialization, dan locus of control terhadap kualitas audit. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer yang diperoleh melalui penyebaran kuesioner. Kuesioner tersebut dibagikan kepada para auditor yang bekerja pada KAP di Jakarta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan audit tenure, time budget pressure, auditor specialization mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit tetapi locus of control tidak mempunyai pengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit.

---

Public accountant profession is very important in the business world. Recently, however the audit quality produced by the audit firm KAP begin to doubt by the public. The purpose of this research is to determine the influence of variables Audit Tenure, Time Budget Pressure, Auditor Specialization, and Locus of Control to Audit Quality. This research use primary data collected through the questionnaire. The questionnaires are distributed to the auditors who work at the audit firm in Jakarta. The results of this research show that the variable Audit Tenure, Time Budget Pressure, Auditor Specialization have significant influence to audit quality, but locus of control has no a significant influence to audit quality."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh tenure audit dan rotasi auditor terhadap kualitas audit, pengaruh ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit, serta pengaruh moderasi ukuran KAP terhadap hubungan tenure audit dan kualitas audit. Tenure audit dibedakan menjadi tenure KAP dan tenure audit partner (AP). Rotasi auditor dibedakan menjadi rotasi KAP dan rotasi audit partner (AP). Sampel penelitian adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2004 hingga 2011, kecuali perusahaan yang bergerak di industri keuangan. Kualitas audit dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan kualitas laba dengan menggunakan tingkat akrual diskresioner (Kasznik, 1999). Tenure KAP dan rotasi KAP terbukti tidak berpengaruh kuadratik terhadap kualitas audit. Tenure AP dan rotasi AP juga tidak terbukti memiliki hubungan kuadratik dengan kualitas audit. Ukuran KAP terbukti berpengaruh positif secara langsung terhadap kualitas audit. Ditemukan pula bahwa pengaruh ukuran KAP memoderasi hubungan antara tenure AP dan kualitas audit. Akan tetapi, tidak ditemukan adanya pengaruh ukuran KAP dalam memoderasi hubungan antara tenure KAP dan kualitas audit. Hasil penelitian ini mengindikasikan perlunya pengkajian lebih lanjut terkait efektivitas peraturan yang membatasi tenure audit.

---

This research aims to examine the effect of audit tenure and auditor rotation on audit quality, the effect of audit firm size on audit quality, and the moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit tenure and audit quality. Audit tenure refers to audit firm tenure and audit partner tenure. Auditor rotation refers to audit firm rotation and audit partner rotation. The research samples are public companies that are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2004-2011 periods exclude the companies in financial industry. Audit quality?s proxy is earnings quality which is measured by the level of discretionary accrual (Kasznik, 1999). This research finds that audit firm tenure and audit firm rotation have no effect on audit quality. Audit partner tenure and audit partner rotation also have no effect on audit quality. There is a positive of audit firm size on audit quality. But, the evidences that support the moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit firm tenure and audit quality are insufficient. In the other hand, moderating effect of audit firm size on the relationship between audit partner tenure and audit quality shows that the engagement with Big X auditor will give a positive impact on audit quality. The results of this research show that the regulation that limits the audit tenure is a subject of further evaluation."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, dan penerapan good corporate governance (yang terdiri dari ukuran dewan komisaris, proporsi komisaris independen, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, kompetensi komite audit, dan jumlah rapat komite audit) terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan empat buah variabel kontrol, yaitu: profitabilitas perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, opini going concern, dan jenis industri.Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji regresi linier berganda terhadap 331 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia per 31 Desember 2013. Sampel penelitian diperoleh melalui metode purposive sampling.Penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris, jumlah rapat dewan komisaris, ukuran komite audit, jumlah rapat komite audit, profitabilitas perusahaan, dan jenis industri berpengaruh negatif terhadap audit report lag. Penelitian ini juga memberikan bukti empiris bahwa ukuran perusahaan dan opini going concern berpengaruh positif terhadap audit report lag. Namun demikian, penelitian ini tidak dapat memberikan bukti yang cukup untuk menjelaskan pengaruh dari pergantian kantor akuntan publik, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, proporsi komisaris independen, dan kompetensi komite audit terhadap audit report lag.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee?s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry.The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method.The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee?s competence on audit report lag., The objective of this research is to examine the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, and good corporate governance implementation (which consists of the board of commissioner size, independent board of commissioner proportion, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, audit committee’s competence, and number of audit committee meetings) on audit report lag. This research also uses four control variables: the profitability of the company, the size of the company, going concern opinion, and the type of industry.The hypotheses testing is done by using multiple linear regression of 331 listed companies in the Indonesia Stock Exchange of December 31, 2013. The samples are taken by using purposive sampling method.The research provides empirical evidence that board of commissioner size, number of board of commissioner meetings, audit committee size, number of audit committee meetings, the profitability of the company, and the type of industry have a negative effect on audit report lag. This research also provides empirical evidence that the size of the company, and going concern opinion have a positive effect on audit report lag. However, this research can not provide sufficient evidence to explain the effect of audit firm changes, audit firm size, independent board of commissioner proportion, and audit committee’s competence on audit report lag.]"

"Tesis ini menguji pengaruh Pendidikan Profesi, Pengalaman Auditor, Jumlah Klien (Audit Capacity) dan Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan menggunakan hasil pemeriksaan yang dilakukan oleh Pusat Pembinaan Akuntan dan Jasa Penilai (PPAJP) ?Kementerian Keuangan sebagai proksi kualitas audit. Hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa Pendidikan Profesi mempunyai dampak positif signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Pengalaman tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Secara umum Jumlah Klien mempunyai dampak positif signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Yang paling kuat buktinya ialah ukuran KAP berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kualitas audit

---

This thesis examines the effect of Continuing Professional Education (CPE), Auditor?s Experience, Audit Capacity Stress and Accounting Firm Size to audit quality with quality review report from The accountant and appraiser supervisory Centre- Ministry of Finance as the proxy of audit quality. CPE have positif signifikan impact to audit quality. Experience don?t have significant impact to audit quality. Commonly, Audit Capacity Stress have positif significant impact to audit quality. Accounting firm size has strongest proof having positif significant impact to audit quality."

"ABSTRAKPeraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 2015 tentang Praktik Akuntan Publik tidaklagi memberikan batasan terhadap jangka waktu perikatan audit suatu perusahaandengan kantor akuntan publik yang sama. Penelitian ini ingin menguji pengaruhtenur kantor akuntan publik terhadap independensi auditor di Indonesia.Independensi auditor diukur melalui kemungkinan auditor untuk memberikan opinimodifikasian. Opini modifikasian dibagi menjadi dua: NGCMO (non-goingconcern modified opinion) dan GCMO (going concern modified opinion). NGCMOmerupakan modifikasi opini yang menyatakan adanya ketidakwajaran dalampelaporan keuangan perusahaan, sedangkan GCMO menyatakan adanya keraguanakan kemampuan perusahaan untuk melangsungkan usahanya di masa depan,sehingga apabila tidak diungkapkan, opini GCMO akan memberikan risiko litigasiyang lebih tinggi. Tenur kantor akuntan publik terbukti berpengaruh negatif untukNGCMO, namun tidak berpengaruh signifikan untuk GCMO

---

ABSTRACTThe new regulation of Indonesia?s government, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20Tahun 2015 about Public Accountant Practices, no longer restricts the tenure ofaudit engagement between the company and the audit firm. This research aims totest the impact of audit firm tenure on auditor?s independence in Indonesia.Auditor?s independence is measured by the probability of the auditor to issue amodified opinion. There are two types of modified opinion: NGCMO (non-goingconcern modified opinion) and GCMO (going concern modified opinion). NGCMOis a modification to state that the financial statement is not presented fairly, whileGCMO states that there are uncertainties regarding the continuity of the business.So, if not properly issued, GCMO will give a higher litigation risk for the auditfirm. The research finds that audit firm tenure negatively affects the probability ofissuance of NGCMO, but not significantly affects the probability of issuance ofGCMO"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh ukuran kantor akuntan publik, yang diukur melalui jumlah rekan, jumlah auditor, jumlah klien dan jumlah pendapatan kantor akuntan publik terhadap kualitas audit yang diukur dengan akrual diskresioner dan opini audit going concern. Sampel penelitian adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2006?2008 dengan observasi sebanyak 348 perusahaan. Metode regresi berganda dan regresi logistik digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis.Hasil penelitian secara keseluruhan, untuk semua sampel maupun untuk sub sampel perusahaan yang diaudit KAP Big 4 dan sub sampel perusahaan yang diaudit KAP non Big 4, menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara ukuran kantor akuntan publik dengan kualitas audit. Ukuran KAP yang besar tidak selalu menghasilkan kualitas audit yang tinggi. Kualitas audit KAP besar dan kecil dapat dianggap cukup seragam.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of public accounting firm size, measured by number of partners, number of auditor staffs, number of clients, and public accounting firm?s revenue, on audit quality (measured by the accruals quality and going concern audit opinion). Samples are manufacturing firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the year 2006?2008 with total observations of 348 firm-years. Multiple regression and logistic regression is used for hypotheses testing.

The results show that for the entire samples as well as for two sub samples, the sub-samples of firms audited by Big 4 and sub-samples of firms audited by Non-Big 4, there are no significant effect of public accounting firm size on audit quality. Large accounting firms does not always produce high quality audit. Thus, audit quality of large and small accounting firms can be considered fairly uniform."