Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tulisan ini akan mencoba memahami bagaimana istilah human security dipahami dalam konteks studi keamanan internasional dari 3 sudut pandang: human security sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia, human security sebagai freedom from fear, dan human security sebagai freedom from want. Human security sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia menekankan pada pentingnya diseminasi norma HAM yang diwujudkan dalam bentuk agenda human security serta peran berbagai aktor dalam upaya diseminasi norma tersebut. Human security sebagai freedom from fear menekankan perlindungan terhadap manusia dari situasi konflik serta justifikasi terhadap intervensi kemanusiaan. Sedangkan human security sebagai freedom from want menekankan perlindungan terhadap martabat dan pemberdayaan manusia melalui program pembangunan. Analisis juga meliputi bagaimana kontribusi human security bagi studi keamanan serta penjajaran perbedaan kedua konsep tersebut. Tulisan ini berargumen bahwa human security memperkaya khasanah kajian keamanan internasional dengan memperluas agenda keamanan dan pengadopsian agenda normatif. Selain itu, tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun diklaim sebagai perusak koherensi intelektual kajian keamanan, konsep human security tetap relevan dalam studi keamanan internasional karena konsep tersebut berorientasi pada pembuatan kebijakan. Pada praktiknya, konsep human security digunakan sebagai jargon dalam mempromosikan agenda keamanan dan pembangunan oleh institusi internasional seperti PBB serta negara middle power seperti Kanada dan Jepang.

---

This paper aims to seek how human security is understood from 3 standpoints human security as human rights, human security as freedom from fear, and human security as freedom from want. Human security as human rights emphasizes dissemination of human rights norms manifested in the form of human security agenda and the role of various actors in the dissemination of the norms. Human Security as freedom from fear emphasizes protection of the people in conflict situations and justification towards humanitarian intervention agenda. Meanwhile, human security as freedom from want emphasizes the protection of human dignity and human empowerment through development program. It also highlights the contribution of human security to security studies as well as juxtaposition of the two concepts.

This paper argues that human security has enriched the repertoire of security studies by expanding the scope of security and adopting normative agenda. This paper concludes that although human security is claimed to be damaging to intellectual coherence of security studies, the concept itself remains relevant in international security studies due to its policy orientedness. In practice, human security is used as a jargon in promoting security and development agenda by international insitutions such as the United Nations as well as middle power countries such as Canada and Japan."

"With the end of the Cold War, threats to national security have become increasingly non-military in nature. Issues such as climate change, resource scarcity, infectious diseases, natural disasters, irregular migration, drug trafficking, information security and transnational crime have come to the forefront. This book provides a comprehensive introduction to Non-Traditional Security concepts. It does so by: " Covering contemporary security issues in depth " Bringing together chapters written by experts in each area " Guiding you towards additional material for your essays and exams through further reading lists " Giving detailed explanations of key concepts " Testing your understanding through end-of-chapter questions Edited by a leading figure in the field, this is an authoritative guide to the key concepts that you'll encounter throughout your non-traditional, and environmental, security studies courses"

"International Security is a cutting-edge analysis of the key security challenges and developments in the post-Cold War world. Drawing on a wide range of contemporary examples, from the Iraq war to the rise of China, it is an essential guide for students and policy makers seeking to understand the theoretical and empirical debates over the fast-changing nature of international security today.The book is organized into four main parts. Part 1 provides an analytical framework for the book, identifying the most significant post-Cold War shifts in international security and recent theoretical developments in security studies. Part 2 analyses the root causes for contemporary warfare, the dilemmas and debates over military intervention, and the role played by the UN, NATO and other organizations in maintaining international peace and security. Part 3 assesses the challenges of environmental security, including the threat of resource-based conflict, most notably over oil and water, and the perceived security challenges of international migration. Part 4 discusses the new security challenges posed by international terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and cyber warfare. It explores the strategies and policies adopted by the United States, particularly in the aftermath of 9/​11 and assesses the implications of the rise of China and other emerging powers.This book will be essential reading for students and analysts of international relations, international security and strategic studies."

"Ilmu hubungan internasional memiliki tiga paradigma utama; realisme, liberalisme, dan kontruktivisme yang khas dalam memandang institusi. Tulisan ini akan melihat dan membandingkan bagaimana ketiga paradigma ini memandang ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. Pada akhirnya, dapat diketahui keunikan dan kelemahan masing-masing paradigma dalam memandang kerjasama keamanan di Asia Tenggara ini. Realisme memandang security dilemma sebagai faktor kunci munculnya kerjasama, sedangkan liberalisme memandang institusionalisme sebagai faktor determinan. Di sisi lain, konstruktivisme menakankan pada identitas kolektif yang terkonstruksi di antara negara-negara anggota APSC 2015.

---

International relations has three major paradigms: realism, liberalism, and constructivism that has distinct view on institution. This paper will compare how the three paradigms asses the ASEAN Political Security Community 2015. In the end, the uniqueness and weaknesses of each paradigm will be identified. Realism regards security dilemma as a key factor in the emergence of security cooperation, while liberalism sees institutionalism as a determinant factor. On the other hand, constructivism emphasizes on collective identity that is constructed among the member countries of APSC 2015."

"Kerja sama keamanan Eropa mengalami perkembangan terbaru dengan aktivasi Permanent Structured Cooperation tahun 2017 oleh Uni Eropa. Aktivasi PESCO dilakukan pada waktu yang unik setelah United Kingdom memilih untuk keluar dari Uni Eropa melalui referendum di tahun 2016. Skripsi ini berusaha mencari tahu mengapa Uni Eropa mengaktivasi PESCO di tahun 2017. Tulisan ini menggunakan teori legitimasi yang ditulis oleh Tallberg dan Zurn dengan melihat legitimasi institusi berdasarkan fitur-fitur yang dimiliki institusi yaitu otoritas, prosedur dan performa. Teori tersebut digunakan karena terdapat permasalahan legitimasi yang dihadapi oleh Uni Eropa ketika PESCO diaktifkan. Menggunakan teori legitimasi, tulisan menemukan bahwa aktivasi PESCO dilakukan sebagai salah satu upaya Uni Eropa untuk melanjutkan integrasi sekaligus meningkatkan legitimasi yang dimiliki oleh institusi. Berdasarkan fitur otoritas, di dalam PESCO Uni Eropa memiliki otoritas yang rendah bila dibandingkan dengan bentuk kerja sama di bidang lainnya seperti Euro Area sebagai upaya mengurangi defisit legitimasi Uni Eropa. Sementara itu, berdasarkan fitur prosedur, pengambilan keputusan yang ada di dalam PESCO berpusat dalam Dewan Uni Eropa memiliki tujuan meningkatkan legitimasi di mata pemerintah negara anggota. Terakhir, berdasarkan fitur Performa, PESCO dibentuk untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas keamanan Uni Eropa dan legitimasi di mata audiens, namun lambatnya penyelesaian proyek menghalangi peningkatan legitimasi di fitur ini. Berdasarkan ketiga fitur tersebut, ditemukan bahwa PESCO dibentuk berdasarkan permasalahan legitimasi yang melanda Uni Eropa yaitu tingginya defisit legitimasi yang dihadapi, rendahnya kepercayaan dari negara anggota serta ketidakmampuan Uni Eropa untuk menyelesaikan masalah keamanan di lingkungan mereka. Dengan mengatasi ketiga hal tersebut, diharapkan aktivasi PESCO dapat meningkatkan legitimasi yang sebelumnya mengalami penurunan diakibatkan berbagai krisis.

---

European security cooperation underwent the latest development by the activation of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) in 2017 by the European Union. The PESCO activation was carried out in a unique time after the United Kingdom chose to leave the European Union through a referendum in 2016. This study seeks to find out why the European Union activated PESCO in 2017 and adopted the theory of legitimacy written by Tallberg and Zurn by looking at the legitimacy of the institutions based on the features of the institution, namely authority, procedure, and performance. Such theory was used because there were legitimacy problems faced by the European Union at the time when PESCO was activated. Using the theory of legitimacy, this study found that PESCO activation is carried out as one of the European Union's efforts to continue the integration while at the same time increasing the legitimacy of the institution. Based on the feature of the authority in PESCO, the European Union has low authority compared with forms of cooperation in other fields, as an effort to reduce the EU's legitimacy deficit. Meanwhile, based on the features of the procedure, the decision-making in PESCO is centered on the Council of the European Union with the aim of increasing legitimacy for its member state governments. Lastly, based on the feature of the performance, PESCO was activated to increase the EU security capabilities and legitimacy for the audience, however, the slow pace of project completion prevented the increase of legitimacy in this feature. Based on these three features, it was found that PESCO was formed on legitimacy problems that plagued the European Union, namely the high deficit of legitimacy, low trust from the member countries and the European Union's inability to resolve security problems in their environment. By overcoming those three things, it is hoped that PESCO activation may increase the legitimacy which has previously decreased due to various crises."

"This book offers a wide-ranging and comprehensive analysis of the growing field of critical security studies. Topics covered include the relationship between security and change, identity, the production of danger, fear and trauma, human insecurity and emancipation. The book explores the meaning and use of these concepts and their relevance to real-life situations ranging from the War on Terror to the Arab Spring, migration, suffering in war, failed states and state-building, and the changing landscape of the international system, with the emergence of a multipolar world and the escalation of global climate change."

"Tesis dengan judul "Kebijakan Cina Menangani lsu SARS dalam Perspektif Human Security" mencoba menjelaskan bagaimana wabah SARS menjadi salah satu ancaman terhadap human security, digambarkan dari dampak penyebaran wabah SARS terhadap beberapa negara berbagai aspek dan gambaran mengenai Cina merespon munculnya isu tersebut dalam perspektif human security.Wabah SARS yang menyerang di tahun 2002-2003 menunjukkan kekurangan transparansi dan ketidakefektifan kebijakan kesehatan publik di Cina yang akhirnya bukan hanya mempengaruhi warga Cina tetapi juga warga di beberapa negara. Penyembunyian dan under-reporting kasus infeksi oleh medical personnel dan pejabat pemerintah dengan serius telah mempengaruhi kepercayaan publik di dalam dan luar Cina. Bentuk ancaman baru seperti wabah SARS ini mempengaruhi persepsi pemimpin Cina dalam menilai kepentingan dan kebutuhan keamanan yang pada akhirnya mempengaruhi pengambilan keputusan dalam kebijakan keamanan. Ditambah lagi dengan tekanan-tekanan yang didapatkan Cina dari WHO dan masyarakat Internasional karena keterlambatan penanganan kasus ini dengan melarang warga untuk melakukan kunjungan perjalanan ke Cina yang tentunya secara langsung berdampak pada bidang perekonomian.Situasi yang berkembang memperlihatkan bahwa SARS telah memberikan implikasi yang cukup luas tidak hanya terhadap keamanan kesehatan manusia, tetapi juga terhadap keamanan sosial, ekonomi dan politik satu negara, dalam hal ini khususnya Cina.Dengan demikian, kebijakan yang diyakini pemerintah Cina dapat dilakukan dalam menanggulangi isu ini pada kenyataannya belum cukup memadai, sehingga dampak dari wabah SARS meningkat hingga mencapai angka kematian/ mortality yang cukup tinggi dan meluas ke beberapa negara."