Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi kebijakan perhitungan PPh secara proporsional bagi suami isteri yang memilih untuk menjalankan hak dan kewajiban perpajakan terpisah serta menganalisis faktor penghambat dalam pengimplementasiannya.  Kondisi saat ini, masih banyak WP dengan status Memilih Terpisah yang belum menjalankan perhitungan dan pelaporan PPh sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Penelitian ini dilakukan metode post-positifisme dan dengan studi pustaka dan wawancara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pertama, belum terpenuhinya indikator implementasi dengan kriteria evaluasi kebijakan William N. Dunn terkait efektivitas, efisiensi, perataan, kecukupan, responsivitas dan ketepatan pada kebijakan PPh atas penghasilan OP bagi suami isteri yang menjalankan hak dan kewajiban perpajakan terpisah. Hal ini dikarenakan masih terdapat gap antara teori terkait perhitungan PPh dengan kebijakan perhitungan PPh secara proporsional untuk WP suami isteri yang memiliki NPWP terpisah. Kebijakan tersebut justru membuat WP harus mengeluarkan biaya tambahan karena terdapat potensi kurang bayar pada perhitungan PPh secara proporsional. Selain itu kebijakan tersebut juga memberatkan WP untuk melakukan perhitungan PPh kembali secara proporsional meskipun setiap bulannya pemberi kerja sudah melakukan pemotongan PPh 21. Kedua, faktor penghambat yang dihadapi oleh WP dan fiskus dalam implementasi ketentuan perhitungan PPh secara proporsional untuk WP suami isteri yang menjalankan kewajiban perpajakan sendiri-sendiri yaitu terbatasnya pengetahuan WP terkait kebijakan perhitungan PPh secara proporsional, keraguan untuk mengajukan penghapusan karena adanya konsekwensi penelitian, dan adanya tambahan biaya kepatuhan untuk menjalankan ketentuan tersebut. Sementara itu, faktor penghambat dari sisi fiskus yaitu keterbatasan sistem IT untuk mengawasi dan mengintegrasikan data suami isteri, jumlah SDM yang tidak sebanding dengan jumlah WP serta penyelarasan ketentuan di setiap KPP.

---

This research aims to evaluate income tax calculation policy regarding maried filing separately and to analyze the obstacles in its implementation. At the present time, there are still many maried filing separately taxpayers that have not conduct their tax payment and submission based on the prevailing regulations. This research is post-positivisme method and conducted through literature review and in-depth interview. The results show that first, the indicator of implementation with evaluation criteria by William Dunn related to Effectiveness, Efficiency, Adequacy, Equity, Responsiveness, Appropriateness on tax income policy on married filing separately have not been found due to the gap between proportional tax calculation on married filing separatlely. This policy tends to cause the taxpayers to spend additional costs due to potential underpayment on the proportional income tax calculation. Furthermore, this policy will cause the taxpayers to recalculate their income tax proportionally even though their monthly income tax article 21 have been withheld by their employers. Secondly, the obstacles faced by taxpayer and tax official in the implementation of proportional income tax calculation on married filing separately are insufficient knowlegde of the taxpayers, the uncertain feeling of submitting cancellation due to the fear of being observed, and additional compliance cost to comply with the regulation. Meanwhile, the challenges found in tax official's side are the limit of IT System to control and integrate data regarding married taxpayers, insufficient number of tax personnels compared to the number of taxpayers and the harmonization of many regulations in every small tax office."

"This study is about woman as part of family. Indonesian tax imposition system considers family as one economic unit Since women population is relatively same compared to men population (year 1971 up to 2000 Population Census Data), it means that women take a significant role in tax revenue. Additional data from Manpower and Transmigration Department shows that job vacancies are provided for women more than for men. Hence, taxation policy for woman is an important object to study.The first matter to study is whether any discriminatory taxation treatment for woman. If it is so, then it is analyzed whether discrimination emerges due to the concept of family as one economic unit. The next thing to find out is discrimination causes other than above concept. Is it discriminative because of government takes affirmative action against women? The following study is to elaborate taxes implication if taxation regulation connected to another regulation such as The Law of Marriage. As a comparator, it brings up a glance of implementation in Singapore, Malaysia and Philippines.In connection with PTKP (Untaxed Income) as one of reflections of family as one economic unit concept, study is carried out on a 2003 regulation concerning Government-Borne income Tax on Workers' Employment Income. Government bears income tax on income received by workers up to Rpl.000.000. This amount is bigger than tax exemption. The analysis is needed to find out whether women get advantage from this regulation.This study is based on The Four Maxims of Adam Smith. Government shall apply 4 concepts for tax imposition (equality, certainty, convenience and economy). For the objective study, it has been used some methods of interpretation. The study is analytical descriptive and carried out by policy research approach in qualitative way. Data collected by library research then observed by using census method. The Data are taxes regulations which were issued during January 3, 1994 up to March 29, 2004. Those data sorted by using key word: "wanita", "ibu", "perempuan", "karyawati", "janda", isteri", dan ?istri" (woman, mother, female employee, widow, divorcee, and wife)The analysis result conclusion that, in general, Indonesian taxation policy uphold Adam Smith's concept of equality which is in this study means equal treatment between woman and man; non discriminative. It is equal in all fields of taxation i. e. General Provisions and Taxation Procedures, Income Tax, Value Added Tax on Goods and Services and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods, Land and Buildings Tax, Fees for Acquisition of Title to Land and Buildings, Tax Collection by Warrant and Tax Court.There are 14 discriminative regulations among 6.544 data, i.e. field of General Provisions and Taxation Procedures, Income Tax, and Tax Collection by Warrant. 6 of those discriminations due to Indonesian tax imposition system considers a family as one economic unit.Decree of Finance Minister number 2941KMK.0312003 concerning Procedures for Entrusting Tax Guarantor Who is Taken into Custody in the Course of Tax Collection by Warrant, provide special treatment upon woman as Tax Guarantor who is taken hostage. This is an affirmative action for protecting, respecting and upholding women's special rights. However there is uncertainty in interpretation of 7 regulations because of inconsistency in drafting. In order to avoid misunderstanding on a regulation, it would be better if the regulation use neutral language (non gender base) where an indefinite gender is intended.If taxation policy for women is connected to another regulation other than taxation, such as The Law of Marriage, then there are some difference subjects, i.e_:1. starting date of manage 1 child status change;2. starting date/ending date of marriage agreement regarding income and assets separation;3. polygamy phenomenon:4. non legal child;5. marriage which is held abroad.Married women as workers who earn in money up to Rp2.000.000 get the most advantage due to implementing Decree of the Minister of Finance No. 4861KMK 0312003 concerning Government-Borne Income Tax on Workers' Employment Income."