Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"As the worlds prison population continues to grow and with the number of inpatient beds in forensic mental health units on the rise, establishing valid and reliable methods of identifying individuals who will commit violent acts is an important public safety issue. One approach to identifying future offenders is through the use of risk assessment-unstructured and structured methods of predicting the likelihood of antisocial behavior. Although much has been written on the performance of risk assessment methods in research settings, little is known about current standards of practice and relevant public policy across the globe. With chapters contributed by leading scholars in more than 15 countries, this volume explores the topic of violence risk assessment from an international perspective. Using findings from the seminal International Risk Survey, the largest qualitative study in the history of the field, current assessment, management, and monitoring practices on six continents are discussed. The most commonly used risk assessment tools are identified and described, risk communication preferences are examined, and recommendations for mental health practitioners, criminal justice professionals, and policymakers are shared. Finally, seminal research studies, current practice guidelines, and relevant legal statutes of individual countries are reviewed."

"ABSTRAKPendahuluan: Penduduk dengan gangguan jiwa berat diketahui berisiko melakukan kejahatankekerasan yang lebih tinggi dari biasanya. Untuk mencegah kekerasan,kemampuan untuk menilai risiko kekerasan diperlukan untuk menilai apakah kekerasanakan berulang atau tidak. Salah satu metode penilaian risiko kekerasan ini adalahdengan Alat Penilaian Risiko Kekerasan (VRA), tetapi metode dan kemampuan untuk menilaiRisiko kekerasan belum umum diajarkan dan digunakan di Indonesia. Masalah inimenimbulkan pertanyaan dari tim peneliti tentang bagaimana mengembangkanketerampilan ini di Indonesia.Metode: Pengumpulan data dilakukan di dua lokasi yaitu di Padang pada tanggal 1 Agustus 2019, danpada tanggal 14 September 2019 di Diklat RSCM, Jakarta. Pesertanya adalah dokter spesialispsikiatri dan/atau sedang menjalani PPDS untuk psikiatri. Peserta mengisilembar angket dan lembar sebelum pendidikan dan lembar post-test setelah pendidikan. DataSkor dan post-test peserta kemudian dianalisis menggunakan Wilcoxon Signed Rank Testdengan SPSS versi 23 untuk melihat signifikansinya. Data demografi juga dianalisis denganpeningkatan nilai post-test dengan Uji Korelasi Spearman, Uji U Mann-Whitney, dan . ujiKruskal-Wallis.Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan (p<0,05) antara nilai pre-test dan post-test,sedangkan analisis data demografi seperti tingkat pendidikan terakhir, pengalaman sebelumnya,menjalani pendidikan penilaian risiko kekerasan selama program pendidikan spesialis (PPDS)psikiatri, pengalaman menjalani pendidikan penilaian risiko kekerasan di luarPPDS untuk psikiatri, pengalaman menangani kasus kekerasan, lama kerja, jumlah kasusditangani per bulan, dan data penilaian diri terhadap kemampuan menangani berbagaikasus kekerasan (fisik, seksual, psikologis dan penelantaran) hingga peningkatan nilai post-testtidak ada hubungan atau perbedaan yang signifikan.Kesimpulan: Ada peningkatan yang signifikan antara skor pre-test dan post-test setelahdiberikan pendidikan. Korelasi dan pengaruh karakteristik demografi peserta terhadap peningkatanskor post-test tidak memiliki nilai signifikan. Penelitian ini dapat menjadi dasar untukmenyusun modul atau materi baru dalam psikiatri PPDSABSTRACTIntroduction: People with severe mental disorders are known to be at risk of committing crimeshigher hardness than usual. To prevent violence,the ability to assess the risk of violence is needed to assess whether violencewill repeat or not. One of these violence risk assessment methods iswith the Violence Risk Assessment Tool (VRA), but methods and capabilities to assessThe risk of violence is not yet commonly taught and used in Indonesia. This problemraises questions from the research team about how to developthese skills in Indonesia.Methods: Data collection was carried out in two locations, namely in Padang on August 1, 2019, andon September 14, 2019 at the RSCM Training and Education, Jakarta. Participants are specialist doctorspsychiatrist and/or undergoing PPDS for psychiatry. Participants fill inquestionnaire sheets and sheets before education and post-test sheets after education. DataParticipants' scores and post-test were then analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Testwith SPSS version 23 to see the significance. Demographic data were also analyzed byincrease in post-test scores with the Spearman Correlation Test, the Mann-Whitney U Test, and . testKruskal-Wallis.Results: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the pre-test and post-test scores,while the analysis of demographic data such as the last education level, previous experience,undergo violence risk assessment education during the specialist education program (PPDS)psychiatry, experience undergoing violence risk assessment education outside pendidikanPPDS for psychiatry, experience in handling violent cases, length of work, number of caseshandled per month, and self-assessment data on the ability to handle variouscases of violence (physical, sexual, psychological and neglect) to increased post-test scoresthere is no significant relationship or difference.Conclusion: There is a significant increase between pre-test and post-test scores aftergiven education. Correlation and influence of participant demographic characteristics on improvementpost-test scores have no significant value. This research can be the basis forcompiling new modules or materials in PPDS psychiatry"