Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The Jury Under Fire: Myth, Controversy, and Reform examines a number of controversial beliefs about juries that have persisted in recent years, as well as the implications of these views for jury reform. It reviews empirical research on both criminal and civil juries that uses a variety of research methodologies: simulations, archival analyses, field studies, and juror interviews. Each chapter is titled with a mistaken assumption or myth about jurors or juries. The book critiques these myths and relies on social science research findings to inform empirically grounded reform efforts. It focuses on the experience of serving as a juror; jury selection and jury size; and the impact of evidence from eyewitnesses, experts, confessions, and juvenile offenders. It also covers the process of deciding damages and punishment and the role of emotions in jurors decision making, and it compares jurors and judges decisions. Finally, it reviews a broad range of efforts to reform the jury, including the most promising reforms that have a strong empirical foundation. Sample legal cases are included throughout the book to illustrate key points and promote reader interest. The book is unique in its comprehensive integration of social science research on juries, legal issues, and the real-world trials that splash across our headlines and television screens."

"In Biloxi, Mississippi, a woman sues a tobacco company for the death of her husband from lung cancer. The protagonists are a jury fixer, that is a lawyer whose role is to assure a jury favorable to the company, and a rogue juror whom the fixer cannot eliminate or control. This is a landmark tobacco trial with hundreds of millions of dollars at stake which begins routinely, then swerves mysteriously off course. The jury is behaving strangely, and at least one juror is convinced he's being watched. Soon they have to be sequestered. Then a tip from an anonymous young woman suggests she is able to predict the jurors' increasingly odd behavior. Is the jury somehow being manipulated, or even controlled? If so, by whom? And, more important, why?"

"Proses reformasi birokrasi dengan metode e-Bureaucracy di Kabupaten Jembrana memunculkan satu asumsi bahwa modernisasi birokrasi dapat tertunjang oleh sistem kemasyarakatan berbasis pada nilai budaya. Secara normatif, ada asumsi bahwa penerapan e-Bureaucracy sejak masa Bupati I Gede Winesa mampu mereformasi birokrasi Kabupaten Jembrana. Namun, hasil penelitian terbaru pada masa Bupati Putu Artha menunjukkan bahwa ada anomali potensi kegagalan e-Bureaucracy, mulai dari penurunan fungsi menara J-Net, tidak berfungsinya Kantor Internet Desa, hingga pelayanan birokrasi secara manual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada dua masalah dasar dalam implementasi e- Bureaucracy. Pertama, lemahnya reformasi internal birokrasi Kabupaten Jembrana. Kondisi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh euforia masa lalu dan lemahnya daya inovasi aparat birokrasi Jembrana. Lemahnya inovasi disebabkan oleh belum optimalnya prinsip pendelegasian dalam struktur birokrasi di Jembrana. Kedua, belum optimalnya partisipasi masyarakat sebagai basis reformasi eksternal. Penyebabnya adalah kuatnya pendekatan top-down pemerintah kabupaten kepada sistem kemasyarakatan yang ada dan masih belum optimalnya prinsip pemberdayaan masyarakat oleh LSM lokal. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menerapkan studi literatur, wawancara mendalam, dan focus group discussions (FGD).

---

The use of technology in reforming the government bureaucracy, namely e-Bureaucracy in the regency of Jembrana raises the assumption that the modernization of the bureaucracy can be supported by the social system based on cultural values. It is assumed that the implementation of e-Bureaucracy since the leadership of Regent I Gede Winesa was able to reform the bureaucracy in Jembrana. However, the latest research of his successor?s leadership suggests that there is the potential for failure of e-Bureaucracy, ranging from a decrease in function of the J-Net tower, the non-functioning of the rural internet office, and the return to manual service. The results showed that there are two basic problems in the implementation of e-Bureaucracy. First, the lack of sustained internal reform in Jembrana. This condition is caused by the euphoria with the past government and by the lack of innovation by the Jembrana bureaucratic apparatus. This situation is caused by the limited delegation of power in the bureaucratic structure in Jembrana. Secondly, community participation is not really being optimized as the basis of external reform. The lack of community participation is caused by the strong top-down approach from government and the lack of empowerment building by local NGO. The study uses a qualitative approach supplemented with literature study, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions (FGD)."

"The use of technology in reforming the government bureaucracy, namely e-Bureaucracy in the regency of Jembrana raises the assumption that the modernization of the bureaucracy can be supported by the social system based on cultural values. It is assumed that the implementation of e-Bureaucracy since the leadership of Regent I Gede Winesa was able to reform the bureaucracy in Jembrana. However, the latest research of his successor?s leadership suggests that there is the potential for failure of e-Bureaucracy, ranging from a decrease in function of the J-Net tower, the non-functioning of the rural internet office, and the return to manual service.The results showed that there are two basic problems in the implementation of e-Bureaucracy. First, the lack of sustained internal reform in Jembrana. This condition is caused by the euphoria with the past government and by the lack of innovation by the Jembrana bureaucratic apparatus. This situation is caused by the limited delegation of power in the bureaucratic structure in Jembrana. Secondly, community participation is not really being optimized as the basis of external reform. The lack of community participation is caused by the strong top-down approach from government and the lack of empowerment building by local NGO. The study uses a qualitative approach supplemented with literature study, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions (FGD).

---

Proses reformasi birokrasi dengan metode e-Bureaucracy di Kabupaten Jembrana memunculkan satu asumsi bahwa modernisasi birokrasi dapat tertunjang oleh sistem kemasyarakatan berbasis pada nilai budaya. Secara normatif, ada asumsi bahwa penerapan e-Bureaucracy sejak masa Bupati I Gede Winesa mampu mereformasi birokrasi Kabupaten Jembrana. Namun, hasil penelitian terbaru pada masa Bupati Putu Artha menunjukkan bahwa ada anomali potensi kegagalan e-Bureaucracy, mulai dari penurunan fungsi menara J-Net, tidak berfungsinya Kantor Internet Desa, hingga pelayanan birokrasi secara manual.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada dua masalah dasar dalam implementasi e-Bureaucracy. Pertama, lemahnya reformasi internal birokrasi Kabupaten Jembrana. Kondisi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh euforia masa lalu dan lemahnya daya inovasi aparat birokrasi Jembrana. Lemahnya inovasi disebabkan oleh belum optimalnya prinsip pendelegasian dalam struktur birokrasi di Jembrana. Kedua, belum optimalnya partisipasi masyarakat sebagai basis reformasi eksternal. Penyebabnya adalah kuatnya pendekatan top-down pemerintah kabupaten kepada sistem kemasyarakatan yang ada dan masih belum optimalnya prinsip pemberdayaan masyarakat oleh LSM lokal. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan menerapkan studi literatur, wawancara mendalam, dan focus group discussions (FGD)."