Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[Skripsi ini membahas pembatalan perkawinan poligami karena ketiadaan izinisteri pertama dalam melakukan poligami. Pasal 5 UU Perkawinan, Hukum Islamdan Pasal 58 KHI (ijtihad para ulama Indonesia), mengatur bahwa poligamidiperbolehkan apabila memenuhi syarat-syarat. Dalam melakukan penelitian,penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridisnormatifdan tipologi bersifat deskriptif analitis. Permasalahan dalam skripsi iniadalah bagaimana pengaturan pembatalan perkawinan poligami, bagaimana akibatpembatalan perkawinan poligami dan apakah tepat pertimbangan hakim dalampembatalan perkawinan pada Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tangerang Nomor312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng. Kesimpulan atas permasalahan tersebut adalahperkawinan poligami yang dilakukan tanpa adanya izin isteri pertama adalahbertentangan dengan UU Perkawinan dan KHI sehingga dapat dibatalkan. Putusanpembatalan perkawinan menyebabkan perkawinan mereka batal, mereka bukanlagi sebagai suami isteri, hak dan kewajiban antara suami isteri menjadi hapus,tidak ada harta bersama, anak yang lahir dari perkawinan yang dibatalkan tetapmenjadi anak sah dari kedua orang-tuanya dan ada masa iddah bagi isteri. PutusanHakim PA Tangerang Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng sudah tepat.

---

This thesis examines the annulment of marriage caused by the absence of

permission from the first wife to do polygamy. Article 5 of Marriage Law, Islamic

Law and Article 58 Compilation of Islamic Law (ijtihad by Indonesian muslim

scholars), regulate that husband is permitted to do polygamy if he fulfill the

requirements. In conducting this research, the writer uses juridicial-normative

library research methods and the typology is descriptive analytical. The problem

in this thesis are how is the regulation of polygamous marriage annulment, the

consequences of polygamous marriage annulment and whether the judges

sentence of religious court of Tangerang No. 312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is already

appropriate and correct or not. The conclusion of those problems are polygamous

marriages that held without the first wife’s permission is prohibited and against

Marriage Law and Compilation of Islamic Law, so that polygamous marriage can

be annulled. Polygamous marriage annulment causes their marriage is annulled,

they are no longer as husband and wife, the rights and obligations between

husband and wife whose marriage is annulled become no longer exist, there is no

common property between them, children who were born on that annulled

polygamous marriage are still legitimate child of their parents and there is waiting

period for the wife. Judge’s sentence of Religious Court of Tangerang No.

312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is correct and appropriate.;This thesis examines the annulment of marriage caused by the absence of

permission from the first wife to do polygamy. Article 5 of Marriage Law, Islamic

Law and Article 58 Compilation of Islamic Law (ijtihad by Indonesian muslim

scholars), regulate that husband is permitted to do polygamy if he fulfill the

requirements. In conducting this research, the writer uses juridicial-normative

library research methods and the typology is descriptive analytical. The problem

in this thesis are how is the regulation of polygamous marriage annulment, the

consequences of polygamous marriage annulment and whether the judges

sentence of religious court of Tangerang No. 312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is already

appropriate and correct or not. The conclusion of those problems are polygamous

marriages that held without the first wife’s permission is prohibited and against

Marriage Law and Compilation of Islamic Law, so that polygamous marriage can

be annulled. Polygamous marriage annulment causes their marriage is annulled,

they are no longer as husband and wife, the rights and obligations between

husband and wife whose marriage is annulled become no longer exist, there is no

common property between them, children who were born on that annulled

polygamous marriage are still legitimate child of their parents and there is waiting

period for the wife. Judge’s sentence of Religious Court of Tangerang No.

312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is correct and appropriate., This thesis examines the annulment of marriage caused by the absence of

permission from the first wife to do polygamy. Article 5 of Marriage Law, Islamic

Law and Article 58 Compilation of Islamic Law (ijtihad by Indonesian muslim

scholars), regulate that husband is permitted to do polygamy if he fulfill the

requirements. In conducting this research, the writer uses juridicial-normative

library research methods and the typology is descriptive analytical. The problem

in this thesis are how is the regulation of polygamous marriage annulment, the

consequences of polygamous marriage annulment and whether the judges

sentence of religious court of Tangerang No. 312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is already

appropriate and correct or not. The conclusion of those problems are polygamous

marriages that held without the first wife’s permission is prohibited and against

Marriage Law and Compilation of Islamic Law, so that polygamous marriage can

be annulled. Polygamous marriage annulment causes their marriage is annulled,

they are no longer as husband and wife, the rights and obligations between

husband and wife whose marriage is annulled become no longer exist, there is no

common property between them, children who were born on that annulled

polygamous marriage are still legitimate child of their parents and there is waiting

period for the wife. Judge’s sentence of Religious Court of Tangerang No.

312/Pdt.G/2009/PA.Tng is correct and appropriate.]"

"Perkawinan poligami harus dilakukan sesuai dengan peraturan perundangundangan yang berlaku. Salah satu syaratnya adalah harus adanya izin dari isteri pertama dan izin dari Pengadilan Agama. Apabila syarat tersebut tidak dipenuhi, maka isteri pertama mempunyai hak untuk membatalkan perkawinan tersebut. Dari uraian tersebut timbul permasalahan diantaranya apakah Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan sudah cukup mengatur perlindungan hukum terhadap isteri pertama sebagai akibat dari perkawinan poligami, bagaimana aturan perundang-undangan berkaitan dengan pembatalan perkawinan dikaitkan dengan perkawinan poligami dan bagaimana kedudukan (status) isteri dan anak-anak yang terlanjur dilahirkan dari perkawinan yang dibatalkan. Untuk dapat mencari jawaban permasalahan ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yang bersifat yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yaitu data yang diperoleh dari kepustakaan dan didukung dengan wawancara kepada narasumber. Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Nomor 822/Pdt.G/2004/PA.Dpk telah dilakukan pembatalan perkawinan. Pembatalan tersebut terjadi karena adanya pelaksanaan perkawinan poligami yang dilakukan tanpa seizin isteri pertama dan izin dari Pengadilan Agama. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan dikatakan bahwa Undang-undang Perkawinan sudah cukup melindungi isteri pertama sebagai akibat dari perkawinan poligami. Poligami yang dilakukan tanpa memenuhi persyaratan yang ditentukan oleh Undang-undang, maka isteri sah dari perkawinan sebelumnya yang tidak setuju dengan adanya perkawinan poligami diberikan hak oleh Undang-undang untuk membatalkan perkawinan. Suami yang melakukan perkawinan poligami tanpa adanya izin dari pengadilan agama dapat menyebabkan perkawinan tersebut dapat dibatalkan. Adanya keputusan pembatalan perkawinan dari pengadilan, segala hak dan kewajiban antara suami isteri menjadi tidak ada dan keputusan pembatalan perkawinan tidak berlaku surut terhadap anak-anak yang dilahirkan dalam perkawinan tersebut, kedudukan status) adalah tetap sebagai anak sah. Dalam hal ini harus dilakukan penyuluhan hukum kepada masyarakat oleh universitas-universitas atau lembaga swadaya masyarakat yang berkecimpung dalam bidang perkawinan mengenai prosedur perkawinan termasuk mengenai penyebab terjadinya pembatalan perkawinan.

---

Polygamy marriages should be conducted in accordance with the legislation in force. One of the conditions have the permission of first wife and permission from the Religious Courts. If conditions are not met, then the first wife the right to cancel the marriage. From the description of which raised the question whether Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage is enough to set the legal protection of the first wife as a result of polygamy marriages, how the rules of the legislation relating to the cancellation of marriage is associated with polygamy marriages and how the position wife and children already born from the marriage canceled. To be able to find answers to these problems, the author uses the method of juridical normative study using secondary data is data obtained from literature and supported by an interview to the informant. Religious Court in Decision No. 822/Pdt.G/2004/PA.Dpk has done annulment. Cancellation is due to implementation of polygamous marriages are performed without first wife's permission and consent of the Religious Courts. Based on research by saying that Marriage Act is sufficient to protect the first wife as a result of polygamy marriages. Polygamy is conducted without complying with the requirements stipulated by the Act without the permission of the first wife and the permission of religious courts, then lawful wife from a previous marriage who does not agree with the existence of polygamy marriages are granted the right by law to annul the marriage of her husband. Marriage can be canceled if there are terms are not being met in the hold of marriage. Husbands who do polygamous marriages without the permission of the court religion then it can lead to marriage be reversed. With the annulment of the court decision, all the rights and obligations between husband and wife become non-existent and the decision is retroactive annulment of the children born within marriage, the position as as his rights are fixed as a legitimate child. Should also be made to the community legal education by universities or non-governmental organizations engaged in the field of marriage about marriage procedures, including the cause of cancellation of marriage."

"ABSTRAKDi Indonesia masalah perkawinan telah mendapat pengaturan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Dalam ketentuan Pasal 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan tersebut perkawinan diartikan sebagai ikatan lahir batin antara seorang pria dengan seorang wanita sebagai suami isteri dengan tujuan membentuk keluarga (rumah tangga) yang bahagia dan kekal berdasarkan Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa. Asas monogami dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan tidak bersifat mutlak, artinya hanya bersifat pengarahan pada pembentukan perkawinan monogami dengan jalan mempersulit dan mempersempit penggunaan lembaga poligami dan bukan menghapus sama sekali sistem poligami. Ketentuan dalam Pasal 65 ayat (1) huruf b Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan menentukan istri yang kedua dan seterusnya tidak mempunyai hak atas harta bersama yang telah ada sebelum perkawinan dengan istri kedua atau berikutnya itu terjadi. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Undang-undang Perkawinan hanya menegaskan bahwa antara suami istri mempunyai hak dan kedudukan yang seimbang. Atas dasar itu maka bagian harta bersama suami/istri adalah seimbang yaitu ½ (setengah) bagian suami dan ½ (setengah) bagian istri atau 50% : 50% bila dipersentasekan. Pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan keputusan pembagian harta perkawinan karena perceraian dan kematian terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.69 K/AG/2009 adalah dengan melihat fakta-fakta dipersidangkan, kemudian diputus berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan perundangundangan yaitu untuk istri pertama ½ dari harta bersama dengan suami yang diperoleh selama perkawinan, ditambah 1/3 x harta bersama yang diperoleh suami bersama dengan istri pertama dan istri kedua, ditambah 1/4 x harta bersama yang diperoleh suami bersama dengan istri ketiga, istri kedua dan istri pertama, ditambah 1/5 x harta bersama yang diperoleh suami bersama istri keempat, ketiga, kedua dan pertama.

---

ABSTRACT

In Indonesia marital problems have got arrangements in Undang-undang No. 1 Thn 1974 on Marriage. Article 1 of Undang-undang No. 1 Thn 1974 on Marriage is defined marriage as a bond between the inner and outer man with one woman as husband and wife with the intention of forming a family (household) are happy and eternal based on God . The principle of monogamy in the Marriage Undangundang No. 1 Thn 1974 on Marriage is not absolute, it means merely a briefing on the formation of monogamous marriage with roads complicate and restrict the use of the institution of polygamy and not removing altogether the system of polygamy The provisions of Article 65 paragraph (1) letter b of Undang-undang No. 1 Thn 1974 on Marriage determine the second wife and so do not have rights to common property which existed prior to the marriage with a second or subsequent wife was happening. This study is a descriptive analysis using normative juridical approach. Marriage Act merely confirms that between husband and wife have equal rights and status. On that basis it is part of the joint property of husband/wife is balanced ie 1/2 (half) of the husband and 1/2 (half) part of the wife or 50 % : 50 % when percentage. Consideration judge gave judgment in the division of property in a marriage by divorce and the death of the 69 Supreme Court K/AG/2009 is to look at the facts council, then terminated under the provisions of the legislation is to first wife half of the property along with husband acquired during the marriage, plus 1/3 x joint property acquired with the husband 's first wife and second wife, plus ¼ x joint property acquired by husband and wife with the third, the second wife and his first wife, plus 1/5 x property along the husband and wife obtained with the fourth, third, second and first."

"Tulisan ini berfokus pada analisis mengenai pembatalan perkawinan karena salah sangka terhadap diri pasangan dalam Putusan No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn dengan mengacu pada UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 yang diubah dengan UU No. 16 Tahun 2019 (UU Perkawinan). Adapun metode penulisan yang digunakan adalah doktrinal dengan studi kepustakaan. Salah sangka terhadap diri pasangan didefinisikan ahli hukum dan para hakim terdahulu sebagai suatu penipuan identitas yang disengaja mengenai dirinya karena tidak terdapat pengaturan mendetail yang mendefinisikan salah sangka di dalam UU Perkawinan. Selaras dengan hal tersebut, Putusan No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn mengandung pokok perkara mengenai salah sangka mengenai diri istri yang diajukan oleh Pemohon. Pemohon menilai bahwa terdapat kebohongan mengenai latar belakang profesi, pendidikan, domisili, serta sikap Termohon yang tidak sesuai dengan sangkaannya sebelum perkawinan. Hakim dalam perkara mengabulkan permohonan Pemohon selaku suami secara seluruhnya dengan mempertimbangkan adanya kebohongan mengenai identitas diri istri selaku Termohon. Penulis menilai bahwa No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn telah sesuai dengan UU Perkawinan, tetapi tidak menyetujui pertimbangan hakim yang menafsirkan sikap pemarah Termohon dan percekcokan setelahnya sebagai suatu salah sangka, karena tidak relevan dengan penipuan identitas yang dilakukan Termohon dan merupakan sebab akibat dengan hak nafkah Termohon yang tertahan. Dalam menghadapi kekosongan hukum terkait salah sangka, hakim juga tidak mengakomodasi hukum agama Kristen yang dianut Pemohon dan Termohon serta memberi pertimbangan yang kurang cermat yang tidak didasarkan pada pengaturan selain UU Perkawinan. Penulis menilai bahwa hakim kurang mencerminkan penguasaan hukum. Dibutuhkan pula pengaturan yang spesifik mengenai definisi dan kategorisasi salah sangka untuk menciptakan kepastian hukum.

---

This paper analyzes marriage annulment due to false presumption towards the spouse in District Court Decision No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn with reference to Law No. 1 of 1974 which was amended by Law No. 16 of 2019 (Marriage Law). The writing method used is doctrinal method with literature study. False presumptions as the basis of marriage annulment has been defined by legal experts and previous judges as deliberate identity fraud regarding oneself due to unavailable provisions in defining false presumptions in the Marriage Law. In accordance with this, District Court Decision No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn contains the subject of the case regarding false presumptions submitted by the husband as Petitioner. The Petitioner considered that there were lies regarding the Respondent's professional background, education, domicile, and attitude which did not match Petitioner presumptions before the marriage. The judge granted the Petitioner's petition in its entirety taking into account the lies regarding the wife's identity as the Respondent. The author considers that No. 700/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Mdn was in accordance with the Marriage Law, but disagree with the judge's consideration which interpreted the Respondent's temperament and subsequent quarrel as a false presumptions, owing to the fact that it was irrelevant to the identity fraud committed by the Respondent and was a causality of the Respondent's livelihood being withheld. In facing the legal vacuum related to false presumptions, the judge also did not accommodate the Christian religious law adhered to by the Petitioner along with Respondent and gave inaccurate considerations that were not based on regulations other than the Marriage Law. In addition, the author considers that judges do not reflect their mastery of the law. Specific regulations are also needed regarding the definition and categorizations of false presumptions to contribute and construct legal certainty."

"Undang-undang No.1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam telah mengatur pelaksanaan perkawinan sedemikian rupa. Meskipun telah ada pengaturan terkait perkawinan, namun masih saja terdapat tindakan yang melanggar ketentuan sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam UU No. 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Misalnya seperti tindakan pemalsuan identitas yang disertai dengan poligami. Hal ini terlihat dengan adanya putusan Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru No. 568/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Pbr, tentang pemalsuan identitas diri disertai dengan poligami. Permasalahan yang timbul dalam penulisan ini yaitu bagaimana akibat hukumnya serta analisis terhadap pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam putusan Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru No. 568/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Pbr. Dalam melakukan penelitian, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis-normatif dan tipologi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitis. Sedangkan kesimpulan dari permasalahan tersebut yaitu akibat hukumnya adalah perkawinan yang mereka lakukan dapat dibatalkan. Sehingga seolah-olah tidak pernah terjadi perkawinan. Kemudian terkait Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam putusan Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru No. 568/Pdt.G/2015/PA. Pbr belum sesuai dengan Undang-Undang No. 1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.

---

Law number 1 year 1974 of marriage and Islamic law compilation has arranged in such a way. Although there has been arrangement related to marriage, but still there are proceeding that breach the provisions as regulated in the Law number 1 year 1974 of marriage and Islamic law compilation. For example, such as forgery identity followed with polygamy. This is can be seen in decision number 568 Pdt.G 2015 PA. Pbr. About forgery identity followed with polygamy, The problems that arise in this writing is how its legal consequences and the the analysis of legal considerations of judges in Court judgment Religion Pekanbaru number 568 Pdt.G 2015 PA. Pbr. In conducting this research, the writer uses juridical normative library research methods and the typology is descriptive analytical. While the conclusion of the problems above are legal consequences are related to the marital relationship, therefore marriage that they can be canceled. Thus resulting as though the marriage never happened. And then related Legal Considerations in Decision Religious Court Judge of Pekanbaru Number 568 Pdt.G 2015 PA. Pbr not in accordance with Law number 1 year 1974 of marriage and Islamic law compilation."

"Skripsi ini membahas pembatalan perkawinan karena status wali nikah yang tidak sah. KHI mengatur bahwa wali nikah merupakan salah satu rukun yang ada dalam perkawinan. Dalam melakukan penelitian, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif yang dilakukan dengan studi pustaka dan wawancara dan tipologi bersifat deskriptif analitis. Permasalahan dalam skripsi ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan pembatalan perkawinan, bagaimana akibat pembatalan perkawinan dan apakah tepat pertimbangan hakim dalam pembatalan perkawinan pada Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bekasi Nomor 1359/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Bks. Kesimpulan atas permasalahan tersebut adalah perkawinan yang dilakukan tanpa adanya wali nikah yang sah adalah bertentangan dengan UU Perkawinan, KHI dan Hukum Islam sehingga dapat dibatalkan. Putusan pembatalan perkawinan menyebabkan hak dan kewajiban antara suami isteri menjadi hapus dan perkawinan mereka dianggap batal, namun tetap ada harta bersama. Anak yang lahir dari perkawinan yang dibatalkan tetap menjadi anak sah dari kedua orangtuanya. Putusan Hakim PA Bekasi Nomor 1359/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Bks adalah tepat.

---

This thesis examines the annulment of marriage caused by the illegal status of the marriage trustee. The Compilation of Islamic Law regulates that the marriage trustee is one of the rukun existed in marriage. In conducting this research, the writer uses juridic-normative research method with literature study and interview and the typology is descriptive analytical. The issues in this undergraduate thesis are how the regulation of marriage annulment, how the consequence of the marriage annulment and whether the judges sentence of religious court of Bekasi No. 1359/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Bks is already appropriate and correct or not.

The conclusion of such issues is that the marriage conducted without legal marriage trustee is contradicted with the Marriage Law, the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Islamic Law so that it can be annulled. The marriage annulment decision causes the rights and obligations between husband and wife whose marriage are annulled become no longer exist, the marriage is annulled, but there is still joint property between them. A child born from that annulled marriage are still legitimate child of both parents. Judge’s sentence of Religious Court of Bekasi No. 1359/Pdt.G/2011/PA.Bks is correct and appropriate."

"UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan pada dasarnya perkawinan menganut asas monogami terbuka, dengan maksud masih diperbolehkan adanya perkawinan poligami apabila dikehendaki oleh yang bersangkutan karena hukum dan agama dari yang bersangkutan mengizinkannya. Menurut agama Islam diperbolehkan berpoligami dengan memenuhi syarat-syarat tertentu. Walaupun sudah ada peraturan yang mengatur poligami namun masih saja terdapat poligami yang tidak memenuhi syarat, salah satunya karena tidak adanya persetujuan dari isteri/isteri-isteri terdahulu. Terlihat dengan adanya putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok No.324/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Dpk tentang Pembatalan Perkawinan Poligami. Permasalahan yang timbul dalam penulisan ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan, akibat dan upaya yang dilakukan dari pembatalan perkawinan poligami ditinjau dari Hukum Islam, UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan KHI, serta analisis terhadap putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok No.324/Pdt.G/PA.Dpk.Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan didukung dengan wawancara kepada narasumber dan tipologi penelitiannya deskriptif analitis. Dari penelitian penulis didapatkan bahwa pengaturan mengenai pembatalan perkawinan poligami ditinjau dari Hukum Islam diatur dalam al-Qur’an Surat An-Nisa ayat 22,23,24, sedangkan dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 diatur dalam Pasal 3 ayat (2), Pasal 4, Pasal 5, Pasal 22, dan Pasal 24. Menurut KHI diatur dalam Pasal 71 huruf a. Adanya keputusan pembatalan perkawinan dari pengadilan menimbulkan akibat hukum terhadap status/kedudukan suami isteri, anak yang dilahirkan dari perkawinan tersebut, harta bersama, dan terhadap pihak ketiga. Kemudian upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh isteri/isteri-isteri mengajukan pembatalan perkawinan ke pengadilan. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Depok No.324/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Dpk telah sesuai dengan Hukum Islam, UU No. 1 Tahun 1974, dan KHI.

---

Regulation No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage essentially adheres to the principle of open monogamy marriages, with the intention of the allowance of polygamy marriages if desired by the individual in question because the law and religion from those individuals allow it. According to the Islamic religion, polygamy is allowed if the necessary terms are fulfilled. Even though there isa regulation that governs polygamy, but there are still polygamous marriages that do not meet the requirement, one of the reasons being is that there are absent of consent from the current legal wife. With the Decision of Religious Court of Depok No. 324/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Dpk on Aborted Nuptials, problems arising from this writing are how are the cancelation polygamous marriages regulated, affected and affronted from the perspective of Islamic Law, Regulation No. 1 of Islamic laws and then analysis of the Decision of Religious Court of Depok No. 324/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Dpk.

The writer uses the method of normative judicial research along with interviews from sources and the typology of writing being analytical descriptive. From this research, the writer concludes that the law regarding cancelation of polygamous marriages from the perspective of Islamic law within the al-Qur’an An-Nisa Letter verse 22,23,24, while on Regulation No. 1 of 1974 is regulated in Article 1 verse 2, Article 2, Article 5, Article 22 and Article 24. According to Compilation of Islamic Law in Article 71 (a), there are decisions on cancellation by courts that gives legal affect towards the status of the bride and groom in question, their sons and/or daughters from the marriage, their shared wealth, and towards the third party. Consequently, the remedy that can be obtained by the wife/wives is to cancel the marriage in front of the court. The Decision of Religious Court of Depok No. 324/Pdt.G/2006/PA.Dpk is within the scope of Islamic Law, Regulation No. 1 of 1974 and Compilation of Islamic Law."

"Putusnya perkawinan tentu akan mempunyai banyak akibat kepada para pihak. Salah satu akibatnya terhadap pihak perempuan adalah masa ‘iddah. Terhadap perkawinan yang dibatalkan di Pengadilan Agama Depok dan Wonosari dapat penulis teliti apakah masa ‘iddah akibat pembatalan perkawinan dapat diperhitungkan serta apakah Hakim Pengadilan Agama tersebut menerapkan ketentuan hukum mengenai masa ‘iddah dalam putusannya. Penulis akan menganalisis dengan mengacu kepada metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Karena begitu penting ditetapkannya masa ‘iddah yang harus dijalankan oleh pihak perempuan setelah putus perkawinannya termasuk dari pembatalan perkawinan.

---

The breakdown of marriage will certainly have a lot due to the parties. One of the women is a result of the waiting period. Against the marriage was canceled in Depok Religious Court and can Wonosari authors carefully whether the waiting period can be taken into account due to the cancellation of marriage and whether the judge courts for applying the legal provisions regarding the waiting period in its decision. The author will analyze with reference to the normative juridical approach. Because it is so important stipulation of the waiting period that must be taken by the woman after the break up of a marriage, including the nullification of the marriage."

"Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (selanjutnya disebut UU Perkawinan) telah mengatur mengenai Pembatalan Perkawinan dalam ketentuan Pasal 22 sampai dengan Pasal 28. Hal-hal yang diatur mengenai Pembatalan Perkawinan di dalam UU Perkawinan sendiri adalah mengenai alasan-alasan apa saja yang dapat menjadi penyebab dibatalkannya suatu perkawinan. Bahwa secara keseluruhan dibatalkannya suatu perkawinan adalah karena tidak dipenuhinya syarat-syarat bagi suami dan/atau isteri untuk melangsungkan perkawinan. Dalam ketentuan Pasal 27 ayat (2) disebutkan bahwa salah satu alasan suatu perkawinan dapat dimohonkan pembatalannya adalah karena terdapat salah sangka atas diri suami atau isteri. Ketentuan inilah yang menjadi dasar adanya permohonan perkawinan yang diajukan Pemohon dalam perkara Nomor 1360 K/Pdt/2012, dimana Pemohon yang berkedudukan sebagai Isteri mendalilkan telah adanya salah sangka terhadap keadaan orientasi seksual Termohon—suami yang dinikahinya. Hakim pada Pengadilan Negeri maupun sampai dengan Mahkamah Agung, menolak adanya permohonan ini dengan alasan bahwa keadaan salah sangka tidak mencakup keadaan orientasi seksual dan perkawinan yang terjadi tidak menyalahi ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, setelah dikaji lebih lanjut dapat dipahami bahwa perkawinan yang demikian sebenarnya telah bertentangan dengan ketentuan Pasal 1 UU Perkawinan yang mengamanatkan kehidupan perkawinan yang langgeng. Lebih lanjut, dikaitkan dengan kajian psikologis mengenai kelainan orientasi seksual, dapat dipahami bahwa orientasi seksual merupakan bagian dari identitas diri seorang individu, sehingga merupakan bagian dari diri seseorang sebagaimana rumusan dari Pasal 27 ayat 2 UU Perkawinan. Untuk itu perkawinan yang demikian sepatutnya dibatalkan.

---

Marriage Regulation Number 1 Year 1994 as amended with The First Amendment of Marriage Regulation Number 16 Year 2019 (later on mentioned as “UU Perkawinan”) has regulated the annulment of marriage in the provisions of Article 22 through Article 28. UU Perkawinan regulates regarding what are the reasons that can be the cause of marriage being annulled. In general, the annulment of marriage can happen because of the conditions that already been established in UU Perkawinan is not fulfilled by the husband and/or the wife. In the provision of Article 27 verse (2) mentioned that one of the reason why marriage can be annulled is because there has been such misinterpretation towards the husband and/or the wife. This provision later became the main reason of marriage annulment petition that requested by the applicant in the case number 1360 K/Pdt/2012 in which the applicant has a legal standing as the wife that postulates that there had been some sort of misinterpretation towards her husband’s sexual orientation. Judges in Pengadilan Negeri and Mahkamah Agung rejected this petition with consideration that misinterpretation as mentioned in the provision of Article 27 verse 2 can not be applied for sexual orientation and there was no one in that marriage violates marriage law, thus, the petition can not be granted. However, after further study it can be understood that this kind of marriage is not comply with the provision of Article 1 UU Perkawinan which mandates that any marriage should expected to be last for a lifetime. Furthermore, related with physicology perspective regarding sexual orientation, it can be understood that sexual orientation is a part of the identity of an individual, therefore it is part of oneself as is mentioned in the Article of 27 verse (2) UU Perkawinan. For this reason such marriages should be cancelled."