Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan menganalisis penentuan status subjek pajak orang pribadi dual residence dalam perpajakan Indonesia baik dengan menggunakan P3B maupun tanpa P3B. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menganalisis keselarasan penentuan tersebut dengan asas certainty dalam perpajakan. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat aturan teknis penentuan status subjek pajak orang pribadi terkait potensi dual residence yang kurang selaras dengan UU PPh. Selain itu, penerapan penentuan status subjek pajak orang pribadi serta pemenuhan hak dan kewajiban perpajakan terkait dual residence di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak belum seragam sehingga memunculkan potensi perselisihan antara Wajib Pajak dengan petugas pajak serta hilangnya potensi penerimaan negara yang bersumber dari pajak. Diperlukan aturan pelaksanaan yang secara jelas dan mudah untuk dilaksanakan di lapangan agar penerapannya dapat sama di setiap unit kerja Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. Hal ini akan bermanfaat tidak hanya bagi Wajib Pajak namun juga kepada petugas pajak agar tidak ada lagi keraguan dalam penerapannya. Jika penerapannya dilakukan secara konsisten maka Wajib Pajak dan petugas pajak akan merasa lebih mudah dalam menjalankan tugasnya masing-masing. Potensi dispute dapat dihindari dan diminimalisasi sekecil mungkin serta dalam jangka panjang dapat berpengaruh pada penerimaan pajak.

---

ABSTRACTThis study was conducted with the aim to analyze the determination of tax subject status of private individuals dual residence in Indonesian Taxation either with Tax Treaty P3B or without P3B. This study also analyzes the alignment of the status determination with certainty principle in taxation. The research approach used in this research is qualitative approach. The results showed that there was an inconsistency between the technical rule on how to determine the status of personal tax subject related to the potential of dual residence and the Income Tax Law in Indonesia. In addition, the application of status of personal tax subject determination and taxation rights and duties fulfillment related to dual residence in the Tax Office in Indonesia were not consistent which might generate disputes between taxpayers and tax officers resulting in the loss of potential state revenues derived from taxes. It is necessary to apply clear and easy practical rules so that the implementation of tax subject determination could be uniform in all offices of Directorate General of Taxes. Equal understanding would benefit not only taxpayers but also tax officers to avoid disagreement in the application and to ease their respective duties. As the result, the potential dispute could be avoided and be minimized as small as possible and lastly, could increase the tax revenue in the long run."

"Laporan magang ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewajiban perpajakan dalam SPT Tahunan Orang Pribadi seorang ekspatriat Jepang. Ekspatriat tersebut menjalankan peran kerja ganda di dua negara, yaitu Singapura dan Indonesia. Menurut Hukum Pajak masing-masing negara, ekspatriat tersebut sama-sama dianggap sebagai tax resident di kedua negara tersebut untuk tahun pajak 2018. Hal ini menyebabkan ekspatriat tersebut harus dikenakan pajak di dua yuridiksi yang berbeda atas penghasilan yang sama. Penghasilan yang diterima oleh ekspatriat tersebut terdiri dari dua jenis, yaitu penghasilan dari Singapura sehubungan dengan pekerjaannya di Singapura dan penghasilan dari Jepang sehubungan dengan pekerjaannya di Indonesia. Kedua penghasilan tersebut terutang pajak di Singapura karena penghasilan dari Singapura bersumber dari Singapura, sedangkan penghasilan dari Jepang dikirimkan ke Singapura yang menganut sistem remittance base. Kedua jenis penghasilan tersebut wajib dilaporkan dalam SPT Tahunan Orang Pribadi ekspatriat sebagai penghasilan luar negeri dan akan dipajaki di Indonesia yang menganut sistem worldwide income. Untuk menghindari perpajakan berganda, ekspatriat tersebut dapat melakukan klaim kredit pajak luar negeri atas pajak penghasilan luar negeri yang telah dibayarkan.

---

This report aims to analyze tax obligations in the Indonesia Individual Tax Returns for a Japanese expatriate. The expatriate runs dual employment roles in two countries, namely Singapore and Indonesia. According to the tax laws of each country, the expatriate is both considered as a tax resident in Singapore and Indonesia for fiscal year 2018. This causes the expatriate to be taxed in two different jurisdictions for the same income. The income received by the expatriate consists of two types, namely income from Singapore in connection with his work in Singapore and income from Japan in connection with his work in Indonesia. Both of these revenues are taxed in Singapore because income from Singapore comes from Singapore, while income from Japan is sent to Singapore which adheres to the remittance base system. Both types of income must be reported by the expatriate in the Indonesia Individual Tax Returns as foreign income and will be taxed in Indonesia which adheres to the worldwide income system. To avoid double taxation, the expatriate can claim foreign tax credit for the foreign income tax that has been paid."

"ABSTRAKSalah satu permasalahan kependudukan rangkap terjadi apabila seorang Wajib Pajak Luar Negeri menerima atau memperoleh penghasilan dari Indonesia dalam satu tahun pajak. Mr. X adalah seorang warga negara Malaysia yang memperoleh keuntungan atas penjualan saham PT A yang tidak diperdagangkan di bursa non-listed company sehingga dikenakan pajak penghasilan atas keuntungan tersebut di Indonesia. Namun, pajak penghasilan tersebut dihitung berdasarkan ketentuan yang berlaku bagi Wajib Pajak Dalam Negeri sehingga menimbulkan pajak kurang bayar dalam SPT Tahunan Mr. X Tahun Pajak 2010. Atas ketidaksesuaian pengenaan pajak penghasilan yang tertuang dalam Surat Ketetapan Pajak Kurang Bayar Pajak Penghasilan Tahun Pajak 2010, maka perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk menentukan status residensi Mr. X yang sebenarnya agar pajak yang dikenakan sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku bagi dirinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Mr. X terbukti sebagai Wajib Pajak Luar Negeri berdasarkan pengujian atas ketentuan tie breaker rule dalam Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda P3B antara Indonesia dengan Malaysia. Kemudian, atas keuntungan penjualan saham non bursa efek yang diterima Mr. X dari Indonesia hanya dikenakan pajak penghasilan di Malaysia sesuai dengan hukum domestik perpajakan Malaysia. Saran yang dapat diberikan adalah diperlukan pemahaman akan P3B atau tax treaty bagi pemeriksa pajak, terutama mengenai kewajiban perpajakan untuk WPLN. Selain itu, Mr. X dapat mengajukan pencabutan Nomor Pokok Wajib Pajak NPWP agar ia hanya menjadi residen di 1 satu negara saja.

---

ABSTRACTOne of the dual residence problems occurs when a Foreign Tax Payer receives or obtains income from Indonesia within one tax year. Mr. X is a Malaysian citizen who gains a capital gain on the sale of PT A rsquo s non trading shares in stock exchange non listed company so that the income tax is imposed on such profits in Indonesia. However, the income tax is calculated based on the applicable tax law for Domestic Tax Payers, thereby incurring the underpayment tax in Mr. X rsquo s Annual Income Tax Return for Tax Year 2010. On the inconsistency of the imposition of income tax as stated in Tax Assessment Letter Income Tax Year 2010, it is necessary to conduct research to determine the status of residency of Mr. X in order that the taxes imposed in accordance with the provisions that apply to him. This research uses descriptive qualitative method with qualitative data analysis technique. The results of this research are Mr. X is proven as a Foreign Tax Payer based on the test of the provision of tie breaker rule in Tax Treaty between Indonesia and Malaysia. Then, the profit of the sale of non stock exchange shares received by Mr. X from Indonesia is only subject to income tax in Malaysia in accordance with Malaysian domestic tax law. The suggestions to be given are the need of understanding of P3B or tax treaty for tax inspector, especially regarding tax obligation for foreign taxpayer. In addition, Mr. X may apply for deregistration of Taxpayer Identification Number NPWP so that he will only be a resident in 1 one country only. "

"Umumnya perencanaan pajak merujuk pada proses merekayasa usaha dan transaksi Wajib Pajak supaya utang pajak berada dalam jumlah yang minimal, tetapi masih dalam bingkai peraturan perpajakan. Upaya tersebut disebut sebagai penghindaran pajak tax avoidance. Pemerintah telah berupaya dalam mengatasi masalah penghindaran pajak yaitu dengan adanya pasal-pasal yang bertujuan sebagai pencegahan penghindaran pajak yang tertuang dalam Undang-undang Nomor 36 tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan UU PPh, namun peraturan ini hanya dapat diterapkan pada transaksi tertentu yang bersifat khusus atau spesifik saja Specific Anti Avoidance Rule/SAAR, sehingga belum mampu sepenuhnya menyelesaikan masalah penghindaran pajak karena ketiadaan peraturan mengenai Peraturan Umum Anti Penghindaran Pajak General Anti Avoidance Rule/GAAR yang hingga saat ini belum dapat dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif yang menghasilkan kajian preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa Indonesia perlu membuat Peraturan Umum Pencegahan Penghindaran Pajak atau General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR yang terintegrasi dalam Undang-undang Pajak Penghasilan, yang memberikan definisi mengenai tax avoidance, acceptable tax avoidance, unacceptable tax avoidance, dan tax evasion demi mencapai kepastian hukum bagi fiskus dan Wajib Pajak, karena tax avoidance sering disalahgunakan untuk hal-hal yang merugikan penerimaan negara.

---

Generally, the tax planning refers to the process of business implementation planned and Tax Payer transaction, that the tax debt is in minimal amounts, but still in the tax regulations frame. That efforts is frequently called ldquo tax avoidance rdquo . The government has sought to tackle the problem of tax avoidance in Indonesia, with provisions aimed at the anti tax avoidance in the Law No. 36 Year 2008 on Fourth Amendment on Law Number 7 of 1983 on Tax income Income Tax Act, but this provision can be applied to certain transactions that are special or specific course Specific Anti Avoidance Rule SAAR , so it has not been able to completely solve the problem of tax avoidance in the absence of regulations on the General Anti Avoidance Tax Rules General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR, which until now have not been able to be issued by the government. This research is a normative study which results a prescriptive study.

The results of the study suggest that Indonesia needs to General Anti Avoidance Rule GAAR integrated in the Law of Income Tax, which provide a definition of tax avoidance, acceptable tax avoidance, unacceptable tax avoidance and tax evasion in order to achieve certainty law for the tax authorities and the taxpayer, for tax avoidance often missued things that are detrimental to the state revenue."

"Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) berdampak pada negara Indonesia dalam aspek ekonomi, hal tersebut berdampak pula pada kepatuhan kewajiban perpajakan wajib pajak. Selaras dengan hal tersebut Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta menerbitkan Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 36 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghapusan Sanksi Admnistrasi Pajak Daerah Selama Status Tanggap Darurat Bencana COVID-19 sebagai bentuk penanganan atas kondisi tersebut. Penelitian skripsi ini membahas mengenai penghapusan sanksi admnistrasi pajak daerah DKI Jakarta selama status tanggap darurat bencana COVID-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui penghapusan sanksi administrasi pajak yang ditinjau dari tujuan umum perpajakan sebagai perlindungan hukum bagi wajib pajak yang terkena dampak COVID-19. Selain itu penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui kewenangan diskresioner yang dilakukan oleh seorang Gubernur dalam mengeluarkan peraturan tersebut serta untuk mengetahui kepastian hukum wajib pajak atas peraturan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data primer berupa peraturan perundangundangan, data sekunder berupa buku dan literatur lain, serta di dukung dengan wawancara dengan pihak terkait. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini ialah menunjukkan bahwa terbitnya peraturan penghapusan sanksi admnistrasi pajak daerah DKI Jakarta selama status tanggap darurat bencana COVID-19 apabila ditinjau dari tujuan perpajakan sudah tepat. Kemudian peraturan tersebut merupakan kewenangan diskresioner yang dilakukan oleh seorang Gubernur selaku kepala daerah dalam mengeluarkan peraturan tersebut serta sudah cukup memberikan kepastian hukum bagi wajib pajak walaupun masih terdapat beberapa hal yang menimbulkan permasalahan.

---

The 2019 Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic impacts Indonesian regarding economic aspect. It also affects tax compliance with tax obligations. In line with this, the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta issued Governor Regulation Number 36 of 2020 concerning the Abolition of Regional Tax Administration Sanctions During the COVID-19 Disaster Emergency Response Status as the form of handling the condition. This undergraduate thesis discusses abolishing regional tax administration sanctions in Jakarta during the emergency response status for the COVID-19 disaster. This research aims to determine the abolition of tax administration sanctions in terms of general tax objectives as legal protection for taxpayers affected by COVID-19. This research also seeks to determine the discretionary authority exercised by a Governor in issuing these regulations and determining the legal certainty of taxpayers on these regulations. Moreover, this study was conducted using normative juridical analysis with primary data in the form of laws and regulations, secondary data in books and other literature, and supported by interviews with related parties. The conclusion of this study is to show that the issuance of regulations on the elimination of regional tax administration sanctions for DKI Jakarta during the emergency response status for the COVID-19 disaster when viewed from tax purposes is correct. The regulation is then a discretionary authority exercised by a Governor as the regional head in issuing the law. It is sufficient to provide legal certainty for taxpayers even though several things cause problems."

"Personal income tax represents personal tax in a way that its imposition is as possible strives to be harmonized with the circumstance of taxpayer. This is generally realized in the form of personal exemptions, which in Indonesia is known as PTKP. Therefore, this thesis will study the method in determining PTKP to reach justice in personal income tax.The thesis aims to look for and explain the reasons and basis that form the background of PTKP adjustment, relationship between Minimum Live Requirement or KHM and amount of PTKP for personal taxpayer, and implication of policy that adjusts the amount of PTKP to Income Tax section 21 accounted by government. Finally, the thesis will also analyze whether the policy of PTKP adjustment may bring justice in tax imposition.Based on experts' theory, a person's income during a period of time is subject to tax. This view has become standard for the ability to pay tax after deducting all expenses incurred to earn, bill, and maintain that person's income. In order to impose fair tax collection, the tax regulations must be enforced to all people without exception. In practice, the tax burden should be tuned to individual's ability to pay. Variety in family burdens may induce variety in the capacity to assume the burdens. As far as personal income taxpayer; there is part of income that should be excluded from tax, especially for the poor. This exclusion should be given out as part of an effort to earn income or to fulfill the minimum live requirement. If some of the minimum live requirement is not available, then the taxpayer may not be able to earn income that would subsequently be subject to tax. The exception is recognized as PTKP, whereas its amount is constantly adapted with the growth of economy, monetary, and price of basic needs annually.Research in this thesis uses descriptive analysis method with qualitative approach on the study of policy. Technique on data collection is in the form of book and field study done through interviews with related parties.The research results in a summary, which implies that the government is not in accordance with the income tax laws that require adjustment of PTKP following any changes in the economy and monetary as well as the price fluctuations of basic needs each year. The government obligation to adjust PTKP accordingly has been replaced by Income Tax Section 21 Accounted by Government. The policy is passed only to taxpayer who earns income from work. Thus, the policy has caused injustice in the system of personal income tax. PTKP for taxpayer in the amount of Rp 1.000.000; (one million rupiah) monthly has been in accordance with current KHM. However, additional PTKP for married couple and their burdens is not suitable with recent situation of economy and monetary as well as price of basic needs. With the existence of policy to adjust PTKP in 2005, Income Tax Section 21 Accounted by Government does not affect the calculation of Income Tax Section 21 for those who owe. So far, PTKP policy has not served justice in tax imposition. Moreover, the policy still needs much attention to be harmonized with the principality of justice.Preferably, adjustment on PTKP is conducted each year so that PTKP policy is not left behind by any changes in basic needs and economical and monetary growth. Also, in determining PTKP, the government should specify more appropriate amount of PTKP to be in accordance with economy, monetary, and taxpayer KHM. Additional PTKP for married couple and their burdens should be around 50% of PTKP instead of 10%. Furthermore, Income Tax Section 21 Accounted by Government should be abolished to provide rule of law and justice for personal taxpayer. In drafting future PTKP policy, effort should be maximized to reach justice in aspects such as: paying more attention to PTKP for daily and weekly paid workers as well as other irregular workers, giving additional PTKP for the burdens and not only in the beginning of tax year, and lastly to allow additional PTKP for siblings of taxpayer in consideration of certain circumstances."

"ABSTRAKPajak Penghasilan (PPh) Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c adalah angsuran Pajak Penghasilanyang harus dilunasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu (WP OPPT) setiapbulannya dihitung berdasarkan persentase tertentu dari peredaran bruto/omzet. Dalampelaksanaan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 menggunakan prinsip self assessment system, dengansistem ini Wajib Pajak (WP) diberikan kepercayaan penuh untuk menghitung kewajibanperpajakannya yang harus disetor dan dilaporkan ke Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) melaluiSurat Pemberitahuan (SPT) Pajak Penghasilan. Maka skripsi ini membahas bagaimanaimplementasi pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c, bagaimana pendapat WP OPPTmengenai kebijakan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c, dan apakah hambatanhambatanyang dihadapi oleh KPP dan WP OPPT dalam melaksanakan pemungutan PPhPasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c di KPP Pratama Klaten. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatankualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara dan literatur.Hasil penelitian ini adalah kesadaran dan pemahaman WP dalam pelaksanaankewajiban PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huurf c masih kurang, serta adanya penurunan kontribusipenerimaan PPh Pasal 25/29 OPPT di KPP Pratama Klaten. Sehingga kesimpulan daripenelitian ini adalah bahwa pelaksanaan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) huruf c bagi WPOPPT di KPP Pratama Klaten belum optimal dikarenakan kurang optimalnya komunikasiyang dilakukan fiskus dengan WP, sumber daya manusia dari segi kuantitas kurangproposional dengan jumlah Wajib Pajak, sikap patuh WP OPPT belum konsisten/masihkurang, pendapat yang diberikan WP OPPT terhadap kebijakan pemungutan PPh Pasal 25ayat (7) huruf c kurang baik., hambatan-hambatan yang dihadapi petugas pajak dalammelaksanakan kebijakan ini adalah masyarakat kurang antusias, WP pindah tempat usaha,sumber daya manusia (petugas pajak) tidak proposional dengan jumlah WP, belum adanyalaw inforcement yang tegas, sedangkan hambatan yang dihadapi WP merasa kesulitan dalammenghitung PPh terutang pada akhir tahun, WP merasa kesulitan dalam melakukan pengisianpada SSP dan SPT Tahunan, dan kemudahan pengadaan fomulir pajak (seperti: SSP).

---

ABSTRACTIncome Tax (VAT) of Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c is the income tax installment

must be paid in individual taxpayer Specific Employers (WP OPPT) per month calculated on

a percentage of gross income / turnover. Tax collection in the implementation of Article 25

uses the principle of self assessment system, with this system Taxpayer (WP) is given full

trust for calculating taxation liabilities that must be paid and reported to the Tax Office

through the Notice of Income Tax (SPT). So this paper discusses how the implementation of

collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c, how do individual taxpayer

Entrepreneur Specific policies regarding the collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph

(7) letter c, and whether the barriers faced by the Office of Services Tax and Individual Tax

Payer Specific Employers in executing the collection of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7)

letter c in Klaten Tax Office. This study used a qualitative approach is descriptive, with

interview data collection techniques and literature.

The results of this research is the awareness and understanding of Taxpayers Income

Tax liability in the implementation of Article 25 paragraph (7) huurf c is still lacking, as well

as a decrease in contribution receipts of Income Tax Article 25/29 of Certain Persons in

Private Employers Tax Office Primary Klaten. So that the conclusions of this study is that for

collection of income tax under Article 25 paragraph (7) letter c for individual taxpayer

Certain Employers at the Tax Office Primary Klaten not optimal due to less optimal fiskus

communications made by the taxpayer, in terms of human resources less quantity

proportional to the number of taxpayers, the attitude of submissive individual taxpayer has

not been consistent Specific Entrepreneur / still less, given the opinion that individual

taxpayer Employers of Certain Income Tax collection policies of Article 25 paragraph (7)

letter c is less good., barrier- obstacles encountered in implementing the tax policy is less

enthusiastic public, taxpayer moved the place of business, human resources (the tax) is not

proportional to the number of taxpayers, the lack of strict law inforcement, while the barriers

faced by taxpayers find it difficult to calculating income tax payable at the end of the year,

taxpayers find it difficult to perform charging at the Tax Payment (SSP) and the Notice of

Income Tax (SPT) Annual, and ease of procurement fomulir taxes (such as: SSP)."

"Studi ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan antara moralitas pajak, kepercayaan terhadap otoritas publik, persepsi terhadap keadilan, dan pengetahuan perpajakan dengan tingkat kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua variabel kontrol yaitu umur operasional usaha (age) dan ukuran usaha berdasarkan jumlah karyawan (size). Penelitian ini juga mengelompokkan pengetahuan perpajakan menjadi kelompok lebih kecil yaitu pengetahuan perpajakan terkait administratif dan pengetahuan perpajakan terkait penegakan hukum/sanksi. Sampel yang digunakan adalah para pelaku usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah yang tersebar di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif. Pengujian tingkat kepatuhan WP UMKM dinilai penting karena sektor UMKM memiliki potensi perpajakan yang cukup tinggi. Instrumen pengumpulan data berupa kuesioner yang menggunakan skala Likert 5 poin dan pernyataan benar atau salah dengan 193 responden. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh membuktikan adanya hubungan positif antara moralitas pajak, kepercayaan terhadap otoritas publik, persepsi terhadap keadilan, dan pengetahuan perpajakan dengan tingkat kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM.

---

This study aims to analyze the association between tax morality, trust in public authorities, perceptions of fairness, and tax knowledge with the level of compliance of SMEs taxpayers. This study uses two control variables which are the age of business operations and the size of the business based on the number of employees. This study also grouped tax knowledge into smaller groups namely taxation knowledge related to administration and taxation knowledge related to law enforcement / sanctions. In this study, the sample used is the micro, small and medium businesses across Indonesia. This research uses quantitative methods. Quantitative testing regarding the level of compliance of SMEs Taxpayers is considered important because the SMEs sector has a high tax potential. Data collection instruments in the form of a questionnaire that uses a 5-point Likert scale and true or false statements with 193 respondents. Quantitative research results show that there is a positive relationship between tax morality, trust in public authorities, perceptions of justice, and tax knowledge with the level of compliance of SMEs taxpayers."

"Ketentuan baru dalam Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan, sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2000 menyebutkan adanya perhitungan besarnya angsuran pajak bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu dalam Pasal 25 ayat (7) yang perhitungannya diatur lebih lanjut dengan Keputusan Menteri Keuangan, terakhir dengan Nomor 8/KMK/03./2002 tanggal 8 Maret 2002 jo. Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor 171/PJ/2002 tanggal 28 Maret 2002. Dalam ketentuan terakhir tersebut diatur mengenai klasifikasi yang tergolong Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu, tarif pajak yang berlaku, perlakuan atas pembayaran PPh Pasal 25, perlakuan kompensasi kerugian dan tindakan pengawasannya.

Tesis ini disusun berdasarkan penelitian dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif analisis. Penelitian dilakukan pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Jakarta Kelapa Gading. Pengumpulan data untuk keperluan analisis diperoleh melalui penelitian dokumen meliputi studi kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan yang meliputi wawancara dengan pejabat di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak yaitu Kepala Seksi PPh Orang Pribadi KPP Jakarta Kelapa Gading, Kepala Seksi PPh Orang Pribadi I Direktorat Pajak Penghasilan Kantor Pusat Direktorat Jenderal Pajak serta kuisioner bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu.

Kerangka teori yang digunakan adalah azas-azas dalam pemungutan pajak, prinsip keadilan horizontal dan vertikal dalam perpajakan dan global taxation. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh data yaitu terdapat kendala dalam menetapkan klasifikasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu, tingkat kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu yang masih rendah, kontribusi penerimaannya yang masih rendah, tindakan pengawasan yang masih menghadapi kendala karena kurangnya koordinasi, dan bagi Wajib Pajak ketentuan ini tidak mencerminkan keadilan karena adanya pengecualian jenis usaha, besarnya tarif, perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 sebagai pelunasan.

Analisis terhadap data-data tersebut di atas menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa ada ketidakadilan horizontal maupun vertikal dalam ketentuan mengenai Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu. Pembedaan jenis usaha dalam klasif kasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu tidak sesuai dengan azas globality. Pengenaan tarif sebesar 2 % dan peredaran bruto sebagai dasar pengenaan pajak tidak sesuai dengan prinsip progression dan net income. Perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 sebagai pelunasan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip dasar yang terkandung dalam Pasal 25 UU Pajak Penghasilan yaitu sebagai angsuran pajak. Untuk itu, diharapkan agar ketentuan mengenai Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25 Bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu dapat ditinjau kembali. Klasifikasi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Pengusaha Tertentu hendaknya tidak membedakan suatu jenis usaha tertentu, perlakuan PPh Pasal 25 ayat (7) sebagai pelunasan hendaknya ditiadakan. Perlu diterbitkan aturan pelaksanaan yang lebih jelas dan tugas berkaitan dengan definisi "Penghasilan Lain" dalam pasal perlakuan pembayaran PPh Pasal 25 dan prosedur dalam tindakan pengawasan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak.

---

One of the new provisions in The Law Number 7 of 1983 concerning Income Tax, as been amended finally to Law Number 17 of 2000 namely concerning calculation of tax installment for any Particular Individual Entrepreneur in Article 25 paragraph (7) whose calculations is further regulated through The Decree of The Minister of Finance, finally into Number: 8/KMK/03. /2002 dated March 8, 2002 in conjunction with The Decree of Director General of Tax number: 171/PJ/2002 dated March 28. 2002. In such final provision, it is regulated on classification of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer, the prevailing tax tariff, application on payment of income tax Article 25, loss compensation application and its control action.

This thesis is drawn up pursuant to research by using policy research with analyzes descriptive method. The Research was made at Kelapa Gading Jakarta Tax Service Office. Data collection for the purpose of analyzes was obtained through document evaluation comprising bibliography study and site research that shall cover interview with officials in vicinity of Directorate General of Tax and questioner distributed to Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer.

Theoretical reference applied is the principles in tax collection, horizontal and vertical justice principle within general taxation and global taxation. In this research, data obtained comprises hindrance in stipulating classification of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer, compliance rate of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer which is still low, control action still face hindrances due to poor coordination, and for Taxpayer, this provision does not reflects justice aspects due to exception of business type, rate, application of Article 25 Income Tax payment as the settlement.

Analyzes against such aforementioned data has resulted in conclusion that there is vertical and horizontal injustice in provision concerning Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer. Unequal treatment of business type of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer Classifications is not in accordance with global principles, rate of 2% and gross circulation as the base of tax impose is not in accordance with the principle of unequal treatment for the unequal and net income. Payment treatment of Tax Income Article 25 as the settlement is not conforming to basic principles set forth in Article 25 Law of Income Tax namely as the tax installment. Therefore it is advisable that provision on Tax Income Article 25 for Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer is to be re-evaluated. Classifications of Particular Individual Entrepreneur Taxpayer shall not treat unequally on the particular type of business, application of Income Tax Article 25 paragraph (7) as the settlement shall be revoked, more transparent and confirmed implemental regulation is to be applied concerning other income definition in treatment of Article 25 Income Tax payment and procedure in controlling the compliance aspect of Tax Payer."