Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Terbitnya Surat Keputusan Direksi PT Bursa Efek Indonesia No. KEP-00100/BEI/10-2014 TAHUN 2014 pada 20 Oktober 2014 seharusnya menyederhanakan persyaratan penawaran umum untuk perusahaan pertambangan. Namun dalam kenyataannya kebijakan tersebut tidak memberikan jawaban atas permasalahan yang dialami oleh perusahaan pertambangan tahap eksplorasi. Perusahaan pertambangan tahap ekplorasi tetap tidak memiliki hak untuk melakukan penawaran umum berdasarkan Surat Keputusan tersebut. Ketiadaan sumber pembiayaan untuk kegiatan eksplorasi tersebut menjadi permasalahan bagi perusahaan untuk dapat melakukan eksplorasi guna memperoleh informasi atas cadangan dan nilai ekonomis dari wilayah izin usaha pertambangan. Bursa Efek Indonesia memiliki perspektif bahwa inti kegiatan pertambangan hanya kegiatan eksploitasi. Hal tersebut yang menghambat para perusahaan pertambangan tahap ekplorasi untuk mendapatkan pendanaan dari pasar modal. Tesis ini menganalisis mengenai larangan perusahaan pertambangan tahap eskplorasi melakukan penawaran umum di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah perbandingan dengan bursa efek di Kanada, Australia dan Hong Kong yang telah mengizinkan perusahaan pertambangan tahap eksplorasi untuk berpartisipasi dalam bursa efek. Dengan adanya perbandingan tersebut diharapkan kelak Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan instansi terkait dapat merumuskan kebijakan yang tepat bagi perusahaan pertambangan tahap eksplorasi untuk dapat memperoleh sumber pembiayaan di Bursa Efek Indonesia.

---

Abstract The issuance of Decree of the Board of Directors of PT Bursa Efek Indonesia No. KEP 00100 BEI 10 2014 of 2014 on 20 October 2014 should simplify the terms of the public offering for mining company. Nevertheless, in reality the policy does not provide any answers to the junior mining companies rsquo s problem. Pursuant to the decree, an exploration mining company still has no right to do initial public offering. The absence of financing sources for exploration activities is a problem for companies to be able to explore futher information on the reserves and economic value of the mining area. In the Indonesian Stock Exchange rsquo s prespective, the core of mining activities is only the exploitation activities. This thing obstructs the mining companies exploration stage to get funding from the capital market. This thesis analyzes the prohibition of exploration mining companies to do a public offering in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The method used in this thesis is the comparison with stock exchanges in Canada, Australia and Hong Kong that have been allowing mining exploration companies to participate in stock exchanges. Through this comparison, we hope that in the future the Indonesia Stock Exchange IDX with relevant agencies can formulate the right policy for exploration mining company to get source of financing in the Indonesian Stock Exchange."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh usia perusahaan, risiko penawaran umum, reputasi underwriter, reputasi auditor, industri perusahaan, nilai Altman Z-Score, ukuran perusahaan, dan rencana penggunaan dana penawaran umum terhadap tingkat initial return penawaran umum perdana. Dalam penelitian ini, rencana penggunaan dana penawaran umum terbagi atas growth opportunities, debt repayment, dan working capital. Sampel pada penelitian ini merupakan perusahaan yang melakukan aktivitas pencatatan pada Bursa Efek Indonesia di periode 2018-2022. Selain pengujian menggunakan Ordinary Least Square, metode regresi dengan Quantile Regression digunakan untuk menganalisis pengaruh dalam model pada tingkat kuantil. Secara keseluruhan, risiko penawaran umum, Altman Z-Score, total aset, dan growth opportunities memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap tingkat initial return penawaran umum. Selain itu, reputasi underwriter, reputasi auditor, industri perusahaan, debt repayment, dan working capital berpengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat initial return di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Sementara usia perusahaan tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap tingkat initial return di pasar modal Indonesia.

---

This research aims to analyze the impact of firm age, IPO risk, underwriter reputation, auditor reputation, industry affiliation, Altman Z-Score, firm size, and intended use of IPO proceeds on the level of initial returns of IPOs. In this study, the intended use of IPO proceeds is categorized into growth opportunities, debt repayment, and working capital. The sample for this study consists of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2018-2022. In addition to the Ordinary Least Square test, the regression method with Quantile Regression is used to analyze the effects in the model at different quantile levels. Overall, IPO risk, Altman Z-Score, total assets, and growth opportunities have a positive influence on the level of initial returns of IPOs. Furthermore, underwriter reputation, auditor reputation, industry affiliation, debt repayment, and working capital have a negative influence on the level of initial returns on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. On the other hand, firm age does not have a significant effect on the level of initial returns in the Indonesian capital market."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh research and development expenditure terhadap kinerja dan nilai perusahaan yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2017-2021. Research and development expenditure diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari research and development expenditure masing-masing perusahaan. Sedangkan kinerja perusahaan dilihat dari kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan dengan ROA dan ROE serta kinerja pasar yang diproksikan dengan Tobins’q. Selanjutnya nilai perusahaan diukur dari logaritma natural dari market capitalization atau total kapitalisaasi pasar. Dengan menggunakan analisis data panel, hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa research and development expenditure berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja dan nilai perusahaan.

---

This study aims to examine the impact of research and development expenditure on the performance and firm value of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2017-2021. Research and development expenditure is proxied by the natural logarithm of each company's research and development expenditure. The performance of the companies is measured by financial performance indicators, namely Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE), as well as market performance measured by Tobin's Q. Furthermore, firm value is assessed by the natural logarithm of market capitalization, representing the total market capitalization. Using panel data analysis, the findings indicate that research and development expenditure has a positive impact on both the performance and firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara karakteristik perusahaan berupa ukuran perusahaan, cash flow, dividend payout ratio, leverage, net working capital, market to book ratio terhadap tingkat cash holdings perusahaan. Peneliti juga ingin mengetahui bagaimana tingkat speed of adjustment bagi perusahaan dengan tingkat actual cash yang lebih rendah maupun lebih tinggi dibandingkan target cash holdings-nya. Penelitian dilakukan terhadap perusahaan non-finansial yang terdaftar di BEI selama periode 2010 - 2019. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Pooled Least Square (PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan, leverage, capital expenditure, net working capital dan MTB memiliki pengaruh yang negative terhadap cash holdings. Sedangkan variabel cash flow dan dividend payout ratio berpengaruh secara positif terhadap cash holdings perusahaan. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa perusahaan dengan cash holdings yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan target cash holdings-nya memiliki speed of adjustment yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan perusahaan dengan cash holdings yang lebih rendah dibandingkan target cash holdings-nya.

---

Cash holdings is defined as firm’s liquid asset that can be used to finance their investment activities or it can be distributed to shareholders as dividend. According to pecking order theory, to minimize asymmetric information cost and other financing cost, firms will finance their investment activities first from their internal financing then with safe debt and risky debt, and finally with equity. A firm needs cash to finance their operating activities such as paying wages or paying taxes. Cash can be obtained from various ways such as product sales, new financing, or the selling of assets. The cash inflows and cash outflows are not perfectly synchronized; therefore, cash holdings act as a buffer (Ross, 2019). This paper aims to investigate the determinants of corporate cash holdings and estimate the cash holdings speed of adjustment on non-financial firms listed in IDX. The method utilized in this paper is panel data techniques. Our results suggest that cash holdings are positively affected by cash flow and dividend payout ratio. Firm size, leverage, capital expenditure, net working capital and market-to-book are negatively related with cash holdings. Our result also shows that firms with higher cash holdings than the target level have a higher speed of adjustment than firms with cash holdings that is lower than the target level."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskanpengaruh kualitas corporate governanceterhadap resiko defaultperusahaan di Indonesia periode 2013-2017. Kualitas Corporate governancedalam penelitian ini diproksikan dengan menggunakan indikator kualitas penerapan corporate governanceyang terdapat dalam Horwath Report (2008).Resiko Defaultdalam penelitian ini diukur dengan menggunakan perhitungan Default riskoleh Risk Managament Institute (RMI) NUS. Selain menggunakan variabel utama, terdapat pula variabel kontrol yang digunakan dalam penelitian yaitu Profitability, Leverage, Likuiditas, Usia Perusahaan dan Ukuruan Aset Perusahaan. Objek penelitian adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2013-2017 berturut-turut. Penelitian ini menggunakan model regresi dengan tiga estimasi yaitu Ordinary Least Square(OLS), Fixed Effect Model(FEM), dan Random Effect Model(REM).Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Kualitas Corporate governanceyang diukur memiliki pengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap kemungkinan Defaultperusahaan di Indonesiaperiode 2013-2017.Tidak hanya itu saja, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa selain variabel utama, variabel kontrol juga memiliki pengaruh terhadap kemungkinan Defaultperusahaan di Indonesia periode 2013-2017 yaitu variabel Profitability, Usia Perusahaan, dan Ukuran Perusahaan.

---

This study aims to explain the effect of quality corporate governance on the risk of default companies in Indonesia for the period2013-2017. The quality of Corporate governance in this study is proxied by using quality indicators of the application of corporate governance contained in Horwath Report (2008). The default risk in this study is measured using the calculation of Default risk by the Risk Managament Institute (RMI) NUS. In addition to using the main variables, there are also control variables used in the study namely Profitability, Leverage, Liquidity, Age of the Company and Corporate Asset Ukuruan. The object of research is companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2013-2017 respectively. This study uses a regression model with three estimates, namely Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Fixed Effect Model (FEM), and Random Effect Model (REM).The results of this study indicate that the measured quality of Corporate governance has a significant negative effect on the possibility of company defaults in Indonesia for the period 2013-2017. Not only that, this study found that in addition to the main variable, the control variable also had an influence on the likelihood of company defaults in Indonesia for the period 2013-2017, namely the variable Profitability, Company Age, and Company Size."

"Pemisahan pemilik dan pengelola menjadi pihak yang berbeda dari suatu perusahaaan sering menimbulkan masalah. Penelitian empiris yang pernah dilakukan oleh para ahli keuangan menyimpulkan hasil yang bervariasi terhadap hubungan struktur kepemilikan dengan stock return atau keberadaan dari agency problem.Penelitian ini pada dasarnya ingin menjawab permasalahan pokok penelitian keberadaan agency problem pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Permasalahan ini kemudian diturunkan pada pertanyaan: Adakah hubungan struktur kepemilikan dengan stock return pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta?Untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian tersebut, penulis menggunakan suatu model yang digunakan oleh Kim, Lee dan Francis (1988), yaitu:rit = b0+ b1(JMit) + b2(EPit) + b3(Size) + b4 {Beta it)Selanjutnya dengan menggunakan regresi linear, data rit , JMit , EPit, Size dan Beta it dianalisis. Dari analisis linear ini akan diperoleh nilai b1. Jika nilai b1 adalah nol (0), artinya tidak ada hubungan struktur kepemilikan dengan stock return, Jika nilai b1 adalah bukan nol (0), artinya ada hubungan antara struktur kepemilikan dengan stock return. Hasil ini mendukung keberadaan dari agency problem.Populasi penelitian ini adalah semua perusahaan Indonesia yang sudah terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Jakarta (BEJ) pada tanggal 31 Mei 2001, yaitu sebanyak 298 perusahaan emiten. Sampel diambil dengan menggunakan teknik stratifikasi (stratified sampling) dengan 4 kriteria, yaitu: perusahaan tersebut harus terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Jakarta sebelum 4 Januari 1999, perusahaan tersebut telah menyerahkan laporan keuangan tahun 1999 dan 2000, dan perusahaan tersebut menerbitkan komposisi kepemilikan saham pada akhir tahun 1999 dan 2000. Dari kriteria ini didapatkan sampel sejumlah 247 perusahaan.Untuk melihat kondisi perusahaan dalam dua tahun terakhir, maka kurun waktu pengamatan penelitian ini diambil sejak 4 Januari 1999 sampai dengan 22 Desember 2000. Banyak pengamatan dalam periode ini sama dengan 486 hari pengamatan.Hasil penelitian dan pengolahan data menggunakan program SPSS versi 10.0. Dilihat dari uji t pada tahun 1999 ditemukan hanya variabel EP dan BETA yang signifikan. Sedangkan pada tahun 2000 hanya BETA yang secara konsisten signifikan. Hal ini berarti secara tidak cukup kuat data untuk menolak Ho.Berdasarkan ini disimpulkan bahwa secara empiris dibuktikan bahwa tidak ada pengaruh tingkat kepemilikan orang dalam terhadap stock return perusahaan-perusahaan yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Jakarta (menerima Ho dan menolak Hi). Hal ini belum mengindikasikan keberadaan agency problem di Indonesia. Dari temuan ini dapat dilihat pasar modal di Indonesia dan di luar negeri adalah berbeda jika kita melihat ke penelitian sebelumnya oleh Kim, Lee dan Francis (1988). Nilai VIF dan uji Durbin Watson menunjukkan bahwa variabel-variabel yang digunakan pada penelitian ini tidak mengalami multikolinearitas dan autokorelasi.Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, maka peneliti dapat memberi rekomendasi bahwa untuk memperkirakan stock return dari perusahaan-perusahaan terbuka di Indonesia tidak cukup dengan melihat pada struktur kepemilikan yang diwakili oleh tingkat kepemilikan orang dalam. Para pengamat pasar modal juga perlu memperhatikan faktor-faktor lainnya, misalnya faktor pengaruh perubahan dan perkembangan sosial, politik, budaya dan keamanan karena pada saat pengamatan ditemukan pengaruh faktor kepemilikan, ukuran, EIP ratio dan Beta hanya sebesar 4.3%. Kenyataan perbedaan kondisi pasar modal di Indonesia dan di luar negeri dapat dipertimbangkan menjadi penelitian lanjutan. Penelitian lanjutan dapat dilakukan dengan dihubungkan dengan perbedaan peraturan yang diberlakukan (contohnya persyaratan untuk IPO) atau perbedaan keras atau tidaknya penegakkan hukum di Indonesia.

---

Relation of Ownership Structure and Stock Return (Empirical Study on Jakarta Stock Exchange Listed Companies)Separation on any company owners and managers often raise problems. Empirical studies on ownership structure show various results for agency problem existences or ownership structure relationship to stock return.This study, basically, has a purpose to answer the relationship between number of insider ownership (manager relation) and listed companies' stock return in Jakarta Stock Exchange. This issue was described in a question: Is there a relationship between ownership structure and listed companies' stock return?In order to answer this issue, researcher employs Kim, Lee and Francis (1998) model as below:rit = b0+ b1(JMit) + b2(EPit) + b3(Size) + b4 {Beta it) Using multiple regression, JMit , EPit, Size and Beta it was analyzed.This multiple regression obtains bi value. If b1 value were equal to zero, it means that no relationship between ownership structure and stock return. If b1 value were not equal to zero, it means there is a relation between ownership structure and stock return. This result supports the existences of agency problem.This research population is every Indonesian company that listed on Jakarta Stock Exchange on May 31St 2001, which are 298 companies. Sample was chosen with stratified sampling in 4 criteria, that is: listed before January 4, 1999, already give 1999 and 2000 financial report, and has issued stock ownership composition at the end of the year (1999 and 2000). The sample becomes 247 companies. In order to show the companies condition in last two years, sample had been observed since January 4, 1999 to December 22, 2000. Observation amount in this period is equal to 486 observations.The result and data processing used SPSS ver. 10.0. T test showed that on 1999 only EP and BETA was proved as significance variable. On 2000 only BETA showed consistency as significant factor. It means observations not strong enough to reject Ho. The conclusion was there is no influence insider ownership to Jakarta Stock Exchange listed companies (accept Ho and reject H1). This finding could not indicate agency problems in Indonesia. V1F value and Durbin Watson test showed variables not have multicollinearity and autocorrelation.Based on that finding, researcher has recommended that stock return prediction didn't need insider ownership factor. The stock market observer should consider such another factor as developments and changes in social, politic, culture and safety matter, since the influence of those independent variables only 4.3%. The difference between capital market in Indonesia and outboard could be considered to be the next studies. The studies would be related to different regulation (e.g. IPO requirements) or different law enforcement."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami pengaruh struktur modal terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan pertambangan di Indonesia, sekaligus mempertimbangkan isu global pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini menganalisis sampel 60 perusahaan pertambangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama 2013 hingga 2022. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa debt to asset berpengaruh negatif terhadap profitabilitas. Debt to equity, long term debt to total capital, long term debt to total equity, dan pertumbuhan aset tidak berpengaruh terhadap profitabilitas. Temuan juga menunjukkan bahwa pandemi COVID-19 memiliki efek moderasi negatif terkait dengan hubungan antara debt to asset dan debt to equity terhadap profitabilitas.

---

This study aims to understand the effect of capital structure on the profitability of mining companies in Indonesia, while considering the global issue of the COVID-19 pandemic. Analyzing a sample of 60 mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2022, the findings indicate that debt to asset has a negative effect on profitability. Debt to equity, long-term debt to capital, long-term debt to equity, and growth do not effect profitability. The findings also reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between debt to asset and debt to equity with profitability."

"Today Stock Exchange must giving a secure feel to all members for transaction process. On the process, they have to prepare guarantee fund, instead there are some fail or problem on payment. The approriate rules done by Bapepam for all the stock exchange members who do the transaction, they have to pay 0.01% from the transaction. The Bapepam give this order to PT. Kliring Penjaminan Efek Indonesia as an institution to make sure all the transaction are safe and to manage it. The 0.01% payment from the all transaction done by the stock exchange members become a problem when The Director General of Tax make a letter about free tax for all stock exchange members and called as others asser. On several time Bapepam also make a letter about note that the money guarantee will call as contribution for all stock exchange members who pay it. So what will be happen if they dont have data about the money guarantee paid by all the stock exchange members, who will own it ? and what will happen if we cannot get the tax from it ? How big the potential tax we cannot get ? Then what the quitable means for all the tax payer if the guarantee fund deductable expenses?This research use methode descriptif Analysis with Qualitative Approach. This methode use to make the theory more clear, to collect data, analyze it and get some conclusion. In this study, the writer find several subject which inside contradictory, there is no coordination to make a rule and the outcome will be wrong interpretation even could cost financial lost for tax payer. According to analyze by the writer it turn out that what the two institution doing is unproductive even they out of the principle about the guarantee fund. In the end, the conclusion is that we need to do more research, especially on law aspect, so that one cannot make a mistakes in the decision making process, accounting note, tax for money guarantee and overall a good system is necessary. The suggestion is we need to socialize our rules to all parties interest, need of strong basis of law to avoid financial lost for the country and tax payer."

"In this Digital Economics era, capital market interests not only to investor to acquire profit from stock buying/selling activity but also to go public company as a cheaper financial source for business development. The excellent price of stock, stability, and accessibility make capital market become more interesting. An improvement in future national economic condition affected the growth of capital market and to anticipate this growth stock exchange has prepared Remote Trading concept.

Remote Trading is a facility that enables broker to do stock transaction directly to the stock trading system. Stock exchange abroad has been successfully implemented this advance concept. As an addition, an integration of remote trading with the Internet/Electronic Commerce will generate an advantageous result.

However, the proposal of remote trading implementation in Indonesia that was initiated by the stock exchange has gave rise to pro-contra due to its advantage and drawback. In the mean time, the stock exchange has already prepared the feasibility study, investment, consultant, and even has pointed out the tender winner for remote trading development. The soft launching for remote trading itself was planned on June 2001. Because of point of view of brokers, who is also the stockholders, the implementation of remote trading was postponed indeterminately.

This seminar is a research proposal for remote trading system that started with literature study, discussion, data collection followed by analysis and concluded in recommendation for correct remote trading implementation strategy for Indonesian capital market."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh skor ESG tinggi yang dimiliki perusahaan terhadap performa saham perusahaan yang tercatat pada Bursa Efek Indonesia saat pandemi Covid-19 tepatnya sejak kasus Covid-19 muncul di Indonesia pada tanggal 2 Maret 2020 hingga akhir pandemi Covid-19 pada 21 Juni 2023. Performa saham yang diukur pada penelitian ini terdiri dari imbal hasil saham dan volatilitas imbal hasil saham perusahaan terbuka sebanyak 77 perusahaan yang dijadikan sampel dalam penelitian ini. Jenis data yang digunakan bersifat cross-section dan time series sehingga pengelolaannya menggunakan salah satu teknik dari regresi panel data yaitu random effect model. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh negatif antara skor ESG tinggi yang dimiliki perusahaan terhadap volatilitas imbal hasil saham perusahaan, tetapi tidak terdapat pengaruh antara skor ESG tinggi yang dimiliki perusahaan terhadap imbal hasil saham perusahaan yang tercatat pada Bursa Efek Indonesia saat pandemi Covid-19.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of the company's high ESG score on the stock performance of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the Covid-19 pandemic, precisely since the Covid-19 case appeared in Indonesia on 2 March 2020 until the end of the Covid-19 pandemic on 21 June 2023. The stock performance measured in this study consists of stock returns and volatility of stock returns of 77 listed companies as a sample in this study. The type of data used is a cross-section and time series, so the method used is a technique of panel data regression, namely the random effect model. The results of this study indicate that there is a negative influence between the high ESG score owned by the company on the volatility of the company's stock returns, but there is no influence between the high ESG score owned by the company on the stock returns of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the Covid-19 pandemic."