Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indigenous peoples have gained increasing international visibility in their fight against longstanding colonial occupation by nation-states. Although living in different locations around the world and practising highly varied ways of life, indigenous peoples nonetheless are affected by similar patterns of colonial dispossession and violence. In defending their collective rights to self-determination, culture, lands and resources, their resistance and creativity offer a pause for critical reflection on the importance of maintaining indigenous distinctiveness against the homogenizing forces of states and corporations. This timely book highlights significant colonial patterns of domination and their effects, as well as responses and resistance to colonialism. It brings indigenous peoples? issues and voices to the forefront of sociological discussions of modernity. In particular, the book examines issues of identity, dispossession, environment, rights and revitalization in relation to historical and ongoing colonialism, showing that the experiences of indigenous peoples in wealthy and poor countries are often parallel and related. With a strong comparative scope and interdisciplinary perspective, the book is an essential introductory reading for students interested in race and ethnicity, human rights, development and indigenous peoples? issues in an interconnected world.--"

"o the colonized, the term 'research' is conflated with European colonialism; the ways in which academic research has been implicated in the throes of imperialism remains a painful memory. This essential volume explores intersections of imperialism and research - specifically, the ways in which imperialism is embedded in disciplines of knowledge and tradition as 'regimes of truth.' Concepts such as 'discovery' and 'claiming' are discussed and an argument presented that the decolonization of research methods will help to reclaim control over indigenous ways of knowing and being.Now in its eagerly awaited second edition, this bestselling book has been substantially revised, with new case-studies and examples and important additions on new indigenous literature, the role of research in indigenous struggles for social justice, which brings this essential volume urgently up-to-date."--Pub. desc.To the colonized, the term "research" is conflated with colonialism; academic research steeped in imperialism remains a painful reality. This essential volume explores intersections of imperialism and research - specifically, the ways in which imperialism is embedded in disciplines of knowledge and tradition as "regimes of truth.This essential volume explores the ways in which imperialism is embedded in disciplines of knowledge, and argues that the decolonization of research methods will help reclaim control over indigenous ways of knowing and being. This eagerly awaited second edition includes substantial revisions, with important additions on new indigenous literature and the role of research in indigenous struggles for social justice, bringing this best-selling book up to date"

"Penelitian ini memaparkan tentang pemaknaan self-determination yang awalnya dipahami sebagai hak untuk merdeka dan memisahkan diri melalui Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Peoples, menjadi hak untuk menentukan nasib sendiri dalam konteks HAM bagi indigenous peoples. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif interpretif, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi perdebatan pada proses penyusunan teks deklarasi indigenous rights di PBB yang dimulai pada tahun 1984-2007. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, walaupun pemaknaan pada akhirnya diterima secara resmi sebagai self-determination yang dibatasi, masih terdapat unsur-unsur ldquo;kolonialisme berlanjut rdquo; advanced colonialism yang masih berlanjut yang menyebabkan masih sulitnya negara menerima pemaknaan self-determination yang bersifat internal. Selain itu, dipaparkan pula mengenai kondisi pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia sebagai refleksi atas permasalahan terhadap pemaknaan self-determination.

---

This study elaborates the meaning of self determination which was originally conceived as the right to independence and secession by Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Peoples, becomes the rights to self determination in the context of rights for indigenous peoples. By using qualitative interpretive approach, this study explores the debate on the process of preparing the text of the UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights from 1984 2007. The result shows that,even though the meaning is accepted formally in form of restricted self determination, there are elements of advanced colonialism that led to the difficulty for states to accept the context of internal meaning of self determination. This study also presents the condition on recognition of ldquo masyarakat adat rdquo in Indonesia as a reflection on the problems on the meaning of self determination."

"Indigenous hunting has always been an indigenous human rights core issue that has received high attention in the conflict between national laws and indigenous legal traditions. J.Y. Interpretation No. 803 affirmed indigenous hunting culture is a constitutional guaranteed fundamental right enjoyed by individual indigenous people. Nevertheless, the said Interpretation did not satisfy indigenous claimant’s assertions. The most critical are the collective nature of indigenous right and the aboriginal title still in the predicament of unclear concept and undetermined content. This article starts with a brief comparative law study, and then analyzes the said Interpretation, and continues with the theory of multicultural constitutionalism to make the argument based on the indigenous claims of traditional territorial rights."

"Masyarakat adat merupakan salah satu kelompok marjinal yang ada di Indonesia. Konsekuensi dari terkategorinya masyarakat adat sebagai kelompok marjinal menyebabkan kepentingan masyarakat adat sering tersisihkan dan tidak diprioritaskan oleh pemerintah. Dampak dari terpinggirkannya masyarakat adat menimbulkan serangkaian permasalahan, seperti perlindungan hukum, konflik agararia, kemiskinan, dan akses terhadap fasilitas kesehatan. Salah satu penyebab terpinggirkannya masyarakat adat di Indonesia karena adanya kekosongan representasi formal di parlemen. Kekosongan representasi formal ini dapat dikomplemen dengan hadirnya representasi non-formal berupa organisasi non-pemerintah, yaitu Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (AMAN). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan sumber data primer dan sekunder. Penelitian ini akan berfokus pada representasi AMAN dalam mewakili masyarakat adat menggunakan perspektif Klaim Representasi dari Michael Saward. Saward menyebutkan jika fokus dari representasi harus diubah dari perwakilan, menjadi tindakan klaim pembuat representasi (claimmaking), dengan menekankan aspek performatif. Dalam teori Klaim Representasinya, Saward menawarkan struktur Makers (M) menghadirkan Subject (S) yang mewakili atau mewujudkan Object (O), yang terhubung dengan Referent (R), kemudian ditawarkan pada Audience (A). Temuan utama dari artikel ini adalah masyarakat adat sebagai Makers representasi, lalu menghadirkan AMAN sebagai Subject yang mewujudkan kepentingan holistik dari masyarakat adat sebagai Object, untuk kepentingan masyarakat adat anggota AMAN sebagai Referen, kemudian ditawarkan pada pemerintah pusat dan daerah serta masyarakat adat anggota AMAN itu sendiri sebagai Audience. Selain itu AMAN juga melakukan aspek performatifnya dengan selalu melakukan advokasi serta desakan pembentukan produk hukum kepada Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. AMAN juga melakukan pemberdayaan kepada komunitas adat yang menjadi anggotanya dan selalu mengedepankan musyarawah dari tingkat terkecil untuk mengambil keputusan.

---

Indigenous peoples are one of the marginalized groups in Indonesia. As a consequence of being categorized as a marginalized group, indigenous peoples' interests are often sidelined and not prioritized by the government. The impact of the marginalization of indigenous peoples leads to a series of problems, such as legal protection, land conflicts, poverty, and access to health facilities. One of the causes of the marginalization of indigenous peoples in Indonesia is the absence of formal representation in parliament. This void of formal representation can be complemented by the presence of non-formal representation in the form of non-governmental organizations, namely the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN). This research uses qualitative methods with primary and secondary data sources. This research will focus on AMAN's representation representing indigenous peoples using Michael Saward's Representation Claim perspective. Saward states that the focus of representation should be changed from the representation itself to the act of claim-making, by emphasizing the performative aspect. In her Representation Claim theory, Saward offers a structure of Makers (M) presenting Subject (S) that represents or embodies Object (O), which is connected to Referent (R), then offered to Audience (A). The main finding of this article is that indigenous peoples as Makers represent, then present AMAN as Subject which embodies the holistic interests of indigenous peoples as Object, for the benefit of indigenous AMAN members as Referent, then offered to the central and local governments and indigenous AMAN members themselves as Audience. In addition, AMAN also carries out its performative aspects by always advocating and insisting on the formation of legal products to the Central and Regional Governments. AMAN also empowers the Indigenous communities that are its members and always prioritizes musyarawah from the smallest level to make decisions."