Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKUnder the Conditionally Constitutional Doctrine, the Indonesian Constitutional Court may declare that a provision of a statute is constitutional if it is read in a way described by the Constitutional Court. In practice, this doctrine allows the Constitutional Court to create new legal norms that might not be covered or even considered in the reviewed statute. The main question is: does the Constitutional Court have any legitimate reasons to use such doctrine? This is especially crucial because the Indonesian House of Representatives once banned the doctrine through amendment to Law No. 24 of 2003 on Constitutional Court in 2011 and shortly thereafter, the Constitutional Court declared that the amendment is unconstitutional. In this article, I will discuss the validity of the Conditionally Constitutional Doctrine through the lens of various theories of legal interpretation, and further conclude that given the nature of judicial review process, attempting to answer the above question from the perspective of traditional legal interpretation theories would not be fruitful. Instead, I would recommend using a pragmatic approach in dealing with the existence of the doctrine and offer certain aspects that can be further pursued by Indonesian legal researchers in order to improve the use of such doctrine."

"[Notaris merupakan pejabat umum yang berwenang membuat akta otentik. Akta otentik yang dibuat oleh Notaris wajib memenuhi syarat formil dan syarat materiil untuk memenuhi sifat otentiknya, agar dapat mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian yang kuat dan sempurna. Pokok permasalahan dari tesis ini adalah bagaimana implikasi akta pencabutan keterangan saksi yang dibuat oleh Notaris terhadapketerangan saksi yang sebelumnya telah diberikan di dalam persidangan, dan bagaimanakah tanggung jawab seorang Notaris bilamana akta yang dibuatnya tidak mempunyai nilai kekuatan pembuktian.Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, penelitian dilakukan secara Yuridis Normatif dan menyatukan denganpola pikir deduktif analisis yang bersumber pada kebenaran koheren. Data yang digunakan adalah Data Sekunder yang terdiri dari Bahan Hukum Primer dan Bahan Hukum Sekunder. Hasil Penelitian ini adalah akta pencabutan keterangan saksi tidak dapat digunakan untuk mencabut keterangan yang telah diberikan sebelumnya di dalam persidangan di bawah sumpah dan atas akta yang tidak mempunyai nilai pembuktian karena kehilangan otentisitasnya, Notaris dapatdimintakan ganti kerugian, peringatan tertulis, sampai dengan pemberhentian secara tidak hormat.;Notary is a public official who authorized to make an authentic deed. An authentic deed of Notary must fulfill both formal and material requirements to meet itsauthentic nature, in order to have the strength of evidence which is strong and perfect. The subject matter of this thesis are about how the implication of the deed of revocation of witness testimony by Notaries deed affect the witness testimony that had previously been given in court and how is the notary responsibilities for the deed that does not have the evidentiary value. To answer these problems, research conducted in Normative method and unite it with deductive analysiswhich is based on coherent truth. The writer using Secondary Data consist of Primary Legal Materials and Secondary Legal Materials. For the result, this research shows that The Deed of Revocation of Witness Testimony can not be used to revoke the previous given testimony which is given under the vow and for the deed that has no evidentiary value because it loses its authenticity, a Notary may be charged to compensate , be given of a written warning, up to dismissal indisgrace;Notary is a public official who authorized to make an authentic deed. An authentic deed of Notary must fulfill both formal and material requirements to meet its authentic nature, in order to have the strength of evidence which is strong and perfect. The subject matter of this thesis are about how the implication of the deed of revocation of witness testimony by Notaries deed affect the witness testimonythat had previously been given in court and how is the notary responsibilities for the deed that does not have the evidentiary value. To answer these problems, research conducted in Normative method and unite it with deductive analysis which is based on coherent truth. The writer using Secondary Data consist of Primary Legal Materials and Secondary Legal Materials. For the result, this research shows that The Deed of Revocation of Witness Testimony can not be used to revoke the previous given testimony which is given under the vow and forthe deed that has no evidentiary value because it loses its authenticity, a Notary may be charged to compensate , be given of a written warning, up to dismissal in disgrace;Notary is a public official who authorized to make an authentic deed. An authenticdeed of Notary must fulfill both formal and material requirements to meet itsauthentic nature, in order to have the strength of evidence which is strong andperfect. The subject matter of this thesis are about how the implication of the deedof revocation of witness testimony by Notaries deed affect the witness testimonythat had previously been given in court and how is the notary responsibilities forthe deed that does not have the evidentiary value. To answer these problems,research conducted in Normative method and unite it with deductive analysiswhich is based on coherent truth. The writer using Secondary Data consist ofPrimary Legal Materials and Secondary Legal Materials. For the result, thisresearch shows that The Deed of Revocation of Witness Testimony can not beused to revoke the previous given testimony which is given under the vow and forthe deed that has no evidentiary value because it loses its authenticity, a Notarymay be charged to compensate , be given of a written warning, up to dismissal indisgrace, Notary is a public official who authorized to make an authentic deed. An authenticdeed of Notary must fulfill both formal and material requirements to meet itsauthentic nature, in order to have the strength of evidence which is strong andperfect. The subject matter of this thesis are about how the implication of the deedof revocation of witness testimony by Notaries deed affect the witness testimonythat had previously been given in court and how is the notary responsibilities forthe deed that does not have the evidentiary value. To answer these problems,research conducted in Normative method and unite it with deductive analysiswhich is based on coherent truth. The writer using Secondary Data consist ofPrimary Legal Materials and Secondary Legal Materials. For the result, thisresearch shows that The Deed of Revocation of Witness Testimony can not beused to revoke the previous given testimony which is given under the vow and forthe deed that has no evidentiary value because it loses its authenticity, a Notarymay be charged to compensate , be given of a written warning, up to dismissal indisgrace]"