Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPasangan suami isteri yang melakukan perkawinan campuran seringkali tidakmemperhatikan akibat hukum dari perkawinan campuran tersebut, khususnya terhadapharta bersama. Untuk melindungi diri pribadi dan agar di kemudian hari konsekuensihukum atas suatu perbuatan hukum dapat dipertanggungjawabkan oleh masing-masingpihak sehingga tidak melibatkan harta yang dimilikinya, hendaknya pasangan yangmelakukan perkawinan campuran membuat perjanjian kawin. Perjanjian kawin sebelumadanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, sesuai Pasal 29 ayat(1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan hanya dapat dibuat pada saat atau sebelum perkawinandilangsungkan. Pada studi kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Daerah Khusus IbukotaJakarta Nomor 613/PDT/2017/PT.DKI, pasangan suami isteri tersebut sempat membuatperjanjian kawin yang dibuat pada Notaris di Indonesia, setelah perkawinandilangsungkan di Australia, namun kemudian perjanjian kawin tersebut batal demihukum. Penulis mengadakan penelitian atas kasus tersebut dengan jenis penelitianyuridis normatif dan sifat penelitiannya deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian,Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa implikasi hukum atas pembatalan perjanjian kawinmenyebabkan seperti dari semula tidak pernah ada suatu perjanjian. Oleh karenanyadalam perkawinan campuran tersebut terdapat harta bersama yang harus dibagi antarasuami isteri setelah perkawinan berakhir karena perceraian yakni masing-masing 50%(lima puluh persen) atau setengah bagian dari harta bersama.

---

ABSTRACTMarried couples who do a mixed marriage often do not pay attention to the legalconsequences of the mixed marriage, especially for joint property. To protect oneselfand so that in the future the legal consequences of a legal action can be accounted for byeach party so that it does not involve the assets they own, couples who have to make amixed marriage make a marriage agreement. Marriage agreement before theConstitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, in accordance with Article29 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law can only be made during or before the marriagetakes place. In the case study of the Decision of the High Court of the Special CapitalRegion of Jakarta Number 613/PDT/2017/PT.DKI, the couple made a marriageagreement made to a notary in Indonesia, after the marriage took place in Australia, butthen the marriage agreement was null and void. . The author conducted research onthese cases with a type of normative juridical research and the nature of the researchwas analytical descriptive. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes thatthe legal implications of the cancellation of the marriage agreement cause that from thebeginning there was never an agreement. Therefore, in a mixed marriage there is a Jointasset which must be divided between husband and wife after the marriage ends due todivorce, each of which is 50% fifty percent or half of the joint property."

"Penelitian ini membahas advokasi perlindungan hak-hak anak sebagai respon legalisasi perkawinan bagi anak perempuan dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974. UU tersebut mengatur batas usia perkawinan perempuan pada usia 16 tahun, yang masih dikategorikan sebagai usia anak. Angka perkawinan anak yang tinggi di Indonesia dan ketiadaan respon pemerintah merevisi kebijakan telah menggerakan masyarakat sipil mengupayakan advokasi. Kelompok masyarakat sipil yang dimaksud adalah Koalisi 18+. Penelitian ini menjawab pertanyaan tentang bagaimana peran Koalisi 18+ mengadvokasi kenaikan batas umur pernikahan dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dalam kurun waktu 2014-2019. Pertanyaan penelitian akan dijawab menggunakan teori Aktivisme Politik oleh Pippa Norris. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitiatif dengan metode pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam dan studi literatur, ditemukan bahwa proses advokasi kebijakan dilakukan melalui tiga jalur yaitu, Uji Materi, pengajuan Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu), dan pengajuan Revisi Undang-Undang dengan menargetkan Pasal 7 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Perkawinan. Dengan ini, Koalisi 18+ dapat dikategorikan sebagai agensi, tepatnya agensi modern. Adapun strategi yang dilakukan merupakan mixed action strategies, sementara target advokasi Koalisi 18+ dikategorikan sebagai state-oriented, karena pergerakannya ditujukan kepada tiga lembaga negara sekaligus (eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif). Keberhasilan Koalisi 18+ ditandai dengan dikabulkannya permohonan uji materi 2017-2018 dan disahkannya UU No. 16 Tahun 2019. Beberapa faktor yang signifikan pada keberhasilan ini yaitu, peluang politik, aliansi dengan aktor di dalam pemerintahan yang pro-perubahan, dan framing isu. Meskipun begitu, keberadaan Eva Kusuma Sundari sebagai gatekeeper perubahan UU dalam pemerintahan, menjadi faktor keberhasilan utama.

---

This study discusses the protection of children's rights as a response to the legalization of girls marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974. The law regulates age limit for women at 16 years, which still categorized as child age. The high rate of child marriage in Indonesia and the lack of government's response to policy revisions have moved civil society to seek advocacy. The civil society group in question is Koalisi 18+. This study addresses the question of Koalisi 18+ role in advocating increase of women's legal age for marriage in Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage throughout 2014-2019. Research questions will be answered with the theory of Political Activism by Pippa Norris. Using a qualitative approach with in-depth data collection methods and literature studies, it was found that the policy advocacy process was carried out through three channels, Judicial Review, submission of Regulations in Lieu of Law (Perppu), and submission of Law Revisions targeted Article 7 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law. With this, Koalisi 18+ can be categorized as an activism agency, a modern agency. The strategy adopted is a mixed action strategy, while the Koalisi 18+ targeted three state institutions at once (executive, legislative, and judicial), proofing it as state-oriented activism. The success of the 18+ Coalition marked by the granting of the 2017-2018 judicial review and the establishment of Law no. 16 of 2019. Some of the significant factors for this success are political opportunities, alliances with prochange actor in government, and issues framing. Even so, the existence of Eva Kusuma Sundari as a gatekeeper for changes to laws in the government, became the main success factor."

"ABSTRAK Perkawinan campuran adalah suatu perkawinan antara dua warganegara yang berbeda, dimana satu pihak warga negara Indonesia dan pihak lain warga negara asing. Calon suami istri sebelum atau pada waktu perkawinan atau suami istri setelah perkawinan, dapat membuat perjanjian kawin mengenai harta benda dalam perkawinan. Perjanjian kawin dalam perkawinan campuran, yang dibuat setelah berlangsungnya perkawinan mengenai harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah, tidak dapat berlaku surut terhadap hak atas tanah yang diperoleh sebelum adanya perjanjian kawin. Status hak atas tanah berupa hak milik, hak guna bangunan dan hak guna, usaha, tidak dapat dipunyai atau dimiliki oleh warga negara asing baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Bagaimana jika hak atas tanah berupa hak guna bangunan yang diperoleh selama perkawinan campuran, dilakukan pemisahan harta berdasarkan penetapan pengadilan. Dalam menjawab masalah tersebut, dipergunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan mengkaji keabsahan perkawinan campuran,  subjek dan objek hak atas tanah dan waktu  hak atas tanah diperoleh, yaitu sejak atau sebelum  perkawinan campuran sah secara hukum. Harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah yang diperoleh sebelum perkawinan campuran sah, tetap merupakan milik pribadi masing masing suami istri, yang tidak dapat dijadikan objek pemisahan harta  Harta kawin berupa hak atas tanah yang diperoleh setelah perkawinan campuran sah, yang oleh undang-undang pokok agraria, dilarang dipunyai oleh warga negara asing melalui perkawinan campuran, tidak dapat dilakukan melalui pemisahan harta.

Kata Kunci: Harta Kawin, Perkawinan Campuran, Pemisahan Harta

---

ABSTRACT Mixed marriage is a marriage between two different citizens, where one party is an Indonesian citizen and the other is a foreign citizen. Prospective husband and wife before or at the time of marriage or husband and wife after marriage, can make a marriage agreement regarding property in marriage. Agreements for marriage in mixed marriages, which are made after the marriage takes place regarding the property of marriage in the form of land rights, cannot apply retroactively to the rights to land acquired prior to the marriage agreement. The status of land rights in the form of property rights, building use rights and usufructuary rights, business, cannot be owned or owned by foreign citizens either directly or indirectly. What if the land rights in the form of building usufructuary rights obtained during mixed marriages are carried out by the separation of assets based on court decisions. In answering the problem, normative research methods are used, by examining the validity of mixed marriages, the subject and object of land rights and when land rights are obtained, ie from or before a mixed marriage is legally legal. Marital assets in the form of land rights acquired before a mixed marriage are legal, still private property of each husband and wife, which cannot be the object of the separation of assets of married property in the form of land rights obtained after a legal mixed marriage, which is based on agrarian law, prohibited from being owned by foreign nationals through mixed marriages, cannot be done through the separation of property.

Keywords: Marriage Assets, Mixed Marriage, Property Separation

 

"

"ABSTRAKPerkawinan adalah hubungan yang paling intim dari semuahubungan dekat lainnya dan merupakan salah satu tugasperkembangan yang harus dicapai oleh orang dewasa muda. Bilaperkawinan berjalan dengan baik, maka kepuasan yangdiberikannya lebih besar dibandingkan dengan kepuasan yangdiberikan oleh dimensi-dimensi lain dalam kehidupan.Kepuasan perkawinan berkaitan erat dengan tahapanperkembangan keluarga. Kepuasan perkawinan tampaknya mengikuticurnilinear path (arah garis lengkung), dimana kepuasanperkawinan paling tinggi pada saat pasangan baru menikah danbelum mempunyai anak, mencapai titik terendah ketika anakpertama berusia remaja, dari kemudian meningkat kembali ketikaanak pertama telah mandiri/keluar rumah (Rollins dan Cannondalam Lerner & Hultsch, 1983; Levenson) Capstensen, & Gottman,1993; Spanier, Lewis, & Cole, 1975; Strong & DeVault, 1989).Walaupun perkawinan diharapkan memberikan kepuasan padapasangan suami istri, tetapi dalam kenyataannya banyak jugapasangan yang akhirnya mengakhiri perkawinan mereka denganparceraian. Kasus perceraian terbanyak diakibatkan oleh adanyaperselisihan suami istri yang terus-menerus, sebanyak ,49.76%(Salaban, 1992); yang disebabkan antara lain oleh adanyahambatan komunikasi di antara suami istri. Munculnya masalahkomunikasi ini dapat dikarenakan tidak adanya intimacy diantara pasangan suami istri, karena intimacy adalah dasar darikomunikasi (Stephen dalam Strong & Devault, 1989).Berdasarkan hal tersebut di atas, maka peneliti tertarikuntuk meneliti hubungan intimacy dengan kepuasan perkawinanpasangan suami istri pada tiga tahapan perkembangan keluarga,yaitu pasangan suami istri yang anak pertamanya usiaprasekolah, pasangan suami istri yang anak pertamanya usiaremaja, dan pasangan suami istri yang anak pertamanya telahmandiri/keluar rumah. Ketiga tahapan ini dipilih denganpertimbangan bahwa pada masa-masa tersebutlah kepuasanperkawinan sangat jelas terlihat, sehingga diharapkan hasilpenelitian ini nantinya dapat memperlihatkan adanyacurvelinear path (arah garis lengkung) dalam kepuasanperkawinan seperti hasil-hasil penelitian sebelumnya. Tujuanpenelitian ini adalah untuk memberi gambaran mengenaiperkawinan dan krisis yang terjadi pada tahap-tahapperkembangan keluarga tersebut, sehingga dapat diantisipasimasalah yang timbul dan dicari pemecahannya secara benar.Penelitian ini dilakukan di Jabotabek dengan subyekpasangan suami iatri yang berpendidikan minimal SLTA danmemiliki tingkat sosial ekonomi menengah keatas. Untukmengukur derajat intimacy, maka akan diberikan kuesionerintimacy dari Sternberg (1988). Sedangkan untuk mengukurkapuasan perkawinan akan digunakan skala kepuasan perkawinandari Spanier (1976) yaitu DAS (Dyadic Adjustment ScaIe) yangterdiri dari 4 subskala yaitu: dyadic consensus (kesepahaman) ,dyadic satisfaction (kepuasan dalam hubungan), dyadic cohesion(kebersamaan), dan affectional expression (ekspresi perasaan).Hasil panelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa ada hubunganpositif dan bermakna antara intimacy dengan kepuasan pasangansuami istri dari seluruh tahapan perkembangan keluarga yangditeliti. Selain itu ditemukan bahwa kepuasan perkawinanternyata memang mengikuti arah garis lengkung (curvilinearpath), dimana kapuasan perkawinan tinggi pada pasangan suamiistri yang anak pertamanya usia prasekolah, menurun dengantajam pada pasangan suami istri yang anak pertamanya usiaremaja, kemudian meningkat kambali pada pasangan suami istriyang anak pertamanya telah keluar rumah/mandiri. Selain itujuga ditemukan bahwa kepuasan parkawinan suami lebih besardaripada kepuasan perkawinan istri, dan cara pasangan dalammemecahkan masalah sehari-hari di antara mereka berpengaruhterhadap kepuasan perkawinan dan intimacy mereka.Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh tersebut, maka beberapasaran diajukan untuk mempebaiki penelitian lebih lanjut, yaitu: ditambahkan metode wawancara untuk mendapatkan gambaranyang mendalam dan menyeluruh dari kepuasan perkawinan danintimacy; penelitian melibatkan seluruh tahapan perkembangankeluarga untuk melihat apakah kepuasan perkawinan dan intimacydi Indonesia memang mengikuti curvelinear path (arah garislengkung); skala kepuasan perkawinan yang dipakai adalah hasilanalisa faktor karena diperkirakan sesuai dengan keadaan yangada di Indnesia. Sedangkan saran tambahan adalah sebaiknyabila Iembaga-lembaga dan para ahli yang kompeten dalam halkomunikasi orang tua dan remaja melakukan pelatihan tentangbagaimana menjadi orang tua dan remaja yang efektif.

---

"

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Perjanjian perkawinan itu sama dengan perjanjian pada umumnya, yaitu perjanjian antara dua orang calon suami dan istri untuk mengatur harta kekayaan pribadi masing-masing yang dibuat menjelang perkawinan, serta disahkan oleh pegawai pencatat nikah. Perjanjian kawin pada dasarnya berlaku dan mengikat suami dan istri sejak perkawinan berlangsung, sedangkan bagi pihak ketiga berlaku sejak perjanjian kawin tersebut didaftarkan. Daya laku dari akta perjanjian kawin yang didaftarkan setelah terjadinya perkawinan, adalah sah secara hukum, sepanjang perjanjian tersebut tidak bertentangan dengan ketentuan yang berlaku, perjanjian tersebut dibuat dalam bentuk akta notaris yang memenuhi 4 syarat sah perjanjian sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dan perjanjian kawin tersebut akan mengikat pihak ketiga apabila telah memenuhi unsur publisitas.

---

Marriage agreements are basically are the same as agreements in general, agreements between two prospective husbands and wives to regulate their personal assets made before marriage, and legalized by a marriage registrar employee. The marriage agreement basically applies and binds husband and wife since the marriage takes place, while for the third party is valid since the marriage agreement is registered. The power of the marriage agreement deed registered after the marriage is legal, as long as the agreement does not conflict with the applicable provisions, the agreement is made in the form of a notary deed that fulfills the 4 legal terms of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the marriage agreement will bind a third party if it fulfil the publicity element."

"Pengakuan terhadap perkawinan dan perceraian yang dilaksanakan Warga Negara Indonesia di luar negeri adalah hal yang penting untuk diteliti. Kasus yang diteliti pada tesis ini adalah Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta Nomor 707/PDT/2020/PT.DKI dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 536/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst. Pokok permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam tesis ini yakni mengenai status perkawinan FKS dan EFS ketika melaporkan pencatatan perkawinannya di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta dan dampak dari pelaporan pencatatan perkawinan tersebut terhadap pihak ketiga. Penelitian ini bersifat eksplanatoris dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi pustaka dan wawancara. Keabsahan perkawinan yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri haruslah mengacu pada Pasal 56 ayat (1) UUPerkawinan yang mengandung dua asas Hukum Perdata Internasional, yakni asas nasionalitas dan asas lex loci celebrationis. Sifat dari akta perkawinan FKS dan ESS yang berbentuk declaratoir menyebabkan akta tersebut dapat serta merta diakui di Indonesia. Putusan cerai pengadilan asing tidak termasuk dalam lingkup pasal 436 Rv karena hanya bersifat konstitutif sehingga putusan perceraian antara FKS dan ESS dapat diakui di Indonesia. Dampak yang ditimbulkan dari status cerai FKS dan ESS adalah tidak adanya legal standing FKS untuk menandatangani spousal consent pada perjanjian-perjanjian yang dibuat oleh ESS.

---

Recognition of marriages and divorces carried out by Indonesian citizens abroad is an important matter to be investigated. The cases studied in this thesis are the DKI Jakarta High Court Decision Number 707/PDT/2020/PT.DKI and the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 536/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst. The main issues that will be discussed in this thesis are regarding the marital status of FKS and EFS when reporting their marriage registration at the Population and Civil Registration Office of DKI Jakarta  and the impact to third parties. This research is explanatory by using normative legal research methods and using data collection techniques in the form of literature studies and interviews. The validity of marriages held abroad must refer to Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law which contains two principles of International Civil Law, namely the principle of nationality and the principle of lex loci celebrationis. The nature of the marriage certificate of FKS and ESS in the form of a declaratoir causes the deed can be recognized in Indonesia immediately. Divorce decisions of foreign courts are not included in the scope of article 436 Rv because they are only constitutive so divorce decisions between FKS and ESS can be recognized in Indonesia. The impact of the divorce status of FKS and ESS is that there is no legal standing for FKS to sign the spousal consent on the agreements made by ESS."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai penetapan beberapa penyimpangan terkait persatuan harta kekayaan yang disepakati oleh pasangan suami dan istri, yang dibuat dalam bentuk Perjanjian Kawin, sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. dimana sebelum berlakunya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri Nomor: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL tentang Pencatatan Pelaporan Perjanjian Kawin tertanggal 19 Mei 2017, Perjanjian Kawin hanya dapat dibuat sebelum dan pada saat Perkawinan, namun setelah keluarnya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri, Perjanjian Kawin dapat dibuat sebelum, pada saat, dan selama perkawinan berlangsung. Adapun permasalahan yang diangkat dalam tesis ini adalah mengenai Penetapan Pengadilan Tangerang Nomor 874/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Tng tertanggal 1 November 2017, yang diperlukan terkait permohonan pencatatan perkawinan yang dicatatkan saat perkawinan dilangsungkan; dan, status harta perkawinan sebelum dan setelah dicatatkan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah Yuridis-Normatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Adapun Analisa data dilakukan dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Analisa didasari pada fungsi dari Penetapan Pengadilan terkait pencatatan perjanjian kawin selama perkawinan dilangsungkan setelah dikeluarkannya Surat Direktur Jendral Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kementrian Dalam Negeri Nomor: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL dan akibat hukum yang mungkin akan terjadi dari pencatatan perjanjian kawin selama perkawinan berlangsung. Hasil penelitian adalah bahwa pada tanggal 19 Mei 2017, Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil telah mengakui adanya pencatatan perjanjian kawin setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan dan tidak mensyaratkan perlunya penetapan dari Pengadilan Negeri, serta akibat hukum dari pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan seperti ini adalah dipenuhinya unsur publisitas menjadikan pihak ketiga ikut tunduk kedalam Perjanjian Kawin.

---

This thesis discussed the establishment of several deviations regarding wealth affiliation between husband and wife that defined in the Marriage agreement, stated in Article 29 Law No. 1 of 1974 about Marriage. Before the creation of General Director Letter of Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) No: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL on the Report Registration of Marriage Agreement, dated Mei 19th, 2017, marriage agreement could only be created before or on the marriage itself, but after the release of General Director Letter Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL), marriage agreement could be created before the day, on the day and during the marriage ceremony. Therefore, the problem that specified in this thesis is about the stipulation of Tangerang District Court No. 874/Pdt.P/2017/PN.Tng dated November 1st, 2017, about the need for a plea in registering marriage that registered during the marriage ceremony and the status of marriage wealth before and after registered to Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL). To answer the problem, Juridical-Normative method is used with descriptive typology research. The data analysis method that is used is the statute approach and case approach. The analysis were based on the function of the establishment of court regarding the registration of marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony after the letter of General Director of Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) No: 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL is issued. And also the law consequences that might happened to the registration of the marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony. The result of this research is that on May 19th, 2017, Population and Civil Registration Agency (DUKCAPIL) is already admitted the registration of marriage agreement during the marriage ceremony and did not give any requirement from the national court. Also, the consequences of the marriage agreement like this are full of publicity that makes the third party should obey the Marriage Agreement."

"Peraturan perundang-undangan telah mengatur mengenai perjanjian perkawinan. Ketentuan mengenai perjanjian perkawinan diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, akan tetapi setelah disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 maka ketentuan undangundang inilah yang berlaku. Ketentuan perjanjian perkawinan diatur dalam pasal 29 Undang- Undang Hukum Perdata. Dalam pasal 29 ayat 1 dinyatakan bahwa perjanjian dibuat dengan bentuk tertulis dan disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan. Berdasarkan pasal 29 ayat 3 yang menegaskan perjanjian perkawinan berlaku sejak perkawinan dilangsungkan, maka perjanjian perkawinan juga harus didaftarkan bersamaan dengan pendaftaran perkawinan untuk dapat disahkan bersamaan dengan perkawinan.Dalam membahas yang menjadi permasalahan Penulis menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Bahan hukum dan data diperoleh melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan survey lapangan dengan wawancara notaris dan pegawai arsip Pengadilan Negeri.Dari hasil penelitian dalam masyarakat terhadap warganegara Indonesia yang melangsungkan perkawinan di luar wilayah Indonesia setelah kembali ke Indonesia harus mendaftarkan perkawinan dan perjanjian perkawinan secara bersamaan di Indonesia. Namun karena yang dicatatkan hanya perkawinannya saja sehingga perjanjian perkawinannya tidak ikut dicatatkan bersamaan pencatatan perkawinan. Terhadap pendaftaran perjanjian perkawinan setelah perkawinan belum memiliki pengaturan dalam perundang-undangan. Untuk itu digunakan jalan keluar dengan meminta izin kepada Pengadilan Negeri berupa Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri.

---

Legislation have been set regarding the marriage covenant. Provisions regarding the aggrement marriage set forth in the Book of the Civil Code Act, but after the passing of Law set forth in article 29 of Law Civil Law. In Article 29 paragraph 1 stated that the agreement made with the written form and approved by the Civil Registrar of Marriage. Beside article 29, paragraph 3 which confirms the marriage agreement effective from the marriage took place, then the marriage contract should also be registered conducted with the registration of marriages to be legalized along with marriage.

The author discusses the problems of using a normative juridical approach. Legal materials and data obtained through library research and field survey by interviewing the notary and civil court records.

From the results of research in Indonesian society of citizens who hold a marriage outside Indonesian territory after returning to Indonesia must register the marriage and the marriage covenant together in Indonesia. However, because the only recorded marriage alone, so the marriage agreement did not enter recorded simultaneously recording marriage. Against registration of a marriage agreement after the marriage has not been setup in the legislation. It is used to exit with the permission from the District Court of the District Court Decision."