Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In a security perspective, the territory of Indonesia and the Southeast Asia region as a whole are strategic areas in economic, political and military aspects. This condition also has complex potential challenges and risks for creating tension among countries. After the Korean War and World War II the development of the crisis on the Korean Peninsula continued. North Korea chose to build and to increase its military capabilities. Indonesia as one of the adjacent countries to the Korean Peninsula, could get an impact to the sovereignty and security of the country. Especially caused by North Korea’s nuclear testing activities. This study aims to determine the form of Indonesian Defense Diplomacy and how the roles of the involved actors in responding to the issue. By using qualitative research methods, this study discusses the issue with constructivist theory and the concept of defense diplomacy for the analysis. The result of this research is a form of Indonesian defense diplomacy in response to the crisis on the Korean Peninsula"

"Area studies, including Asian and Southeast Asian studies, in the post-Cold War era have been facing an epochal challenge that is rooted in two conditions: on the one hand, the end of the Cold War and the fading geopolitical rationale, and on the other, the emergence of the technology-driven transformation of the global economy and society. The consequences thus far are paradoxical: 1) While the technology-led transformation needs a workforce with critical and innovative abilities, higher education becomes more hyper-utilitarian; 2) While the transformation instigates increasing diversity of identities in global cultures, many countries thrive for STEM education at the expense of learning languages and cultures, including area studies which are essential for diversity. Southeast Asian studies programs need to change in response to these new conditions. These changing conditions and paradoxes, nevertheless, take different forms and degrees in the American, European and Asian academies, thanks to their different histories of higher education. The prospects for Southeast Asian Studies in these various academies are likely to be different too. "

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai peranan instrumen ASEAN berupa forum-forum yang berfokus pada keamanan maritim seperti ASEAN Maritime Forum AMF , Extended ASEAN Maritime Forum EAMF , dan ASEAN Defense Minister Meeting ADMM Plus Experts rsquo; Maritime Group on Maritime Security yang belum berperan secara efektif dalam upaya menurunkan tingkat kejahatan di perairan Asia Tenggara, khususnya pembajakan dan perompakan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deduktif. Hasil penelitian berkesimpulan bahwa kerjasama yang sudah disepakati dalam kerangka ASEAN tidak terlalu berjalan efektif karena adanya relative gain dan self-interest yang berbeda dari setiap anggota ASEAN, sehingga forum kerjasama maritim di bawah ASEAN hanya menjadi forum trust building tanpa ada tindak lanjut berupa operasi bersama atau patroli bersama di dalam kerangka ASEAN. Penelitan ini menyarankan agar Indonesia sebagai pemimpin tradisional ASEAN dapat memimpin kerja sama regional dalam menangani pembajakan dan perompakan di wilayah Asia Tenggara.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the role of ASEAN instruments in the form of forums focusing on maritime security such as the ASEAN Maritime Forum AMF , the Extended ASEAN Maritime Forum EAMF , and the ASEAN Defense Minister Meeting ADMM Plus Experts rsquo Maritime Group on Maritime Security have not functioned effectively in the efforts to reduce crime rates in Southeast Asian waters, especially sea piracy and armed robbery at sea. This research is a deductive qualitative research. The research concludes that the agreed cooperation within the framework of ASEAN are not very effective because of the relative gain and different self interest of each ASEAN member, so that the maritime cooperation forums under ASEAN merely becomes forums of trust building without any follow up in the form of joint operation or joint patrol within the framework of ASEAN. This research suggests that Indonesia, as a traditional ASEAN leader, can lead regional cooperation in dealing with sea piracy and armed robbery at sea in the Southeast Asian region."

"Penelitian ini berintikan pembahasan mengenai arti penting dari kehadiran ASEAN Regional Forum sebagai Forum dialog keamanan satu-satunya di kawasan Asia Pasifik yang diikuti oleh 24 negara yang terdiri atas 10 (sepuluh) negara anggota ASEAN, negara besar seperti Amerika Serikat, Perwakilan Uni Eropa, Australia, Rusia, China, Jepang dan India maupun negara-negara di kawasan Asia Pasifik yang memiliki kepentingan terhadap keamanan kawasan Asia Pasifik seperti Korea Selatan, Korea Utara, Mongolia, Pakistan, Selandia Baru dan juga perwakilan dari Sekretariat ASEAN. Arti Penting ASEAN Regional Forum kemudian akan dianalisis kontribusinya terhadap Ketahanan Nasional Indonesia khususnya di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan sepanjang periode 1994-2006 untuk menemukan jawaban sejauh mana ASEAN Regional Forum telah memberikan kontribusi bagi kebutuhan peningkatan ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.Dalam upaya menganalisis kontribusi ASEAN Regional Forum terhadap ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan, Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga teori utama yaitu keamanan kooperatif (cooperative security), ketahanan regional (regional resilience) dan ketahanan nasional (national resillience). Penelitian bersifat Studi Dokumen yang dilengkapi dengan Hasil Wawancara pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam kegiatan ASEAN Regional Forum baik dari jalur pertama maupun jalur kedua maupun pihak-pihak yang memahami kebutuhan ketahanan nasional di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kontribusi yang signifikan walaupun belum maksimal dari ASEAN Regional Forum terhadap kebutuhan ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan. Hal ini dikarenakan dengan adanya ASEAN Regional Forum, Indonesia memiliki wadah untuk melakukan interaksi dengan negara-negara tetangga maupun negara besar dalam upaya memenuhi kebutuhan pertahanan dan keamanannya baik yang bersifat pembangunan rasa saling percaya maupun peningkatan kerjasama di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan. Sebaliknya kehadiran ASEAN Regional Forum telah memberikan kontribusi terhadap terciptanya stabilitas keamanan dan perdamaian di kawasan Asia Pasifik dan juga peningkatan rasa saling percaya serta perumusan sejumlah langkah-langkah kerjasama dalam pengelolaan bersama keamanan kawasan, yang ikut mendukung upaya Indonesia untuk meningkatkan ketahanan nasionalnya khususnya di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.

---

This Research focused on the explanation about the important meaning of ASEAN Regional Forum formation as the one and only forum for multilateral security dialogue in Asia Pacific Region. ASEAN Regional Forum that had been built on 1994 was followed by 24 countries include 10 members of ASEAN, major powers such as United States, China, Australia, representative from European Commision, Japan, India and also another middle power states that have security interest in Asia Paciic Region such as South Korea, North Korea, Mongolia, Pakistan and the representative from ASEAN Secretariat. The important thing of the development of ASEAN Regional Forum since 1994 until 2006 then will be analyzed toward the need of Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security fields to find the answer how far the development ASEAN Regional Forum had gave several contributions to increase the Indonesian National Resilience.In effort to analyze the relation between ASEAN Regional Forum and Indonesian National Resilience, this research using three theoritical frameworks about cooperative security, regional resilience and national resilience. This Research is based on library study and also using the interview process with three important persons whose involving on ASEAN Regional Forum activities as first track and second track. That Three persons also have deeply understanding about the needs of Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security fields.The conclusion of this research pointed out that there were a significant contributions from ASEAN Regional Forum toward Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security field since 1994 until 2006. Through the participation on ASEAN Regional Forum, Indonesian Government could has opportunities to discuss with neighboured countries or major power countries to improve the multilateral and bilateral dialogue and also to make cooperation for Indonesia National Resilience?s need. In the other hand, the successfully of ASEAN Regional Forum that had already creating a security stability and also short term peace in Asia Pacific Region could brought a neceessary support for Indonesia?s need to improve and strenghten her National Resilience on defense and security field."

"Otonomi Daerah telah memberikan peluang yang luas kepada pemerintah daerah dan masyarakat untuk mengatur daerahnya, termasuk memanfaatkan sumber daya alam daerah sebagai modal pembangunan. Dengan demikian, peranan pemerintah daerah dan partisipasi masyarakat akan sangat menentukan dalam pembangunan daerah. Keberhasilan pembangunan daerah akan meningkatkan ketahanan daerah.Kajian penelitian ini tentang "Hubungan Antara Penambangan Pasir Dengan Ketahanan Daerah, Studi Kasus Kabupaten Magelang". Adapun titik berat atau fokus penelitian adalah Peranan Pemerintah Kabupaten Magelang dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Mengatasi Dampak Penambangan Pasir Gunung Merapi di Kecamatan Srumbung, Kabupaten Magelang Untuk Mendukung Ketahanan Daerah. Permasalahan ini sangat menarik perhatian, meilgingat penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi merupakan salah satu permasalahan utama yang dihadapi Kabupaten Magelang.Permasalahan yang menjadi pertanyaan penelitian adalah bagainnana peranan Pemerintah Kabupaten Magelang dan partisipasi masyarakat mengatasi dampak penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi di Kecamatan Srumbung, Kabupaten Magelang, apakah penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi mendukung pembangunan daerah, dan apakah kegiatan usaha penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi mendukung Ketahanan Daerah, Untuk mengukur hubungan variabel, peneliti mengujinya dengan teknik analisa statistik.Lokasi penelitian di Kecamatan Srumbung, Kabupaten Magelang, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian survey dan jumlah sampel responden 100 orang melalui purposive sampling. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan kuesioner dan wawancara. Teknik analisa data yang digunakan metode deskriptif, sedangkan untuk mengukur korelasi antar variabel menggunakan teknik korelasi Pearson Product Moment (r).Berdasarkan tolak ukur variabeI, maka peranan pemerintah daerah dalam mengatasi dampak penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi belum optimal. Meskipun, Pemerintah Kabupaten Magelang telah melakukan berbagai kebijakan, tetapi masyarakat masih menilai bahwa upaya pemerintah belum seperti yang diharapkan. Partisipasi masyarakat menunjukkan kondisi yang sama, masyarakat belum secara penuh berpartisipasi dalam mengatasi dampak penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi. Partisipasi masyarakat masih terbatas dalam keinginan, belum diwujudkan dalam tindakan nyata.Dalam hal pembangunan daerah menunjukkan bahwa kontribusi penambangan pasir cukup besar terhadap pemasukan kas daerah, tetapi tidak banyak memberikan pengaruh terhadap peningkatan kehidupan masyarakat. Terhadap Ketahanan Daerah, dilihat dari aspek kesejahteraan dan aspek keamanan adanya penambangan pasir memiliki dua sisi yang kontradiktif, disatu pihak menguntungkan tetapi dilain pihak merugikan.Dilihat dari perhitungan korelasi antar variabel, diketahui korelasi dari peranan pemerintah daerah dan partisipasi masyarakat dengan pembangunan daerah sebesar 0,32, maka ada korelasi positif pada kategori rendah. Hal ini berarti hipotesa diterirna.Dengan demikian, perlu upaya yang lebih keras lagi dari Pemerintah Kabupaten Magelang dengan melibatkan sejauh mungkin partisipasi masyarakat mengatasi dampak penambangan pasir Gunung Merapi, sehingga dapat lebih mendukung pembangunan daerah dan Ketahanan Daerah.

---

Local autonomy has been giving a wide range of opportunity for the people and local government in administering their region, including in using natural resources as a capital. Therefore the role of local government and participation of local people would significantly determine the development of the region. Accordingly the success of local development will increase the regional resilience.

This research observes "the Relations between Sand Mining Activities and Regional Resilience, with the case study of Magelang Regency." The focus of the research is on the role of Magelang Regency government and the participations of Magelang people in overcoming the impact of sand mining in Mount Merapi, located in Srumbung District, Regency of Magelang, in supporting the regional resilience. This issue attracts immense attention, considering the sand mining at Mount Merapi is one of the main problems faced by Magelang Regency.

The research question is how have the role of Magelang government and the participations of Magelang people in overcoming the impact of sand mining at Mount Merapi, have the sand mining support the local development, and have the sand mining activities support the regional resilience. In measuring the relations between variables, the research tested it by using statistical analysis technique.

The location of the research was at Srumbung Districts, Regency of Magelang, using the survey research method, and by respondent samples of 100 people through purposive sampling. Research instruments used in the research are questioners and interviews. The technique used to analyze the data was descriptive method. And in order to correlate between variables, the Pearson Product Moment correlation technique (r) was used.

Based on variable indicators, Magelang Government roles in overcoming the impact of sand mining activities has not yet optimal. Even though the government of Magelang Regency has been launching a series of policy, but still the Magelang people perceived that government efforts are not as expected. Participations of the people of Magelang showed similar condition that the people have not been fully participated in overcoming the impact of sand mining at Mount Merapi. The participations of Magelang people is still limited to desire, not yet implemented in a concrete way.

Related to local development, result of the research showed that the sand mining activities have major contribution for the regency income, but still not giving influence for the people live. Related to Regional Resilience, viewed from the prosperity and security aspects, the sand mining have two contradicting side, in one hand it give benefits, but in other hand it brings costs.

Viewed from the relations between variables, correlations of the role of local government and the people participation with the local development is 0,32. This means that there is positive correlations, but in low category.

Thus, it is needed a stronger efforts from the Magelang Regency government through involving Magelang people participation in managing the impact of sand mining activities at Mount Merapi, so that it could give more supports for the local development and regional resilience."