Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan manajemen risiko terintegrasi dan struktur tata kelola terhadap kinerja perusahaan (ROA dan Tobin’s Q) pada 50 perusahaan keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2006-2018. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan regresi data panel fixed-effect dan random-effect. Analisis univariat juga dilakukan untuk melihat perbedaan antara hasil observasi perusahaan yang menerapkan manajemen risiko perusahaan terintegrasi dan yang tidak menerapkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penerapan risk committee dan risk assessment frequency yang tinggi dapat meningkatkan ROA perusahaan, sementara tingkat pelaporan komite risiko kepada dewan direksi (RC to BoD) dapat menurunkan ROA. Di sisi lain, risk assessment frequency yang tinggi akan menurunkan nilai Tobin’s Q perusahaan. Hasil analisis univariat menunjukan adanya tanda awal bahwa penerapan manajemen risiko perusahaan yang semakin terintegrasi (ERM advanced) memiliki nilai rata-rata Tobin’s Q yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan perusahaan yang belum menerapkan manajemen risiko perusahaan dengan terintegrasi dan signifikan secara statistik. Independensi direksi pada struktur tata kelola perusahaan dapat meningkatkan nilai Tobin’s Q.

---

This study is conducted to ensure the effect of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and corporate governance structure to 50 firm’s performance (ROA and Tobin’s Q) in financial sector that listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2006-2018. The hypothesis testing is carried out using the panel data fixed-effect and random-effect regression method. Univariate analysis was also conducted to see the differences between the results of observations of companies that implementing high ERM advanced and not. The results shows that companies who have risk committee and high risk assessment frequency have a greater value of ROA and this results are statistically significant, but the greater frequency of reporting from risk committee to directors (RC to BoD) will decrease the firm’s value of ROA In addition, high frequency of risk assessment shows a negative impact on Tobin’s Q. There is an initial indication of the value-relevance of ERM advanced that seen from the results of univariate analysis that shows firms with high ERM advanced have a higher Tobin’s Q on average than companies that have low ERM advanced and the results are statistically significant. In terms of corporate governance structure, the independency of directors shows that companies have a greater market performance (Tobin’s Q).

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan dan struktur modal perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) periode 2008-2017. Tata kelola perusahaan diproksikan oleh ukuran dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, komisaris perempuan, komite audit, konsentrasi kepemilikan dan reputasi auditor. Dengan menggunakan sampel 262 perusahaan dan jumlah observasi 2308 firm-year, hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tata kelola perusahaan secara signfikan mempengaruhi kinerja perusahaan dan struktur modal perusahaan. Dimana konsentrasi kepemilikan dan komisaris perempuan berpengaruh secara positif terhadap kinerja perusahaan dan struktur modal perusahaan, sedangkan ukuran dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, komite audit dan reputasi auditor berpengaruh negatif terhadap kinerja perusahaan dan struktur modal perusahaan. Lalu, secara sempurna leverage memediasi hubungan antara ukuran dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, komisaris perempuan, komite audit, dan konsentrasi kepemilikan serta secara parsial leverage memediasi hubungan antara reputasi auditor dan kinerja perusahaan.

---

This study aims to investigate and analyze the effect of corporate governance on firm performance and capital structure of non-financial companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2008-2017. Corporate governance is proxied by board commissioner size, independent commissioner, female commissioner, audit committee, ownership concentration, and audit reputation. Using 262 companies and the number of observations of 2308 firm-year, this study found that corporate governance associated with firm performance and capital structure. Furthermore, ownership concentration and female commissioners have positive effect on firm performance and capital structure, while board commisioners size, independent commisioners, audit committees, and audit reputation have negative effect on firm performance and capital structure. Then, financial leverage perfectly mediates the effect of board commisioners size, independent commisioners, female commissioners, audit committees, and ownership concentration on firm performance, while leverage partially mediates the effect of audit reputation on firm performance.

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Enterprise Risk Managamenet terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan sampel 53 perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode tahun 2008 sampai 2015.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa size, leverage, sales growth, tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Enterprise Risk Managamenet. ROA dan opacity berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ERM. ERM, ROA, sales growth, dan dividend tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Size dan leverage berpengaruh signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.

---

This research objective is to find out whether there is an effect of the Enterprise Risk Managamenet implementation on firm value. This research was conducted on 53 non financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2008 to 2015.The result of this study show that there is no a significant effect of size, leverage, sales growth to Enterprise Risk Managamenet implementation. ROA dan opacity showed a significant effect to ERM. ERM, ROA, sales growth, and dividend showed there is no significant effect on firm value. Size and leverage showed a significant effect on firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal terhadap agency cost pada perusahaan sektor non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2008 2012 Corporate governance diproksikan dengan board of commissioner size dan proporsi dewan komisaris Struktur kepemilikan diproksikan dengan kepemilikan manajerial dan kepemilikan institusional Sedangkan struktur modal diproksikan dengan debt to asset ratio Agency cost pada penelitian ini diproksikan dengan asset utilisation ratio Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan uji analisis Random Effect Model REMHasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa secara simultan corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap agency cost Selanjutnya secara parsial hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa board of commissioner size kepemilikan manajerial kepemilikan institusional dan debt to asset ratio memiliki pengaruh yang negatif signifikan terhadap agency cost Kata Kunci Agency cost corporate governance struktur kepemilikan dan struktur modal.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure on agency cost of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. Corporate governance is proxied by board of commissioner size and proportion of independent commissioners. Ownership structure is proxied by managerial ownership and institutional ownership. Whereas, capital structure is proxied by debt-to-asset ratio. In this study, agency cost is measured by asset utilisation ratio. This research is a quantitative research by using panel data regression. This research is analyzed with Random Effect Model (REM).

The result shows that corporate governance, ownership structure, and capital structure simultaneously have significant effect on agency cost. Furthermore, board of commissioner size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and debt-to-asset ratio significantly affect agency cost and have negative correlation with agency cost."

"The purpose of this paper is to determine the direct influence of the mechanism of good corporate governance (GCG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on financial performance as well as through earnings management as a mediating variable. The data used in this research are secondary data involving 115 companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period of 2014. The data used in this study are analyzed using partial least square and carried out with the help of SmartPLS 2.0 software. The results show that the mechanism of GCG doesnt has effect on earnings management, CSR has a negative effect on earnings management, mechanism of GCG has a positive effect on financial performance, but CSR and earnings management dont have effect on financial performance. The results also show earnings management cannot be a mediation between GCG mechanisms and financial performance or CSR and financial performance."

"Penelitian ini mengkaji penerapan dari corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Corporate governance merupakan seperangkat aturan yang mengatur relasi antara staekholders, pemerintah, pihak internal maupun eksternal, karyawan, dan manajemen yang memiliki keterkaitan dengan hak dan kewajiban mereka. Proksi yang digunakan untuk variabel corporate governance adalah komisaris independen, board size, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan non-institusional Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap biaya modal dan nilai perusahaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah regresi data panel. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah non-keuangan yang tercatat di BEI pada periode tahun 2006-2016.Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, komisaris independen, boardsize, managerial ownership dan institusional ownership memiliki pengaruh secara signifikan terhadap biaya modal. Selain itu, hasil penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa variabel dari corporate governance seperti, boardsize, institusional ownership, dan non- institusional ownership berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan Tobins Q.

---

This study examines the use of corporate governance to the cost of capital and corporate value. Corporate governance is a set of rules which manages the relationships between stakeholders, government, internal and external parties, employees, and management that are related to their rights and obligations. The proxies used for corporate governance variables are independent commissioners, board size, managerial ownership, institutional ownership and non institutional ownership. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of corporate governance on the cost of capital and firm value. The research method used is panel data regression. The sample used in this study is non financial listed on the IDX in the period 2006 2016.The results of this study indicate that variables of corporate governance such as, independent commissioner, boardsize, managerial ownership and institutional ownership have a significant influence on capital costs. In addition, the results of this study also found that variables of corporate governance such as boardsize, institutional ownership, and non institutional ownership significantly influence the firm 39s value Tobin 39s Q."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja perusahaan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2010 hingga 2016. Komponen corporate governance yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu dewan direksi, dewan direksi independen, dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan asing, dengan ukuran perusahaan, umur perusahaan dan leverage sebagai variabel kontrol. Sedangakan untuk mengukur kinerja perusahaan yaitu menggunakan (Return on Asset) ROA, (Return on Equity) ROE, (Net Profit Margin) NPM, (Stock Return) SR dan Tobin’s Q. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun dewan direksi berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap ROA dan SR. Dewan Komisaris berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Direktur Independen berpengaruh signifikan ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Komisaris Independen berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap ROA, Tobins’ Q dan SR, namun Komisaris Independen berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROE dan NPM. Kepemilikan Manager signifikan terhadap terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Kepemilikan Institusional berpengaruh signifikan terhadap terhadap ROA, ROE, NPM dan Tobin’s Q, namun tidak signifikan terhadap SR. Kepemilikan Asing berpengaruh signifikan terhadap ROA, ROE dan NPM, namun Kepemilikan Asing berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap Tobin’s Q dan SR.

---

This study aims to examine empirically the effect of corporate governance on the firm performance in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2010 to 2016. Dependent variable used in this study are board of directors, independent board of directors, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership, company size, company age and leverage as control variables. While the components used to measure the performance of the company as an independent variable that is (Return on Assets) ROA, Return on Equity ROE, (Net Profit Margin) NPM, (Stock Return) SR and Tobin's Q. The results of this study found that the board of directors had a significant effect on ROE, NPM and Tobin's Q, but the board of directors had no significant effect on ROA and SR. The Board of Commissioners has a significant effect on ROA, ROE, NPM and Tobin's Q, but not significant to SR. Independent

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur modal dan corporate governance terhadap leverage ratios pada perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2008-2012. Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga definisi leverage ratios untuk melihat perbedaan signifikansi dan arah hubungan pada tiap model penelitian. Variabel independen dalam penelitian ini berupa struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah tiga definisi leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, dan debt to asset ratio).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada model 1 (DER) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size dan board independence) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 2 (LDR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size dan asset tangibility) terhadap leverage ratios; pada model 3 (DR) terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara struktur modal (size, profitability, asset tangibility) dan corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) terhadap leverage-ratios.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of capital structure and corporate governance on leverage ratios of non financial companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008-2012. This research uses three proxies of leverage ratios to see significance difference and relation signs in each model. The independence variables of this research are capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership), while the dependence variables are the three proxies of leverage ratios (debt to equity ratio, long-term debt to equity ratio, debt to asset ratio).

The result shows that there is significant effect of capital structure (size, growth rate, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence) toward leverage ratios in the first model (DER), while the second model (LDR) shows significant effect of capital structure (size dan asset tangibility) towards leverage ratios, and there is significant effect of capital structure (size, profitability, asset tangibility) and corporate governance (board size, board independence, insider ownership) toward leverage ratios in the third model (DR)."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh struktur kepemilikan (institutional dan managerial ownership) dan corporate governance (board size dan non-executive directors) terhadap struktur modal. Menggunakan sampel perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2008-2013, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hasil yang signifikan antara struktur kepemilikan dan corporate governance terhadap struktur modal. Return on asset (ROA) sebagai variabel kontrol juga mempunyai hasil yang signifikan dengan struktur modal namun firm size mempunyai hasil yang tidak signifikan terhadap struktur modal. Maka, hasil penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa struktur kepemilikan dan corporate governance mempunyai peran penting pada struktur modal perusahaan manufaktur.

---

This research aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure (institutional and managerial ownership) and corporate governance (board size and non-executive directors) on capital structure. By using listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2008-2013 as a sample, results reveal that ownership structure and corporate governance are significantly correlated with capital structure. Return on asset as control variable has significant correlation with capital structure, but as for firm size has insignificant correlation with capital structure. Therefore, results suggest that ownership structure and corporate governance play important roles in a firm's capital structure."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh proporsi komisaris independen terhadap financial distress, mengetahui pengaruh blockholder ownership terhadap financial distress, mengetahui pengaruh director ownership terhadap financial distres, dan mengetahui pengaruh jumlah komite audit terhadap financial distress. Metode pengujian yang digunakan adalah dengan analisis regresi berganda berbasis LOGIT. Penelitian ini membuktikan pada periode tahun 2013, hanya blockholder ownership yang berpengaruh signifikan terhadap berkurangnya resiko terjadinya kesulitan keuangan. Sementara komposisi komisaris independen, director ownership, dan komite audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap berkurang resiko terjadinya kesulitan keuangan.;This study aims to determine the effect of the proportion of independent directors on the financial distress, determine the effect on the financial distress blockholder ownership, determine the influence of director ownership of the financial distress, and determine the influence of the number of audit committee financial distress. Testing method used is the multiple regression analysis based on LOGIT. This study proves the period of 2013, only blockholder ownership that significantly influence the reduction of the risk of financial difficulties. While the composition of the independent board, director ownership, and the audit committee did not significantly influence the reduced risk of financial distress., This study aims to determine the effect of the proportion of independent directors on the financial distress, determine the effect on the financial distress blockholder ownership, determine the influence of director ownership of the financial distress, and determine the influence of the number of audit committee financial distress. Testing method used is the multiple regression analysis based on LOGIT. This study proves the period of 2013, only blockholder ownership that significantly influence the reduction of the risk of financial difficulties. While the composition of the independent board, director ownership, and the audit committee did not significantly influence the reduced risk of financial distress.]"