Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This study examines the effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) on earnings quality (EQ) in member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Using 1845 firm-year observations covering the 2008–2016 period, this study performs panel data regressions to examine the association between CSRD as measured by a dummy variable and three common EQ measures, namely, value relevance (VR), accrual quality (AQ), and earnings persistence (PER). The study concludes that CSRD in three of the six GCC countries (Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) has a positive and significant association with EQ in terms of VR. The use of generalized least squares (GLS) shows that CSRD has an effect on AQ in Kuwait and Bahrain whereas CSRD has an effect on PER only in Kuwait. Regulators of capital markets should use CSR information as guidelines to improve financial reporting quality and achieve better allocation of resources in capital markets."

"

Penerapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) di Indonesia tergolong masih tertinggal di banding Negara-negara ASEAN hal ini bisa dilihat dari pemenuhan pelaporan implementasi CSR oleh perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia. Dalam lingkup ASEAN, Thailand adalah Negara yang penerapan CSRnya paling baik, oleh karena itu perlu dijadikan sebagai benchmark untuk perbaikan penerapan di Indonesia. Hasilnya adalah dari sisi regulasi, pendekatan yang diambil kedua Negara berbeda, dari sisi kultur, terdapat ketaatan yang tinggi terhadap keyakinan yang mendorong penerapan CSR di Thailand menjadi lebih baik, dan faktor lain yang memperkuat penerapan CSR di Thailand adalah keteladanan, konsistensi, dan pengaruh Raja terhadap praktik CSR.

---

The implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia is still left behind compared to ASEAN countries, this can be seen from the fulfillment of reporting on CSR implementation by companies in Indonesia. In ASEAN Regional, Thailand is the country whereby the CSR impelentation is the best, therefore it need to be selected as a benchmark as to improve the implementation of CSR in Indonesia. The result is that from regulation aspect, both Thailand and Indonesia have different approaches, from cultural aspect, there is high adherence to the beliefs that drives CSR implementation in Thailand to be better and the last, and other factors that reinforce the implementation of CSR in Thailand among others are lead by example, consistency and the strong influence of the King on CSR practices.

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah terdapat pengaruh pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) menurut pedoman Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) terhadap nilai perusahaan. Besarnya pengaruh pengungkapan CSR diukur dari jumlah skor pengungkapan CSR setiap dimensi berdasarkan pedoman GRI di dalam laporan tahunan perusahaan. Pedoman GRI reporting yang paling terbaru adalah GRI G3. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan menggunakan model regresi berganda dengan sampel 263 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2010. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan bukti empiris bahwa pengungkapan CSR, baik secara keseluruhan maupun per dimensi, memiliki pengaruh yang positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Temuan ini sejalan dengan penelitian Samy et al. (2010) yang menyatakan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara pengungkapan CSR berdasarkan GRI G3 dengan nilai perusahaan.

---

This research is conducted to prove if there is any effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure according to Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines on firm?s value. The effect of CSR disclosure is measured by the total CSR disclosure score of each dimension based on GRI guidelines in company?s annual reports. The latest version of GRI reporting standard is GRI G3. Hypothesis is tested using multiple regression analysis with 263 samples of listed firms in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2010. The results of the research give empiric evidence that overall CSR disclosure and each of CSR disclosure?s dimensions (economic, environment, social, human rights, community, and product responsibility) have positive and significant effect on the value of the firm. This result is consistent with Samy et al. (2010) findings which indicate that there is a positive and significant causal relationship between CSR disclosure based on GRI G3 with the value of the firm."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pengungkapan corporate social responsibility (CSR) terhadap biaya utang yang diukur melalui yield spread. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel perusahaan publik di Indonesia yang menerbitkan obligasi dalam rentang tahun 2011-2015. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengungkapan CSR berpengaruh negatif terhadap yield spread sebagai proksi biaya utang. Hal ini disebabkan karena informasi mengenai aktivitas CSR dapat mengurangi adanya informasi asimetri, terutama bagi investor publik. Pengungkapan CSR memungkinkan investor untuk dapat menilai perusahaan dengan lebih baik sehingga imbal hasil yang diminta oleh investor dapat menjadi semakin rendah.

---

The aim of this research is to analyze the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on cost of debt as measured by bond yield spread. Sample of this research are firms that issued bonds during the year of 2011-2015. The result of this study indicates that CSR disclosure has negative impact on yield spread. Informations regarding the firms’ CSR activities are believed to reduce asymmetric information, mainly for public investors. Such CSR disclosure could enhance investors’ assessment of the firms and therefore they may require lower yield."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran mengenai praktik pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) serta menguji secara empiris pengaruh dari struktur kepemilikan saham terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji regresi linier berganda terhadap 128 perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2014. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa tingkat pengungkapan CSR masih sangat rendah dengan jumlah persentase tingkat pengungkapan kurang dari 70%. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kepemilikan saham oleh keluarga, institusi, dan publik berpengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Hal ini dapat disebabkan oleh lemahnya kontrol dari para pemegang saham terhadap perusahaan terkait dengan isu sosial dan lingkungan, sehingga tingkat pengungkapan CSR pada perusahaan menjadi rendah. Kepemilikan saham oleh investor asing tidak terbukti berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Hal ini dapat disebabkan oleh tujuan dari investor asing yang bersifat jangka pendek, sehingga lebih terkonsentrasi pada profit perusahaan.

---

The objective of this study is to determine the implementation of corporate social responsibilty disclosure and to determine the effect of ownership structure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The hypothesis testing is done using multiple linear regression of the 128 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014. This study find that the level of CSR disclosure is still weak, with level of percentage disclosure below 70%. This study also finds that family ownership, institution ownership, and public ownership have negative significant effect on CSR disclosure. It can be caused by the lack of control from the shareholders on the social and environment issues, so that the level of CSR disclosures is weak. Foreign ownership is not has significant effect on CSR disclosure. It can be casued by the goals of foreign investor only for short-term investment, so the focus of company is profit."

"[ABSTRAKTujuan utama penelitian ini adalah untuk meneliti hubungan empiris tentang pengaruh corporate governance terhadap corporate social responsibility disclosure pada perusahaan-perusahaan yang tergabung dalam indeks LQ 45. Pengukuran yang digunakan pada variabel dependen adalah indeks skoring CSRD. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme CG dengan komponen variabel commissioners independence berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR, sebaliknya board independence berpengaruh positif, namun tidak signifikan. Selain itu, variabel manajerial ownership berpengaruh positif dan siginifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR, namun pada foreign ownership berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan pada pengungkapan CSR. Pada variabel kontrol yang digunakan, yaitu umur perusahaan dan ROA berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan, sedangkan pada leverage dan ROE berpengaruh negatif, namun tidak signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR.ABSTRACTThe main objective of this study was to examine the empirical relationship of the influence of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure in companies incorporated in the LQ 45 index measurements used in the dependent variable is the index scoring CSRD. These results indicate that the mechanism of CG with a variable component of commissioners independence significantly negative effect on the disclosure of CSR, board independence otherwise positive effect, but not significant. In addition, variable managerial ownership and significantly positive effect on the disclosure of CSR, but on foreign ownership not significantly positive effect on CSR. In the control variables used, the age of the company and ROA is not significantly positive effect, whereas the effect of leverage and ROE is negative, but not significantly to the disclosure of CSR.;The main objective of this study was to examine the empirical relationship of the influence of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure in companies incorporated in the LQ 45 index measurements used in the dependent variable is the index scoring CSRD. These results indicate that the mechanism of CG with a variable component of commissioners independence significantly negative effect on the disclosure of CSR, board independence otherwise positive effect, but not significant. In addition, variable managerial ownership and significantly positive effect on the disclosure of CSR, but on foreign ownership not significantly positive effect on CSR. In the control variables used, the age of the company and ROA is not significantly positive effect, whereas the effect of leverage and ROE is negative, but not significantly to the disclosure of CSR., The main objective of this study was to examine the empirical relationship of the influence of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure in companies incorporated in the LQ 45 index measurements used in the dependent variable is the index scoring CSRD. These results indicate that the mechanism of CG with a variable component of commissioners independence significantly negative effect on the disclosure of CSR, board independence otherwise positive effect, but not significant. In addition, variable managerial ownership and significantly positive effect on the disclosure of CSR, but on foreign ownership not significantly positive effect on CSR. In the control variables used, the age of the company and ROA is not significantly positive effect, whereas the effect of leverage and ROE is negative, but not significantly to the disclosure of CSR.]"

"Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji pengaruh jenis struktur kepemilikan dan aktivitas dewan komisaris terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. Jenis struktur kepemilikan meliputi institusional, asing, dan publik, serta aktivitas dewan komisaris meliputi pengawasan dewan komisaris dan frekuensi rapat dewan komisaris. Metode penelitian ini adalah regresi linear berganda dari 104 sampel perusahaan manufaktur pada tahun 2013. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan pengawasan dewan komisaris ternyata berpengaruh positif terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responbility. Adapun kepemilikan institusional, asing, dan publik, serta frekuensi rapat dewan komisaris tidak ada berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility.

---

The objective of this research is to analyze the effect of the type of ownership structure and the activities of the board of commissioners on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The types of ownership include institutional, foreign, and public ownership, the activities of the board commissioners include the board of commissioner meeting frequency and monitoring. The research method used is multiple linear regression of 104 samples from manufacturing companies for period 2013.

The result of this research indicates the board of commissioner monitoring has positive effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Institutional, foreign, and public ownership, and the board of commissioner meeting do not have effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure."

"Terdapat banyak penelitian yang menganalisis hubungan antara corporate social responsibility (CSR) dan kinerja keuangan bank, namun pertanyaan ini masih menimbulkan perdebatan. Penelitian ini memilih untuk mengkaji tema ini dari sudut yang berbeda. Demi memberikan perspektif alternatif tentang masalah tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan efisiensi biaya sebagai ukuran kinerja bank yang lebih komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh CSR terhadap efisiensi biaya bank. Berdasarkan sampel internasional dari 87 bank di 20 negara maju selama periode 2005 - 2018, penelitin ini menerapkan prosedur estimasi stochastic frontier untuk menghitung efisiensi biaya bank. Dalam regresi tahap kedua, penelitian ini menggunakan Feasible Generalized Least Square (FEGLS) untuk mengukur pengaruh CSR terhadap efisiensi biaya bank. Hasil investigasi empiris mengungkapkan bahwa CSR memiliki pengaruh signifikan yang positif terhadap efisiensi biaya bank. Investigasi ini juga menemukan bahwa pengaruh CSR terhadap efisiensi bank menjadi tidak signifikan selama periode krisis. Selain itu, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kinerja CSR meningkat selama krisis, sedangkan efisiensi bank menurun

---

Numerous studies are analyzing the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the bank’s financial performance. However this question still gives rise to debate. We have chosen to approach this theme from a different angle. In order to provide an alternate perspective on the issue, we use cost efficiency as a more comprehensive measurement of bank performance. This study aims to investigate the effect of CSR on bank cost efficiency. Using an international sample of 87 banks in 20 developed countries over 2005 - 2018 periods, we apply stochastic frontier estimation procedures to compute bank cost efficiency. In the second stage regression, we use Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) to measure the influence of CSR on bank cost efficiency. Our empirical investigation reveals that CSR has a significant positive impact on bank cost efficiency. The investigation also finds that the effect of CSR on bank efficiency become not significant during the crisis period. In addition, we find that CSR performance increased during the crisis, while the bank efficiency decreased"

"Originally, the concept of CSR was come from business ethic values that impose corporation's ethical responsibility to their social dan natural environment. That development of ethical business was part of social consciousness on the degradation of environment as impact of corporation activities. This reality also raised the deep environmental ethic or deep ecology which challenge anthropocentrism economical development and urged ecocentrism development. In Indonesia, this phenomenon was marked by the enactment of Act 4/1982 on environmental management. The constitutional debate on CSR just began when the Indonesian Constitutional court heard and decided the judicial review case of Act 40/2007 on limited liability company which stipulate CSR mandatory law for corporation that have activity in natural resources areas. In its decision, Constitutional Court refused the petition. This means that court affirmed that CSR mandatory law is not contrary to the constitution. However, the legal argumentation of the court was not shifted from economical and environmental perspectives. The constitutional basic of the decision is article 33 (4) concerning national economic principles and article 33 (3) concerning state power on land, water, and natural resources. The constitutional court did not use the human rights concept as the source of CSR mandatory law. "