Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Dalam kehidupan, mahasiswa tidak luput dari kesalahan-kesalahan kecil yang dilakukan sehari-hari, seperti melewatkan jadwal kerja kelompok ataupun tenggat waktu pengumpulan tugas. Berbagai kesalahan kecil tersebut dikenal dengan istilah kegagalan kognitif yang jika dilakukan secara terus-menerus dapat berakibat negatif bagi individu. Bagi mahasiswa yang berada pada kondisi kognitif terbaik, meningkatnya kegagalan kognitif disebabkan dari tipe kepribadian yang mereka miliki. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui besaran peran kepribadian neuroticism dan conscientiousness terhadap kegagalan kognitif pada mahasiswa sarjana di Indonesia. Partisipan penelitian adalah sebanyak 249 mahasiswa (83 laki-laki dan 166 perempuan) berusia 18–25 tahun (M=21, SD=1.4). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan alat ukur Cognitive Failure Questionnaire dan IPIP-BFM 25. Berdasarkan analisis regresi berganda, ditemukan bahwa kepribadian neuroticism dan conscientiousness secara bersamaan berperan terhadap kegagalan kognitif individu (F(2,246)=45.495, p<0.001, R2=0.27). Neuroticism memiliki pengaruh yang lebih besar (=0.47, SE=0.257, p<0.001) dibandingkan conscientiousness (=-0.236, SE=0.326, p<0.001) terhadap kegagalan kognitif mahasiswa. Melalui penelitian ini, diharapkan individu dapat mengetahui ciri unik yang dimiliki pada kepribadian tertentu, khususnya pada trait kepribadian conscientiousness dan neuroticism. Sehingga, bagi individu yang memiliki conscientiousness yang tinggi dapat mempertahankan ketelitian dan disiplin yang tinggi, sedangkan bagi individu yang memiliki neuroticism yang tinggi dapat meminta bantuan kepada orang lain untuk mengingatkan untuk dapat mengontrol emosi negatif yang dirasakan sehingga tidak mempengaruhi atensi terhadap hal yang harus dikerjakan.

---

In everyday life, students make a lot of small mistakes, such as forgetting the group work schedule and also forgetting the task deadline, which is called cognitive failure. All the small mistakes have negative consequences if they happen continuously. For students who are in the best cognitive condition, cognitive failure increase because of the personality types that they have. The purpose of this study is to see the contribution of personality trait neuroticism and conscientiousness to cognitive failure in college students in Indonesia. The participants of this study are 249 students (83 males and 166 females) aged 18–25 years old (M=21, SD=1.4). This study is a quantitative study that used Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) and IPIP-BFM 25. The result showed that neuroticism and conscientiousness simultaneously have a significant contribution to cognitive failure (F(2,246)=45.495, p<0.001, R2=0.27). However, neuroticism has a greater contribution (=0.47, SE=0.257, p<0.001) than conscientiousness (=-0.236, SE=0.326, p<0.001) to cognitive failure in college students. Based on this study, for students that have a high score of conscientiousness suggested to maintain the positive characteristics, such as attention to detail and self-discipline. However, students that have high score of neuroticism can ask for help from others to remind them of controlling the negative emotion that they feel so it doesn’t affect their attention to the task that has to be done."

""Cognitive psychology is an enormous field with a rich history. One problem confronting instructors in cognitive psychology courses is covering such diverse topics as pattern recognition, attention, memory, language, decision making, and problem solving. It is virtually impossible to both cover these topics and provide details regarding the beauty of the experimental studies that have tackled important topics in a single textbook. Cognitive Psychology: Key Readings helps to the void and provides students with the opportunity to learn about the details of the actual articles and chapters that have had major influences in the development of this discipline. The classic papers were selected because they have been control in defining distinct areas of research or changing the way researchers think about a given topic.""