Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[This book shows that the definitions and implications of the concept of balanced growth vary significantly among the different disciplines in economic science, but are not exclusive at all.Terms such as sustainability or balanced growth have become buzzwords. In practice, they are often a desirable vision rather than an achievable objective. Doubts may arise about the extent to which such concepts are compatible with a modern market economy. Is balanced growth possible at all? Is it reasonable to accept balanced growth as a norm? Why should a balanced growth path be a desirable strategy to pursue for policymakers, managers, employees, and other societal stakeholders? Empirical evidence suggests that the actual worldwide economic growth is not balanced at all. Meanwhile, ever since the beginning of the financial and economic crisis in 2007 and its accompanying spillover effects, our globalizing world has uncompromisingly shown the flip side of its coin. Its crisis-prone character has intensified the discussion about our economic system’s sustainability. Questions related to acceptable sovereign debt levels, suitable trade deficits and surpluses, firms’ growth targets, resource management and efficiency have aroused high interest. What is the cause of the observed imbalances? In our opinion, this debate must involve rethinking the qualitative and quantitative dimension of our present understanding of the nature of economic growth.A companion volume to a renowned symposium at the University of St. Gallen, this collection of articles by renowned researchers and practitioners tackles this urgent topic from a variety of angles, including macroeconomic and resourcing perspectives., This book shows that the definitions and implications of the concept of balanced growth vary significantly among the different disciplines in economic science, but are not exclusive at all.Terms such as sustainability or balanced growth have become buzzwords. In practice, they are often a desirable vision rather than an achievable objective. Doubts may arise about the extent to which such concepts are compatible with a modern market economy. Is balanced growth possible at all? Is it reasonable to accept balanced growth as a norm? Why should a balanced growth path be a desirable strategy to pursue for policymakers, managers, employees, and other societal stakeholders? Empirical evidence suggests that the actual worldwide economic growth is not balanced at all. Meanwhile, ever since the beginning of the financial and economic crisis in 2007 and its accompanying spillover effects, our globalizing world has uncompromisingly shown the flip side of its coin. Its crisis-prone character has intensified the discussion about our economic system’s sustainability. Questions related to acceptable sovereign debt levels, suitable trade deficits and surpluses, firms’ growth targets, resource management and efficiency have aroused high interest. What is the cause of the observed imbalances? In our opinion, this debate must involve rethinking the qualitative and quantitative dimension of our present understanding of the nature of economic growth.A companion volume to a renowned symposium at the University of St. Gallen, this collection of articles by renowned researchers and practitioners tackles this urgent topic from a variety of angles, including macroeconomic and resourcing perspectives.]"

"Public utilities development have to growth compatibalities and urban system. Atleast, need two of paradigm; economic and ecology. Convergencies of economic and ecology paradigm has to implemented on urban planning., who concider city development, population and public service."

"How to sustain our world for future generations has perplexed us for centuries. We have reached a crossroads: we may choose the rocky path of responsibility or continue on the paved road of excess that promises hardship for our progeny. Independent efforts to resolve isolated issues are inadequate. Different from these efforts and from other books on the topic, this book uses systems thinking to understand the dominant forces that are shaping our hope for sustainability. It first describes a mental model, the bubble that holds our beliefs - that emerges from preponderant world views and explains current global trends. The model emphasizes economic growth and drives behavior toward short-term and self-motivated outcomes that thwart sustainability. The book then weaves statistical trends into a system diagram and shows how the economic, environmental, and societal contributors of sustainability interact. From this holistic perspective, it finds leverage points where actions can be most effective and combines eight areas of intervention into an integrated plan. By emphasizing both individual and collective actions, it addresses the conundrum of how to blend human nature with sustainability. Finally, it identifies primary three lessons we can learn by applying systems thinking to sustainability. Its metaphor-rich and accessible style makes the complex topic approachable and allows the reader to appreciate the intricate balance required to sustain life on earth."

"[ABSTRACTThis paper investigated whether fiscal policy, especially government investmentexpenditure in Indonesia, depends on changes in the economic business cycle andwhether its impact is significant on economic growth. This paper analyzed therelationship between government investment expenditure and output gap using anordinary least squares (OLS) regression covering three periods of study (1980?1996, 2001?2014, and 1980?2014). In general, the result showed governmentinvestment expenditure tended to be acyclical. This study also evaluated theimpact of the changes in government investment expenditure on gross domesticproduct (GDP) using a vector autoregression (VAR) approach. The resultsrevealed government investment expenditure did not have a significant impact oneconomic growth.

---

ABSTRAKTesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah arah kebijakan fiskal, khususnyapengeluaran pemerintah, dipengaruhi perubahan siklus ekonomi dan berdampaksignifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi atau tidak. Studi ini membahashubungan antara pengeluaran investasi pemerintah dan output gap menggunakanmodel regresi ordinary least squares (OLS) yang meliputi tiga periode observasi(1980?1996, 2001, dan 1980?2014). Secara umum, hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa pengeluaran investasi pemerintah cenderung mengarah acyclical (netral).Selain itu, paper ini juga menganalisis dampak perubahan pengeluaran investasipemerintah terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) menggunakan model vectorautoregression (VAR). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran investasipemerintah tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi;Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah arah kebijakan fiskal, khususnyapengeluaran pemerintah, dipengaruhi perubahan siklus ekonomi dan berdampaksignifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi atau tidak. Studi ini membahashubungan antara pengeluaran investasi pemerintah dan output gap menggunakanmodel regresi ordinary least squares (OLS) yang meliputi tiga periode observasi(1980?1996, 2001, dan 1980?2014). Secara umum, hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa pengeluaran investasi pemerintah cenderung mengarah acyclical (netral).Selain itu, paper ini juga menganalisis dampak perubahan pengeluaran investasipemerintah terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) menggunakan model vectorautoregression (VAR). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran investasipemerintah tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi;Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah arah kebijakan fiskal, khususnyapengeluaran pemerintah, dipengaruhi perubahan siklus ekonomi dan berdampaksignifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi atau tidak. Studi ini membahashubungan antara pengeluaran investasi pemerintah dan output gap menggunakanmodel regresi ordinary least squares (OLS) yang meliputi tiga periode observasi(1980?1996, 2001, dan 1980?2014). Secara umum, hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa pengeluaran investasi pemerintah cenderung mengarah acyclical (netral).Selain itu, paper ini juga menganalisis dampak perubahan pengeluaran investasipemerintah terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) menggunakan model vectorautoregression (VAR). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran investasipemerintah tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi;Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah arah kebijakan fiskal, khususnyapengeluaran pemerintah, dipengaruhi perubahan siklus ekonomi dan berdampaksignifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi atau tidak. Studi ini membahashubungan antara pengeluaran investasi pemerintah dan output gap menggunakanmodel regresi ordinary least squares (OLS) yang meliputi tiga periode observasi(1980?1996, 2001, dan 1980?2014). Secara umum, hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa pengeluaran investasi pemerintah cenderung mengarah acyclical (netral).Selain itu, paper ini juga menganalisis dampak perubahan pengeluaran investasipemerintah terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) menggunakan model vectorautoregression (VAR). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran investasipemerintah tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi, Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis apakah arah kebijakan fiskal, khususnyapengeluaran pemerintah, dipengaruhi perubahan siklus ekonomi dan berdampaksignifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi atau tidak. Studi ini membahashubungan antara pengeluaran investasi pemerintah dan output gap menggunakanmodel regresi ordinary least squares (OLS) yang meliputi tiga periode observasi(1980–1996, 2001, dan 1980–2014). Secara umum, hasil analisis menunjukkanbahwa pengeluaran investasi pemerintah cenderung mengarah acyclical (netral).Selain itu, paper ini juga menganalisis dampak perubahan pengeluaran investasipemerintah terhadap Produk Domestik Bruto (PDB) menggunakan model vectorautoregression (VAR). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa pengeluaran investasipemerintah tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi]"

"ABSTRAKThesis ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor penentu pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Untuk itu, dilakukan analisis terhadap data panel dari 33 provinsi di Indonesia mulai tahun 2006 sampai 2015. Analisis empiris pada thesis ini melibatkan dua metode estimasi: 1 Ordinary Least Squares OLS dengan Fixed Effects Model, dan 2 Generalized Method of Moments GMM . Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rasio investasi sebagai akumulasi persediaan physical capital, tingkat pendidikan sebagai akumulasi persediaan human capital, pertumbuhan penduduk, desentralisasi, dan perdagangan memiliki dampak positif yang signifikan terhadap pendapatan per kapita. Selanjutnya, pengeluaran pemerintah dan proporsi penganut agama Islam memiliki pengaruh negatif yang signifikan terhadap pendapatan per kapita. Disisi lain, proporsi penganut agama Kristen Protestan dan Kristen Katolik tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap pendapatan per kapita.

---

ABSTRACT This paper identifies the determinants of economic growth in Indonesia. To accomplish this, panel data for 33 provinces in Indonesia, for the years of 2006 through 2015, were analyzed. The empirical analysis involved two estimation methods 1 Ordinary Least Squares OLS with a Fixed Effects Model, and 2 Generalized Method of Moments GMM . The results reveal that investment ratio as the stock of physical capital, education level as the stock of human capital population growth, decentralization, and trade across the provinces have a significant positive impact on the income per capita. Government expenditures and the proportion of adherents to the Islam religion have a significant negative influence on the income per capita. However, the proportion of adherents to the Protestant and the Catholic religions do not affect the income per capita."

"ABSTRACTPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keterkaitan karakteristik direksi, yang berupa ukuran direksi, proporsi direksi independen, keberadaan direksi wanita, keberadaan direksi warga negara asing, dan aktivitas direksi, yang berupa jumlah rapat direksi yang diadakan dalam satu tahun dan persentase kehadiran direksi dalam rapat-rapat tersebut, terhadap kualitas laporan keberlanjutan sesuai dengan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di lima negara Top 5 Negara Asia Tenggara yaitu, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura, Thailand, dan Filipina pada tahun pelaporan 2016 dan 2107. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan regresi ordinary least square terhadap data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui situs perusahaan atau datastream. Pengukuran terhadap kualitas laporan keberlanjutan dilakukan dengan proses scoring manual terhadap pemetaan GRI Standard dan GRI G4 dengan tujuh belas tujuan dalam SDGs. Temuan penelitian ini adalah adanya signifikansi keterkaitan persentase kehadiran direksi dalam rapat direksi dan keberadaan komite CSR dengan kuaitas laporan keberlanjutan dalam observasi penelitian sehingga meningkatkan pentingnya peran komite CSR dalam penyusunan laporan keberlanjutan, terutama di negara Asia Tenggara dalam penelitian dan meningkatkan ugensi untuk mempromosikan adanya komite CSR dalam perusahaan, khususnya bagi perusahaan terbuka.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the effect of the characteristics of directors, in the form of board size, the proportion of independent directors, the presence of female directors, the presence of foreign directors, and directors activities, in the form of a number of board meetings held in one year and the percentage of directors in meetings, on quality of sustainability reports is in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the five Top 5 Southeast Asia countries, which are Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines in the 2016 and 2107 reporting years. This research was conducted using ordinary least square regression of secondary data collected through the companys website or datastream. The measurement of the quality of sustainability reports is carried out with a manual scoring process on the GRI Standard and GRI G4 mapping with seventeen objectives in the SDGs. The findings of this study are the significance of the relationship between the percentage of directors` attendance at the board of directors and the existence of CSR committees with the quality of sustainability reports in research observations, thus increasing the importance of CSR committees in the preparation of sustainability reports, especially in Southeast Asian countries in research and enhancing incentives to promote CSR committees within the company, especially for public companies."