Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Secara global, kesehatan adalah industri senilai USD 3.5 triliun atau setara dengan 8% dari PDB dunia. Menurut data, masih ada kekurangan dari sistem kesehatan saat ini, antara lain: (i) angka harapan hidup yang masih bervariasi; (ii) 100 juta orang dimiskinkan oleh pengeluaran kesehatan; (iii) kesenjangan kesehatan yang terus terjadi, bahkan di negara-negara kaya (US dan Australia); (iv) sebagian besar peralatan yang tidak digunakan dengan semestinya. Memperkuat sistem kesehatan berarti mengatasi kendala utama di setiap bidang, dengan demikian derajat kesehatan akan meningkat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif analitik. Metode yang digunakan adalah tinjauan kepustakaan. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang didapatkan melalui pencarian studi/penelitian yang sudah ada sebelumnya dan teori-teori yang berkaitan dengan topik. Kriteria inklusi pada penelitian ini adalah penelitian dengan semua jenis metode yang dapat menjawab topik dan menggunakan framework WHO: Six Building Blocks. Kriteria eksklusi penelitian adalah penelitian lebih dari 10 tahun, serta penelitian yang tidak dapat menjawab pertanyaan penelitian. Informasi yang didapatkan dari studi literatur ini akan diuraikan dalam bentuk table hasil dan narasi, dengan hasil temuannya yaitu kinerja sistem kesehatan di negara berkembang belum lebih baik dari negara maju, dilihat dari status kesehatan masyarakat dan permasalahan kesehatan yang sedang dialami.

---

Globally, healthcare is an industry of USD 3.5 trillion worth or equal to 8% of the world GDP. According to the data, there are still shortcomings of the current health system, as follows: (i) life expectancy that still varies; (ii) 100 million people are impoverished by health spending; (iii) health gaps that continue to occur, even in wealthy countries (the US and Australia); (iv) most of the equipment is not used properly. Strengthening the health system means overcoming the main obstacles in each field, thus the value of health will increase. This research uses a qualitative approach that is descriptive-analytic. The methods used are a literature review. The type of data used is secondary data obtained through pre-existing study/research searches and topic-related theories. The inclusion criteria for this study are research with all types of methods that can answer topics and use the WHO framework: Six Building Blocks. The research exclusion criteria are the research of more than 10 years, as well as research that cannot answer research questions. The information obtained from this literature study will be described in the form of results table and narration, with the result of the health systems performance in the developing countries has not been better than in developed countries, judging by the public health status and the health problems that are being experienced."

"This articel provides a comparative analysis of national human resource development (NHRD) plan implementation in Korea, the united states and Japan...."

"[This book have identified the major factors that influence the health-care delivery and policy-making systems. The impacts of environmental factors on the health-care system have been both positive and negative. On the one hand, the United States is foremost in the world in the development and deployment of advanced medical technologies and equipment. Furthermore, the standards adopted by the nation’s medical schools and health facilities far surpass, or are comparable to, those of other advanced countries., This book have identified the major factors that influence the health-care delivery and policy-making systems. The impacts of environmental factors on the health-care system have been both positive and negative. On the one hand, the United States is foremost in the world in the development and deployment of advanced medical technologies and equipment. Furthermore, the standards adopted by the nation’s medical schools and health facilities far surpass, or are comparable to, those of other advanced countries.]"

"Recent trends in health care across the United States and internationally have emphasized a novel approach that consists in comparing the effectiveness and efficacy of treatment interventions with a patient-centered emphasis (i.e., evidence-based health care), while ensuring cost constraints, maximizing benefits, and minimizing risks. In this book, experts in comparative effectiveness and efficacy research and analysis for practice (CEERAP) in health care in general address a range of topical issues. The emphasis is on implications for endodontics and nursing, both of which are considered in a series of detailed chapters. Commonalities and differences among CEERAP, utility-based and logic-based analysis and decision-making, and evidence-based and patient-centered practice are defined and discussed. The book concludes by examining applications for CEERAP in developing patient-centered optimal treatment interventions for the next decade."

"Studi ini meneliti implementasi skema asuransi simpanan di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat, dengan fokus pada kerangka legislatif dan aplikasi praktis. Undang-Undang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) Indonesia dan Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) Amerika Serikat bertujuan untuk menjaga stabilitas keuangan dan melindungi para deposan. Dengan menganalisis studi kasus, penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas undang-undang tersebut selama krisis perbankan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan doktrinal normatif, yang berfokus pada norma hukum, prinsip, dan analisis komparatif. Penelitian ini memanfaatkan bahan hukum primer (teks undang-undang seperti FDIA dan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 Indonesia), bahan sekunder (artikel ilmiah dan komentar hukum), dan bahan tersier (kamus hukum). Data dikumpulkan melalui tinjauan dokumen yang komprehensif dan dianalisis menggunakan kerangka kualitatif dan deskriptif. Temuan mengungkapkan bahwa sementara LPS Indonesia telah mengelola kegagalan bank-bank kecil di pedesaan dan kasus-kasus besar yang melibatkan bank-bank besar, FDIC di Amerika Serikat telah menangani banyak kegagalan bank profil tinggi. Proses resolusi yang sudah mapan dan intervensi tepat waktu oleh FDIC menyoroti pentingnya koordinasi regulasi yang efektif dan adaptasi kebijakan. Rekomendasi untuk Indonesia termasuk meningkatkan kecepatan resolusi bank dan memperbaiki koordinasi regulasi. Studi ini menekankan interaksi dinamis antara kerangka hukum dan implementasi praktis dalam memastikan stabilitas keuangan dan perlindungan deposan.

---

This study examines the implementation of deposit insurance schemes in Indonesia and the United States, focusing on legislative frameworks and practical applications. The Indonesian Deposit Insurance Corporation Law and the United States' Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) aim to maintain financial stability and protect depositors. By analyzing case studies, this research evaluates the effectiveness of these laws during banking crises.The research employs a normative doctrinal approach, focusing on legal norms, principles, and comparative analysis. It utilizes primary legal materials (statutory texts like the FDIA and Indonesia's Law Number 24 of 2004), secondary materials (scholarly articles and legal commentaries), and tertiary materials (legal dictionary). Data is gathered through comprehensive document reviews and analyzed using a qualitative and descriptive framework. The findings reveal that while Indonesia's LPS has managed failures of smaller rural banks and notable cases involving larger banks, the FDIC in the United States has handled multiple high-profile bank failures. The FDIC’s established resolution process and timely interventions highlight the importance of effective regulatory coordination and policy adaptation. Recommendations for Indonesia include enhancing bank resolution speed and improving regulatory coordination. This study underscores the dynamic interplay between legal frameworks and practical implementation in ensuring financial stability and depositor protection."