Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Insersi jarum spinal dapat menimbulkan nyeri sehingga perlu dilakukan teknik stimulasi kompres dingin guna menurunkan intensitas nyeri yang dialami. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi efektivitas kompres dingin dalam menurunkan intensitas nyeri insersi jarum spinal pada prosedur spinal anestesi. Desain yang digunakan adalah quasy experimental dengan pendekatan post test only design non equivalent control group. Sampel terdiri dari 72 pasien dewasa yang terbagi atas 36 orang kelompok intervensi dan 36 orang kelompok kontrol.Analisis data untuk mengetahui perbedaan rerata kelompok perlakuan (kompres dingin) dan kelompok kontrol (standar prosedur) dengan intensitas nyeri dan menganalisis hubungan variabel jenis kelamin dan pengalaman nyeri insersi spinal dengan intensitas nyeri menggunakan uji Mann Whitney. Analisis data untuk mengetahui hubungan variabel usia, ukuran jarum spinal dan kecemasan dilakukan uji Kruskal Wallis.Hasil analisis menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara kelompok perlakuan (kompres dingin) dan kelompok kontrol (standar prosedur) dan hubungan bermakna antara variabel kecemasan dengan intensitas nyeri (p<0,05). Hasil analisis menunjukkan tidak terdapat hubungan bermakna pada variabel usia, jenis kelamin, pengalaman nyeri insersi dan ukuran jarum spinal (p>0,05). Dapat disimpulkan kompres dingin merupakan intervensi yang terbukti efektif untuk menurunkan intensitas nyeri insersi jarum spinal pada prosedur spinal anestesi.

---

Spinal needle insertion may cause pain hence cold compress stimulation technique to reduce the intensity of the pain is required. This study aims to identify the effectiveness of cold compress in reducing the intensity of spinal needle insertion pain in spinal anesthesia procedures. The design used was quasy experimental with post test only design non equivalent control group approach. The sample consisted of 72 adult patients divided into 36 intervention groups and 36 control groups.Data analysis is to obtain the difference average of treatment group (cold compress) and control group (standard procedure) with pain intensity and analyze the connection of gender and spinal insertion pain variables and the intensity of pain using Mann Whitney test. Data analysis to obtain the correlation of age, spinal needle size and anxiety variables was conducted using Kruskal Wallis test.Analysis results show that there are significant differences between treatment group (cold compress) and control group (standard procedure) and significant relationship between anxiety variables with pain intensity (p <0.05). The results show no significant association in age, sex, insertion pain experience and spinal needle size (p> 0.05). It can be concluded that cold compress is an effective intervention to decrease the intensity of spinal needle insertion pain in spinal anesthesia procedure."

"PendahuluanUntuk menentukan apakah diperlukan fusi tulang belakang disamping dekompresi untuk kasus stenosis spinal lumbar (SSL) akan bergantung kepada stabilitas segmen tulang belakang yang terkena. Stabilitas tulang belakang didefinisikan sebagai kemampuan tulang belakang untuk mempertahankan kemampuan geraknya dengan serta mencegah terjadinya nyeri, defisit neurologis, dan angulasi yang tidak normal. Namun, sampai saat ini, belum ada konsensus yang jelas tentang definisi ketidakstabilan untuk menentukan apakah diperlukan fusi pada kasus SSL. Dalam penelitian ini, kami mengembangkan sistem penilaian baru, yang disebut dengan Indonesia Score of Spinal Instability (ISSI), untuk membantu menentukan adanya ketidakstabilan pada tulang belakang dan mengevaluasi kebutuhan fusi pada LSS.Metodologi Penelitian ini terdiri dari tiga tahap, tahap pertama adalah tinjauan sistematis untuk menemukan prediktor ketidakstabilan tulang belakang pada SSL, tahap kedua adalah pengembangan sistem penilaian untuk ketidakstabilan tulang belakang - Indonesia Score of Spinal Instability (ISSI) melalui pendapat ahli dan teknik Delphi yang dimodifikasi, dan tahap ketiga adalah studi validitas dan reliabilitas sistem penilaian yang baru dikembangkan. Tinjauan sistematis dilakukan dengan menggunakan pedoman dari Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Pendapat ahli dan teknik Delphi yang dimodifikasi dilakukan oleh ahli bedah tulang belakang berpengalaman di Indonesia yang telah terpilih, tahap ini dilakukan dua kali untuk menilai apakah ada perbedaan antara putaran pertama dan kedua. Tahap kedua akan menghasilkan ISSI yang baru. Pengujian validitas dan reliabilitas dilakukan di rumah sakit institusional kami, yang melibatkan ahli bedah Ortopedi dan Ahli Radiologi yang bersertifikasi dan dibandingkan dengan penilaian radiologis dari White & Panjabi.HasilSebanyak 54 studi dimasukkan dalam tinjauan sistematis, dan prediktor ketidakstabilan pada stenosis tulang belakang dibagi menjadi klinis (adanya nyeri punggung sebagai gejala primer atau sekunder), radiografi polos statis (adanya vacuum phenomenon, kolaps diskus intervertebralis, sklerosis subkondral, dan traction spur), radiografi polos dinamik (translasi dan angulasi dinamik), dan temuan pencitraan resonansi magnetik/ (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) yang terdiri dari efusi sendi faset, degenerasi otot multifidus, degenerasi endplate, dan degenerasi diskus. Melalui pendapat para ahli dan teknik Delphi yang dimodifikasi, penilaian ISSI dikembangkan dan terdiri dari komponen klinis (nyeri punggung), komponen radiografi dinamik (translasi horizontal dan angulasi), dan komponen MRI (efusi sendi faset), masing- masing komponen tersebut akan diberi nilai, dan total nilai adalah 0 hingga 14. Penilaian akhir akan mengklasifikasikan pasien ke dalam tiga kelompok: kelompok stabil (nilai 0 hingga 4) di mana fusi tidak diperlukan, kelompok berpotensi tidak stabil (nilai 5 hingga 8) di mana keputusan fusi didasarkan pada penilaian klinis dokter bedah, dan kelompok tidak stabil (nilai 9 hingga 14) di mana fusi diperlukan. Tahap akhir penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa ISSI ini memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik.Diskusi dan KesimpulanISSI yang baru dikembangkan adalah sistem penilaian ketidakstabilan tulang belakang pada kasus SLL degeneratif yang sahih (valid) dan dapat diandalkan (reliabel), yang dapat membantu mengidentifikasi adanya ketidakstabilan pada SSL degenratif. ISSI diharapkan dapat digunakan sebagai pedoman untuk memutuskan apakah fusi tulang belakang diperlukan.

---

Introduction

Whether spinal fusion is performed in addition to a decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) depends on the stability of the involved spinal segments. Spinal stability is defined as the ability of the spine to maintain its degree of motion while simultaneously preventing pain, neurologic deficits, and abnormal angulation. However, until currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the definition of instability to perform fusion in the cases of LSS. We developed a new scoring system, the Indonesia Score of Spinal Instability (ISSI), to identify spinal instability and to evaluate the need of spinal fusion in LSS.

Materials and Methods

This study consisted of three stages, the first stage was the systematic review to find predictors of spinal instability in LSS, the second stage was the development of scoring system for spinal instability – the Indonesia Score of Spinal Instability (ISSI) through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, and the third stage was validity and reliability studies of the new developed scoring system. The systematic review was performed through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Expert opinion and modified Delphi technique were performed by experience spine surgeons in Indonesia who had been elected, this stage was performed twice to assess whether there was difference between first and second rounds. The second stage would yield the new developing ISSI. Validity and reliability testing were performed in our institutional hospitals, which included the board-certified Orthopaedic surgeon and Radiologist and was compared with the radiological checklist from White & Panjabi.

Results

A total of 54 studies were included in the systematic reviews, and the predictors of instability in spinal stenosis were divided into clinical (presence of back pain as primary or secondary symptoms), static plain radiograph (presence of vacuum phenomenon, intervertebral disk collapse, subchondral sclerosis, and traction spurs), dynamic plain radiograph (horizontal translation and angulation), and magnetic resonance imaging/ MRI findings (facet joint effusion, fatty degeneration of multifidus, endplate degeneration, and disk degeneration). Through expert opinion and modified Delphi technique, ISSI score was developed and consisted of the clinical component (back pain), dynamic radiograph component (horizontal translation and angulation), and MRI component (facet joint effusion), each of the component would be scored, and the total scoring would be from 0 to 14. The final scoring would classify patients into three groups: stable group (score of 0 to 4) in which the fusion is not needed, potentially unstable group (score of 5 to 8) in which the decision of fusion is based on surgeon’s clinical judgment, and unstable group (score of 9 to 14) in which the fusion is needed. Final stage of study concluded that this ISSI had good reliability and validity

Discussion and Conclusion

The new developed ISSI was a valid and reliable scoring system that could help to identify the presence of instability in LSS and the need of fusion. This ISSI can be used as a guideline to decide whether spinal fusion would be needed."

"This volume contains information on the diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of spinal tumors. Various aspects of different major types of spinal tumors (astrocytomas, ependymomas, and oligodendroglioma) are discussed. Insights into the understanding of molecular pathways involved in tumor biology are explained. Classification of intradural spinal tumors, including the percentages of each of the three major types, is detailed. Symptoms, radiological features, and clinicopathological parameters of spinal cord tumors are explained. Diagnosis, outcome, and prognosis of primary spinal cord and oligodendroglioma are discussed. Diagnosis of some other spinal tumors (e.g., pilomyxoid and chordomas) is also explained. The useful role of neuroimaging in diagnosing spinal teratoid/rhabdoid and gangliogliomas is included. A wide variety of treatments of a number of spinal cord tumor types are presented in detail. Therapies discussed include chemotherapy, surgery, radiosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, Cyberknife stereotactic radiotherapy, standard radiation alone, and rhenium-186 intracavity radiation. Also are duiscussed embolozation and spondylectomy. The usefulness of transplantation of human embryonic stem cells-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors and motoneuron progenitors in the repair of injured spinal cord is emphasized. Symptoms of the advent of spinal tumors are pointed out. Introduction to new technologies and their applications to spinal cord tumor diagnosis, treatment, and therapy assessment are explained."

"ABSTRACTCross-leg sitting is locus posture performed well in Asian area, and a lifestyle and culture are thought to affect it. It is usually essential to cross-leg sitting carried out in the case of Zen meditation to maintain cross-leg sitting locus in a relaxed state to perform locus posture in floor, and to perform it in hip joint flexion of bilateral feet, abduction, and lateral rotation position in the meditation for a long time. The spinal column of cross-leg sitting was intended that aligning it confirmed backbone in lumbar vertebrae being displaced than rest standing position in the kyphosis direction or raising a bearing surface whether aligning it changed into lordotic projection from the lumbar vertebrae kyphosis direction. The thoracic vertebra angle and the lumbar vertebrae angle measured it using SpinalMouse®. We decided to measure a thoracic vertebra angle, a lumbar vertebrae angle when we changed the height of the target rest standing position and the bearing surface of cross-leg sitting. The thoracic vertebra angle did not change by raising the bearing surface of cross-leg sitting, however the lumbar vertebrae angle changed. It showed a significant correlation between hip joint flexion, abduction, an external rotation angles and the change of the lumbar vertebrae angle. Results of this study suggested that lumbar, aligning it changed to lordosis in the high cross-leg sitting thing that we changed. The quantity that aligning it biases into lordosis of the lumbar part is related to the flexion of the hip joint, abduction, external rotation flexibility."