Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACT

The focus of this sociolinguistic study is the relationship between social economic status (socionomic status) and the linguistic code, especially the sentence complexity. The purposes of the study are (1) to measure sentence patterns' among groups of speaker socionomic lower-low, upper-low, lower-middle, and upper-middle; (2) to measure the index of sentence complexity based of the average sentence length (ASL), the index of sentence complexity based on average block length (ABL), and the index of sentence based of the average clause depth (ACD) of four socionomic status groups; (3) to measure the variety of sentence complexity among four socionomic status groups; (4) to measure the effect of socionomic status on the sentence complexity; (5) to measure the contributions of each subvariable of socionomic status to the sentence complexity, and; (6) to measure the close relationship between socionomic status and sentence complexity.

This study used two approaches, namely lingustic and sociological approaches. The relationship between socionomic status and sentence complexity was analyzed in terms deficit theory. The subjects of this study were the native speakers of the Minangkabau language in Municipality of Padang. The data were sentences spoken by informants and individual reports about the social, economic, and cultural conditions of the informants. The data were collected by using recording and questionnaire. The data in the form of sentence were analyzed by using the technique of sentence patterns measurement and sentence complexity according to Cook (1979). Data that were collected by using questionnaire were analyzed by using Hollingshead and Redlich's (1958) and Labov's techniques (1966) to measure the socionomic status of the speakers. Sentence complexity variation among the four socionomic status groups was measured by using one-way variant analysis. The effect of socionomic to the sentence complexity and the contributions of each socionomic's subvariables to sentence complexity were measured by using double regresion analysis technique.

The findings of this study include the following.

There is no significant different between sentence patterns and the index of sentence complexity of oral Minangkabau language spoken by lower-low, upper-low, lower-middle, and upper-middle socionomic status speaker. The sentence patterns and sentence complexity do not indicate the socionomic status of its speakers. There is no difference of linguistic codes in sentence complexity among the four socionomic status groups.

There is no significant effect between socionomic and ASL. On other side, socionomic status gives significant effect to ABL and ACD. All socionomic's subvariables (Job, education, and income) do not give significant contribution to ASL. Among the three subvariables of socionomic, it is only the income that gives significant contribution to ABL and ACD. Although the effect of socionomic to ASL is minimal, it indicates positive correlation between the socionomic status and ASL, ABL, and ACD."

"Sampah yang dihasilkan di lingkungan kampus Universitas Indonesia sebagian besar berasal dari gedung perkuliahan dan administrasi, sampah kantin, dan sampah halaman dari setiap fakultas. Karakteristik sampah yang dihasilkan dari gedung kuliah dan administrasi berbeda dengan sampah yang dihasilkan dari kantin dan halaman sehingga dalam proses pengumpulannya sebaiknya sampah-sampah tersebut dipisahkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui timbulan dan komposisi sampah yang dihasilkan di lingkungan kampus Universitas Indonesia dengan studi kasus FISIP, FE, dan FT.Pemilihan fakultas-fakultas tersebut didasarkan pada jumlah mahasiswa pada fakultas tersebut yang paling banyak diantara fakultas lainnya dan juga ketiga fakultas ini memiliki masalah terkait sampah kantin yang dihasilkan. Dari data timbulan dan komposisi sampah yang didapat kemudian dapat diketahui banyaknya sampah yang dapat didaur ulang dari sampel sampah gedung dan kantin. Dari hasil pengukuran timbulan dan komposisi diketahui bahwa persentase sampah yang didaur ulang sebesar untuk 29% untuk sampah gedung dan 10% untuk sampah kantin FISIP; 38% untuk sampah gedung dan 9% untuk sampah kantin FE; dan 37% untuk sampah gedung dan 10% untuk sampah kantin FT.

---

Solid waste generation in Universitas Indonesia campus largely derived from the lecture and the administration buildings, canteen, and yard from each faculty. Characteristics of waste generation from the lecture and administration buildings were different from waste generation from the canteen and yard, so in collecting process, solid waste should be separated. This study aims to determine the solid waste generation and composition in University Indonesia campus, with case study Faculty of Social and Political Science (FISIP), Faculty of Economics (FE), and Faculty of Engineering (FT).The selection of these faculties is based on the number of students which are the most among other faculties and also these faculties have problems related to canteen waste generation. From solid waste generation and composition data, we can find the amount of waste that can be recycled from the building and canteen waste. The results of composition and percentage of recycled waste measurements shows that 29% building waste and 10% canteen waste can be recycled in FISIP; 38% for building waste and 9% for canteen waste can be recycled in FE; and 37% for building waste and 10% for canteen waste can be recycled in FT."

"Program pemberdayaan perempuan melalui daur ulang sampah ini sebagai upaya menciptakan pembangunan lingkungan berbasis masyarakat, yaitu mengupayakan peran serta atau partisipasi masyarakat."