Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This study adresses language style, different ways of communicating, and the purposes of communication of male and female in Twitter status. The objectives of the study are: a) to find out the dominant type of language style used by male and female; b) to describe the way of communicating between male and female; and c) to describe the purposes of communicating of male and female in Twitter status. The data were obtained from 20 male’s status and 20 females’ status in December 2012 until March 2013. The data were analyzed based on three theory, first is five language style according to Joos (1967), they are formal style, consultative style, frozen style, intimate style and casual style; second is the difference ways of communicating between male and female according to Tannen (l992), they are advice versus understanding , information versus feeling, and conflict versus compromise; third is purposes of Twitter conununication according to Patrick (2010), they are entertainment, integration into community, relationship maintenance, and identity construction. The findings show that: a) the dominant style used male in Twitter ststus is Consultative style which are ll status (55 %) because male express their status for their existency, integrity, their style and social status to show that they are not jobless while female dominantly used Casual style with 9 status (45 %) because most of woman write status for their existency in the community Twitter, to express their feeling, opinion and theirstyle; b) Male used advice which are 10 status (50 %) because most of man think logically, to show their responsibility and look wise while female dominantly used feeling which are 8 status (40 %) because most of woman think based on their feeling, emotionally, and expressively; c) The resons of communication of male and female in Twitter status are: identity construction, giving information, praying, showing feelings, and giving advice."

"This paper reports on the results of a study conducted with a view to finding out the pragmatic forces behind the choice of a language or a language variety over another, and, additionally. to getting insights into factors that influence code choice. The underlying assumption is that a language or a language var ieey can be seen as a metaphor, which conveys a certain pragmatic meaning, depending on who speaks to whom, where, when, about what, how and why.Data for the study was drawn from tape recordings of 1udruk. an east Javanese folk theater, which differs from many other forms of drama in that dialogs are not set and memorized and that therefore players have to invent, make up or "recite" their lines without preparation. The rationale for choosing ludruk dialogs as the topic of the study is that, being impromptu, they very much resemble natural, everyday conversations and thus their rules of speaking can be expected to very much reflect those in natural, everyday discourse, if not exactly the same.While Indonesian, the national language of Indonesia. is also used in ludruk performances -- a recent phenomenon and especially in television performances for audience nationwide - the traditional language of ludruk is Javanese. specifically the eastern dialect of this language. Madurese. the language of the ethnic group on the island of Madura and much or the eastern part of last Java Province. is sometimes user) in a performance, but?"

"ABSTRACTThe "everydayness" of the modern life, "unthinking, mundane reality" as described by Lukács in History and Class Consciousness, is often associated with the reified state of consciousness in bourgeois society. Also, linked with repetitive, uncreative, and contingent qualities of housework, the everyday tends to be gendered feminine, as Henri Lefebvre declares that "women symbolizes everyday life in its entirety" and that women are its "active critique". However, if women immerse themselves in everyday life so as to be the symbol of it, the question is: how can women acquire the revolutionary consciousness that enables them to perceive, theorize, and alter the everyday? How can women's creative work such as poetry be both the symbol and at the same time an active critique of their everyday life?This paper will examine how postwar and contemporary women poets writing in Japanese and in the proletariat literary tradition - such as Ishigaki Rin, Chong Chuwol, Park Kyongmi - have been seeking for an alternative poetic language in which they could represent and critique women's everyday life. Particular focus will be given to the interconnections between women, their domestic work, and objects used for their work, as typically seen in Ishigaki's famous poem, "In Front of me the Pot and Rice-Pot and Burning Flames" (1959). Where as Ishigaki follows realistic methods to portray women's life, Chong and Park, being second- generation Korean poets and ever uncomfortably affiliated with the Japanese language, are visibly more experimental. As a contemporary "postmodern" poet, Park argues that in poetic language, words should carefully be arranged and combined so that they cannot invoke sentiments that are attached to so-called "mother tongue". This alienated state of language, or language as butsu (thing/ object), becomes analogous to women's body, labour, and their everyday life."