Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This volume provides a critical roadmap through the major historical sources of legal semiotics as we know them today. The history of legal semiotics, now at least a century old, has never been written (a non-event itself pregnant with semiotic possibility).  As a consequence, its sources are seldom clearly exposed and, as word, object and meaning change, are sometimes lost. They reach from an English translation of the 1916 inaugural lecture of the first Chair in Legal Significs at the Amsterdam University, via mid 20th century studies on “property” or “contract,” to equally fascinating essays on contemporary semiotic problems produced by former students of the Roberta Kevelson Semiotics Roundtable Seminar at Penn State University 2012 and 2013. Together, the materials in this book weave the fabric of semiotics and significs, two names for the unfolding of semiotics in law and legal discourse at least until the second half of the 20th century, and both of which covered a lawyer’s focus on sign and meaning in law.  The latter is embedded within the cultural imperatives of the civilization that gave these terms meaning and made them an effective tool for the dissection of law, its reconstitution as an instrument to be used by the lawyer to advance the interests of her clients, and for judges as a means to restructure language as a narrative of law whose power could bend behavior to its strictures. Legal semiotics has become an indispensible part of the elite lawyer’s toolkit and a fundamental approach to analysis of legal texts. Two previous volumes published in 2011 and 2012 explored the conceptual, methodological and epistemological progress in the field of legal semiotics, the modern forms of semiotics study, and the mechanics of meaning making processes by lawyers. Yet the great lessons of semiotics requires a focus on the origins of the concepts and frameworks that would become contemporary legal semiotics, its origins as an object of the consciousness of meaning making—one whose roots, as lessons for the oracular conversations of law, are expanded in this volume."

"ABSTRAKKeberadaan perguruan tinggi publik dengan status PTN-BH telah menuaiperdebatan sejak awal kemunculannya. Studi ini merupakan studi pertama yangmenginvestigasi efisiensi sektor pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia, sekaligusmengobservasi apakah status PTN-BH memiliki pengaruh terhadap skor efisiensidengan menggunakan Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis. Menggunakansampel 38 PTN dengan ranking tertinggi di Indonesia pada tahun 2012 dan 2014,hasil perhitungan skor efisiensi relatif menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata perguruantinggi yang dipilih menjadi PTN-BH memiliki skor efisiensi relatif sebesar100%?atau dengan kata lain, mereka telah beroperasi secara efisien. Pada tahapkedua, hasil regresi dengan estimasi Pooled Tobit dan Random-Effects Tobitmenunjukkan korelasi yang positif dan signifikan antara status PTN-BH dengandengan skor efisiensi. Selain itu, faktor lokasi, ukuran kelas, dan keberadaanprogram doktor di universitas yang bersangkutan juga berpengaruh terhadap skor efisiensi.

---

ABSTRACTThe existence of public Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs)?known asPublic IHEs?Legal Entity or Perguruan Tinggi Negeri?Badan Hukum (PTNBH) has caused controversy among academics. This is the first study toinvestigate the efficiency of higher education sector Indonesia as well as toobserve whether the new legal status has positive impact on efficiency scores byemploying Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis. Using a sample of 38 publicuniversities occupying top rankings in Indonesia for year of 2012 and 2014, theresults show that on average, PTN-BH universities have efficiency score of100%?or in other words, they have already operated efficiently. At the secondstage, Pooled Tobit and Random-Effects Tobit estimations reveal positive andsignificant correlation between the new status and efficiency score. Furthermore,location factors, class size, and the existence of doctoral program also affectuniversities efficiency score significantly."

"This book is an absolutely critical volume bridging a number of key areas in Canadian education,classroom politics, schools, teachers’ work, higher education, and much more, with the theoretical contributions of Michel Foucault. The essays are carefully chosen and utilize Foucauldian concepts such as governmentality, discipline, subjectivity, and genealogy to excellent critical effect. ;"