Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Pengukuran efisiensi perbankan syariah dalam penelitian ini diperoleh dengan mengestimasi fungsi biaya perbankan. Secara teoritis, dengan mengestimasi fungsi biaya, dapat diukur biaya minimum yang dibutuhkan untuk memproduksi suatu tingkat output tertentu dengan menggunakan tingkat harga input tertentu. Fungsi biaya yang diestimasi secara ekonometris ini merupakan cost frontier.Skor efisiensi suatu bank pada waktu tertentu dihitung dengan dua pendekatan yaitu Stochastic Frontier Approach dan Distribution Free Approach. Error term dari estimasi fungsi biaya suatu bank dibandingkan dengan error term dari estimasi fungsi biaya bank yang paling efisien dalam sampel. Hasil perhitungan efisiensi biaya menunjukkan bahwa skor efisiensi perbankan syariah di Indonesia antara tahun 2001 sampai dengan tahun 2004 berkisar antara 50% sampai 90%. Berdasarkan analisis alokasi input, terlihat bahwa bagi hasil merupakan komponen biaya yang paling berpengaruh terhadap struktur biaya perbankan syariah. Berdasarkan jenis bank, skor efisiensi rata-rata Bank Umuin Syariah lebih tinggi dari pada skor efisiensi rata-rata Unit Usaha Syariah. Estimasi fungsi biaya dapat diturunkan untuk menganalisis Economies of Scale dan Economies of Scope. Secara rata-rata bank syariah telah mencapai kondisi Economies of Scale dan positive Economies of Scope. Perbandingan efisiensi perbankan syariah dengan efisiensi bank konvensional menunjukkan bahwa efisiensi bank syariah tidak berbeda nyata dengan efisiensi beberapa bank konvensional yang menjadi referensi.

---

The measurement of efficiency in sharia banks in this thesis is obtained by estimating the banks' cost function. Theoretically, by estimating a cost function, the minimum cost required to produce a certain level of output at a certain level of input prices can be measured. This econometrically estimated cost function forms the cost frontier.

The score of efficiency in a bank at a certain time is calculated using two approaches: the Stochastic Frontier Approach and the Distribution Fee Approach. The two approaches compare the error term in a bank and that in the most efficient bank in the sample. The calculation of cost efficiency shows that the scores of efficiency in Shari'a banks in Indonesia during the period from 2001 through 2004 range in mean value between 50% and 90%. Based on the input allocation analysis, it is found that the profit sharing component contributes the greatest proportion of the cost structure in Shari'a banks. Based on the type status of the banks, the average score of efficiency in Shari'a banks is higher than that in Shari'a units of conventional banks. The estimated cost function can be used to analyze the economies of scale and the economies of scope. On average, Shari'a banks have achieved the economies of scale and economies of scope. Finally, a comparison between the efficiency in sharia banks and that in conventional banks shows that the efficiency in Shari'a banks is not significantly different from that in conventional banks."

"Penelitian Ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan tingkat intermediasi, aktifitas layanan jasa berbasis upah (fee based service) dan tingkat efisiensi antara bank umum konvensional (BUK) dan bank umum syariah (BUS) di Indonesia pada tahun 2011-2013. Selain itu juga disertakan beberapa variabel kontrol untuk mengetahui pengaruh variabel kontrol tersebut terhadap variabel dependen penelitian. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua metode, yaitu stochastic frontier approach untuk menghitung skor inefisiensi biaya dari bank dan juga menggunakan metode regresi data panel. Hasil pertama dari penelitian ini menemukan fakta bahwa tingkat intermediasi BUS lebih tinggi dibandingkan BUK.Variabel kontrol size memiliki pengaruh positif, sedangkan variabel inefisiensi dan non loan earning assets berpengaruh negatif terhadap tingkat intermediasi. Hasil yang kedua adalah secara rata-rata proporsi pendapatan jasa per total pendapatan operasional BUS lebih tinggi dibandingkan BUK. Variabel kontrol size berpengaruh positif, sementara variabel risiko kredit tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan. Hasil ketiga dari penelitian adalah tingkat inefisiensi BUS lebih tinggi dibandingkan BUK. Variabel kontrol size dan risiko kredit memberikan pengaruh yang positif terhadap inefisiensi tersebut.

---

The aim of this research is to compare the differences of intermediation, fee based service activity, and efficiency of conventional banks vs islamic banks in Indonesia for 2011-2013 period. Moreover this study is also including some control variables to find out their effect to the dependent variables. This research uses two methods, namely stochastic frontier approach, and panel data regression. This research indicates that islamic banks have a higher intermediation ratio, higher proportion on fee income to total operating income, and less efficient. The control variables that have a positively significant effect on intermediation ratio are size, meanwhile inefficiency and non loan earning asset negatively affecting the intermediation ratio. The control variables that shows a positively significant effect on the proportion of fee income to total operating income is size, meanwhile the credit risk variable has no significant effect on the proportion of fee income to total operating income. The control variables that shows a negatively relation on efficiency are size and credit risk."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan margin bank pada bank syariah dan konvensional dan determinan marginnya di Indonesia periode 2010-2017 dengan menggunakan metode analisis fixed effect model Generalized Least Square (GLS). Variabel dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas variabel spesifik bank, yaitu degree of risk aversion, risiko kredit, ukuran operasi bank, opportunity cost of bank reserves, kualitas manajemen, dan implicit interest payment. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan bahwa rata-rata margin bank serta rata-rata determinannya berbeda secara signifikan antara bank syariah dan bank konvensional. Selain itu, ditemukan juga bahwa margin bank konvensional ditentukan degree of risk aversion, risiko kredit, ukuran operasi bank, kualitas manajemen, dan implicit interest payment. Sedangkan margin bank syariah ditentukan oleh degree of risk aversion, ukuran operasi bank, opportunity cost of bank reserves, dan kualitas manajemen.

---

This study aims to analyze differences in bank margins in Islamic and conventional banks and their margin determinants in Indonesia for the period 2010-2017 by using the method of fixed effect model Generalized Least Square (GLS). The variables in this study consisted of bank-specific variables, namely the degree of risk aversion, credit risk, the size of bank operations, the opportunity cost of bank reserves, management quality, and implicit interest payment.

The results of this study found that the average bank margin and the average determinant differed significantly between Islamic banks and conventional banks. Moreover, it was also found that conventional bank margins were determined by the degree of risk aversion, credit risk, bank operations size, management quality, and implicit interest payment. While the margin of Islamic banks is determined by the degree of risk aversion, the size of bank operations, opportunity cost of bank reserves, and the quality of management."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh modal dan risiko terhadap efisiensi bank di Indonesia. Data yang digunakan berasal dari laporan keuangan 59 bank konvensional dan 19 bank syariah. Efisiensi dihitung menggunakan pendekatan nonparametrik Data Envelopment Analysis DEA. Selama periode 2012-2016, bank syariah memiliki modal dan efisiensi yang lebih rendah, serta risiko yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan bank konvensional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pengaruh modal terhadap efisiensi bank konvensional adalah signifikan positif. Sementara pengaruh risiko terhadap efisiensi bank konvensional dan syariah adalah signifikan negatif sehingga mendukung hipotesis bad luck.

---

ABSTRACTThe aim of this study is to determine the effect of capital and risk on efficiency in Indonesian banking sector. The data used come from the financial statements of 59 conventional and 19 Islamic banks. Efficiency is measured using nonparametric Data Envelopment Analysis DEA approach. Within 2012 2016 period, Islamic banks have lower capital and efficiency, yet higher risk compared to its conventional counterpart. This study found that capital has a significant positive impact on conventional bank 39 s efficiency. The effect of risk on the efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks is significant negative, showing that it supports bad luck hypothesis."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini membandingkan bank konvensional dan bank syariah di Indonesiadengan menggunakan regresi logistik. Data dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari 107bank umum konvensional dan 11 bank umum syariah Indonesia selama periode2011-2014. Rasio FBI dan LDR digunakan sebagai indikator model bisnis. RasioCIR dan OC digunakan sebagai indikator efisiensi. Rasio LLP dan NPL digunakansebagai indikator kualitas aset. Rasio ROA, ETA, dan nilai ZSCORE digunakansebagai indikator stabilitas. Hasilnya adalah bank konvensional dan bank syariah diIndonesia berbeda dilihat dari indikator model bisnis, efisiensi, kualitas aset, danstabilitas. Bank konvensional lebih efisien dan memiliki tingkat profitabilitas yanglebih tinggi dibandingkan bank syariah, namun bank syariah memiliki kualitas asetyang lebih baik dan juga lebih stabil.

---

ABSTRACTThis study compares conventional and Islamic banks in Indonesia by using logisticregression. The data in this study consist of 107 conventional commercial banksand 11 islamic commercial banks in Indonesia during period of 2011-2014. FBI andLDR ratio are used as indicator of business model. CIR and OC ratio are used asindicator of efficiency. LLP and NPL ratio are used as indicator of asset quality.ROA, EAR, and ZSCORE score are used as indicator of stability. The results areconventional and Islamic can be distinguished by business model, efficiency, assetquality, and stability indicators. Conventional banks are more efficient and moreprofitable than Islamic banks, but Islamic banks have better asset quality and morestable."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan profitabilitas, efisiensi, likuiditas dan risiko antara bank syariah yang berbasis profit-loss-sharing dan bank konvensional yang berbasis bunga di Indonesia dengan menggunakan 18 rasio keuangan. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test digunakan untuk menguji distribusi normalitas data. Pengujian hipotesis untuk data normal menggunakan uji t yang mencakup Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Profit Margin (PM), dan Retained Earning to Asset (RETA), sedangkan untuk data yang tidak normal yaitu Return on Deposit (ROD), Net Opertating Margin (NOM), Operating Expense to Asset (OEA), Operating Income to Asset (OIA), Operating Expense to Revenue (OER), Asset Turn Over (ATO), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Net Non-Interest Margin (NNIM), Cash to Asset (CTA), Cash to Deposit (CTD), Deposit to Asset (DTA), Equity Multiplier (EM), Equity to Deposit (ETD) dan Total Liabilities to Asset (TLE), digunakan uji Mann Whitney. Penelitian menggunakan 17 data bank syariah dan 52 data bank konvensional dari tahun 2008 sampai dengan tahun 2011. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan untuk profitabilitas bank konvensional lebih baik dibandingkan bank syariah, sedangkan efisiensi, likuiditas dan risiko antara bank syariah dan bank konvensional relatif sama.

---

The purpose of this study is to compare profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and risk between profit-loss-sharing-based Islamic bank and interest-based bank in Indonesia using 18 financial ratios. Kolmogorov-mimov test was used to examine the normal distribution. T-test was used to test normal data that consist of Return on Asset (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Profit Margin (PM), and Retained Earning to Asset (RETA), while Mann Whitney test was used to test abnormal data such as Return on Deposit (ROD), Net Operating Margin (NOM), Operating Expense to Asset (OEA), Operating Income to Asset (OIA), Operating Expense to Revenue (OER), Asset Turn Over (ATO), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Net Non-Interest Margin (NNIM), Cash to Asset (CTA), Cash to Deposit (CTD), Deposit to Asset (DTA), Equity Multiplier (EM), Equity to Deposit (ETD) as well as Total Liabilities to Asset (TLE). This study used 17 Islamic banks data and 52 conventional banks data from 2008 to 2011. The results show that conventional banks? profitability is better than Islamic bank, whereas efficiency, liquidity, and risk are relatively equal."

"ABSTRAKFokus utama penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan bank syariah dan bank konvensional di Indonesia pada model bisnis, efisiensi, stabillitas, dan profitabilitas. Model bisnis diukur dengan menggunakan analisa uji Mann-Whitney melalui 3 tiga indikator, yaitu Fee Based Income Ratio, Non Deposit Funding Ratio, dan Loans Deposit Ratio. Efisiensi diukur dengan menggunakan analisa uji Mann-Whitney melalui 2 dua indikator, yaitu Operating Cost Ratio dan Cost Income Ratio. Stabilitas diukur dengan menggunakan analisa uji Mann-Whitney melalui indikator Z-Score. Dan profitabilitas diukur dengan menggunakan analisa uji Mann-Whitney melalui 2 dua indikator, yaitu return on asset ROA dan return on equity ROE , serta analisa regresi data panel dengan metode pengolahan fixed effect melalui 1 satu indikator, yaitu pengaruh tingkat persaingan terhadap profitabilitas, yang diukur masing-masing menggunakan ROA dan ROE, dimana tingkat persaingan diukur dengan menggunakan lerner index.Dengan menggunakan data pada 69 bank konvensional dan 10 bank syariah di Indonesia selama periode kuartal ketiga tahun 2010 s.d. kuartal kedua tahun 2014, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, model bisnis bank syariah dan bank konvensional berbeda, dimana bank konvensional lebih baik daripada bank syariah. Kedua, efisiensi bank syariah dan bank konvensional berbeda, dimana bank syariah lebih baik daripada bank konvensional. Ketiga, stabilitas berbeda, dimana bank konvensional lebih stabil daripada bank syariah. Dan keempat, profitabilitas berbeda, dimana dengan menggunakan analisa uji Mann-Whitney ditemukan bahwa bank konvensional memiliki profitabilitas yang lebih tinggi daripada bank syariah, namun dengan menggunakan pengaruh tingkat persaingan terhadap profitabilitas ditemukan bahwa tingkat persaingan berpengaruh lebih besar untuk meningkatkan profitabilitas pada bank syariah daripada bank konvensional.Kata Kunci: disparitas, model bisnis bank, efisiensi bank, stabilitas bank, profitabilitas bank, tingkat persaingan bank

---

ABSTRACTThe main focus of this thesis is to study disparities between syariah banks and conventional banks in Indonesia by business model, efficiency, stability, and profitability. The business model is measured using Mann Whitney test analysis by 3 three indicator, which is fee based income ratio, non deposit funding ratio, and loans deposit ratio. The efficiency is measured using Mann Whitney test analysis by 2 two indicator, which is operating cost ratio and cost income ratio. The stability is measured using Mann Whitney test analysis by 1 one indicator, which is Z Score. And profitability is measured using Mann Whitney test analysis by 2 two indicator, which is return on asset ROA and return on equity ROE , and using panel data fixed effect method by 1 one indicator, which is the impact of competition on the profitability, which is measured by ROA and ROE, and competition is measured by lerner index.By using data 69 conventional banks and 10 syariah banks in Indonesia, started from the 3rd quarter of 2010 until the 2nd quarter of 2014, the research shows that first, business model syariah and conventional banks is different, where conventional banks is better than syariah banks. Second, efficiency syariah and conventional banks is different, where syariah bank is better than conventional bank. Third, stability syariah and conventional banks isn rsquo t different. And fourth, profitability is different, where by using Mann Whitney test analysis, the research shows that conventional banks have higher profitability than syariah banks, but by using impact of competitive condition on the profitability, the research shows that competition will have a greater effect to improve profitability in syariah banks than conventional banks.Key words disparity, bank business model, bank efficiency, bank stability, bank profitability, bank competition"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kelompok bank syariah dan konvensional di Indonesia yang terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia apabila dilihat dari sisi model bisnis, kualitas aset, efisiensi, dan stabilitas, untuk periode 2008-2012. Variabel yang digunakan dalam penilaian model bisnis adalah FIR, NDF, LDR. Sedangkan untuk faktor efisiensi adalah OH Cost dan CIR. Di sisi lain, kualitas aset dinilai dari LLR, LLP, dan NPL. Sementara stabilitas ditinjau dari sisi ROA, EAR, dan MM. Uji yang digunakan adalah statistik deskriptif dan Mann-Whitney. Hasil olah data secara umum menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan signifikan dalam hal model bisnis, efisiensi, kualitas aset, dan stabilitas di antara kedua jenis bank dalam sampel di tahun 2008 hingga 2012.

---

This study aims to compare business model efficiency asset quality and stability of Islamic and conventional banks which are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2008 until 2012 The variables used for business model were FIR NDF LDR whereas efficiency were OH Cost and CIR As for the asset quality the proxy used were LLR LLP and NPL Lastly ROA EAR and MM were used for representing stability The statistics tests used were descriptive statistics and Mann Whitney test The results showed that there were no significant differences in business model efficiency asset quality and stability from 2008 until 2012"

"Digitalisasi pada sektor perbankan menunjukkan pertumbuhan yang sangat baik dan munculnya bank digital di Indonesia bisa saja menjadi sebuah solusi untuk meningkatkan inklusi keuangan di Indonesia. Selama beberapa tahun terakhir, bank digital terlihat menarik pada sektor perbankan dan hal ini dapat dilihat pada transformasi bank. Studi ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kinerja saham yang disesuaikan risikonya untuk bank digital dan bank konvensional di Indonesia menggunakan rasio ukuran kinerja yang umum digunakan seperti rasio Sharpe, Treynor, Sortino, dan Jensen. Regresi data panel dilakukan berdasarkan rasio-rasio tersebut pada penelitian ini. Hasil utama dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kinerja saham bank digital cenderung memiliki kinerja yang lebih baik dibandingkan kinerja saham bank konvensional. Kemudian, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa besaran suatu bank, return on equity (ROE), dan non-performing loans (NPL) memiliki kecenderungan pengaruh positif pada kinerja saham bank. Salah satu limitasi pada penelitian ini adalah kurangnya penelitian terdahulu mengenai bank digital. Oleh sebab itu, penelitian selanjutnya dapat melakukan penelitian eksplorasi lebih lanjut tentang bank digital.

---

The digitalization in the banking sector shows enormous growth, and the rise of digital banks may be a solution to boost financial inclusion in Indonesia. In recent years, digital banks in Indonesia seem to attract the banking sector, which is reflected in the bank transformation. This study aims to compare the risk-adjusted stock performance of digital banks and conventional banks in Indonesia using commonly used performance measure ratios, such as Sharpe, Treynor, Sortino, and Jensen. Panel data regression with performance ratios as the dependent variables was constructed in this study. The main outcome of this study shows that the performance of digital banks tends to be better than conventional banks. Moreover, size of banks, return on equity (ROE), and non-performing loans (NPL) tend to be positively associated with the risk-adjusted performance. One of the limitations of this research is the absence of prior research on digital bank. As a result, exploratory research on digital banking can be conducted."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa perbedaan profitabilitas dan kualitas aset antara bank umum syariah dengan bank umum konvensional di Indonesia pada periode 2010-2012. Selain itu juga disertakan beberapa variabel kontrol untuk mengetahui pengaruh variabel kontrol tersebut terhadap profitabilitas maupun kualitas aset bank di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode regresi data panel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bank umum syariah memiliki profitabilitas dan kualitas aset lebih rendah dibandingkan bank umum konvensional. Variabel kontrol equity to total asset, BOPO, loan loss provision, deposit growth, serta size berpengaruh signifikan terhadap profitabilitas bank. Variabel kontrol lagged return on equity, size, dan loan to total asset berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas aset bank, sedangkan variabel equity to total asset dan lagged BOPO tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas aset bank.

---

The aim of this research is to analyze the difference of profitability and asset quality between Islamic bank and conventional bank in Indonesia for the period of 2010-2012. Moreover this study also included some control variables to find out its effect to bank profitability and asset quality in Indonesia. This research uses panel data regression.

The results of this research indicate that Islamic bank has less profitability and asset quality than conventional bank. Control variables equity to total asset, BOPO, loan loss provision, deposit growth, and size have a significant effect on bank profitability. Control variables lagged return on equity, size, and lagged loan to total asset have significant effect bank asset quality, while variable equity to total asset and lagged BOPO have no significant effect on bank asset quality."