Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang berwenang untuk membuat akta autentik dan memiliki kewenangan lainnya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris sudah seharusnya memberikan penyuluhan hukum terkait pembuatan akta perjanjian perkawinan agar tidak melanggar batas-batas hukum dan agama sebagaimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 29 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jika kemudian pasangan suami-istri yang berbeda agama ingin membuat perjanjian perkawinan (postnuptial agreement) yang isinya tidak hanya mengatur mengenai harta kekayaan para pihak tetapi juga mengenai agama yang akan dianut oleh anak-anak para pihak, apakah sesuai kewenangannya Notaris kemudian dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan tersebut atau justru Notaris tidak dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan tersebut. Permasalahan yang diangkat mengenai batasan para pihak dalam membuat perjanjian perkawinan dan akibat hukum pembuatan klausula moralitas dalam perjanjian perkawinan terhadap perkawinan beda agama yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri. Bentuk penelitian ini yuridis-normatif dengan tipe penelitian eksplanatoris. Hasil analisis adalah batasan dalam membuat perjanjian perkawinan terdiri dari batasan hukum berupa peraturan perundang-undangan seputar harta kekayaan dan batasan agama berupa hukum agama para pihak. Apabila Notaris membuatkan perjanjian perkawinan antara para pihak yang perkawinannya dilangsungkan di luar negeri akan tetapi perkawinan tersebut merupakan perkawinan beda agama dan kehendak para pihak yang akan dituangkan ke dalam perjanjian perkawinan tidak hanya mengatur mengenai harta kekayaan para pihak tetapi juga mengenai agama yang akan dianut oleh anak-anak para pihak, maka akan memiliki implikasi terhadap tiga pihak, yaitu terhadap Notaris, terhadap para pihak, dan terhadap pihak ketiga. Saran berupa dilakukannya revisi terhadap Undang-Undang Perkawinan yang memperjelas ketentuan Pasal 29 dan mempertegas larangan perkawinan beda agama serta timbulnya kewenangan PP-INI untuk mengadakan seminar dengan pembahasan mengenai substansi perjanjian perkawinan yang hanya berisikan tentang harta kekayaan.

---

Notaries as public officials who are authorized to make authentic deeds and have other authorities based on the Notary Office Law should provide legal explanation regarding the formulation of a marriage agreement deed so as not to violate legal and religious boundaries as stated in Article 29 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law. If then a married couple of different religions wants to make a postnuptial agreement whose contents not only stipulate the assets of the parties but also regarding the religion that will be adhered to by the children of the parties, is it within the Notary's power to draft such an agreement or even the Notary cannot draft the marriage agreement. Issues raised regarding the limitations of the parties in making marriage agreement and the legal consequences of including morality clauses in marriage agreement for interfaith marriage held abroad. The form of this research is juridical-normative with explanatory research type. The results of the analysis are the limitations in making a marriage agreement consisting of legal restrictions in the form of laws and regulations regarding assets and religious restrictions are in the form of religious laws of the parties. If a Notary draws up a marriage agreement between parties whose marriage was held abroad, but it is an interfaith marriage and the will of the parties to be poured into the marriage agreement regulates not only the assets of the parties but also regarding the religion to which the children will adhere, it will have implications for three parties, namely the Notary, against the parties, and against the third party. Suggestions in the form of revising the Marriage Law which clarifies the provisions of Article 29 and reinforces the prohibition on interfaith marriage as well as the emergence of PP-INI's authority to hold seminars with a discussion of the substance of the marriage agreement, which only comprises assets."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Penelitian ini berjudul pengesahan perkawinan beda agama yang dilangsukan di Indonesia. Permasalahan penelitian ini meliputi pengaturan mengenai perkawinan beda agama dan pertimbangan hakim mengenai pengesahan perkawinan beda agama, sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Purwokwerto Nomor 54/Pdt.P/2019/PN Pwt. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif, tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis, menggunakan data sekunder, dengan yang dan dianalisis secara kualitatif, dengan bentuk laporan deskriptif analitis. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah hakim dalam pertimbangannya tidak mengindahkan aturan undang-undang perkawinan mengenai sahnya perkawinan, dimana dalam pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan sahnya perkawinan harus diperbolehkan oleh kedua agama calon mempelai, dan bukan hanya dari satu calon mempelai saja dan artinya hakim menganalisis diluar dari kewenangannya. Hakim dalam pertimbangannya ini hanya melihat dari dispensasi yang diberikan oleh salah satu agama, namun tidak mengindahkan aturan agama yang lain. Hakim diberikan kewenangan oleh Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan bukan untuk mengesahkan perkawinan tetapi hanya berwenang untuk memerintahkan mencatatkan perkawinan beda agama, yang artinya hakim tidak berwenang untuk mengesahkan suatu perkawinan, karena sahnya perkawinan berdasarkan agama.

---

This research is entitled the legalization of the interfaith marriage held in Indonesia. The problem of this research covers a regulation of interfaith marriage and the judge’s consideration for the legalization of interfaith marriage, as contained in the Purwokerto Judicial Court Decision number 54/Pdt.P/2019/Pn Pwt. The research method is normative juridical, typology of the research used was descriptive analytical, using secondary data, and analyzed qualitatively, in the form of analytical descriptive reports. The conclusion of this research is that the judges in their consideration didn’t heed the marriage law regarding the validity of marriage , where in article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law, the marriage must be permitted by the two prospective bride-to-be, and not only by one prospective bride and its mean the judge in their analyzes outside of their authority. The judges in their consideration only consider from the excemption by one religion, but they didn’t heed the rules of other religions.The judges were given authority by the Population Administration Law not to validating marriage but only has the authority to order the registry office to register of interfaith marriages , which means that the judge is not to validating a marriage, because marriage is legitimately based on religion."

"Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan tidak mengatur secara tegas mengenai kemungkinan penyimpangan terhadap harta benda suami dan istri di dalam perjanjian perkawinan. Pasal 29 Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan memberikan kemungkinan kepada calon suami dan calon istri untuk melakukan penyimpangan terhadap ketentuan mengenai pembentukkan harta bersama, penyimpangan tersebut dilakukan dengan membuat suatu perjanjian perkawinan sebelum perkawinan dilangsungkan. Perjanjian perkawinan merupakan persetujuan bersama antara calon suami dan calon istri yang disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan untuk mengatur akibat perkawinan terhadap harta benda mereka yang menyimpang dari persatuan harta kekayaaan. Dalam hal terjadi perkawinan di luar wilayah Indonesia, yang mana sebelum perkawinan calon suami dan calon istri telah membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut tidak mendapat pengesahan dari Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan di Indonesia, dengan demikian status perjanjian perkawinan yang demikian tetap berlaku tidak menjadi batal, kecuali dalam proses pembuatannya menyalahi hukum, ketertiban umum dan kesusilaan. Perjanjian perkawinan tersebut berlaku sebagai akta otentik bagi para pihak yang membuatnya, akan tetapi akta perjanjian perkawinan tersebut hanya mengikat kedua belah pihak yang membuatnya. Dengan status perjanjian perkawinan tersebut, maka Perlindungan hukum terhadap harta kekayaan suami dan istri adalah apabila terdapat permasalahan atau sengketa yang menyangkut harta kekayaan suami dan istri maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut hanya berlaku terhadap mereka saja sedangkan terhadap pihak ketiga tetap menganggap mereka melangsungkan perkawinan dengan percampuran harta. Agar perjanjian perkawinan tersebut dapat disahkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan, maka suami dan istri dapat mengajukan permohonan untuk mendapatkan izin dari Pengadilan Negeri dalam bentuk Surat Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri yang memerintahkan agar Kantor Catatan Sipil bersedia untuk mengesahkan perjanjian perkawinan tersebut.

---

In the Law Number 1/1974 on Marriage, it doesn’t explicitly provide the possible aberration on a married couple’s property in a marriage contract. Article 29 of Law Number 1/ 1974 on Marriage gives possibility to the prospective husband and prospective wife to commit violation of the provisions on the formation of joint property, such violation is committed by entering into a marriage contract before a marriage takes place. A Marriage Contract forms a joint agreement between prospective husband and prospective wife that is legalized by Marriage Registrar to govem the marriage consequences against their properties that aberrate from the unity of property. If a marriage takes place outside the territory of Indonesia, in which prior to a marriage the prospective husband and wife have entered into a marriage contract, the said mairiage contract doesn’t obtain an approval from a Marriage Registrar in Indonesia, there by such marriage contract status remains in effect and not invalid except, its drafling process violating the law, public order and morality. Such marriage contract shall become effective as an authentic deed for the parties who entered into it; however such marriage contract deed shall only bind on both parties who entered into it. With such marriage contract status, the Legal Protection against a married. couple’s property is, in case of any problem or dispute in respect of a married couple’s property then such marriage contract shall be effective for them only while against the third party remains considering them to have solemnized a marriage with the confusion of property. In order that the said marriage contract can be legalized by a Marriage Registrar then a married couple may file an application for obtaining an approval from the District Court in the form of a Stipulation of the District Court instructing the Civil Registration Office is willing to legalize the said marriage contract."

"Perjanjian perkawinan merupakan suatu langkah preventif sekaligus sarana bagi calon suami dan istri untuk melindungi harta bendanya dari akibat hukum perkawinan. Indonesia sendiri mengakui perkawinan yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri termasuk juga perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar negeri. Dengan ini penulis tertarik untuk membahas lebih lanjut keabsahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar negeri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan hukum perkawinan warga negara Indonesia yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri serta dampak dari perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar negeri terhadap harta benda yang ada di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam menyusun penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif yang memanfaatkan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Selain itu, penulis juga melakukan analisis terhadap Putusan Nomor 536/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sgr., Putusan Nomor 93/PDT/2020/PT.Dps., dan Putusan Nomor 2234 K/Pdt/2021 untuk melakukan penelitian ini. Temuan penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa perkawinan yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri diakui sah selama sesuai dengan hukum negara tempat perkawinan berlangsung dan tidak melanggar undang-undang di Indonesia dan akibat hukum dari perkawinan tersebut baru akan muncul setelah didaftarkan sesuai dengan peraturan di Indonesia. Sementara itu, terhadap perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat di luar negeri memerlukan penetapan Pengadilan Negeri untuk dicatatkan di kantor catatan sipil. Keberlakuan perjanjian ini bergantung pada hukum negara yang berlaku serta hukum yang berlaku bagi para pihak yang membuat perjanjian. Analisis putusan Pengadilan Negeri dalam kasus-kasus tertentu memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang pertimbangan hakim dalam menangani perkara sejenis. Dengan menyajikan temuan ini, penelitian ini diharapkan memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman hukum mengenai perkawinan yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri bagi warga negara Indonesia serta memberikan landasan bagi penanganan kasus serupa di masa depan.

---

Marriage agreements serve as both a preventive measure and a means for prospective spouses to protect their assets from the legal consequences of marriage. Indonesia recognizes marriages conducted abroad, including marriage agreements made outside the country. Therefore, the author is interested in delving further into the validity of marriage agreements made abroad. This research aims to determine the legal validity of marriages involving Indonesian citizens held outside the country and the impact of marriage agreements made abroad on assets in Indonesia. The research methodology used in this research is a normative juridical method utilizing secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Additionally, the author analyses Decision Number 536/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Sgr., Decision Number 93/PDT/2020/PT.Dps., and Decision Number 2234 K/Pdt/2021 for this study. The findings indicate that marriages conducted abroad are recognized as valid as long as they comply with the laws of the country where the marriage occurred and do not violate Indonesian laws, with legal consequences arising only after registration according to Indonesian regulations. Concerning marriage agreements made abroad, a determination by the District Court is required for registration in the civil registry office. The enforceability of these agreements depends on the laws of the relevant country and the laws applicable to the parties involved in the agreement. The analysis of District Court decisions in specific cases provides a profound understanding of the considerations judges take when handling similar cases. By presenting these findings, this research is expected to contribute to the legal understanding of marriages conducted abroad for Indonesian citizens and establish a foundation for the handling of similar cases in the future."

"Perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia masih menuai pro dan kontra yang dibuktikan dengan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 333/Pdt.P/2018/PN.Skt dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1977K/Pdt/2017. Sehingga, sering kali pasangan yang memiliki perbedaan agama mencari ‘jalan pintas’ dengan melakukan perkawinannya di Australia karena dinilai lebih efisien atau peraturannya cenderung lebih mudah bagi mereka yang ingin melangsungkan perkawinan beda agama jika dibandingkan dengan peraturan di Indonesia. Lalu, dalam hal pencatatan sipil, pasangan yang menikah di luar negeri selalu dapat mencatatkan perkawinannya disebabkan oleh asas universalitas. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbandingan Hukum perkawinan antara Indonesia dengan Australia, serta sudut pandang dari Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini yaitu dikarenakan ketidak pastian hukum di Indonesia, masyarakat kerap melakukan penyelundupan hukum dengan melakukan perkawinan di Australia. Bentuk penelitian yang penulis gunakan dalam karya tulis ini adalah yuridis-normatif, yaitu melihat dan memahami norma hukum yang terdapat di dalam peraturan perundang-undangan.

---

Interfaith marriage in Indonesia still reaps pros and cons as evidenced by Court Decision Number 333/Pdt.P/2018/PN.Skt and Supreme Court Decision Number 1977K/Pdt/2017. Thus, many couples who have different religions look for 'shortcuts' by getting married in Australia because it is considered more efficient or the regulations tend to be easier for those who want to hold interfaith marriages when compared to regulations in Indonesia. Then, in the case of civil registration, couples who marry abroad can always register their marriages due to the principle of universality. This study was conducted to determine the comparison of marriage law between Indonesia and Australia, as well as the point of view of Indonesian Private International Law. The conclusion obtained from this study is that due to legal uncertainty in Indonesia, people often carry out legal smuggling by marrying in Australia. The form of research that the author uses in this paper is juridical-normative, namely seeing and understanding legal norms contained in laws and regulations."

"ABSTRAKSalah satu cara mencegah konflik dalam perkawinan adalah membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian yang dibuat oleh suami dan istri untuk mengatur akibat perkawinan terhadap harta perkawinan mereka. Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Perkawinan memberikan batasan dalam membuat perjanjian tersebut, yakni batasan hukum, agama, dan kesusilaan. Namun tidak ada penjelasan lebih lanjut hukum mana yang menjadi rujukan, begitu pula untuk agama dan kesusilaannya. Skripsi ini merupakan penelitian yang bertujuan mengetahui tiga batasan perjanjian perkawinan tersebut di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan dalam skripsi ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder yang didukung hasil wawancara dengan narasumber terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian perkawinan di Indonesia, yang diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, dibatasi oleh hukum hanya tentang harta kekayaan perkawinan saja, dan tidak boleh melanggar ajaran agama dan kesusilaan di daerah masing-masing.

---

ABSTRACTOne of the ways to prevent conflict in a marriage is to make a marriage agreement. A marriage agreement is an agreement made by a husband and wife to regulate the effect of marriage on their marital property. Article 29 of the Marriage Law provides restrictions on making the agreement, namely legal, religious and moral boundaries. However, there is no further explanation of which law is the reference, as well as for religion and morality. This thesis is a research which aims to find out the three limits of the marriage agreement in Indonesia. The method used in this thesis is juridical normative by examining library materials or secondary data which is supported by interviews with related sources. The results showed that the marriage agreement in Indonesia, which is regulated in the Civil Code, Islamic Law Compilation, and Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, is limited by law to only marital assets, and may not violate religious and moral teachings in their respective regions. "

"Perkawinan berbeda agama di Indonesia tidak diatur dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan yang berlaku di Indonesia, oleh sebab itu banyak pasangan berbeda agama yang hendak menikah melakukan pernikahannya di Luar Negeri lalu dicatatkan di Kantor Catatan Sipil Indonesia ketika mereka kembali ke Tanah Air. Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan memberikan kemudahan bagi para pasangan berbeda agama ini dalam mencatatkan perkawinannya di Kantor Catatan Sipil. Pencatatan perkawinan beda agama ini hanya diakui oleh negara bahwa benar mereka adalah pasangan suami istri, tapi tidak sah menurut Agama. Disini akan di bahas tentang bagaimana keabsahan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia dan tentang pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan putusan pengadilan sebelum dan sesudah berlakunya Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang Administrasi Kependudukan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dan termasuk penelitian kepustakaan, data dan informasi diperoleh melalui dokumen-dokumen hukum dan juga dari hasil wawancara kepada Kepala Sub Dinas Kantor Catatan Sipil Jakarta. Pada kasus yang akan di bahas disini, pencatatan perkawinan yang dilakukan di luar negeri hanya untuk memenuhi syarat pada pasal 56 Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan, bukan menentukan sah atau tidaknya perkawinan tersebut. Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan juga tidak mengatur mengenai tata cara melangsungkan perkawinan beda agama itu sehingga masih mengacu pada Undang-Undang Perkawinan yang berlaku. Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan masih memerlukan penyempurnaan agar tidak bertentangan dengan pasal 2 Undang-Undang Perkawinan.

---

Marriage of different religions in Indonesia are not regulated in the Marriage Law in force in Indonesia, so many couples of different religions who want to get married are held marriage in other State and listed in the Civil Indonesia when they returned to the country. Population Administration Act provides convenience for couples of different religions to register their marriages at the Registry Office. Recording of interfaith marriage is only recognized by the state that they are properly married couples, but not valid according to religion.

Here will be discussed about how the validity of the marriage of different religions in Indonesia and on consideration of the judge in giving the verdict the court before and after the enactment of Law number 23 year 2006 about Population Administration. This study is normative and juridical research including library research, data and information obtained through legal documents and also from interviews to the Head of Sub Office of Civil Registry Office in Jakarta.

In a case that will be discussed here, the recording of marriages conducted in foreign countries only to meet the requirements in article 56 of Law on Population Administration, instead of determining whether or not the marriage is legitimate. Population Administration Act does not establish ordinances regulating the marriage of different religions, so it still refers to the Marriage Law. Population Administration Act still requires refinement in order not to conflict with Article 2 of the Marriage Law."

"Perkawinan merupakan suatu ikatan yang sangat dalam dan kuat sebagai penghubung antara seorang pria dengan seorang wanita dalam membentuk suatu keluarga atau rumah tangga. Dalam membentuk suatu keluarga bukan hanya komitmen yang diperlukan tetapi keyakinan beragama pun diperlukan. Namun pada kenyataannya dalam kehidupan masyarakat masih sering kita jumpai perkawinan yang tidak didasari pada satu agama melainkan mereka hanya berdasarkan cinta. Fenomena perkawinan beda agama yang terjadi di kalangan masyarakat indonesia bisa menimbulkan berbagai macam permasalahan dari segi hukum hukum seperti keabsahan perkawinan itu sendiri menurut undang-undang perkawinan, karena berdasarkan Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No 1 tahun 1974 perkawinan yang sah adalah perkawinan yang dilakukan menurut hukum agama dan kepercayaan, selain itu perkawinan beda agama juga menimbulkan suatu permasalahan yaitu masalah kewarisan terhadap anak yang lahir dari perkawinan beda agama. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam skripsi ini adalah mengenai keabsahan perkawinan beda agama menurut Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 dan juga mengenai kewarisan terhadap anak yang dilahirkan dari perkawinan beda agama. Metode yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif serta jenis data adalah data primer melalui wawancara dan data sekunder dengan studi dokumen dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perkawinan beda agama menurut Undang-Undang No 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan yang sah, karena berdasarkan Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan No 1 Tahun 1974 perkawinan yang sah adalah perkawinan yang dilakukan menurut hukum masing-masing agama dan kepercayaan. Dari Pasal 2 ayat (1) dapat disimpulkan bahwa undang-undang perkawinan menyerahkan sahnya suatu perkawinan dari sudut agama, jika suatu agama memperbolehkan perkawinan beda agama maka perkawinan agama boleh dilakukan tetapi jika suatu agama melarang perkawinan beda agama maka melakukan tidak boleh melakukan perkawinan beda agama. dari hasil penelitian yang dilakukan bahwa setiap agama di Indonesia melarang untuk melakukan perkawinan beda agama. Oleh karena itu, perkawinan beda agama adalah perkawinan yang tidak sah menurut undang-undang perkawinan. Serta akibat terhadap anak yang dilahirkan dari perkawinan beda agama terkait masalah kewarisan yaitu tidak ada hak kewarisan dari orang yang beda agama sehingga anak yang lahir dari perkawinan beda agama hanya bisa mendapatkan kewarisan memalui wasiat wajibah yang besarnya tidak boleh lebih dari 1/3.

---

Marriage was a very deep and strong as a liaison between a man and a woman in the form of a family or household. In forming a family is not only necessary but a commitment that was required of religious belief. But in reality in people's lives are often encountered that marriage is not based on one religion, but they are only based on love. The phenomenon of interfaith marriages are prevalent in Indonesia could lead to a wide range of legal issues such as the validity of the marriage law itself by the laws of marriage, because according to Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No 1 of 1974 legitimate marriage is a marriage performed according to religious laws and beliefs, other than that the marriage of different religions also raises an issue of the issue of inheritance of the children born of the marriage of different religions. Problems discussed in this thesis is about the validity of the marriage of different religions according to Law No. 1 of 1974 and also the inheritance of the children born of the marriage of different religions. The method used in this study is normative juridical and type of data is primary data through interviews and secondary data to study the document and literature studies. The results showed that inter-religious marriages under the Act No. 1 of 1974 is a valid marriage, because according to Article 2 paragraph (1) Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 legitimate marriage is a marriage conducted according to the laws of each religion and confidence. Of Article 2 paragraph (1) it can be concluded that the law gave a legal marriage marriage from the point of religion, if a religion allows marriage then the marriage of different religions, but religion should be done if a religion forbids the marriage of different religions do not perform interfaith marriages . of the results of research conducted in Indonesia that every religion forbids to perform interfaith marriages. Therefore, marriage is a marriage of different religions that are not valid under the law of marriage. And due to the children born of the marriage of different religions inheritance related issues ie no inheritance rights of people of different religions so that children born of the marriage of different religions can only get the inheritance of wajibah that magnitude will not be more than 1/3."

"Penulisan ini membahas mengenai kedudukan hukum akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat oleh Notaris terhadap pelaku perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia (studi kasus Notaris X di Jakarta Barat). Adanya perkembangan mengenai pengesahan pencatatan perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia dan juga pengalaman Notaris X yang seringkali membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan yang para penghadapnya beda agama menjadi dasar bagi Notaris X untuk membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan bagi Tuan A yang beragama Kristen dan Nyonya B yang beragama Buddha. Hal tersebut menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai kedudukan akta perjanjian perkawinan beda agama yang dibuat oleh Notaris X dan mengenai batasan hukum serta langkah hukum bagi seorang Notaris dalam membuat akta perjanjian perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. Bentuk penelitian ini adalah yuridisnormatif dengan tipe penelitian eksplanatoris. Pada akhirnya akta perjanjian perkawinan beda agama yang dibuat oleh Notaris X ialah batal demi hukum dikarenakan tidak memenuhi ketentuan syarat objektif perjanjian. Selanjutnya akta perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat oleh seorang Notaris tidak boleh bertentangan dengan ketentuan agama, kesusilaan dan ketertiban umum sebagaimana ternyata dalam Pasal 29 ayat (2) UndangUndang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Adapun seorang Notaris dalam menghadapi akta perjanjian perkawinan beda agama, seorang Notaris harus mengedepankan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya.

---

This writing discusses the legal position of the marriage agreement deed made by a Notary against interfaith marriage actors in Indonesia (case study of Notary X in West Jakarta). The developments regarding the legalization of the registration of interfaith marriages in Indonesia and also the experience of Notary X who often makes marriage agreement deeds where the parties are of different religions becomes the basis for Notary X to make a marriage agreement deed for Mr. A who is a Christian and Mrs. B who is a Buddhist. This raises questions about the position of the interfaith marriage agreement deed made by Notary X including the legal limitations and legal steps for a Notary in making the interfaith marriage agreement deed in Indonesia. The form of this research is juridical-normative with explanatory research type. In the end, the deed of interfaith marriage agreement made by Notary X was null and void because it did not meet the provisions of the objective conditions of the agreement. Furthermore, the marriage agreement deed made by a Notary may not conflict with the provisions of religion, morality and public order as stated in Article 29 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. As for a Notary in dealing with an interfaith marriage agreement deed, a Notary must prioritize the principle of prudence in carrying out his duties."