Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai Pembatalan Persetujuan Suami Isteri/Spousal Consent terhadap pengikatan Jaminan Perseorangan atau yang dikenal sebagai Personal Guarantee dalam perjanjian kredit. Pada kasus ini suami isteri menikah setelah tahun 1974 tanpa adanya perjanjian kawin sehingga tunduk pada Pasal 35 dan 36 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, bahwa harta benda yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta bersama dan mengenai harta bersama suami isteri dapat bertindak atas perjanjian kedua belah pihak. Sehingga ketika pembuatan Personal Guarantee diperlukan Persetujuan Suami Isteri/Spousal Consent. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah keabsahan pembatalan Persetujuan Suami Isteri/Spousal Consent dalam perjanjian kredit; dan akibat hukum dari pembatalan Persetujuan Suami Isteri/Spousal Consent pada pengikatan jaminan dalam perjanjian kredit bagi para pihak dalam Putusan Nomor 210/PDT/2016/PT.DKI. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis-normatif atas sistematika hukum, dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa pembatalan spousal consent dalam putusan ini adalah sah karena dalam melakukan perbuatan hukum perkawinan suami isteri yang tidak terikat dalam suatu perjanjian kawin dan salah satu pihak ingin mengikatkan diri dengan pihak ketiga yang memiliki dampak terhadap pembebanan/penjaminan harta bersama, maka harus terlebih dahulu memperoleh persetujuan tertulis dari suami/isteri tersebut. Pihak yang akan dibebani kewajiban hukum oleh orang lain harus secara tegas diberitahukan tentang hal tersebut dan kemudian ia harus menyetujui dan menandatangani, baru kemudian dia dapat dipertanggungjawabkan apabila terjadi kesalahan.

---

This research discusses about the cancellation of Spousal Consent on the binding of Personal Guarantees in credit agreements. In this case, the husband and wife married after year of 1974 without having a prenuptial agreement so that according to Articles 35 and 36 of Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974, the property acquired during marriage becomes joint property and regarding joint property, husband and wife can act based on the agreement between both sides, so that Spousal Consent is required when creating Personal Guarantee. The issues raised are the validity of the cancellation of Spousal Consent in the credit agreement; and the legal consequences of the cancellation of the Spousal Consent on binding Personal Guarantee in the credit agreement for the parties under the case number 210/PDT/2016/PT.DKI. To answer these problems, a juridical-normative legal research method on legal systematics is used. The results of the study conclude that in carrying out legal acts of husband and wife marriage who are not bound by a prenuptial agreement and if one of the parties wants to bind themselves with the third party which has an impact on the imposition of joint property, it must first obtain written approval from the husband/wife. The party who will be under a legal obligation by another person must be expressly notified about it and then must agree and sign, only then he can be held accountable if something goes wrong."

"Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Pasal 29 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan mengalami perubahan sehingga menciptakan norma baru. Salah satunya yaitu memberikan kewenangan kepada notaris untuk mengesahkan perjanjian perkawinan. Pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dilakukan notaris dimaknai berbeda dengan pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan yang dilakukan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis kewenangan notaris dalam pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 yang dibandingkan dengan Pasal 15 UU Jabatan Notaris.Kesimpulan yang diperoleh berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut adalah kewenangan notaris dalam pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 dimaknai bahwa notaris berwenang membuat perjanjian perkawinan dalam bentuk akta autentik untuk memenuhi syarat pencatatan perjanjian perkawinan yang telah ditetapkan oleh peraturan pelaksana Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, sehingga tetap diperlukan pengesahan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan agar mengikat pihak ketiga.

---

After the ruling of the Constitutional Court the number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, article 29 paragraph (1) of the ACT of marriage changes thus creating new norms. One that is giving authority to the notary to certify the prenuptial agreement. The passage of the prenuptial agreement done different is meant with the notary attestation of the agreement of a marriage conducted by officers of Registrar of marriage. Research methods used in this research is the juridical normative by analyzing the notary authority in prenuptial agreement based on the endorsement of the ruling of the Constitutional Court the number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 compared with article 15 LAW Office Of Notary Public.Conclusion based on the analysis of the results obtained was the notary authority in endorsement prenuptial agreement after the ruling of the Constitutional Court the number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 meant that the notary is authorized to make the prenuptial agreement in the form of an authentic deed recording the agreement to qualify for registration of prenuptial agreement that have been established by the regulations implementing the ruling of the Constitutional Court the number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, so keep it needed endorsement by officers of Registrar of marriage in order to be binding on third parties."

"Perjanjian perkawinan dibuat untuk mengatur harta benda milik suami istri. Perjanjian perkawinan yang telah dibuat harus didaftarkan di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil bersamaan dengan pendaftaran akta nikah. Namun dalam praktiknya para pihak yang membuat akad nikah tidak melampirkan akad nikah pada saat pencatatan nikah. Pentingnya pencatatan berdampak pada status aset dan hutang pihak ketiga. Berdasarkan aturan, akad nikah yang tidak tercatat membuat akad nikah tidak sah, karena tidak memenuhi asas publisitas. Dengan menggunakan metode penulisan normatif, makalah ini akan membahas tentang perjanjian nikah yang tidak tercatat dalam akta nikah dengan menganalisis Putusan Nomor 25 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.Tbn. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa akad nikah siri akan membatalkan akad nikah yang tidak mengikat pihak ketiga. Namun keberadaan akad nikah tetap berlaku bagi pihak yang membuatnya. Penulis menyarankan kepada hakim untuk memberikan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat mengenai tata cara pembuatan dan pencatatan akad nikah serta mempertimbangkan pula untuk menentukan perpanjangan atau pembaharuan akad nikah.

---

The marriage agreement is made to regulate the property belonging to the husband and wife. Marriage agreements that have been made must be registered at the Population and Civil Registry Service together with the registration of a marriage certificate. However, in practice, the parties making the marriage contract do not attach the marriage contract at the time of registration of marriage. The importance of record-keeping has an impact on the asset and debt status of third parties. Based on the regulations, an unregistered marriage contract invalidates the marriage contract, because it does not fulfill the principle of publicity. By using the normative writing method, this paper will discuss about marriage agreements that are not recorded in the marriage certificate by analyzing Decision Number 25 / Pdt.G / 2013 / PN.Tbn. It can be concluded that the siri nikah contract will cancel the marriage contract that is not binding on a third party. However, the existence of the marriage contract still applies to the party who made it. The author suggests the judge to provide socialization to the public regarding the procedures for making and recording marriage contracts and also considering determining the extension or renewal of the marriage contract."

"Perjanjian kawin dibuat untuk menyimpangi ketentuan persatuan harta perkawinan yang diatur dalam undang-undang serta dibuat dengan akta otentik untuk kepastian tanggal akta dan didaftarkan agar berlaku pada pihak ketiga yang terikat dengan para pihak pembuat perjanjian kawin. Akta otentik ini dibuat di hadapan pejabat berwenang, yakni seorang Notaris yang tunduk pada suatu undang-undang khusus yang mengatur jabatannya termasuk tugas, kewajiban serta tanggung jawabnya dalam membuat akta, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Dengan tidak dibuatnya akta perjanjian kawin yang sesuai dengan kaidah-kaidah hukum yang telah ditentukan, maka akta perjanjian kawin tersebut bisa dianggap cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum dan menjadikan para pihak berada dalam persatuan harta perkawinan. Dalam penulisan ini, kasus yang diangkat adalah kasus dimana diadakannya sebuah perjanjian kredit dan perjanjian jaminan yang dibuat oleh Almarhum Suhendro Halim dengan PT Bank Negara Indonesia berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang cacat hukum dan batal demi hukum serta tidak didaftarkan pada pegawai pencatatan perkawinan yang berakibat pada dikembalikannya jaminan tersebut ketika harus dieksekusi kepada Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa sebagai penggugat bersih dari jaminan. Dari sini kemudian penulis melakukan penelitian yuridis normatif tentang tanggung jawab Notaris dalam menjalankan jabatannya dalam membuat akta perjanjian kawin serta upaya hukum seperti apakah yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga yang dirugikan karena berada dalam posisi tidak memiliki jaminan untuk pelunasan hutang perjanjian kredit yang masih berjalan.

---

The prenuptial agreement is made to deviate from the union of the marital assets which stipulated in the law and made with an authentic deed for certainty of the date and registered to apply to third parties whose bound by the prenuptial agreement makers. This authentic deed made before an authorized official, a Notary who is subject to a special law that regulates his position including his duties, obligations and responsibilities in making a deed, namely Law Number 2 Year 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 years 2004 concerning Notary Position. With the absence of a prenuptial agreement deed in accordance with predetermined legal rules, the prenuptial agreement deed can be deemed legally flawed and null and void and makes the parties in the union of marital assets. In this paper, the case raised is the case in which a loan agreement and guarantee agreement was made by the late Suhendro Halim with PT Bank Negara Indonesia based on a prenuptial agreement that was legally flawed and null and void and was not registered with the marriage registrar employee who resulted in the return of collateral when it must be executed to Ny. Ratnaria Tjandrasa as the plaintiff free from collateral status. From this case, the writer conducts a normative juridical analysis about the responsibility of the Notary in carrying out his position in making prenuptial agreement deeds and what legal remedies can be done by third parties who are disadvantaged because they are in the position of having no collateral for repayment for the loan agreement."

"Perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan di Kantor Catatan Sipil atau Kantor Urusan Agama dapat dijadikan alasan seseorang untuk mengajukan gugatan pembatalan perjanjian perkawinan. Disahkannya perjanjian perkawinan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan dapat ditafsirkan sebagai salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan. Metode penelitian adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif bersifat deskriptif analitis. Perjanjian perkawinan yang tidak dicatatkan oleh Pegawai Pencatat Perkawinan tetap berlaku bagi para pihak (suami-istri) yang membuatnya. Tidak dicatatkannya perjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat dijadikan alasan sebagai perbuatan tidak terpenuhinya syarat perjanjian perkawinan yang mengakibatkan perjanjian perkawinan tersebut batal demi hukum. Pengesahan perjanjian perkawinan oleh pegawai pencatat perkawinan sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, hanya merupakan tindakan Pencatatan/Pendaftaran saja guna memenuhi asas publisitas. Pendapat Mahkamah Agung mengenai perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris bukan syarat formil merupakan pendapat yang keliru. Perjanjian perkawinan yang dibuat dihadapan notaris merupakan syarat sahnya perjanjian perkawinan sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata. Diperlukan peraturan pelaksana untuk mengatur perjanjian perkawinan itu sendiri, agar jelas dan tidak menimbulkan multitafsir.

---

A Prenuptial Agreement not registered at Civil Registry or religious Affairs Office may be the reason of a person to file a cancellation of the Prenuptial Agreement. The passing of the Prenuptial Agreement by the Marriage Officer may be interpreted as one of the conditions for the validity of the Prenuptial Agreement. The research method is normative juridical with qualitative approach is descriptive analytical. The Prenuptial Agreement not registered by the Marriage Officer shall apply to the parties (the spouses) who make it. The non-registration of the Prenuptial Agreement shall not be the reason for the non-fulfillment of the terms of the Prenuptial Agreement which resulted in the Prenuptial Agreement being void. The ratification of the Prenuptial Agreement by the marriage registrar as stipulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage, is only a Registration / Registration activity only to fulfill the publicity principle. The Supreme Court's opinion on the Prenuptial Agreement made by Notary is not a formal requirement is a false opinion. The Prenuptial Agreement made by notary is a requirement for the validity of a Prenuptial Agreement as described in the Civil Code. An implementing regulation is required to govern the Prenuptial agreement itself, in order to be clear and not to create multiple interpretations."

"Terbukanya suatu pewarisan adalah karena kematian. Sehingga, dengan terbukanya pewarisan maka di dalam KUHPerdata telah ditentukan siapa-siapa yang akan menjadi ahli waris. Namun, adanya perbedaan penafsiran, suatu warisan tidak didapatkan apabila di dalam suatu ikatan perkawinan telah dilaksanakan dengan suatu perjanjian perkawinan. Sehingga timbul permasalahan yaitu bagaimana pengaruh perjanjian perkawinan pisah harta antara suami dan istrinya terhadap hak mewaris serta bagaimana kedudukan hukum mewaris suami dan adik pewaris terkait sebagai ahli waris yang ditinjau dalam KUHPerdata. Terhadap permasalahan tersebut, dilakukan penelitian untuk menemukan titik terang akan siapa yang akan berhak menjadi ahli waris. Selanjutnya, penyusunan tesis ini disusun dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif, untuk mendapatkan hasil penelitian yang bersifat analisis kualitatif yaitu dengan menelaah data yang diperoleh. Akhirnya, sampailah pada hasil penelitian bahwa suatu perjanjian perkawinan mengatur pemisahan harta kekayaan selama perkawinan, dengan putusnya perkawinan akibat kematian seseorang terhadap harta kekayaan, akan adanya pewarisan dalam bentuk perpindahan kekayaan dan dalam pewarisanpun telah ditentukan siapa yang menjadi ahli waris, sehingga suatu perjanjian perkawinan tidak dapat menutup hak mewaris seorang suami. Kedudukan hukum seorang suami dan adik pewaris sebagai ahli waris telah ditentukan dengan penggolongan ahli waris yang mana golongan ahli waris terdekat menutup golongan ahli waris terjauh. Dengan demikian, karena masih adanya suami, harta peninggalan pewaris, haruslah jatuh pada golongan pertama. Disarankan bagi Notaris untuk memberi penjelasan bila ingin membuat perjanjian perkawinan.

---

The opening of inheritance would be occurred due to demise. Then, it has been determined which people who will inherit and be the heirs in Indonesian Civil Code (“ICC”). However, due to a dissimilar interpretation, inheritance will not be obtained when the marriage done within a prenuptial agreement. Thereby, some issues arises such as how the effect of prenuptial agreement of split property against right of inheritance between husband and wife and how the legal standing of heirs to inherit between husband and sister-in-law which is reviewed in the Indonesian Civil Code. In regards to this issue, already doing some research to find some real information on whose has the right to become heirs. Hereinafter, This thesis composed with normative legal research method, which is to gain a result that based on qualitative analysis in which is analyzed by collected data. Finally, it can be concluded that a prenuptial agreement arranged the separation of wealth during the marriage, with dissolution of marriage due to demise towards the person’s wealth, there would be transfer of wealth in the form of inheritance and also, it’s already been determined whose going to be the heirs, so that a prenuptial agreement may not closed the right of inheritance for husband. The legal standing of husband and sister-in-law as heirs have been determined by their classification, which is the closest heirs, would cancel further heirs. By this circumstances, because there’s still the husband of the late wife, the property of inheritance, must be owned by the first line of classified person. Suggestion for Notary, give information before the clients want to make prenuptial agreement."

"[Perkawinan campuran sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 adalah perkawinan antara dua orang yang di Indonesia tunduk pada hukum yang berlainan, karena perbedaan kewarganegaraan dan salah satu pihak berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Perkawinan campuran dapat dilaksanakan di Indonesia maupun di luar Indonesia. Dalam hal perkawinan campuran dilaksanakan di luar Indonesia adalah sah bilamana dilakukan menurut hukum yang berlaku di Negara di mana perkawinan itu dilangsungkan dan bagi Warga Negara Indonesia tidak melanggar ketentuan-ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Dalam jangka waktu 1 (satu) tahun sejak sekembalinya mereka ke Indonesia, bukti perkawinan mereka harus didaftarkan di Kantor Pencatatan perkawinan tempat tinggal mereka. Pasangan perkawinan campuran yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran di luar negeri juga dapat membuat perjanjian perkawinan. Perjanjian perkawinan adalah perjanjian tertulis yang dibuat oleh calon suami isteri sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan untuk mengatur akibat-akibat perkawinan terhadap harta kekayaan mereka. Pentingnya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan bagi pasangan yang hendak melangsungkan perkawinan campuran adalah terkait dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak milik atas tanah di Indonesia yang hanya dapat dimiliki oleh Warga Negara Indonesia, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, yaitu dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan hukum sekunder berupa norma-norma dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan. Prosedur pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan dalam perkawinan campuran yang dilangsungkan di luar negeri, tetap mengacu pada ketentuan Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu dibuat sebelum atau pada saat perkawinan dilangsungkan dan berdasarkan pada hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Dalam hal setelah perkawinan dilangsungkan di luar negeri dan mereka kembali ke Indonesia namun tidak mendaftarkan perkawinannya tersebut dan kemudian mereka membuat perjanjian perkawinan, maka perjanjian perkawinan tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum karena melanggar ketentuan Undang-undang yaitu dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung.

---

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place. Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

;Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

, Mixed marriage as stipulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 is a marriage between two people in Indonesia which subject to different laws, because of differences in nationality and one party is having Indonesian nationality. Mixed marriage can be implemented and held in Indonesia and outside Indonesia. In the case of mixed marriages conducted outside Indonesia is legal if carried out under the applicable law in the State where the marriage was celebrated and for Indonesian citizens do not violate the provisions of the Marriage Act. Within a period of one (1) year since upon their return to Indonesia, evidence of their marriage should be registered in the marriage registration office where they live. Mixed marriage couples who want to hold the marriage abroad can also make a prenuptial agreement. Prenuptial agreement is a written agreement made by the prospective spouses before or at the day of the marriage took place to regulate the effects of marriage on their property. The importance of making prenuptial agreements for couples who want to have a mixed marriage is associated with legal protection of property rights over land in Indonesia that can only be owned by an Indonesian citizen, as stipulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). This thesis using normative juridical method, which is carried out by tracing the secondary law in the form of norms of the legislation relating to the cases. The procedure of making the prenuptial agreement in mixed marriages held abroad, still have to refer to the provisions of the Marriage Act is made before or at the day of the marriage took place and according to the laws in force in Indonesia. In the event that after the marriage held abroad and they return to Indonesia but did not register the marriage and then they make a prenuptial agreement, then the prenuptial agreement becomes null and void because it violated the provisions of the Act that is made after the marriage took place.

]"

"Membina sebuah rumah tangga memang tidak semudah membalikkan tangan, pasti selalu ada konflik yang timbul terutama masalah harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan. Apabila sebelum melangsungkan perkawinan suami isteri tidak membuat perjanjian kawin, maka harta bawaan dan harta yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta persatuan bulat. Kemudian selama perkawinan berlangsung, terjadi sesuatu hal misal suami boros dan berkelakukan tidak baik yang mengakibatkan harta bersama akan habis, maka isteri dapat mengajukan tuntutan pemisahan harta kekayaan ke Pengadilan Negeri, karena perjanjian kawin sudah tidak dapat lagi dibuat setelah perkawinan berlangsung. Dari keadaan tersebut di atas, maka yang jadi permasalahan penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah akibat hukum dari pemisahan harta kekayaan yang dilakukan berdasarkan perjanjian kawin yang dibuat setelah perkawinan dan bagaimana secara yuridis pertimbangan Hakim mengenai pemisahan harta kekayaan dalam perkawinan sebagaimana ternyata dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2901 K/Pdt/2012 tanggal 9 Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, dimana penulis dalam meneliti mengacu pada aturanaturan hukum yang ada. Maka ditemukan jawabannya bahwa akibat hukum yang timbul sebagaimana ternyata dalam kasus yang diteliti yaitu tidak dapat diadakan pemisahan karena isteri tidak memenuhi Pasal 186 BW, sehingga objek sengketa tetap menjadi harta bersama suami dan isteri. Untuk perjanjian pisah harta yang telah dibuat dihadapan Notaris menjadi batal demi hukum karena mengandung cacat yuridis dan bertentangan dengan undang-undang. Dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung sudah tepat dan telah sesuai dengan Pasal 119 BW, karena antara suami dan isteri tersebut tetap terjadi persatuan harta bulat. Sedangkan penerapan Pasal 29 ayat (4) Undang-undang Perkawinan dalam pertimbangan Hakim dianggap kurang tepat karena tidak terjadi perubahan perjanjian kawin.

---

Fostering a household is not as easy as turning the hand, there is always a conflict triggered by wealth in marriage. If spouse did not make a prenuptial agreement, separation asset and any asset they acquire during the course of their marriage would be community asset. Furthermore, during the marriage takes place, if there is something happen e.g. the husband is extravagant and does not have good manner which is caused community asset would be lost, the wife could propose a claim for asset separation to District Court, because prenuptial agreement could no longer be made after marriage took place. According to that circumstances, the consent of this research is how the legal consequences of the assets separation that is performed by prenuptial agreement made after marriage and how the juridical considerations of the Judge regarding separation assets in marriage, as it turns out in the Supreme Court Verdict No. 2901 K / Pdt / 2012 dated December 9, 2013. By using a normative juridical research method, the author in researching refers to rules of existing law. Then found the answer that the legal consequences arising in this case study that the separation cannot be held because the wife does not comply with Article 186 BW, then the object of dispute remain the property of the husband and wife. And the prenuptial agreement that has been made before a Notary cancelled and void because of flawed juridical and contrary to law. And Supreme Court decisions were appropriate and in accordance with Article 119 of the BW, as between husband and wife are still having community assets. While the application of Article 29 paragraph (4) of the Law of Marriage in consideration of Judges considered less appropriate because there is no change in prenuptial agreement."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai kesepakatan bersama (perjanjian) pra perceraian. Perjanjian ini belum diatur didalam hukum perkawinan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksplanatoris dengan desain preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan Undang-undang Perkawinan Nomor: 1 Tahun 1974 perlu di amandemen karena sudah tidak mengakomodir kepentingan masyarakat; Perlunya dibuat sebuah Memory of Understanding (MoU) antara Pemerintah (diwakili oleh Kementrian Hukum dan HAM), Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai peraturan pelaksana sementara, menunggu peraturan perundang-undangan dibuat; Perlu adanya kesepahaman di kalangan Notaris terkait dengan bentuk, jenis akta, moralitas dan etik bagi Notaris yang membuat kesepakatan bersama (perjanjian) pra perceraian ini.

---

The focus of this study is mutual consent (agreement) pre divorce. This agreement hasn't been regulate by Indonesian matrimonial regulation. This research is explanatory prescriptive. The researcher suggest that Indonesian matrimonial regulation Number: 1 year 1974 need to be amendment because it can't accommodate the citizen stipulation; Memory of Understanding between The Government (represent by Ministry of Law and Human Rights), Indonesian Notary Organization, and The Supreme Court is needed as a transitory regulation; There is need to be an understanding in the Indonesian Notary Community regarding the outline, the type of the agreement, morality and ethical conduct of the notary that construct mutual consent (agreement) pre divorce."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai permasalahan perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan. Yang menjadi permasalahan adalah apakah perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan berlaku efektif kepada pihak ketiga dan bagaimanakah kedudukan harta benda dalam perkawinan tersebut apabila perjanjian kawin yang dibuat tidak didaftarkan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dalam penulisan ini. Perjanjian Perkawinan adalah perjanjian yang dibuat sebelum perkawinan dan mengikat kedua belah pihak dan calon mempelai yang akan menikah. Banyaknya angka perceraian yang berujung masalah dalam harta perkawinan dirasakan perlu dibuatnya perjanjian perkawinan. Tidak hanya harta perkawinan, hutang - hutang yang timbul sepanjang perkawinan juga sering dipermasalahkan apalagi jika perjanjian perkawinan mengikat pihak ketiga.Tentunya pembuatan perjanjian perkawinan haruslah dengan prosedur yang berlaku seperti harus dibuat dengan akta notaris dan harus didaftarkan. Undang - Undang mengatur bahwa perjanjian perkawinan haruslah didaftarkan di Kepaniteraan Pengadilan Negeri setempat. Penulis dalam penulisan ini mencoba menganalisa perjanjian kawin yang tidak didaftarkan apakah dapat melindungi kepentingan pihak ketiga atau dianggap tidak berlaku sama sekali untuk pihak ketiga serta kedudukan harta benda dalam perkawinan itu sendiri apakah berlaku harta bersama atau berlaku pemisahan harta seperti yang tercantum dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan. Pihak Ketiga akan dirugikan apabila tidak dilakukan pendaftaran, karena Perjanjian Perkawinan dianggap tidak berlaku kepada pihak ketiga apabila tidak diaftarkan. Harta Benda dalam perkawinan dianggap tidak ada pemisahan harta dalam perkawinan tersebut. Pendaftaran perjanjian perkawinan dianggap syarat mutlak sehingga notaris juga bertanggung jawab untuk menjelaskan kepada kedua belah pihak sebelum pembuatan perjanjian mengenai akibat - akibat yang akan timbul jika perjanjian perkawinan tidak didaftarkan. Penulis ini menyarankan agar notaris memberikan penyuluhan hukum terlebih dahulu kepada klien yang akan membuat perjanjian kawin.

---

This research talking about prenuptial agreements that not been registered. The problems are whether the unregistered prenuptial agreements can be effective to third party and how the marital property position in unregistered prenuptial agreements. Juridical normative approach was used as method in this research. Prenuptial agreements is a contract entered into prior to marriage by the people intending to marry or contract with each other. Many problems occurs in divorce events, especially about marital property and financial rights. That is why prenuptial agreements is needed, to establishes the property and financial rights of each spouse and also third party, in the event of divorce.Prenuptial agreements should be made with notary deed to be registered. According to laws, prenuptial agreements should be registered to local district court.In this research, writer want to analyze the absent of prenuptial agreements, whether it can protect the third party's interests and also determine how property is handled during marriage based on marital agreement.Third party will be disadvantaged if prenuptials agreement is not been registered because marital agreement considered not valid to third party. It also affect to marital property where it can be considered no separation of property in that marriage. Thus, prenuptial agreement is a must before marriage and notary has responsibility to explain to both parties, the result that can be happened if the prenuptial agreements not been registered."