Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"

Perbankan merupakan sektor yang memiliki peran sangat vital, sebagai lembaga intermediasi industri perbankan mempunyai sifat khusus yang tidak dimiliki oleh sektor jasa keuangan lain. Industri perbankan sebagai penggerak dan jantung dalam suatu perekonomian negara. Saat ini, bank digital tengah berlomba-lomba menawarkan suku bunga simpanan tinggi hingga 10%, untuk menarik minat masyarakat. Hal tersebut berpotensi memiliki risiko yang merugikan bagi para nasabahnya. Dari hasil penelitian ini, perlu menjadi perhatian penting bagi para nasabah karena apabila suku bunga simpanan yang diperjanjikan antara bank dengan nasabah penyimpan melebihi tingkat bunga penjaminan simpanan, maka simpanan nasabah tersebut tidak akan dijamin. Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan pada dasarnya hanya akan menjamin pembayaran simpanan nasabah tersebut hingga Rp2.000.000.000,00 (dua miliar rupiah). Proses penyelesaian sengketa nasabah dalam mengajukan ganti rugi jika mengalami kerugian dapat ditempuh secara non-litigasi dan litigasi. Secara non-litigasi dengan mengajukan permohonan penyelesaian sengketa ke Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (LAPS SJK), sedangkan dengan cara litigasi dengan mengajukan proses penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan, dimana semua pihak yang bersengketa saling berhadapan satu sama lain untuk mempertahankan hak-haknya di muka pengadilan. Dalam menyelenggarakan dan menawarkan produk dan/layanan digital, Bank Digital wajib memperhatikan risiko-risiko yang ada dan keamanannya guna memenuhi ketentuan pelindungan hukum nasabah. Bank Digital harus dapat memenuhi dan mematuhi prosedur pelaksanaan, yaitu prinsip kepercayaan (fiduciary principle),prinsip kerahasiaan (confidential principle), dan prinsip kehati-hatian (prudential principle), dan prinsip mengenal nasabah. Keempat prinsip tersebut harus ditunjukkan dalam menjalankan kebijakan maupun teknis perbankan.

---

Banking is a sector that has a very vital role, as an intermediary institution the banking industry has special characteristics that are not shared by other financial services sectors. The banking industry is the driving force and heart of a country's economy. Currently, digital banks are competing to offer high deposit rates of up to 10%, to attract public interest. This has the potential to have detrimental risks for its customers. From the results of this study, it should be an important concern for customers because if the deposit interest rate agreed between the bank and the depositor exceeds the deposit guarantee interest rate, the customer's deposit will not be guaranteed. The Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation will basically only guarantee the payment of customer deposits up to Rp2,000,000,000.00 (two billion rupiah). The process of resolving customer disputes in applying for compensation if they experience losses can be pursued in non-litigation and litigation. Non-litigation by submitting a dispute resolution application to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK), while by litigation by submitting a dispute resolution process in court, where all parties to the dispute face each other to defend their rights before the court. In organizing and offering digital products and services, Digital Banks must pay attention to the existing risks and security in order to fulfill the provisions of customer legal protection. The Digital Bank must be able to fulfill and comply with the implementation procedures, namely fiduciary principle, confidential principle, prudential principle, and know your customer principle. These four principles must be demonstrated in carrying out banking policies and techniques.

"

"ABSTRAKSalah satu fungsi Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan LPS adalah menjamin dana masyarakat yang tersimpan di perbankan. Bank-bank peserta penjaminan harus membayar premi, yang selama ini besarnya sama flat untuk semua. Premi jenis ini memiliki beberapa kelemahan, seperti terjadinya pengalihan risiko risk shifting , subsidi silang cross subsidy , investasi berisiko tinggi excessive risk-taking , dan itikad bisnis yang buruk moral hazard . Berbagai model telah dikembangkan untuk mendukung penggunaan premi yang berbasiskan risiko risk based . Namun semua pendekatan tersebut menggunakan data informasi pasar, sehingga hanya efektif digunakan untuk bank-bank yang sahamnya diperdagangkan secara aktif di bursa efek.Penelitian ini mengusulkan metode perhitungan premi penjaminan simpanan berbasiskan risiko, yang dapat diterapkan untuk semua bank di Indonesia, baik yang sahamnya sudah terdaftar listed di bursa efek, maupun yang belum. Besarnya premi berbasiskan risiko yang seharusnya dibebankan kepada masing-masing bank dihitung dengan model discrete lower barrier option Wibowo, 2007 . Pada pendekatan ini evaluasi nilai aset -dan penutupan bank yang bermasalah- tidak perlu menunggu saat kewajiban liability jatuh tempo. Nilai pasar dari aset bank yang menjadi masukan utama dari model ini diestimasikan dengan menggunakan model arus kas Cooperstein, Pennacchi, dan Redburn 1995 , sementara volatilitasnya diestimasi dengan menggunakan prosedur iterasi Loeffler dan Posch 2007 . Perbedaan tarif premi antar bank kemudian diperiksa kesesuaiannya dengan perbedaan karakteristik serta rasio-rasio keuangan yang menjadi proxy dari risiko bank

---

ABSTRACTOne function of the Indonesian Deposit Insurance Corporation Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan ndash LPS is to provide insurance to public funds deposited in banks. Banks in Indonesia must participate in the insurance program, which premium has sofar been set equal for all flat rate . This type of premium is known to have several drawbacks, such as causing risk shifting and cross subsidy, as well as encourage bankers to involve in excessive risk taking and moral hazard. Various models have been developed to support use of risk based premiums, in which banks are charged based on their individual risks. Those approaches, however, are based primarily on stock market information. They are thus applicable only for the banks whose shares are actively traded in the stock exchange.This research proposes an alternative method to calculate risk based insurance premium which can be applied to all banks in Indonesia, including those whose shares have not been listed on the market. The varying premiums which should be charged to each bank are calculated with a discrete lower barrier option model Wibowo, 2007 . This model allows that evaluation of bank asset value ndash and decision to close a default bank may be effected at times not coincide with maturity of its liabilities. The model uses market value of bank assets as its primary input, which shall be estimated using a cash flow model set forth by Cooperstein, Pennacchi, and Redburn 1995 . Asset rsquo s volatility as secondary input is estimated using iterative procedure proposed by Loeffler and Posch 2007 . Variation in premium rates between banks have then been reviewed for their correlations with their different characteristics and financial ratios as proxy of the banks rsquo risk."

"[ABSTRAKSebagai salah satu unsur penting dalam jaring pengaman sistem keuangan khususnya dibidang perbankan, Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) memiliki peranan untuk menjaga stabilitas keuangan Indonesia. Krisis ekonomi global pada tahun 2008 mengharuskan LPS meningkatkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan LPS meningkatkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2004 Tentang Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2009 dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, menganalisis kemungkinan penurunan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS serta hubungannya dengan penerapan risk-based premium di Indonesia untuk menjaga stabilitas sistem keuangan Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis-normatif. Data yang dikumpulkan dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan Pasal 11 UU LPS dimungkinkan terjadi penurunan terhadap Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS. Berdasarkan alasan peningkatan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan pada tahun 2008, yaitu adanya ancaman krisis ekonomi, UU LPS mengatur apabila alasan tersebut telah teratasi maka besaran Nilai Penjamin Simpanan dapat disesuaikan kembali. Maka berdasarkan hal ini, dimungkinkan untuk menurunkan Nilai Penjamin Simpanan LPS. ABSTRACTAs one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ;As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia?s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. , As one of the important elements in the financial safety net, especially in banking system, Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) has a big role to keep the stability of Indonesia’s financial system. The global economic crisis in 2008 requires IDIC increase the Deposit Insurance Coverage. This studies aims to determine the reaseon IDIC increase the coverage based on Law No. 24 of 2004 on the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) as amended by Act No. 7 of 2009, to analyze the possibility to decrease the deposit insurance coverage and its relation to the risk-based premium in Indonesia in order to maintan the stability of the financial system. This research is a normative juridical research. The data were collected by literature study. The results for this study are based Article 11 of IDIC Act, there is a posibility to adjust the Deposit Insurance Coverage. IDIC increased the coverage in 2008 because there is a threat of an economic crisis. So based on this Act, if the threat is no longer a problem for Indonesia, IDIC can adjust to decrease the Deposit Insurance Coverage. ]"

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai pembahasan pertanggungjawaban pengurus lembaga penjamin simpanan dalam penyelamatan bank gagal yang menyebabkan terjadinya kerugian negara.Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penulisan ini adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pengurus lembaga penjamin simpanan (LPS) terhadap kerugian negara pada saat penyelamatan bank gagal berdampak sistemik dan bagaimana bentuk kerugian negara yang terjadi pada upaya penyelamatan bank gagal terhadap bank gagal berdampak sistemik.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah secara normatif, sedangkan metode analisis datanya adalah secara kualitatif.

Keuangan Negara merupakan hal yang penting atau fundamental bagi penyelenggaraan negara karena berperan penting dalam usaha untuk mencapai terwujudnya tujuan negara. Kekayaan LPS yang digunakan untuk memberikan dana bailout merupakan kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara menyebutkan bahwa kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan merupakan bagian dari keuangan negara beserta dengan pengelolaannya.Kemudian dijelaskan pula bahwa Presiden selaku pemegang kekuasaan atas pengelolaan keuangan negara telah memberikan kewenangan dalam bidang pengelolaan kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan kepada Menteri Keuangan. Sehingga yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan adalalah Menteri Keuangan karena pemberian wewenang dari Presiden adalah secara delegasi.

Mengenai status hukum apakah terjadi kerugian negara dalam penyelamatan bank gagal sistemik dalam kasus Bank Century ini disebabkan perumusan undang-undang sangat membingukan bagi para pelaku yang terlibat. Sehingga dengan hal ini dapat menyebabkan pejabat sebagai pelaku pembuat kebijakan akan sangat bersikap hati-hati dalam menjalankan kewenangannya. Sehingga diharapkan kedepannya pemerintah dengan jelas membuat suatu perubahan terhadap Undang-Undang Keuangan Negara agar tidak terjadi perbedaan tafsiran.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is describing about the accountability of the board of Deposit Insurance Corporation in rescuing the failed bank which the state losses. The main issues discussed in this thesis is how the accountability board of the board of Deposit Insurance Corporation against the state loss at the time of rescuing the failed banks with systematic impact and how the form of state loss which occurred in the efforts to rescue the failed bank with systematic impact. The thesis used a normative approach as research method, while the methods of data analysis is qualitative.

State Finance is essential or fundamental to the administration of the state since it has an important role to achieve the realization of the state's objective. LPS' assets used to provide bailout funds are separated from the state assets. Law No. 17 Year 2003 on State Finance stated that separated state assets is part of the state financial along with financial management. Furthermore, it also explained that the President as the holder of power over the financial management of the state has given the authority over the separated state assets management to the Minister of Finance. Therefore, the responsible party over the management of the separated state assets is the Minister of Finance due to the authorization from President by way of delegation.

Regarding the legal status if there is a state loss in the state in the rescue of systemic failed bank in the Bank Century case is due to the formulation of the legislation which very confusing for the parties involved. Therefore, this can lead to officers as perpetrators of policy makers will be very cautious in carrying out its authority. It is expected that in the future government to clearly make amendment Law of State Finance in order to avoid differences in interpretation.

"

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas tentang kemampuan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan dalammenghadapi potensi risiko moral hazard terutama yang berhubungan denganpenyaluran kredit perbankan. Keberadaan suatu institusi penjaminan simpanandimanapun akan selalu diiringi oleh risiko moral hazard bank-bank anggotapenjaminan. Penelitian ini dibatasi hanya meneliti bank-bank perkreditan rakyatkarena menimbang selama berdiri hingga saat ini, (2005-2012) paparan terbesar LPSadalah disaat melikuidasi BPR. Risiko moral hazard tidak akan dapat dihilangkan,namun dapat ditekan. Salah satu parameter yang sangat berpengaruh dalam menjagatingkat risiko moral hazard agar tetap rendah dan berada pada batas toleransi yaitunilai maksimum simpanan yang dijamin (coverage limit). Tesis ini juga berusahameneliti parameter lain yang berpengaruh dengan memasukkan variabel-variabelmakroekonomi seperti pertumbuhan PDB, laju inflasi, suku bunga acuan BankIndonesia, suku bunga yang dijamin oleh LPS, dan perkembangan penyaluran danakredit pada BPR. Dalam perkembangan penyusunan tesis ini, dilakukan jugapengujian dalam mengukur risiko moral hazard yang berhubungan dengan kreditBPR secara kuantitatif dengan mengadopsi metode dalam pengukuran pencadanganklaim LPS yaitu pendekatan perhitungan value at risk CreditRisk+ dengan input databerasal dari data non performing loan (NPL) BPR selama tahun 2011 yang masihberada dalam proses maupun yang telah selesai proses likuidasinya oleh LPS.

---

AbstractThis research is to determine Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) abilityin order to encounter the impact of moral hazard risk in correlation with bank creditdisbursement. The existences of a deposit insurer institution everywhere will alwaysbe followed by the moral hazard risk of bank members. This study limited toscrutinize only rural banks because since the establishment (2005-2012) the IDIClargest exposure was when it liquidated rural banks. The risk of moral hazard cannotbe eliminated, but it can be suppressed. One of the robust parameter that veryimportant in maintaining the level of moral hazard risk in order to remain low and onthe threshold of tolerance is the maximum deposit coverage limit. This research alsoattempted to examine the other parameters that affect by asserted the macroeconomicvariables such as GDP growth, inflation rate, BI rate, deposit insurance rate, and thedevelopment of rural banks credit disbursement. Furthermore, this study also try tomeasured moral hazard risk in associated with rural banks credit failure quantitativelyby adopting the IDIC?s provision cover claim method using banking credit riskmeasurement approach (internal rating based). After further consideration,CreditRisk+ value at risk approach was chosen using input data from liquidated ruralbanks non performing loan (NPL) during 2011"

"Fokus tesis ini membahas eksistensi Aset Eks Bank Dalam Likuidasi (Aset Eks BDL) yang permasalahannya timbul akibat dilakukannya penghapusan Aset Eks BDL dari Neraca Sementara Likuidasi (NSL) oleh Tim Likuidasi. Tesis ini menggunakan desain penelitian yuridis normatif yang disajikan secara kualitatif dengan teknis analisis deskriptif dan kritis. Berdasarkan Peraturan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan tentang Likuidasi Bank (PLPS LB) diatur ketentuan bahwa Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS) berwenang mengelola Aset Eks BDL, namun permasalahannya adalah tidak ditemukannya alas hak bagi LPS untuk melakukan pengelolaan tersebut. Sebelum status badan hukum BDL hapus, tidak dilakukan terlebih dahulu penyerahan (levering) atau pengalihan piutang (cessie) dari Tim Likuidasi kepada LPS sehingga, secara yuridis tindakan penghapusan Aset Eks BDL dari NSL tidak benar-benar menghapuskan kepemilikan aset oleh BDL. Oleh karena itu, untuk menghindari potensi permasalahan hukum kedepannya, ada baiknya LPS memberi pengaturan yang jelas mengenai alas hak bagi LPS dalam melakukan pengelolaan Aset Eks BDL dengan tetap memperhatikan pelaksanaan likuidasi 16 bank yang dicabut izinnya pada tahun 1997, dimana Negara (c.q. Kementerian Keuangan) sebagai kreditur mayoritas menerima sisa Aset Eks BDL sebagai pembayaran non-tunai.

---

The focus of this thesis is the existence of Ex Liquidated Bank Assets (Ex BDL Assets) whereby the issue at hand arises from the removal of Ex BDL Assets from the Liquidation Team?s (Liquidator) Balance Sheet of Liquidation (NSL) by the Liquidators. This thesis uses normative legal research methods which is presented in qualitative approach and the technical analysis is descriptive and critical. Pursuant to the Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC) Regulation on Bank Liquidation (PLPS LB), IDIC has the authority to manage the Ex BDL Assets, however the issue at hand is that IDIC does not have the legal right to manage the Ex BDL Assets. Prior to the cessation of BDL?s legal status, since a delivery (levering) or transfer of receivables (cessie) has never been carried out by the Liquidator, the removal of such Ex BDL Assets from the NSL does not factually eliminate the ownership of BDL. Due to such issue, to avoid potential legal issue in the future, IDIC needs to make a clear regulation on the legal rights of IDIC to manage Ex BDL Assets by referring to the implementation of liquidation upon 16 banks whose licenses were revoked back in 1997, whereby the Government of Indonesia as (c.q. the Ministry of Finance) as majority creditor has accepted Ex BDL Assets as non-cash payment."

"Skripsi ini berisi tentang tinjauan hukum dari program pengembalian dana (cash back) yang dihitung sebagai komponen bunga dalam menentukan criteria simpanan layak bayar oleh LPS. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif, yang menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis yang memberikan deskripsi mengenai pengaturan cash back oleh Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan dengan melakukan studi kasus terhadap pembayaran klaim nasabah dalam likuidasi Bang IFI. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa sebelum diberlakukannya PLPS No. 2/PLPS/2010 tentang Program Penjaminan Simpanan, terjadi kesimpangsiuran hokum dalam pengaturan cash back yang akibatnya berdampak dalam pembayaran klaim nasabah Bank IFI. Selain itu, pengaturan tegas mengenai cash back dalam PLPS tersebut masih membuka kemungkinan kasus seperti Bank IFI kembali terjadi maka penulis menyarankan agar terdapat larangan terhadap pengadaan program cash back oleh Bank.

---

The Essay is about The Legal Review of Cash Back Program which is counted as interest's component in determining Criteria of Eligible Deposit by Indonesian Deposit Insurance Corporation (IDIC). This research uses qualitative method which produces descriptive analytical data concerning description about cash back regulation by Deposit Insurance Corporation which will be related to the case of IFI Bank Liquidation.

The result stated that before IDIC Regulation Number 2/PLPS/2010 about Deposit Insurance Program was valid; there was an ambiguous of cash back regulation which leads to the case of The Refund of Costumer Claim in IFI Bank. Moreover, the explicitness of that cash back regulation, in the newest IDIC Regulation, still opens a possibility for case like IFI Bank to reoccur. Therefore, the researcher suggests that cash back program by Bank should not be allowed."

"ABSTRAK Penelitian ini membahas mengenai penetapan risiko fiskal dalam pelaksanaan tugas dan wewenang Bank Indonesia (BI) dan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan (LPS). Tujuan pengelolaan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (APBN) dibatasi oleh Undnag Undang Dasar 1945 yaitu untuk mewujudkan tujuan bernegara. Sejak APBN 2008, risiko fiskal mulai dicantumkan, diantaranya risiko fiskal sektor keuangan berupa risiko kekurangan modal BI-LPS. Risiko fiskal adalah segala sesuatu yang akan membebani APBN, yang dapat mempengaruhi ketahanan dan kesinambungan fiskal serta kemampuan APBN untuk melaksanakan fungsi penganggaran. Oleh karenanya, penetapan risiko fiskal harus dilakukan secara cermat. Adapun permasalahan yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah mengenai peran dan kewajiban negara terhadap kekurangan modal BI-LPS; dan, bagaimana APBN sebagai wujud pengelolaan keuangan negara untuk mencapai tujuan bernegara dapat ditranformasikan untuk mendukung pendanaan risiko BI-LPS sebagai badan hukum. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan analitis (analytical approach) dan interdisiplin meliputi pendekatan hukum, ekonomi dan politik. Adapun analisa data dilakukan secara preskriptif. analisis didasarkan pada nilai kemanfaatan dari penggunaan APBN (dalam bentuk risiko fiskal) untuk mengejawantahkan peran dan kewajiban negara pada sektor keuangan disandingkan dengan fungsi konstitusional APBN untuk mencapai tujuan bernegara (kemkmuran rakyat yang berkeadilan sosial). Hasil analisa adalah bahwa penetapan risiko fiskal terhadap kecukupan modal BI-LPS dilakukan untuk melindungi rakyat terhadap ekses dari ketidakstabilan sektor keuangan, melalui penjagaan eksistensi bank sentral dan lembaga penjamin simpanan agar perekonomian nasional tetap stabil dan keberlanjutan fiskal tetap terjaga.ABSTRACT This study discusses the determination of fiscal risk in implementation of the duties and authorities of Bank Indonesia (BI) and the deposit Insurance Institutions (LPS). The goal of managing the state budget (APBN) is limited by the Undang Undang Dasar 1945 namely to realize the goal of the state. Since APBN 2008, fiscal risks have begun to be concluded, including the financial sector risks in the form of a risk of lack of BI-LPS capital. Fiscal risks is anything that will burden the state budget, which can effect the resilience and fiscal sustainability as well as the ability of the state budget to carry out the budgeting function. Therefore, the determination of fiscal risk must be carried out carefully. The problems raised in this study are how the role and obligations of the state towards the lack of BI-LPS capital; and how the APBN as a formn of management of state finances to achieve the goals of the state can be transformed to support BI-LPS risks fundiing as a legal entity. To answer this problem, normative legal research methodes use analytical and interdisiplinarry approaches, including legal, economic and political approaches. The data analysis is done prescriptively. The analysis is based on the value of benefit from the use of the state budget (in the form of fiscal risk) to manifest the role and obligations of the state in financial sector juxstaposed with the constitutional function of the state budget to achieve the goal of the state (social prosperity and justice). The results of the analysis is that the determination of fiscal risk to the capital adequacy of BI-LPS is done to protect the people agains the excesses of financial sector instability through maintaining the existence of central bank and deposit insurance institutions so that the national economy remains stable and fiscal sustainability is maintained.

"

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaruh program penjaminan simpanan (deposit insurance) oleh LPS terhadap disiplin pasar dengan menggunakan data time series dari 120 bank umum selama kurun waktu Januari 2003 sampai dengan Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan empat variasi yang menjadi variabel terikat berupa tingkat suku bunga deposito 1 bulan/TD, tingkat suku bunga deposito 3 bulan/TD3, tingkat suku bunga deposito rata-rata 1 dan 3 bulan/MRATE, dan Interbank Call Money, serta dengan variabel bebas berupa : (i) variabel risiko bank yang terdiri dari : NPL, LDR, BOPO, ROA, dan CAR; (ii) variabel kontrol yang terdiri dari Growth GDP dan Inflasi; dan (iii) variabel dummy, diperoleh hasil penelitian Kebijakan program penjaminan simpanan LPS yang di-proxy oleh dummy, efektif menekan tingkat bunga pada lag 4 periode. Dengan kata lain, kebijakan LPS pada saat ini membutuhkan masa tenggang waktu yang relatif lama yaitu 4 triwulan untuk dapat berpengaruh pada kedisplinan pasar.

---

This research explain about The Impact Analysis of Deposit Insurance Program by The Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation to Market Dicipline using the time series data from 120 banks from January 2003 to December 2013. I use Ordinary Least Squares/OLS method with four variations of dependent variables (time deposit rate 1 month, 3 months, average rate in 1 month and 3 months, and interbank call money), as well as the independent variable such as: (i) the bank's risk variables consisting of: NPL, LDR, ROA, ROA, and the CAR Ratios; (ii) the control variables consisting of GDP Growth and Inflation; and (iii) a dummy variable, the result of this research is deposit insurance program by IDIC with proxy by dummy, effectively reduces the interest rate on the lag 4 period. In other words, the policy of IDIC during the grace period requires a relatively long time, that is 4 quarters, to be able to influence the market discipline."

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai pengaruh program penjaminan simpanan (deposit insurance) oleh LPS terhadap disiplin pasar dengan menggunakan data time series dari 120 bank umum selama kurun waktu Januari 2003 sampai dengan Desember 2013. Dengan menggunakan empat variasi yang menjadi variabel terikat berupa tingkat suku bunga deposito 1 bulan/TD, tingkat suku bunga deposito 3 bulan/TD3, tingkat suku bunga deposito rata-rata 1 dan 3 bulan/MRATE, dan Interbank Call Money, serta dengan variabel bebas berupa : (i) variabel risiko bank yang terdiri dari : NPL, LDR, BOPO, ROA, dan CAR; (ii) variabel kontrol yang terdiri dari Growth GDP dan Inflasi; dan (iii) variabel dummy, diperoleh hasil penelitian Kebijakan program penjaminan simpanan LPS yang di-proxy oleh dummy, efektif menekan tingkat bunga pada lag 4 periode. Dengan kata lain, kebijakan LPS pada saat ini membutuhkan masa tenggang waktu yang relatif lama yaitu 4 triwulan untuk dapat berpengaruh pada kedisplinan pasar.

---

This research explain about The Impact Analysis of Deposit Insurance Program by The Indonesia Deposit Insurance Corporation to Market Dicipline using the time series data from 120 banks from January 2003 to December 2013. I use Ordinary Least Squares/OLS method with four variations of dependent variables (time deposit rate 1 month, 3 months, average rate in 1 month and 3 months, and interbank call money), as well as the independent variable such as: (i) the bank's risk variables consisting of: NPL, LDR, ROA, ROA, and the CAR Ratios; (ii) the control variables consisting of GDP Growth and Inflation; and (iii) a dummy variable, the result of this research is deposit insurance program by IDIC with proxy by dummy, effectively reduces the interest rate on the lag 4 period. In other words, the policy of IDIC during the grace period requires a relatively long time, that is 4 quarters, to be able to influence the market discipline."