Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Indonesia is not one of the claimant states, but Chinese provocation through its fishing vessels which escorted by Chinese Coast Guard has been violating Indonesia Exclusive Economic Zone on South China Sea which is intersected with Nine Dashed Line (NDL). Until now, the synergy among Indonesian power instruments to defend Indonesia’s sovereign rights is still weak, thus the problem identification in this research is how the synergy of the instrument of competent forces in the Indonesian maritime domain to face Chinese Claims on South China Sea. Synergy analysis is seen from three aspects: perspective, policy, and Rules Of Engangement (ROE) applied to operational. This research uses qualitative method to explore research questions deeper, with Soft System Methodology analysis method to approach problems with the comparison between system thinking and real world in a structured way, and supported NVivo to execute the process of data triangulation. Research results show that maritime power instruments of Indonesia do not have a harmonious perspective on NDL yet. This study also shows that policy from policy makers and strategic derivatives from strategy makers of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia's have not been orchestrated, thus appropriate ROE at operational level to confront China's provocation of the South China Sea has not been formulated by adjusting authority with instrument capability. Overall, the study found that the synergy of Indonesian maritime power instruments need to be optimized to deal with Chinese Claims over the territory of Indonesian jurisdiction in the South China Sea."

"South China has become one of the most of serious hot spot in the world. The geopolitics of the sub region plays a very crucial tole in the pattern of interactions among the claimant states of the south china sea."

"Klaim teritorial Cina mencakup hampir seluruh wilayah perairan di Laut Cina Selatan. Dengan didukung oleh kekuatan ekonomi dan militernya sebagai sebuah great power baru di Asia Pasifik, Cina mengerahkan banyak dana untuk melakukan diplomasi dengan negara-negara pengklaim lain dan tak segan menggunakan jalur kekerasan. Dalam beberapa kasus, Cina bahkan melakukan langkah-langkah yang agresif sehingga menimbulkan keresahan bagi negara-negara litoral, khususnya negara-negara anggota ASEAN yang terlibat konflik dengan Cina di Laut Cina Selatan. Sementara itu, Indonesia, sebagai negara terbesar di ASEAN, justru melakukan pendekatan terhadap Cina baik itu dari segi diplomasi maupun militer dengan tetap mempertahankan hubungan baik dengan Amerika Serikat. Penelitian ini akan membahas mengapa Indonesia, sebagai sebuah middle power, memilih untuk melakukan hedging sebagai respon dari konflik yang melibatkan great power kawasan.

---

China’s territorial claim extended along the waters of South China Sea. With the support of its economic and military power as a rising power of Asia Pacific, China exert a lot of expense to conduct diplomacy with other claimant states, and did not hesitate to use its force. China’s effort to asset its claim seen as am agresive behavior, and developing concern among the littoral state, especialy members of ASEAN who are involved with China in the dispute of South China Sea. Meanwhile, Indonesia, as the largest country in ASEAN, approaching china both in diplomacy and military aspect while still maintaining a good relation with United States. This study will discuss further about decision-making and rationale of Indonesia as a middle power country, in response to a conflict that involving a regional great power."

"Fokus dari skripsi ini adalah untuk membahas prinsip perbatasan maritime dan penerapannya pada Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan, khususnya pada batas maritim negara penuntut. Skripsi ini juga menguraikan lebih lanjut mengenai posisi Indonesia di dalam sengketa tersebut. Tujuan dari skripsi ini adalah untuk memberikan pemahaman lebih lanjut mengenai Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan dan mendiskusikan lebih lanjut mengenai negara penutut yang mana yang memiliki klaim paling sah di Laut Cina Selatan.

---

The focus of this thesis is to discuss the maritime boundaries principle and applying the principle in the South China Sea Dispute regarding the maritime boundaries of the Claimant States. The thesis also elaborates more about Indonesia's position in the dispute. The purpose of this thesis is to give a more thorough understanding about the South China Sea Dispute, and discuss further regarding which claimant state has the most legitimate claim in the South China Sea."

" ABSTRAK

Pesatnya aktivitas pelayaran menyebabkan sengketa teritorial dan maritim yang terjadi di Laut Tiongkok Selatan menimbulkan kekhawatiran akan terhambatnya hak untuk berlayar, khususnya bagi kapal perang. Penguasaan secara de facto oleh Tiongkok atas fitur-fitur laut di Spartly, Paracel dan Scarborough Shoal dapat berimplikasi pada keberlakuan hukum domestik Tiongkok yang membatasi hak lintas damai kapal perang asing di laut teritorial dan aktivitas militer asing di ZEEnya. Klaim Tiongkok ini ditentang oleh Amerika dengan cara mengirimkan kapal perangnya untuk berlayar di perairan yang masih bersengketa tersebut di bawah misi FONOP. Dalam meneliti permasalahan ini, Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian berupa yuridis normatif. Adapun kesimpulan yang diperoleh dari permasalahan tersebut adalah klaim Tiongkok tidak dapat dibenarkan oleh hukum internasional, dengan demikian hak lintas damai tidak berlaku di perairan sekitar fitur-fitur yang diklaim negara tersebut dan kapal asing tetap dapat berlayar di bawah rezim kebebasan navigasi yang tertuang dalam Pasal 58 1 UNCLOS. Oleh sebab itu, seharusnya Amerika mengirimkan kapal perangnya untuk melakukan kebebasan navigasi. Selain itu, Tiongkok tidak berhak mengklaim ZEE dari fitur-fitur yang diklaimnya tersebut sehingga kebijakan atas aktivitas militer tidak dapat diterapkan. Tiongkok adalah negara yang telah meratifikasi UNCLOS, maka seyogyanya negara tersebut mematuhi ketentuan-ketentuan yang diatur dalam konvensi tersebut.

---

ABSTRACT<>br>

Territorial and maritime disputes occurring in the South China Sea have raised awareness among international communities regarding the impediment of navigational rights. China rsquo s de facto control on the sea features such as Spartly, Paracel and Scarborough Shoal possibly implies the enforcement of Chinese domestic laws that limit the innocent passage of foreign warships in territorial sea and foreign military activities in EEZ. However, America opposes Chinese claims by sending its warships to sail near disputed waters under FONOP mission. The research method used in this thesis is yuridis normatif. The conclusions derived from the problem are, Chinese claims cannot be justified by international law, therefore the right of innocent passage is not applicable in the waters surrounding the claimed features and foreign warships are able to sail under the regime of freedom of navigation provisioned in Article 58 1 UNCLOS. Therefore, America should have sent its warships under the freedom of navigation regime. On the other hand, China is not capable of claiming EEZ derived from the features, therefore the country cannot restrict military activities in the region. Moreover, as member of UNCLOS, China has obligation to follow the rules set up in the convention. "